Jump to content

Bobby Friction Is Trying To Put Sikh In A Bad Light..


Recommended Posts

Mandela says screw him, if I ever saw him I would lay him down on his backside and whoever supports him.

The problem is that he's a high profile Sikh. He's been in the media spotlight for a long time and he's pretty well established. Someone who doesn't know what we know would think "This Friction fella is a Sikh and he's saying those things about his OWN people? He must be right".

Its very careless of him to behave in such a way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem is that he's a high profile Sikh. He's been in the media spotlight for a long time and he's pretty well established. Someone who doesn't know what we know would think "This Friction fella is a Sikh and he's saying those things about his OWN people? He must be right".

Its very careless of him to behave in such a way.

Mandela says he is a mug he knows very well what he said, he is not stupid. Mandela hates it when people defend someone when they insult someone like Baba Jarnail Singh Bhindernwale.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mandela says he is a mug he knows very well what he said, he is not stupid. Mandela hates it when people defend someone when they insult someone like Baba Jarnail Singh Bhindernwale.

I wasn't defending him. I was lambasting him for his careless and ignorant comments.

Kaljugi says Mandela needs to learn to read people's posts properly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wasn't defending him. I was lambasting him for his careless and ignorant comments.

Kaljugi says Mandela needs to learn to read people's posts properly.

Mandela says did he refer to anything you said <edited> ? Look over this thread and see there are some benders that think Bobby Friction is some kind of new age Sikh role model.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mandela says did he refer to anything you said <edited> ? Look over this thread and see there are some benders that think Bobby Friction is some kind of new age Sikh role model.

I'll ignore that comment. You should've made it clear that you weren't referring to me. By quoting me in your reply it seemed you were.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sikhworldtv says much love and respect to ALL the sevadaars that volunteered their time and efforts in safeguarding Gurughars, properties and the community in the face of Kaljug - TRUE SIKH SPIRIT - my humble thanks. These brave Sikhs raised the profile of our faith and media (Sangat TV) worldwide which could not have been achieved even if we had tried using the best advertising agency. These adils, frictions and that fat joker kohli are just nobody's that will be forgotten in a blink of an eye but true and righteous people have the gratitude of the Khalsa Panth and a place in our hearts where the Guru dwells. Waheguru

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mandela says did he refer to anything you said <edited>? Look over this thread and see there are some benders that think Bobby Friction is some kind of new age Sikh role model.

HDSH says Mandela deserves a warning for that comment and a warning he shall receive :wink2:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No one said that, All what is implied is gursikhs are not the majority of the community here. The westernised sikhs manage to balance lifestyles best.

They have good jobs, earn more money, less likely to be racially harassed as they more integrated.

Yea back to the topic is good idea, we seemed to have lost the way abit.

Doesn't matter what kind of sikh you are, amritdhari or not, each bhagat walks their own path, some are harrassed some maybe not so much, racially or not it doesn't matter, harrassments and slander is enough

Slander is expected for just about any bhagat

No bhagat is EVER integrated with mortals, how can a bhagat who's frequency is higher and finer than the mortals ever truly integrate when they are an outcaste(diff frequency-Truth)...

