Jump to content

Darshan Of Hanuman Ji To Gursikhs


alias
 Share

Recommended Posts

does anyone know stories of gursikhs that have been given darshan of hanuman ji? iv heard of guruji giving ganesh darsan to ppl who are sikhs, but this darhan was given as a punishment i.e. to punish this gursikh, they were given darshan of ganesh.

perhaps the same with hanumaan?

would be happy with thoughts / >contributions<.

n please, try not to laf too much :p it is a serious q.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

alias ji

As far as darshan is concerned, Gurmat preaches seeking darshan of Akal Purakh. Darshan of other avtars is not the goal of a Gursikh. I feel that the highest darshan is that of nirgun saroop of Akal Purakh. Through meditation on Gurbani and Naam one can achieve darshan of Akal Purakh. Maybe through meditation Gursikhs have had darshan of other avtars, prophets etc. However a Gursikh will not focus on these and continue to do bhagti to get darshan of their preetam piare . Only darshan of supreme avtar, supreme prophet, sri Akal Purakh can quench the thirst of a Gursikh.

Waheguru Ji Ka Khalsa Waheguru Ji Ki Fateh

This is very, very true.

Our darshan should be the dust of the feet of Akaal Purakh's saints to realize Waheguru.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^^^^ hehe :angrymonkey:

yes, thas standard. darshan of akaal purakh is what we want. but, i have heard (from our akj sangat) that there was one gursikh (known well in the back in the day sangat) that got dashan of ganesh for some reason or other as a punishment.

im not saying that we should strive for the devis.. : /

im talking about punishment.

anyone know bout this specifically re the devis? ganesh hanuman raam krishna, seeta, anyone?

and thanks HDSH :happybouncer:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Darshan of any kind of positive spiritual entities, is a consequence of gathering and concentrating the consciousness, and then elevating it to higher levels in the inner realms . They(spiritual positive entities) may appear to us, but that is not so important. And moreover, darshan of any of these entities can never ever be called punisment. Punishments or curses cause pain and suffering, can cover us with agyanta, but to these darshans we can never call it a punishment. It is like, as if one is in darkness, and one aims to see the Sun, but by any reason instead of seeing the Sun first, one sees the light of a lamp, or of a bulb of 100 watts lit on, or the light of the stars or moon on a dark night... though one´s aim is to see the Sunlight, but seeing these dim lights is better, than to be in total darkness, there is no harm in it... but then, one has not got to be attracted by them, rather one should be firm in his/her resolution, that I have to reach my goal, which is none other than Wahiguru Akal Purukh.

These experiences of darshans of these lower entities than Satpurush, only show us that we are heading in the right direction, towards Wahiguru, that we are on the right track and thus sholud not give any importance more than that, but just as an encouraging evidence or proof.

Wahiguru is important, and we should be so much absorbed in Him(through spiritual practice), that no other entity may dare even to come in front of us to distract us, even for a fraction of a second; by saying to itself, that this soul is a real lover of Him(Akal Purukh), just as I am of Ram( in this case of Hanuman),so it should not be disturbed at all, not even by thought, rather, given any possible aid until it reaches it goal( Satnam).

Wahiguru ki fateh.

P.S: maybe at some time in the past,the individual had a unconsciouss desire or some thoughts of these so called "gods", that is why Hanuman ji appeared.... or it can also be possible, that rather, when one is on the way to our supreme Father Wahiguru, these so called gods, devis or devtas, come to have the darshan of that wadbhagee soul, and wish it all the best, as they themselves can not go further then where they are located, until they reap thier good karmas there, and come down to earth and be born in a human form, only then, can they try to go and merge in Wahiguru, this privilege of merging in Satnam is only granted to humans, that is why, this human form is called the top of creation.

And even then in the human form, only those wadbhagees marked by Wahiguru on their foreheads or written in their destiny, come to love Him, believe in Him, and do all their best to merge in Him as soon as possible. It is all His utter grace, humans by themselves are powerless and uncapable, in this particular matter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When once begins to reach higher stages of spirituality, other avataars and devtaa's come to get such a gursikh's darshan.

