Jump to content

Criminal Amitabh Bachan


Recommended Posts

Ajmer Singh Randhawa has been making these allegations for years. To date he has never produced any evidence, if there was evidence then Bachan could be barred from entry into the UK (as Tytler was a few years ago). So its time Ajmer Singh Randhawa put up the evidence so an alleged criminal can have some legal sanctions put in place against him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ajmer Singh Randhawa has been making these allegations for years. To date he has never produced any evidence, if there was evidence then Bachan could be barred from entry into the UK (as Tytler was a few years ago). So its time Ajmer Singh Randhawa put up the evidence so an alleged criminal can have some legal sanctions put in place against him.

in 1984 all of indias eyes were glued to the only tv channel they had at that time, doordarshan tv. on this tv channel, many - not just ajmer singh randhawa, but others across india heard amitabh's comments - they were said live. now, in 1984 televisions in homes was a luxary for many, and even fewer would have had vcr recorders. now, out of the minority that would have had vcr recorders, how many of them would have been recording amitabs comments? none because no one knew he was going to say them. so yes its virtually impossible to have solid proof because 1984 was no where near as advanced with technology as we are today. It is not only Ajmer who has made these allegations. The common elders in delhi know the truth.

if we look at the facts:

- amitabh was a close friend to rajeev

- amitabhs mum was a close friend to indira

- there are many who have said that amitabh made these comments, but the comments at that time would have seemed trivial given the prime minister had just been assassinated. Also at this time was anti sikh propaganda running throughout Indian media, genocides taking place in several parts of the country - predominantly in the countries capital... even the army had given poisoned food with to the sikhs after the genocide. There was so much huge news, and cover ups going on ofcourse amitabs "khoon ka badla khoon" comment will go unreported whilst all this is going on.

-during the 1984 genocide, doordarshan did not report that sikhs were being killed AT ALL even though crowds were heard at indiras funeral on tv saying "khoon ka badla khoon" etc. so if thousands of Sikhs getting hacked / burnt is not going to make headlines, how can we expect amitabs inciting crowds to kill to reach headlines? just because its in the past now that doesn't mean it didn't happen.

-in 2007 amitabh told ndtv that he does not believe operation bluestar was a mistake... i find this interesting because most indians i have spoken to believe it was a mistake. Anyway, even if this was amitabs belief, he could have went on to say "sikhs have suffered aloit" or "the situation could have been handled better by the indian government" but he did not. Interestingly he boasts "my mother is a sikh"....

with all this in mind... it is extremely probable that amitabh was promoting the killing of sikhs... we already know his close friend rajeev did.

im going alittle offtopic here...

in this video sonia ghandi confirms indira gave instructions to rajeev of what she wanted to happen after she would die. she says indira knew she would die.

sant ji said many times in their speeches that indira use to threaten Sikhs by saying "remember there are Sikhs in delhi"... and "remember there are Sikhs out side of Punjab"... even indira's messenger swami vishnudevananda threatened santji with exactly the same thing.

the sikh genocide was planned. before sikhs were being burnt alive hospitals in delhi were told to close their burns units. there was large quantities of highly flammable white powder mysteriously available all across delhi to burn Sikhs with. Sikh homes were specifically marked and targetted by the government. it was all planned. indira knew she would die, in fact the whole indian nation did. she signed her own death certificate with op bluestar. she knew she was going to die and she made preparations for the genocide before hand.

indira knew she would die. she planned the sikh genocide with rajeev. and amitabh was rajeevs bumchum.

It is on the basis of what i have written above, i believe elders when they say they have witnessed amitabh live in nov 84 on doordarshan tv inciting mobs to kill Sikhs.

re: ajmer singhs video evidence:

could someone please provide a source of where ajmer singh has claimed to have video evidence?... i will personally write to him and request it... such evidence should be made public as some sangat has already suggested.

another thing we often forget to mention is that indira was by no means a democratic leader. she was a criminal. she was found guilty of election fraud, at this she illigitimatly declared a state of emergency to re-write the constition and legalise her criminal activity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Amitabh Bachchan's mum was a Sikh.

yh so was jagdish tytler LOL..and yet he organised the killing of supposedly his own people...dont use that <banned word filter activated> on us..amitabh bachan is a hindu..he goes mandir..he prays to idols...he obeys the word of the bhramin pandit...he is not a sikh...why are there so many india a** lickers on this forum?!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yh so was jagdish tytler LOL..and yet he organised the killing of supposedly his own people...dont use that <banned word filter activated> on us..amitabh bachan is a hindu..he goes mandir..he prays to idols...he obeys the word of the bhramin pandit...he is not a sikh...why are there so many india a** lickers on this forum?!

If you read what i wrote... I said his mum was a Sikh - I did not say he was a Sikh.

You forget that our Gurus fought for the rights of these 'idol worshippers' to go to their mandir and worship.

I suggest you study our history.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People asking for proof:

Babu Singh Dukhia, a resident of Tirlok Puri in Delhi, claimed there were eyewitnesses that saw Amitabh Bachchan inciting mobs to avenge the death of Indira Gandhi. The documentary says Amitabh Bachchan was clearly involved in inciting mobs and was heard saying “khoon ka badla khoon” at the funeral of late Indira Gandhi.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sikhs don't hate Hindus and Hindus don't hate Sikhs. Its people who hate.

