Jump to content

Reject Sangat Tv!


singh1986
 Share

Recommended Posts

Sorry For the text language... im typing on my phone...

Recently it has come to everyones attention about the views of upinder the main presenter on Sangat TV, about his low disregard for sant jarnail singh ji and various Gursikh groups. After repeated emails and comments by users on facebook on sangat TV's fanpage they continue to promote this hysterical and misguided presenter. Bare in mind this is the same channel that showed Sant Ji speeches...

In addition one has to question the judgement of Sangat TV to use Sonia Deol as a presenter!? ...I usually keep calm about such issues and wait for a Uturn as sometimes mistakes can be made as shown by Sikh Channel! However I am losing patience and considering pulling my direct debit from them. I suspect other Sikhs will follow suit...

The question is, is sangat Tv losing its orginal intended auidence in attempt to pull non-sikh viewers? In that case they are no longer a Sikh Channel... and sikhs shouldnt feel obliged to support them!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sangat TV have dug themselves into a hole. Upinder Randhawa is now bigger than Sangat TV. Due to the idiocy shown by the channel they have made a fool like him into a celebrity. They need him to keep their non-Sikh viewers who only came across the channel due to his reporting on the riots. Conversely they will lose many Sikh viewers who cannot stand someone with his views being a presenter on a Sikh TV channel. Like I said, they've dug themselves into a hole.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is no community in this world without differences but I think every community have learned to live, help and do its parchar together other then Sikh community.

I agree brother. These days they have forgotten what a Sikh is that is why. They behave like athiests, like thugs, like animals. These people are enemies of Sikhism, they forgotton they have to attack 5 vices everyday and not abuse individuals with different political views. They have become the enemy within, we have got a big problem on our hands if they do not sort themselves out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i think sangat tv do a great job overall. they have pro khalistan views, they have given time to controversial topics, like grooming and genuinely help sikh families with health and advise.

I think upinder was bought in to be a normal topical presenter rather than a Sikhi parchaarak. I think this initial plan was a good idea to lure moderate sikhs to watch the channel on topical issues- and hopefully continue to watch for Gurbani.

I think the last few days were not planned at all.. and upinder became a reporter& parchaarak at the same time. I think hes a genuine guy, but hes cringe worthy comments just put me off big time.

I think a Sikhi based channel should preach Sikhi only, and Sikh principles. Upinder should stick to interviews and reports without doing parchaar. The parchaar should be only pro sikhi. otherwise he should join other "universal love" hippy type yoga channels.

I'm not against love and respect to everyone (who deserves it).. but this a Sikh channel and should always maintain a pro sikhi view.

Theres no need for us to justify our loyalty to this country. we gave 200'000 lives to give them freedom even after they had looted, raped and hung our young brothers and split our beautiful punjab.

This man is OTT.. his message of love peace in EVERY single sentence is getting pathetic. Deol is jumping on bandwagon.. for her she had no choice.. either join sangat or join in with the looters.. silly unemployed turd!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with you here SarabhaPanjab, good points. They need to maintan a balance between westernised Sikhs and the more religious Sikhs, if that balance is not reached properly it can turn off alot of viewers. And it should be only a channel that is addressing Sikh issues. I dont want the channel to be hijacked to promote faiths or extremist viewpoints of some Sikhs. These kind of people will make people turn off. A balanced approach is needed some kids or uneducated people do not have the braincells to comprehend what that means and so try to bash anything they see on sangatTV as anti-sikh and must be shut down. You got liberal extremist Sikhs like Bobby friction threatnening to report that channel to ofcom and you got right wing extremists in here telling us to boycott the channel. Daft people alround, we need more balanced people to give people a chance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You comments would be correct if it weren't for Muslay blowing each other up everyday.

May be i am wrong because my only source to whats going in other communities is newspaper and tv but I havent seen any muslim abusing other muslims on the bases of quran muhamad namaz or daily routine. Nor i have seen them in news telling each other to boycott certain groups due to on any religious issue.

