Jump to content

Death Penalty In The U.K - Are In Favour Of It?


Recommended Posts

An on line petition has exceeded 100 Thousand in favour of Capital Punishment, which means has to be debated in Parliament.

I am in full favour of Capital Punishment.

I would say some of the major Religions support capital punishment some not as directly as others, for example we believe in Righteousness and Justice.

I believe it's a deterrent, to murders, rape, and Pedos.

It's also cost effect, as the tax payers wouldn't have to pay for scum to live and have 3 meals a day, and a warm bed, while victims and their families suffer.

It would also mean less people in prison which would more means standard criminals i.e. thieves can be accommodated in prison for longer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And what about when someone is wrongfully convicted(as they are all the time..).

Sajjan Thug murdered many, and became Guru Nanak's devotee etc. We need to think about this aswell...

Science is very advanced in solving crime, with DNA.

Ian Huntley who killed the two girls from soham, MiraHindley, who killed many children, should be hung.

What bout Sajjan Kumar who organised the Delhiriots he should be hung.

You change your ways we don't have door mat believes,wrong doers should be delt with

Indra Ghandi

Michael o Dwyer

Lala Jagat Narian

Gen Viadya

Catch my drift

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As sad as it may sound, maybe in a small country like England the message that if you do wrong, you will get punished severely and that may prove to be a deterrent to some criminals?

Some people are animals and don't understand anything but harsh force. You can reason and plead with these people as much as you like, but it won't make a difference to someone who is "evil". I guess if people are afraid of miscarriages of justice, the police and the law will have to work extra hard to ensure there is NO doubt. If there is doubt, the death sentence should be taken off the table.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As sad as it may sound, maybe in a small country like England the message that if you do wrong, you will get punished severely and that may prove to be a deterrent to some criminals?

Some people are animals and don't understand anything but harsh force. You can reason and plead with these people as much as you like, but it won't make a difference to someone who is "evil". I guess if people are afraid of miscarriages of justice, the police and the law will have to work extra hard to ensure there is NO doubt. If there is doubt, the death sentence should be taken off the table.

If people are worried about miscarriages of justice then there's something wrong with the Justice system.

Its not some thing which Is acceptable in a highly developed country like the UK in 2011.

The middle class mps and their families are not likely ever to be victims of horrific crimes which is why they wont implement Capital Punishment, they have no idea.

The inner cities are sess pit and a jungle with all sorts of psychos, there's only one way to deal with them

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am in full favour of Capital Punishment.

I believe it's a deterrent, to murders, rape, and Pedos.

What led you to "believe" that then Singh ? All the evidence suggests that the rate of henious murders are alot higher in states which have the death penalty. Probably because the sanctity of human life is lessened and cheapened. In other words, killing becomes more acceptable in places where the state also practices killing.

Be carefull what you wish for Singh. In other words, put a bit more thought into the things you wish for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

in the kingdom of maharaja ranjit singh...execution was outlawed...however amputations of hands, feet, nose or ears were used as punishment to criminals and acted as a determent to those who contemplated committing crimes...but a humans life should never be taken from him if their is an alterior method of punishment....they should always have the chance to reform...as this human life doesnt come aound often....they should still have the oppurtunity to meet waheguru....for the likes of jagdish tyler and sajjan kumar i would prefer them rotting in prison than being executed...the only reason kharkoos assasinated anti skh individuals responsible for the murder of thousands of sikhs was because that was the only option they had in punishing these people and bringing them to justice....if kharkoos had control of prisons of their own..dont you think that would be the first place they would of sent these mass murderers....too many innocent people have been executed by governments in history...i dont trust them to send someone to the gallows...especially in this high tec age where governments can easily plant evidence against political enemies

watch this....most these kids were sentenced to death when they were oonly 17/18...how is that fair...human should be given the chance to reform themselves...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Science is very advanced in solving crime, with DNA.

Ian Huntley who killed the two girls from soham, MiraHindley, who killed many children, should be hung.

What bout Sajjan Kumar who organised the Delhiriots he should be hung.

You change your ways we don't have door mat believes,wrong doers should be delt with

Indra Ghandi

Michael o Dwyer

Lala Jagat Narian

Gen Viadya

Catch my drift

However, these people never became good. Even being given opportunities to become good they never did, as these people have clearly been programmed (sent by god) to be like this, this is their karam, they have to be like this in this life, therefore we have to do something about it. If they turn around and actually ask for forgiveness and begin to do some acts of righteousness then chardhee kalaa!

Who the hell do we think we are to take dharam raaj's authority into our own hands?!?!?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe it's a deterrent, to murders, rape, and Pedos.

No its not the countries with the death penalty have the most murderers rapists and pedos and the countries without have the least

It's also cost effect, as the tax payers wouldn't have to pay for scum to live and have 3 meals a day, and a warm bed, while victims and their families suffer.

Prisoners have the right to appeal after that it makes the death penalty cost millions for each prisoner

It would also mean less people in prison which would more means standard criminals i.e. thieves can be accommodated in prison for longer.