The bhagat is the lowest of the low, the most humble, their humble and light frequency grates on the dark energies that affect others...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was searching igurbani.com which gives correct pronunciation of Gurbani. I can’t remember all of it at once. I guess it relies on more practice, like more Sehaj Paths. The meaning becomes clearer. I have noticed slight variants in it. This could be because it’s written in old Punjabi.  
    • Veer Manpreet Singh, a lay preacher, claims that -Sikhs aren't supposed to worship Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We are only supposed to worship God as is written in Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We only "revere" Guru Granth Sahib ji.     He says a lot of other things in this video, some are good refutations of Hindu superstitions, but the reformers often go too far. Anyways, what he is saying about not worshipping Guru Granth Sahib ji is totally wrong. The reason is Guru Granth Sahib ji is Guru. Guru is Satguru. Satguru is God. We worship God. Therefore, we also worship Satguru (Guru Granth Sahib ji).   There are innumerable verses in Gurbani equating God and Guru. ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਗੁਰੁ ਡੁਬਦਾ ਲਏ ਤਰਾਇ ॥੨॥ The Guru is the Supreme Lord and the Transcendent Master. The Guru floats (saves) the drowning one. p49   ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਏਕੋ ਜਾਣੁ ॥ Know the Guru and God as One. p864   ਗੁਰ ਨਾਲਿ ਤੁਲਿ ਨ ਲਗਈ ਖੋਜਿ ਡਿਠਾ ਬ੍ਰਹਮੰਡੁ ॥ There is no one at par with the Guru. I have searched and seen the whole universe. p49 (If the Guru is the greatest in the whole universe, shouldn't we worship the Guru?)   I'd like to ask Manpreet Singh what is worship? Any reasonable definition would include obeisance, remembrance, and praise. Those are exactly the same things Gurbani says to do regarding Guru! Remembrance and obeisance: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੁ ਅਪਨਾ ਸਦ ਸਦਾ ਸਮ੍ਹਾਰੇ ॥ Ever, ever, I think of the True Guru, ਗੁਰ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਕੇਸ ਸੰਗਿ ਝਾਰੇ ॥੧॥ and the Guru's feet I brush with my head's hair. p387   Praise: ਗੁਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਆਪਿ ॥ The Guru himself is the transcendent Lord and the supreme master. ਆਠ ਪਹਰ ਨਾਨਕ ਗੁਰ ਜਾਪਿ ॥੪॥੧੬॥੬੭॥ Throughout the eight watches of the day, O Nanak meditate thou on the Guru. p387   In fact, Gurbani says the way to find God is to worship (puja) of Guru: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੂ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਧੋਇ ਧੋਇ ਪੂਜਹੁ ਇਨ ਬਿਧਿ ਮੇਰਾ ਹਰਿ ਪ੍ਰਭੁ ਲਹੁ ਰੇ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ Washing and bathing the True Guru's feet, worship thou them. In this way thou shall obtain my Lord Master. Pause. p1118   Could it be any clearer that we are to worship Guru ji?
    • Bro, reciting a shorter Chaupai Sahib is hardly "anti-Dasam". It's fine to argue that the longer Chaupai is more traditional, but the short one isn't anti-Dasam. That's like claiming shorter Rehras is anti-Guru Granth Sahib ji just because there are fewer selections from Guru Granth Sahib. It might not be traditional, but it's not anti-Guru Granth Sahib. I prefer the longer versions, but let's not exaggerate. Every tradition has a slightly different Rehras version. Nanaksar vs Taksal vs Nihangs and so on. The basic template for Rehras is at the beginning of Guru Granth Sahib ji. Later, Chaupai Sahib was added and Anand Sahib always follows as the end of a process. Then some sangats added more saloks to start Rehras and others were added at the end. Some additional selections from Dasam Bani were also added, but it wasn't the same ones for every sangat. The important thing is to not hate on each other for these variations.
    • Umm, so you're upset that this jatha did Chaupai the same way it's being done at Harimandar Sahib for 100 years? Shouldn't you be upset at the manager of Darbar Sahib? I'm not saying that Sikhs who are aware of certain issues shouldn't do the longer Chaupai, but there are only so many battles you can fight. Instead of calling some jatha traitors because they're doing the (for better or worse) "standard" Chauapai published by the SGPC, it would be better to change things from the central point. You can't fault the average Sikh for picking up the average Gutka and doing paath.
    • It's the same here in Toronto. Alot of the gudwaras here are political orientated and get tons of funding from the government-probably want them stay hush hush with all the BS that has been happening with India.  These guys are skewing gurbani. A complaint was sent to a ragi singh a couple of days ago in regards to a hukamnama. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use