True. I have also heard that when a GurSikh does Simran for hours a day. Slowly as his spiritual level goes higher he starts to have spiritual experiences like remembering his past lives, nowing future events and even having darshan of avtars. Some Gursikhs get very impressed with these spiritual experiences that they get stuck and don't go higher. But the ones who try to stay unimpressed experience even higher spiritual levels.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was searching igurbani.com which gives correct pronunciation of Gurbani. I can’t remember all of it at once. I guess it relies on more practice, like more Sehaj Paths. The meaning becomes clearer. I have noticed slight variants in it. This could be because it’s written in old Punjabi.  
    • Veer Manpreet Singh, a lay preacher, claims that -Sikhs aren't supposed to worship Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We are only supposed to worship God as is written in Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We only "revere" Guru Granth Sahib ji.     He says a lot of other things in this video, some are good refutations of Hindu superstitions, but the reformers often go too far. Anyways, what he is saying about not worshipping Guru Granth Sahib ji is totally wrong. The reason is Guru Granth Sahib ji is Guru. Guru is Satguru. Satguru is God. We worship God. Therefore, we also worship Satguru (Guru Granth Sahib ji).   There are innumerable verses in Gurbani equating God and Guru. ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਗੁਰੁ ਡੁਬਦਾ ਲਏ ਤਰਾਇ ॥੨॥ The Guru is the Supreme Lord and the Transcendent Master. The Guru floats (saves) the drowning one. p49   ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਏਕੋ ਜਾਣੁ ॥ Know the Guru and God as One. p864   ਗੁਰ ਨਾਲਿ ਤੁਲਿ ਨ ਲਗਈ ਖੋਜਿ ਡਿਠਾ ਬ੍ਰਹਮੰਡੁ ॥ There is no one at par with the Guru. I have searched and seen the whole universe. p49 (If the Guru is the greatest in the whole universe, shouldn't we worship the Guru?)   I'd like to ask Manpreet Singh what is worship? Any reasonable definition would include obeisance, remembrance, and praise. Those are exactly the same things Gurbani says to do regarding Guru! Remembrance and obeisance: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੁ ਅਪਨਾ ਸਦ ਸਦਾ ਸਮ੍ਹਾਰੇ ॥ Ever, ever, I think of the True Guru, ਗੁਰ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਕੇਸ ਸੰਗਿ ਝਾਰੇ ॥੧॥ and the Guru's feet I brush with my head's hair. p387   Praise: ਗੁਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਆਪਿ ॥ The Guru himself is the transcendent Lord and the supreme master. ਆਠ ਪਹਰ ਨਾਨਕ ਗੁਰ ਜਾਪਿ ॥੪॥੧੬॥੬੭॥ Throughout the eight watches of the day, O Nanak meditate thou on the Guru. p387   In fact, Gurbani says the way to find God is to worship (puja) of Guru: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੂ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਧੋਇ ਧੋਇ ਪੂਜਹੁ ਇਨ ਬਿਧਿ ਮੇਰਾ ਹਰਿ ਪ੍ਰਭੁ ਲਹੁ ਰੇ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ Washing and bathing the True Guru's feet, worship thou them. In this way thou shall obtain my Lord Master. Pause. p1118   Could it be any clearer that we are to worship Guru ji?
    • Bro, reciting a shorter Chaupai Sahib is hardly "anti-Dasam". It's fine to argue that the longer Chaupai is more traditional, but the short one isn't anti-Dasam. That's like claiming shorter Rehras is anti-Guru Granth Sahib ji just because there are fewer selections from Guru Granth Sahib. It might not be traditional, but it's not anti-Guru Granth Sahib. I prefer the longer versions, but let's not exaggerate. Every tradition has a slightly different Rehras version. Nanaksar vs Taksal vs Nihangs and so on. The basic template for Rehras is at the beginning of Guru Granth Sahib ji. Later, Chaupai Sahib was added and Anand Sahib always follows as the end of a process. Then some sangats added more saloks to start Rehras and others were added at the end. Some additional selections from Dasam Bani were also added, but it wasn't the same ones for every sangat. The important thing is to not hate on each other for these variations.
    • Umm, so you're upset that this jatha did Chaupai the same way it's being done at Harimandar Sahib for 100 years? Shouldn't you be upset at the manager of Darbar Sahib? I'm not saying that Sikhs who are aware of certain issues shouldn't do the longer Chaupai, but there are only so many battles you can fight. Instead of calling some jatha traitors because they're doing the (for better or worse) "standard" Chauapai published by the SGPC, it would be better to change things from the central point. You can't fault the average Sikh for picking up the average Gutka and doing paath.
    • It's the same here in Toronto. Alot of the gudwaras here are political orientated and get tons of funding from the government-probably want them stay hush hush with all the BS that has been happening with India.  These guys are skewing gurbani. A complaint was sent to a ragi singh a couple of days ago in regards to a hukamnama. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use