Jump to content

Does Mukti Or Sachkhand Only Available To Sikhs?


mirror
 Share

Recommended Posts

Mirror Veerji, you are correct from one side but this Shabad can be compare to Our Guru Sahibaan's Life also

what was Bhai Lehna ji before receiving Guruship from Guru Nanak Dev ji. What was Guru Ramdas before receiving Guruship from Guru Amardas ji. if we read Suraj Prakash granth, we can find infinte examples How from Guru Nanak dev ji till SGGSji ...TESTS were conducted before passing Guruship to another.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think You are taking it very Personal here veerji. I never wanted to offend you.

Its your destiny and luck if you do not want to read the ebook of sant mahapursh. I just wanted to tell that it will give more insight detailed Information of Bhagats with GURBANI quotes

Har Har Jan Duee Ayk Hai(n) Bib Bichar Kachh Naahi

Why are you avoiding my simple request of a Gurmat action, for you to provide Gurbani for you claims? And this will be my last request, if not then its easy to see where your coming from.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is a common misconception that bhagats were Hindus or Muslims. Initially they were but eventually, they parted ways. Bhagat Kabir Ji was a disciple of Bhagat Ramanand Ji but later on he met Guru Nanak Dev Ji and received Naam. Even Hindu scholars like Raam Kumar Verma and Prof. Divedi affirm that Bhagat Ji was greatly influenced by a “Punjabi Sadhu” who was none other than Guru Sahib. Nihal Singh Soori wrote a detailed work on Bhagats in the beginning of 20th century.

All Janamsakhis confirm that Guru Sahib met Sheikh Farid Ji twice whose real name was Sheikh Ibrahim Farid Saani. Bhai Vir Singh in Guru Nanak Chamatkar on Page 250 states that it is Bani of Farid Saani included in Aad Guru Granth Sahib Ji and not of first Farid who was born in 12th century. Prof. Khaliq Nizami in his book on Bhagat Farid also advocated the same viewpoint. So it is not just Sikhs but even Hindu and Muslim scholars after careful study of the lives of the bhagats reach the conclusion that bhagats were influenced by Guru Sahibans which is clear from their own Bani.

Those who wish to study about Bhagats whose Bani is included in Aad Guru Granth Sahib Ji, please read the book Itihaas Guru Granth Sahib by Giani Gurdit Singh. Guru Rakha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is a common misconception that bhagats were Hindus or Muslims. Initially they were but eventually, they parted ways. Bhagat Kabir Ji was a disciple of Bhagat Ramanand Ji but later on he met Guru Nanak Dev Ji and received Naam. Even Hindu scholars like Raam Kumar Verma and Prof. Divedi affirm that Bhagat Ji was greatly influenced by a “Punjabi Sadhu” who was none other than Guru Sahib. Nihal Singh Soori wrote a detailed work on Bhagats in the beginning of 20th century.

All Janamsakhis confirm that Guru Sahib met Sheikh Farid Ji twice whose real name was Sheikh Ibrahim Farid Saani. Bhai Vir Singh in Guru Nanak Chamatkar on Page 250 states that it is Bani of Farid Saani included in Aad Guru Granth Sahib Ji and not of first Farid who was born in 12th century. Prof. Khaliq Nizami in his book on Bhagat Farid also advocated the same viewpoint. So it is not just Sikhs but even Hindu and Muslim scholars after careful study of the lives of the bhagats reach the conclusion that bhagats were influenced by Guru Sahibans which is clear from their own Bani.

Those who wish to study about Bhagats whose Bani is included in Aad Guru Granth Sahib Ji, please read the book Itihaas Guru Granth Sahib by Giani Gurdit Singh. Guru Rakha

Thank you veer. This refutes the claim that Gurbani is a collection of hymns of Hindu and Muslim saints, as proposed by many so-called scholars, both Sikh and non-Sikh.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 12 years later...
On 10/12/2011 at 2:16 PM, singh154 said:

I also agree with bhai mehtab singh ji as ultimately you must make up your own mind. However I have done a lot of research into this and what I will say is that Sant Isher Singh ji, Sant Nand singh ji, sant jagjit singh ji harokowale, a lot of taksaali elder singhs who have done sangat with taksaali mahapurakhs believe that you don't need to be a sikh to get to sachkand.

However reading bhai randhir singh ji's literature I've noticed that he only believes that amridari sikhs can reach sackhand. Therefore over the years I have noticed that majority of AKJ hold his views. Therefore you will notice that this subject can lead to a lot of arguments.

I think you should read as much literature as possible and then make your mind up. Remember read from many sources and then make your mind up.

