Jump to content

Bobby Friction Is Trying To Put Sikh In A Bad Light..


Recommended Posts

You choose to live here and if you don't like the 'uncivilised society' then gladly leave this country, you do have this choice.

How on earth has my affliation with my religion got to do with where I live you tool. Sikhs have been praised by the whole of the country twitter, newspapers can be used as a source. So you take your filthy face elsewhere. It's not welcome here with all your negative posts regarding Sikhs.

Khalsa is on the Rise!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seriously guys, Bobby Frictiion is a right tw@t. But threatening him with violence only helps him play victim. It would have been better if people had ridiculed him or taken the p*ss out of him as a person rather than threaten his family. A coconut like him is probably down the police station already trying to get them to track down everyone who threatened him.

Adil Ray has supposedly been trying to stir things too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What you on about negative? Since when has this country been a nation full of paag wearing teetotal bhindranwale fanatics? Why then resort to threatening the majority who are more assimilated and integrated into the society of this great land just because they dont follow the hillbilly village views you hold?

This goes for islamic extremists too, dont bite the hands that feed you.

Threatening our personalities - havent we been here before?

http://www.dailymail...us-TV-film.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All these flying accusations, before making sweeping statements please provide evidence of what these guys are alleged to have said before bashing them, because no one will take you guys seriously if you cant back up what with screenprints or quotes from articles or audio/video pieces of what they are alleged to have said. So unless you have any evidence, I would advise you guys to not spread rumours as it destorys your credibility in future posts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Solely joined in order to protect the likes of Bobby Friction? Look at join date you buffoon. Notice it is way before yesterday lol

Also by the way I didnt explicitly state true followers should leave, nor did I explicitly state only sikhs but applies to any religion. Live your life how you want it but if all you going to do is <banned word filter activated> about how uncivilised this society is and how you dont like the majority of sikhs drinking sharaab, being moneh etc.. you know where the door is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What you on about negative? Since when has this country been a nation full of paag wearing teetotal bhindranwale fanatics? Why then resort to threatening the majority who are more assimilated and integrated into the society of this great land just because they dont follow the hillbilly village views you hold?

This goes for islamic extremists too, dont bite the hands that feed you.

Threatening our personalities - havent we been here before?

http://www.dailymail...us-TV-film.html

Our personalities? Hah! He's not ours, Gursikhs dont follow the Godless. We look to God, ask our Gurus for help, praise our Sants, and honor our Shaheeds. Sant Thakur Singh Ji supported Sant Bhindranwale Ji, but apparently you know more. The Damdi Taksal was happy with Sant Bhindranwale Ji, and the first Mukhi of the Taksal was Baba Deep Singh Ji, and I'm sure he keeps a watchful eye on the Taksal and thus supported Sant Bhindranwale Ji, otherwise he wouldn't have let him become a Mukhi. Sri Guru Gobind Singh Ji supported Baba Deep Singh Ji, and the Guru was supported by God. Thus, Sant Bhindranwale Ji was approved by men of God. But that's fine, you praise friction. Beg him for help, and ask him for salvation. We however will keep under Gods Sanctuary, atleast He loves us back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What you on about negative? Since when has this country been a nation full of paag wearing teetotal bhindranwale fanatics? Why then resort to threatening the majority who are more assimilated and integrated into the society of this great land just because they dont follow the hillbilly village views you hold?

I mentioned this "clever" tactic in another thread last week. Equating Gursikhs with unintegrated, intolerant Islamists who threaten this country.