But in todays news paper i read panthic morcha calling sant samaj golak choors and sant samaj calling panthic morcha as congress planted agents in sgpc polls.

anyways i dont want to hijack this thread i have no idea what sangat tv is just heard it a couple of times that to on this forum only

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was searching igurbani.com which gives correct pronunciation of Gurbani. I can’t remember all of it at once. I guess it relies on more practice, like more Sehaj Paths. The meaning becomes clearer. I have noticed slight variants in it. This could be because it’s written in old Punjabi.  
    • Veer Manpreet Singh, a lay preacher, claims that -Sikhs aren't supposed to worship Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We are only supposed to worship God as is written in Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We only "revere" Guru Granth Sahib ji.     He says a lot of other things in this video, some are good refutations of Hindu superstitions, but the reformers often go too far. Anyways, what he is saying about not worshipping Guru Granth Sahib ji is totally wrong. The reason is Guru Granth Sahib ji is Guru. Guru is Satguru. Satguru is God. We worship God. Therefore, we also worship Satguru (Guru Granth Sahib ji).   There are innumerable verses in Gurbani equating God and Guru. ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਗੁਰੁ ਡੁਬਦਾ ਲਏ ਤਰਾਇ ॥੨॥ The Guru is the Supreme Lord and the Transcendent Master. The Guru floats (saves) the drowning one. p49   ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਏਕੋ ਜਾਣੁ ॥ Know the Guru and God as One. p864   ਗੁਰ ਨਾਲਿ ਤੁਲਿ ਨ ਲਗਈ ਖੋਜਿ ਡਿਠਾ ਬ੍ਰਹਮੰਡੁ ॥ There is no one at par with the Guru. I have searched and seen the whole universe. p49 (If the Guru is the greatest in the whole universe, shouldn't we worship the Guru?)   I'd like to ask Manpreet Singh what is worship? Any reasonable definition would include obeisance, remembrance, and praise. Those are exactly the same things Gurbani says to do regarding Guru! Remembrance and obeisance: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੁ ਅਪਨਾ ਸਦ ਸਦਾ ਸਮ੍ਹਾਰੇ ॥ Ever, ever, I think of the True Guru, ਗੁਰ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਕੇਸ ਸੰਗਿ ਝਾਰੇ ॥੧॥ and the Guru's feet I brush with my head's hair. p387   Praise: ਗੁਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਆਪਿ ॥ The Guru himself is the transcendent Lord and the supreme master. ਆਠ ਪਹਰ ਨਾਨਕ ਗੁਰ ਜਾਪਿ ॥੪॥੧੬॥੬੭॥ Throughout the eight watches of the day, O Nanak meditate thou on the Guru. p387   In fact, Gurbani says the way to find God is to worship (puja) of Guru: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੂ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਧੋਇ ਧੋਇ ਪੂਜਹੁ ਇਨ ਬਿਧਿ ਮੇਰਾ ਹਰਿ ਪ੍ਰਭੁ ਲਹੁ ਰੇ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ Washing and bathing the True Guru's feet, worship thou them. In this way thou shall obtain my Lord Master. Pause. p1118   Could it be any clearer that we are to worship Guru ji?
    • Bro, reciting a shorter Chaupai Sahib is hardly "anti-Dasam". It's fine to argue that the longer Chaupai is more traditional, but the short one isn't anti-Dasam. That's like claiming shorter Rehras is anti-Guru Granth Sahib ji just because there are fewer selections from Guru Granth Sahib. It might not be traditional, but it's not anti-Guru Granth Sahib. I prefer the longer versions, but let's not exaggerate. Every tradition has a slightly different Rehras version. Nanaksar vs Taksal vs Nihangs and so on. The basic template for Rehras is at the beginning of Guru Granth Sahib ji. Later, Chaupai Sahib was added and Anand Sahib always follows as the end of a process. Then some sangats added more saloks to start Rehras and others were added at the end. Some additional selections from Dasam Bani were also added, but it wasn't the same ones for every sangat. The important thing is to not hate on each other for these variations.
    • Umm, so you're upset that this jatha did Chaupai the same way it's being done at Harimandar Sahib for 100 years? Shouldn't you be upset at the manager of Darbar Sahib? I'm not saying that Sikhs who are aware of certain issues shouldn't do the longer Chaupai, but there are only so many battles you can fight. Instead of calling some jatha traitors because they're doing the (for better or worse) "standard" Chauapai published by the SGPC, it would be better to change things from the central point. You can't fault the average Sikh for picking up the average Gutka and doing paath.
    • It's the same here in Toronto. Alot of the gudwaras here are political orientated and get tons of funding from the government-probably want them stay hush hush with all the BS that has been happening with India.  These guys are skewing gurbani. A complaint was sent to a ragi singh a couple of days ago in regards to a hukamnama. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use