Again prisoners have the right to appeal which takes years and most inmates spend decades in death row

"It is better to risk sparing a guilty person than to condemn an innocent one." ~Voltaire

all that needs be said

Also if some one murdered one of my family members id want him to spend the rest of his life in a cage knowing that he will never be free again instead of being executed which is the easy way out and that if dna evidence comes out in the future that hes innocent it wouldnt be too late and he could be released and given full compensation

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was searching igurbani.com which gives correct pronunciation of Gurbani. I can’t remember all of it at once. I guess it relies on more practice, like more Sehaj Paths. The meaning becomes clearer. I have noticed slight variants in it. This could be because it’s written in old Punjabi.  
    • Veer Manpreet Singh, a lay preacher, claims that -Sikhs aren't supposed to worship Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We are only supposed to worship God as is written in Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We only "revere" Guru Granth Sahib ji.     He says a lot of other things in this video, some are good refutations of Hindu superstitions, but the reformers often go too far. Anyways, what he is saying about not worshipping Guru Granth Sahib ji is totally wrong. The reason is Guru Granth Sahib ji is Guru. Guru is Satguru. Satguru is God. We worship God. Therefore, we also worship Satguru (Guru Granth Sahib ji).   There are innumerable verses in Gurbani equating God and Guru. ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਗੁਰੁ ਡੁਬਦਾ ਲਏ ਤਰਾਇ ॥੨॥ The Guru is the Supreme Lord and the Transcendent Master. The Guru floats (saves) the drowning one. p49   ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਏਕੋ ਜਾਣੁ ॥ Know the Guru and God as One. p864   ਗੁਰ ਨਾਲਿ ਤੁਲਿ ਨ ਲਗਈ ਖੋਜਿ ਡਿਠਾ ਬ੍ਰਹਮੰਡੁ ॥ There is no one at par with the Guru. I have searched and seen the whole universe. p49 (If the Guru is the greatest in the whole universe, shouldn't we worship the Guru?)   I'd like to ask Manpreet Singh what is worship? Any reasonable definition would include obeisance, remembrance, and praise. Those are exactly the same things Gurbani says to do regarding Guru! Remembrance and obeisance: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੁ ਅਪਨਾ ਸਦ ਸਦਾ ਸਮ੍ਹਾਰੇ ॥ Ever, ever, I think of the True Guru, ਗੁਰ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਕੇਸ ਸੰਗਿ ਝਾਰੇ ॥੧॥ and the Guru's feet I brush with my head's hair. p387   Praise: ਗੁਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਆਪਿ ॥ The Guru himself is the transcendent Lord and the supreme master. ਆਠ ਪਹਰ ਨਾਨਕ ਗੁਰ ਜਾਪਿ ॥੪॥੧੬॥੬੭॥ Throughout the eight watches of the day, O Nanak meditate thou on the Guru. p387   In fact, Gurbani says the way to find God is to worship (puja) of Guru: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੂ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਧੋਇ ਧੋਇ ਪੂਜਹੁ ਇਨ ਬਿਧਿ ਮੇਰਾ ਹਰਿ ਪ੍ਰਭੁ ਲਹੁ ਰੇ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ Washing and bathing the True Guru's feet, worship thou them. In this way thou shall obtain my Lord Master. Pause. p1118   Could it be any clearer that we are to worship Guru ji?
    • Bro, reciting a shorter Chaupai Sahib is hardly "anti-Dasam". It's fine to argue that the longer Chaupai is more traditional, but the short one isn't anti-Dasam. That's like claiming shorter Rehras is anti-Guru Granth Sahib ji just because there are fewer selections from Guru Granth Sahib. It might not be traditional, but it's not anti-Guru Granth Sahib. I prefer the longer versions, but let's not exaggerate. Every tradition has a slightly different Rehras version. Nanaksar vs Taksal vs Nihangs and so on. The basic template for Rehras is at the beginning of Guru Granth Sahib ji. Later, Chaupai Sahib was added and Anand Sahib always follows as the end of a process. Then some sangats added more saloks to start Rehras and others were added at the end. Some additional selections from Dasam Bani were also added, but it wasn't the same ones for every sangat. The important thing is to not hate on each other for these variations.
    • Umm, so you're upset that this jatha did Chaupai the same way it's being done at Harimandar Sahib for 100 years? Shouldn't you be upset at the manager of Darbar Sahib? I'm not saying that Sikhs who are aware of certain issues shouldn't do the longer Chaupai, but there are only so many battles you can fight. Instead of calling some jatha traitors because they're doing the (for better or worse) "standard" Chauapai published by the SGPC, it would be better to change things from the central point. You can't fault the average Sikh for picking up the average Gutka and doing paath.
    • It's the same here in Toronto. Alot of the gudwaras here are political orientated and get tons of funding from the government-probably want them stay hush hush with all the BS that has been happening with India.  These guys are skewing gurbani. A complaint was sent to a ragi singh a couple of days ago in regards to a hukamnama. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use