Jump to content

Bobby Friction Is Trying To Put Sikh In A Bad Light..


Recommended Posts

I think bobby has cleared up what he ment in a comprehensive note on his FB notes, we should bury this and move on. Some Singhs really need to stop creating personal issues with people and using foul language against fellow Sikhs. Your doing more damage than good with your online vendetta's

http://www.facebook....150274517525772

This doesnt clear up anything, the guy sounds like a complete sellout....

It was the Sikh Massands that got Baba Banda Singh Bahadhur arrested and executed....

It was the Sikh Massands that sold out and lost Maharaja Ranjit Singh and the Sikhs their Raaj...

It was the Sikh Massands that begged Indra to attack the Darbar Sahib in 84, so that they could get rid of Bhindranwale and take control...

It is the Sikh Massands like Bobby Friction, who continue to stab their own community in the back at every opportunity. While the whole world praises Sangat TV, this plonker manages to find the only negative and formally report it to the relevant authorities.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aman what you on about? People can say it was Sikhs who were the guard dogs of the British during the Raj.

This is all very stupid and even though I cant stand Friction's work but he is right. I mean only a small percentage of sikhs think Bhindranwale is a sant, whilst the overwhelming majority cant stand him.

As for sangat tv, yes the reporting was good but then to cut to the 'relgious sikh' view of thing would make those that are not sikh think that the community is worse than muslims in trying everything possible to look for converts.

Also who are these 'idiots' threatening him and his family?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mean only a small percentage of sikhs think Bhindranwale is a sant, whilst the overwhelming majority cant stand him.

As for sangat tv, yes the reporting was good but then to cut to the 'relgious sikh' view of thing would make those that are not sikh think that the community is worse than muslims in trying everything possible to look for converts.

A small percentage of Sikhs think Sant Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale is a Sant? You obviously have no clue about Sikhi and have no respect for those who keep its precepts, as is evidenced by your comparison of Sikhs who keep rehit and Sikhi roop (i.e. real Gursikhs not those who call themselves Sikh then go out drinking and clubbing in imitation of their Western masters) with Islamic militants.

K.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would like to make it clear the majority of Sikhs think Sant Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale is a hero of Sikhism. The minority the pubbing clubbing sell out types who got no love for Sikh history, valour, ethics, traditions hate him because maybe through ignorance they havent seen his speechs? or because they just hate anyone who stood up for Sikhs militarly when others wouldnt and didnt have the balls to.

And those who make threats against other Sikhs in these kind of heated debates and issues you need to stop doing that because you are taking yourself outside the faith and into athiestic thoughts. I seen some real nasty comments by people defending bobby's views and those who oppose them. A Sikh shouldnt speak in a way that makes Sikhs look like uneducated violent fools, you give us all a bad name with your behaviour online.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aman what you on about? People can say it was Sikhs who were the guard dogs of the British during the Raj.

This is all very stupid and even though I cant stand Friction's work but he is right. I mean only a small percentage of sikhs think Bhindranwale is a sant, whilst the overwhelming majority cant stand him.

As for sangat tv, yes the reporting was good but then to cut to the 'relgious sikh' view of thing would make those that are not sikh think that the community is worse than muslims in trying everything possible to look for converts.

Also who are these 'idiots' threatening him and his family?

The Sangat TV Channel is a SIKH RELIGIOUS CHANNEL PREACHING ABOUT SIKHISM! SO WHO THE <banned word filter activated> ARE YOU TO SAY JUST BECAUSE THE AUDIENCE IS NON-SIKH THAT THEY SHOULD SUDDENLY STOP THE PREACHING FOR WHAT THE CHANNEL IS ESTABLISHED FOR!

YOU <banned word filter activated> <banned word filter activated>!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Sangat TV Channel is a SIKH RELIGIOUS CHANNEL PREACHING ABOUT SIKHISM! SO WHO THE <banned word filter activated> ARE YOU TO SAY JUST BECAUSE THE AUDIENCE IS NON-SIKH THAT THEY SHOULD SUDDENLY STOP THE PREACHING FOR WHAT THE CHANNEL IS ESTABLISHED FOR!

YOU <banned word filter activated> <banned word filter activated>!

Yeah well done mate your as bad as these people threatening our personalities. Great language by the way!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah well done mate your as bad as these people threatening our personalities. Great language by the way!

I'm no mate of yours you cretin. Shove your so called personalities up your arse.

