Jump to content

Sant Jarnail Singh ji


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 22
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

The greatest warrior of the 20th century! my mates dads best mate was out there with Sant Jarnail Singh Ji before 1984 in Nanak Niwas, he noted that Sant Ji was a very rare exceptional character in few instances he witnessed that some people come to speak to Sant Ji and try to convince him to backdown from his panthak stance but not only would sant ji not have it, the people would walk away convinced with Sant Jis words after he spoke in very simple but powerful few words, their minds just changed automitically when they went back, these were top educated scholars so so . . The same source mentioned that he even witnessed members of different religions coming to Sant Ji and take amrit their souls just suddenly wanted amrit.

Another source mentioned how he felt a magnetic presence near Sant Ji, wherever sant ji went great crowds were attracted, many youths even then had ghootiya but trimmed beards in the 80s, just one speech and hundreds started growing their beards uncut from one instance. A very similar attribute of Shaheed Baba Manochahal ( also inspired by Sant Ji) when touring in the terai region in the early days.

Sant Ji was not your ordinary guy. He knew the gorment gonna attack Darbar sahib years before it did thats why he had to take the stance to defend it, very far sighted. A singh wrote to me painfully on the very subject of Sant Ji. This singh now in america lost his entire family in the anti sikh delhi riots. He said at the time sant ji told the delhi sikhs to do something for their own safety, a lot of them didnt listen to him and thought wrong of that, but after the riots he and other delhi sikhs realised what sant ji meant. If

he had listened to to Sant Ji his family might have been alive today. half of delhi sikh massacred raped maimed might have been saved if they listened to his advice earlier .

Some old tyme singhs from the uk went to Darbar Sahib before 1984 they said at that tyme there was a meeting betweeen spiritual gurmukhs the aura generated was ment to be crazy next levels. Sant ji had a radiant shine on his face, some serious power behind this being that some of the uk singhs felt. (im sorry im not allowed to go into details). these singhs are now in their 50s and 60s.

Even before 1984 numerous singhs staying in the complex were doing soo much kamaiya they were bairag in mast. some of them were in such a spiritual state that walls meant nothing, their heads and dastaars would sometimes accidently hit the wall while their walking in spiritual trance dastaar and kes come loose and the strangest thing was the loose kes then stood upright with a divine glow around their being. This may defy western logic but sikhi is a inward path things happen in different stages of gurmat way that defy western thought or rigidity.

There are some other things but i dont think its right to type them it sometimes feels like a fine line that you have to draw. Like our hearts want to talk about the 84 singhs but we cant openly discuss everything .

I hope this thread remains to the topic and dont veer off direction into whether sant coming back or not. It would be nice to just talk about the good things about sant ji and other gurmukhs in that period.

I have read that sikhs with serious kamaiya from Guru jis days are born into different parts of the future for certain purposes to unfold that are part of a bigger picture.

few things amongst many i will always respect about Sant Ji is honesty, truth and rightful conduct simplicity and love for mankind whether a man was amritdhari or not sant ji can be seen pictured with monai , singhs etc. Although he preached sikhi it was

his duty, he loved one and all without discriminatiing or eerka.

The indian media have wrongly misquoted and twisted some of his speeches the very sad thing is many sikhs mainstream believe the media than gurmukhs who spent their entire lives in service, people wont put faith in his speeches but in the papers. those repeated mantras live in peoples brains, all i can say is please stay away from these indian newspapers never believe a word.

some sikhs even have bad stories to tell about sant ji to discredit his name but their often sourced back to the indian media or blatent lies they themselves make up cos they cant stand the fact that this one tyme figure was dearly loved by the masses of punjab.

I would love to hear about sant jis early days as a youth growing up so that the rest of us can take courage from that premi gurmukh and carry on spiritual growth in the face of this capitalist world .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was at some friend of my mom's house a couple of months back, and this bebbiji was talking about sant jarnal singh ji.

She was talking about how there was a wedding in their pind, and sant ji was the granthi of the wedding. What happend was they only assumed this many people would show up, but when they so much sangat was showing up just to see sant jarnal singh ji do his role as giyaani for a wedding. She just said it was so amazing, how so many people showed up just to see him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

so u no in 1984 wen the attack happened, wuz it easy 4 the government 2 kill sant ji. cuz i read it took days 2 enter, but sant ji n his forces killed just 88 soldiers. while sant ji's army lost 200+.

that has 2 b a load of BS, rite? sant ji wuz whey more powerful. i read he nearly wiped a whole division of the india army. so now can sum1 clarify this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

thanks 4 that. say how many singhs were there n how many indian troops were there.

also, i no sant ji wuz killin the indian troops. but wut i cant undastand is how did the indian troops enter darbar sahib then? or wuz it reinforcements that overpowered sant ji's army (in order 2 enter darbar sahib)

bhol chukke muaff if i hav offended ny1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

so u no in 1984 wen the attack happened, wuz it easy 4 the government 2 kill sant ji. cuz i read it took days 2 enter, but sant ji n his forces killed just 88 soldiers. while sant ji's army lost 200+.

that has 2 b a load of BS, rite? sant ji wuz whey more powerful. i read he nearly wiped a whole division of the india army. so now can sum1 clarify this?

I read in "sikh history" by khuswant singh that rajiv gandhi in one of his speeches told people that 700 Indian soldiers were killed in the operation.Thats why army was so mad that they killed every sikh they saw.Its a pretty big number, isn't it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

thanks 4 that. say how many singhs were there n how many indian troops were there.

also, i no sant ji wuz killin the indian troops. but wut i cant undastand is how did the indian troops enter darbar sahib then? or wuz it reinforcements that overpowered sant ji's army (in order 2 enter darbar sahib)

bhol chukke muaff if i hav offended ny1.