Niether religion enforces hate upon the other nor does either religion ask to hate in the name of their religion. Our Gurus taught us to fight oppression not the faith of the oppresor.

Obviously you get nut jobs who blame it upon the WHOLE religion which is wrong. Theres fundamentalist on all sides who say stuff in the name of religion, use your brians and think does the religion itself say that. The answer is no people twist things to get people on board to hate others on religious grounds. Classic divide and rule tactics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Sikh Reddit is pathetic, it’s run by a fat POS.  It’s natural to want a virgin if you’re a virgin yourself, so I don’t blame u. Especially when you’re religious and following Sikhi, it just feels so wrong to be w/ someone who is not a virgin.  As a woman it’s easy to find a virgin man b/c any man who tells you he is a virgin is 99% not lying lol. But I understand it is harder to find a virgin woman since ur a man. Since ur in the west it’s gonna be 100% even harder, as only 4% of woman are virgins at marriage in the west. Nowadays there are more virgin men than women. A lot of women will also lie to get a good quality partner, they know deep down men want a clean partner so they’ll lie.  Since ur in the west, u have to be very careful. Honestly my best advice to anyone reading this is u just gotta have common sense. Many men don’t, they’re pretty dumb and easily fall in love based on looks and lies. U don’t wanna be a dumb ***** who’s w/ a woman that’s been with the entire city, nor do u wanna be the dude paying this chick alimony, etc (women w/more sexual partners tend to correlate w/higher risk for divorce). U gotta sus out how she is in her day to day life. Dig into her background. Does she often go out, does she have many male friends, are there any stories about her past. If she has lots of luxury items and what not and is always going out, does she work hard for them by working jobs. If she’s velli and always doing that, that’s sus. A lot of women partake in much more expensive things than men and have lots of things b/c they have some simp or beta orbiter paying them, usually in exchange for some lewd things. The number of women I’ve met thruout the years doing this was insane, like even the ones I thought were angelic ones. furthermore does she have a history of smoking or doing drugs, think about how old is she? The older she is the less likely she is to be a virgin. Did she go to a uni, what kind of uni did she go to and what did she study? Women acquire their most number of sexual partners during uni. Is she a woman that doesn’t like the fact ur a virgin or isn’t as into u because of that? Red flag because a virgin woman would want a virgin man so she can feel more comfortable. There’s lots of memes that women prefer “Chad men with high body count” b/c it shows that they’re experienced but nah, that’s just b/c the majority of women are not virgins lol. Does she spend all her day on social medias like Instagram or Snapchat or Twitter or whatever? Know that there are many men in her DMs most likely. a woman should be willing to delete her socials for u if she truly loves u. The best person for a relationship is a person with no socials. Another tip is how does she speak and dress around family or outside?. Is her family conservative or liberal? Whenever she does goes out is she usually with her family? i can write more questions for u to think about but honestly it’ll be depressing for u. The true reality is you are most likely NOT going to end up with a virgin (the only way to know is if she bleeds ur first night, even the most repulsive and vile of Sikh/Punjabi women don’t pursue hymenoplasties such as Middle eastern women do, so u should be good). You are most likely NOT going to be with a woman who is obsessed with u and loves u deeply, is willing to do anything for u, many men simp for and obey their women these days and not the other way around. You are likely NOT going to end up in a happy marriage, over 6/10 married couples hate their marriage statistically.  U just gotta keep your hopes up. If u do end up getting married to a witch, there’s not much u can do. Think of ur children and care for them deeply. Be a good man, etc. 
    • I’ve seen lots of alt communities or whatever inquire “which religion is the most tolerant, which is the most accepting, which will accept me as a LGBTQASHFKRLIV148959+, which will accept me because I’ve sinned, which will accept me bc I’m literally a pedo,  which will accept bc I’m a furry” literally stupid things like this and guess what everyone usually replies with. ”Sikhi” the whole modernization thing is a joke, just stick to ur roots. Stop promoting the religion as some kind of charity free for all accepting of all sins and degenerates type religion. Just filth will join the religion then, it’s already happening. The leaders and youth of Sikhi are such a massive joke.
    • Lol this is so common. This is the average wedding. Plus nowadays auntiyaan and young girls are dressing half naked in lenghas and saris and stuff or literally sometimes even a western dress. Men freely dance with women. Plus they hire some naked belly dancer or hire some Bhangra team dancing like monkeys at ur wedding. It’s awful. I assume it’s Punjabi culture. Let’s not mention all the men getting drunk and trying to hit on the women at the weddings.  So many young folks skip the gurudwara wedding too because it’s boring and they can’t get lit even though that’s the main part of the wedding & most important. Amritdhari men and women are less likely to engage in such activities tho, I don’t see them doing this, when they get invited to such weddings they sit in the corner and refuse to engage or dance and such.  I’m marrying into a non Punjabi family and me and my partner went to a Sikh wedding recently because he’s never experienced one and he was shocked and said he thought Sikhs were way more conservative.
    • I hate the way people throw money. It's usually a manmukh tradition to show how wealthy you are and you can just throw rupees around. It's nothing more than showing off.
    • While drinking alcohol is never a good thing, hearsay about such things may be unreliable. The fact is, at wedding receptions, everybody goes: children, drinkers, and non-drinkers. Obviously, there are both alcoholic and non-alcoholic drinks available. Are the aunties absolutely sure the uncles were drinking whiskey?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use