Heathen telling us SIkhs we can't preach our Religion because he's so far up the arse of uncivilised society. Get off this site!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was searching igurbani.com which gives correct pronunciation of Gurbani. I can’t remember all of it at once. I guess it relies on more practice, like more Sehaj Paths. The meaning becomes clearer. I have noticed slight variants in it. This could be because it’s written in old Punjabi.  
    • Veer Manpreet Singh, a lay preacher, claims that -Sikhs aren't supposed to worship Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We are only supposed to worship God as is written in Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We only "revere" Guru Granth Sahib ji.     He says a lot of other things in this video, some are good refutations of Hindu superstitions, but the reformers often go too far. Anyways, what he is saying about not worshipping Guru Granth Sahib ji is totally wrong. The reason is Guru Granth Sahib ji is Guru. Guru is Satguru. Satguru is God. We worship God. Therefore, we also worship Satguru (Guru Granth Sahib ji).   There are innumerable verses in Gurbani equating God and Guru. ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਗੁਰੁ ਡੁਬਦਾ ਲਏ ਤਰਾਇ ॥੨॥ The Guru is the Supreme Lord and the Transcendent Master. The Guru floats (saves) the drowning one. p49   ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਏਕੋ ਜਾਣੁ ॥ Know the Guru and God as One. p864   ਗੁਰ ਨਾਲਿ ਤੁਲਿ ਨ ਲਗਈ ਖੋਜਿ ਡਿਠਾ ਬ੍ਰਹਮੰਡੁ ॥ There is no one at par with the Guru. I have searched and seen the whole universe. p49 (If the Guru is the greatest in the whole universe, shouldn't we worship the Guru?)   I'd like to ask Manpreet Singh what is worship? Any reasonable definition would include obeisance, remembrance, and praise. Those are exactly the same things Gurbani says to do regarding Guru! Remembrance and obeisance: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੁ ਅਪਨਾ ਸਦ ਸਦਾ ਸਮ੍ਹਾਰੇ ॥ Ever, ever, I think of the True Guru, ਗੁਰ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਕੇਸ ਸੰਗਿ ਝਾਰੇ ॥੧॥ and the Guru's feet I brush with my head's hair. p387   Praise: ਗੁਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਆਪਿ ॥ The Guru himself is the transcendent Lord and the supreme master. ਆਠ ਪਹਰ ਨਾਨਕ ਗੁਰ ਜਾਪਿ ॥੪॥੧੬॥੬੭॥ Throughout the eight watches of the day, O Nanak meditate thou on the Guru. p387   In fact, Gurbani says the way to find God is to worship (puja) of Guru: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੂ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਧੋਇ ਧੋਇ ਪੂਜਹੁ ਇਨ ਬਿਧਿ ਮੇਰਾ ਹਰਿ ਪ੍ਰਭੁ ਲਹੁ ਰੇ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ Washing and bathing the True Guru's feet, worship thou them. In this way thou shall obtain my Lord Master. Pause. p1118   Could it be any clearer that we are to worship Guru ji?
    • Bro, reciting a shorter Chaupai Sahib is hardly "anti-Dasam". It's fine to argue that the longer Chaupai is more traditional, but the short one isn't anti-Dasam. That's like claiming shorter Rehras is anti-Guru Granth Sahib ji just because there are fewer selections from Guru Granth Sahib. It might not be traditional, but it's not anti-Guru Granth Sahib. I prefer the longer versions, but let's not exaggerate. Every tradition has a slightly different Rehras version. Nanaksar vs Taksal vs Nihangs and so on. The basic template for Rehras is at the beginning of Guru Granth Sahib ji. Later, Chaupai Sahib was added and Anand Sahib always follows as the end of a process. Then some sangats added more saloks to start Rehras and others were added at the end. Some additional selections from Dasam Bani were also added, but it wasn't the same ones for every sangat. The important thing is to not hate on each other for these variations.
    • Umm, so you're upset that this jatha did Chaupai the same way it's being done at Harimandar Sahib for 100 years? Shouldn't you be upset at the manager of Darbar Sahib? I'm not saying that Sikhs who are aware of certain issues shouldn't do the longer Chaupai, but there are only so many battles you can fight. Instead of calling some jatha traitors because they're doing the (for better or worse) "standard" Chauapai published by the SGPC, it would be better to change things from the central point. You can't fault the average Sikh for picking up the average Gutka and doing paath.
    • It's the same here in Toronto. Alot of the gudwaras here are political orientated and get tons of funding from the government-probably want them stay hush hush with all the BS that has been happening with India.  These guys are skewing gurbani. A complaint was sent to a ragi singh a couple of days ago in regards to a hukamnama. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use