Now being a Gursikh is comparable to being a hill-billy? This coming from a Sikh?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was searching igurbani.com which gives correct pronunciation of Gurbani. I can’t remember all of it at once. I guess it relies on more practice, like more Sehaj Paths. The meaning becomes clearer. I have noticed slight variants in it. This could be because it’s written in old Punjabi.  
    • Veer Manpreet Singh, a lay preacher, claims that -Sikhs aren't supposed to worship Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We are only supposed to worship God as is written in Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We only "revere" Guru Granth Sahib ji.     He says a lot of other things in this video, some are good refutations of Hindu superstitions, but the reformers often go too far. Anyways, what he is saying about not worshipping Guru Granth Sahib ji is totally wrong. The reason is Guru Granth Sahib ji is Guru. Guru is Satguru. Satguru is God. We worship God. Therefore, we also worship Satguru (Guru Granth Sahib ji).   There are innumerable verses in Gurbani equating God and Guru. ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਗੁਰੁ ਡੁਬਦਾ ਲਏ ਤਰਾਇ ॥੨॥ The Guru is the Supreme Lord and the Transcendent Master. The Guru floats (saves) the drowning one. p49   ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਏਕੋ ਜਾਣੁ ॥ Know the Guru and God as One. p864   ਗੁਰ ਨਾਲਿ ਤੁਲਿ ਨ ਲਗਈ ਖੋਜਿ ਡਿਠਾ ਬ੍ਰਹਮੰਡੁ ॥ There is no one at par with the Guru. I have searched and seen the whole universe. p49 (If the Guru is the greatest in the whole universe, shouldn't we worship the Guru?)   I'd like to ask Manpreet Singh what is worship? Any reasonable definition would include obeisance, remembrance, and praise. Those are exactly the same things Gurbani says to do regarding Guru! Remembrance and obeisance: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੁ ਅਪਨਾ ਸਦ ਸਦਾ ਸਮ੍ਹਾਰੇ ॥ Ever, ever, I think of the True Guru, ਗੁਰ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਕੇਸ ਸੰਗਿ ਝਾਰੇ ॥੧॥ and the Guru's feet I brush with my head's hair. p387   Praise: ਗੁਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਆਪਿ ॥ The Guru himself is the transcendent Lord and the supreme master. ਆਠ ਪਹਰ ਨਾਨਕ ਗੁਰ ਜਾਪਿ ॥੪॥੧੬॥੬੭॥ Throughout the eight watches of the day, O Nanak meditate thou on the Guru. p387   In fact, Gurbani says the way to find God is to worship (puja) of Guru: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੂ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਧੋਇ ਧੋਇ ਪੂਜਹੁ ਇਨ ਬਿਧਿ ਮੇਰਾ ਹਰਿ ਪ੍ਰਭੁ ਲਹੁ ਰੇ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ Washing and bathing the True Guru's feet, worship thou them. In this way thou shall obtain my Lord Master. Pause. p1118   Could it be any clearer that we are to worship Guru ji?
    • Bro, reciting a shorter Chaupai Sahib is hardly "anti-Dasam". It's fine to argue that the longer Chaupai is more traditional, but the short one isn't anti-Dasam. That's like claiming shorter Rehras is anti-Guru Granth Sahib ji just because there are fewer selections from Guru Granth Sahib. It might not be traditional, but it's not anti-Guru Granth Sahib. I prefer the longer versions, but let's not exaggerate. Every tradition has a slightly different Rehras version. Nanaksar vs Taksal vs Nihangs and so on. The basic template for Rehras is at the beginning of Guru Granth Sahib ji. Later, Chaupai Sahib was added and Anand Sahib always follows as the end of a process. Then some sangats added more saloks to start Rehras and others were added at the end. Some additional selections from Dasam Bani were also added, but it wasn't the same ones for every sangat. The important thing is to not hate on each other for these variations.
    • Umm, so you're upset that this jatha did Chaupai the same way it's being done at Harimandar Sahib for 100 years? Shouldn't you be upset at the manager of Darbar Sahib? I'm not saying that Sikhs who are aware of certain issues shouldn't do the longer Chaupai, but there are only so many battles you can fight. Instead of calling some jatha traitors because they're doing the (for better or worse) "standard" Chauapai published by the SGPC, it would be better to change things from the central point. You can't fault the average Sikh for picking up the average Gutka and doing paath.
    • It's the same here in Toronto. Alot of the gudwaras here are political orientated and get tons of funding from the government-probably want them stay hush hush with all the BS that has been happening with India.  These guys are skewing gurbani. A complaint was sent to a ragi singh a couple of days ago in regards to a hukamnama. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use