Indian forces used tanks, helicopters and all means they cud use....so they managed to get in.Sant ji and Sikh soldiers had only guns, so here lies the huge difference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

so u no in 1984 wen the attack happened, wuz it easy 4 the government 2 kill sant ji. cuz i read it took days 2 enter, but sant ji n his forces killed just 88 soldiers. while sant ji's army lost 200+.

that has 2 b a load of BS, rite? sant ji wuz whey more powerful. i read he nearly wiped a whole division of the india army. so now can sum1 clarify this?

I read in "sikh history" by khuswant singh that rajiv gandhi in one of his speeches told people that 700 Indian soldiers were killed in the operation.Thats why army was so mad that they killed every sikh they saw.Its a pretty big number, isn't it?

Khuswant singh is the biggest fool, and should be shot, or should be burn alive.

As he drinks Alcohol while listening to Bani and he called Sant Ji a fool and the Movement a waste of time. He said Khalistan will never be. I know this as I saw this on TV.

He had a bottle on hes table while he was drinking alcohol, and he was playing Rehas Sahib, and he said I do this every night.

So don't buy hes

books. He works for GOI.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was searching igurbani.com which gives correct pronunciation of Gurbani. I can’t remember all of it at once. I guess it relies on more practice, like more Sehaj Paths. The meaning becomes clearer. I have noticed slight variants in it. This could be because it’s written in old Punjabi.  
    • Veer Manpreet Singh, a lay preacher, claims that -Sikhs aren't supposed to worship Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We are only supposed to worship God as is written in Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We only "revere" Guru Granth Sahib ji.     He says a lot of other things in this video, some are good refutations of Hindu superstitions, but the reformers often go too far. Anyways, what he is saying about not worshipping Guru Granth Sahib ji is totally wrong. The reason is Guru Granth Sahib ji is Guru. Guru is Satguru. Satguru is God. We worship God. Therefore, we also worship Satguru (Guru Granth Sahib ji).   There are innumerable verses in Gurbani equating God and Guru. ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਗੁਰੁ ਡੁਬਦਾ ਲਏ ਤਰਾਇ ॥੨॥ The Guru is the Supreme Lord and the Transcendent Master. The Guru floats (saves) the drowning one. p49   ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਏਕੋ ਜਾਣੁ ॥ Know the Guru and God as One. p864   ਗੁਰ ਨਾਲਿ ਤੁਲਿ ਨ ਲਗਈ ਖੋਜਿ ਡਿਠਾ ਬ੍ਰਹਮੰਡੁ ॥ There is no one at par with the Guru. I have searched and seen the whole universe. p49 (If the Guru is the greatest in the whole universe, shouldn't we worship the Guru?)   I'd like to ask Manpreet Singh what is worship? Any reasonable definition would include obeisance, remembrance, and praise. Those are exactly the same things Gurbani says to do regarding Guru! Remembrance and obeisance: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੁ ਅਪਨਾ ਸਦ ਸਦਾ ਸਮ੍ਹਾਰੇ ॥ Ever, ever, I think of the True Guru, ਗੁਰ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਕੇਸ ਸੰਗਿ ਝਾਰੇ ॥੧॥ and the Guru's feet I brush with my head's hair. p387   Praise: ਗੁਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਆਪਿ ॥ The Guru himself is the transcendent Lord and the supreme master. ਆਠ ਪਹਰ ਨਾਨਕ ਗੁਰ ਜਾਪਿ ॥੪॥੧੬॥੬੭॥ Throughout the eight watches of the day, O Nanak meditate thou on the Guru. p387   In fact, Gurbani says the way to find God is to worship (puja) of Guru: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੂ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਧੋਇ ਧੋਇ ਪੂਜਹੁ ਇਨ ਬਿਧਿ ਮੇਰਾ ਹਰਿ ਪ੍ਰਭੁ ਲਹੁ ਰੇ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ Washing and bathing the True Guru's feet, worship thou them. In this way thou shall obtain my Lord Master. Pause. p1118   Could it be any clearer that we are to worship Guru ji?
    • Bro, reciting a shorter Chaupai Sahib is hardly "anti-Dasam". It's fine to argue that the longer Chaupai is more traditional, but the short one isn't anti-Dasam. That's like claiming shorter Rehras is anti-Guru Granth Sahib ji just because there are fewer selections from Guru Granth Sahib. It might not be traditional, but it's not anti-Guru Granth Sahib. I prefer the longer versions, but let's not exaggerate. Every tradition has a slightly different Rehras version. Nanaksar vs Taksal vs Nihangs and so on. The basic template for Rehras is at the beginning of Guru Granth Sahib ji. Later, Chaupai Sahib was added and Anand Sahib always follows as the end of a process. Then some sangats added more saloks to start Rehras and others were added at the end. Some additional selections from Dasam Bani were also added, but it wasn't the same ones for every sangat. The important thing is to not hate on each other for these variations.
    • Umm, so you're upset that this jatha did Chaupai the same way it's being done at Harimandar Sahib for 100 years? Shouldn't you be upset at the manager of Darbar Sahib? I'm not saying that Sikhs who are aware of certain issues shouldn't do the longer Chaupai, but there are only so many battles you can fight. Instead of calling some jatha traitors because they're doing the (for better or worse) "standard" Chauapai published by the SGPC, it would be better to change things from the central point. You can't fault the average Sikh for picking up the average Gutka and doing paath.
    • It's the same here in Toronto. Alot of the gudwaras here are political orientated and get tons of funding from the government-probably want them stay hush hush with all the BS that has been happening with India.  These guys are skewing gurbani. A complaint was sent to a ragi singh a couple of days ago in regards to a hukamnama. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use