Sikhs Win Khalistan Debate On Bbc - Listen For Yourself

[saint-soldier]

Sat Sri Akal,

I missed it yesterday

See the problem is that so much blood is already splilled of our beloved ones that we can never forgive ourself if we dont support there ideas.

We are greatly in debt of great couragous acts done by our brothers, and we cannot let there shaheedi to go in waste.

So it is duty of each and every sikh to support there ideas.

See the truth is art of war

There is going to be oil crises. Without power they cant develop. So anarchy is coming very fast.

Anarchy leads to instability, and this makes Govt difficult to control.

So it is just wainting time for few years.

We have good future. Global warming will fill low lying areas.

TN and kerala will be under water, so people will migrate to upper ares, leads to lot of Choas.

Wheat prices will rise, only himachal and Punjab+kashmir will be habitat.

Punjab as more area under water more rains in Himalaya, we can save that water:) in dam.

So war is fast appraoching on us.

We have to save our land and food for our children so all will have to fight or vanish in History.

My view is Fight for survival will begin in next 15 years, so prepare yourself for last stand.

Either you will survive or perish in history as lost religion.

By belief we will surely rise.

It is fast cycle one thing lead to another, so Choas is fast approaching.

Whoever will take this as an opportunity will survive the Gods ultimate test.

We sikhs had passed all and will pass this also.

Gotta agree with you but lol u sounded a bit like one of them people talking about the world ending in the year 2000.

[chatanga]

this is the reply that i reecieved fromthe bbc about this program. has anybody else had anyhgin similiar?

Dear Mr Singh

Thank you for your e-mail regarding the 14 April edition of 'Nihal' on BBC

Asian Network.

I appreciate that you objected strongly to comments made by a caller 'Ash

from Birmingham'.

The programme editor for the 'Nihal' programme has replied that Ash's

contribution was indeed impassioned as was the debate. He talked about what

he would do in the theoretical establishment of a Sikh state - he said he

would take up arms to defend the division of India. We don't think it was a

direct threat or an indication of his intention to kill Sikhs. It was more

of an explanation of the likely consequences if a Khalistani state was

established. Within the context of the debate, we felt his contribution was

valid and to exclude him would have reduced the range of our debate.

We do acknowledge your concerns, however, and would like to assure you that

we have registered your comments on our audience log. This is the internal

report of audience feedback which we compile daily for all programme makers

and commissioning executives within the BBC, and also their senior

management. It ensures that your points, and all other comments we receive,

are circulated and considered across the BBC.

Thank you again for taking the time to contact us.

Regards

Jonathan Carberry

BBC Complaints

[SaRpAnCh]

What the cops saying Sikh Federation reported him

[Bored]

nothings gonna happen to em