Is there any katha or book that mentions those Mahapurkhs saying other faiths can reach sachkhand?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Yes Sachkhand and Oness with God is available for EVERYONE and ANYONE provided they do the right things according to their religious doctrines. 

I know some are... controversial scriptures in another religion. But nothing is controversial it's just how we humans depict them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Ik i'm a few (13) years late but basically: Get a single Mal-mal dastar (around 3-5 metres) and starch it. You just whisk 2 ladles of starch (Kershaw's, cornstarch or maida) with around 5 cups of water until it's completely smooth and mix it on low heat flame for around 20 mins until it goes clear and think like water. When this cools off, take a clean but damp turban and soak it into the starch and make sure you coat the whole dastar evenly You leave it out to hang dry in the sun/air. Once dry u can store it in a cool, dry place until you wanna tie it (for about 4 months) Take the dastar, sprinkle some water all throughout the turban to make it slightly wet and just soft enough to tie. Then you and another person hold the dastar at each end to make a stretched rectangle (two people holding one corner in each of their hands). Fold it in half width-wise 3 times. Tie the turban like this quite loosely. The starch will make it tighter as it dries BUT TIE IT STAIGHT ONTO YOUR HEAD. NO MINi-TURBAN BENEATH IT. JUST TIE YOUR FLATTENED JOORA ON TOP OF YOUR HEAD AND THE DASTAR DIRECTLY ON TOP Secure it with pins and wear it on your head until it has dried from the water you sprinkled before the pooni. After it has completely dried (give it around 3-4 hours just to make sure) you take it off your head DO NOT UNWRAP IT TAKE IT OFF IN IT'S SHAPE and the next time you need to wear you can just place it on your head over your flattened joora instead of tying this. You can do this for around 5 months after you first tied it until you have to ever tie it again.
    • I tie a Punjabi style dastar with starch. Why do people hate this so much? Once when I was tying my dastar my neck seized up and the apna doctor said staying in that position daily for more than 5 mins is dangerous. He recommended a starched pagg like his dad. And I respect my pagg more than my life. I put it on the top shelf of my cupboard whenever it isn't on my head, recite Waheguruji da naam whenever I am tying my joora, fifty and when i place the Dastar on my head and I mata thek and kiss  it before I do. And when I do tie it (every 4 months when the starch starts to weaken) I make sure that I pooni and tie it with much love and whilst reciting paath. I get that if someone treats their turban like a hat (eg: throwing it on the floor, cramping it or just disrespecting it) then this is unacceptable but just cos one puts their pagg on their head rather than tying it each time doesn't mean they treat it as such. (and let's be honest, starched or not we've all put our dad's pagg on our head like a hat when we were kids as a joke and meant no disrespect. Intention is everything). Ik Singhs who get angry tying their pagg and start doing maa/phen di gaaliyan, and when they take it off they just throw to the side and wait to tie it again next time. (Also, I'm from a Jat Sikh family so pls don't try to make this about "starched paggs are tarkhan/caste based" or anything stupid like that). PS: I do remember that stupidness in the 90s/early 2000s UK when Sikh men used to have a tiny starched paggs and were completely clean shaven or had a little goatee like Herbie Sahara/ Vijay from achanak. Now THAT was stupid and deserves all the hate but I just mean the concept of a starched dastar whether it's Punjabi Style, Kenyan style or whatever
    • Anyone know how to tie this turban? My Nani's dad tied it, it was starched but i can't work out whether the pooni was kenyan orpunjabi (like folded or an actual pooni). This was very common before partition, and uses a single dastar (not double stitched). Is it js Kenyan pagg with a higher larr?
    • It doesn't matter. What the nihangs did 100 years ago has no relevance today. Because people fight differently now. As a karate black belt, 90% of what we learn is useless, cos it revolves around how people fought 100 years ago. Today, most teenage boys likely to cause fights (at least in the uk) do boxing. But when boxing was really popular, people used to throw punches, hence why the "man to man fist fight" image was there. But now that UFC is popular, people do all sorts like grappling, knees and all (even with no training).  And also, I highly doubt anyone ever attacked a nihang Singh unarmed back then, just by seeing their saroop with shastaraan. What they did do, however, was Loh Mushti but that was more of a sport than a combat system. They definitely would have trained in basic fighting like wrestling and strikes but not a system. Because any good fighter knows that trying to find a "code" to fight by is stupid. But in terms of unarmed fighting, it was rare and probably revolved around disarming an armed attacker (do NOT even attemp to learn that, you will get killed and there's no point even trying to learn).   If you're interested for historical/ preservation purposed then great, but if you want to learn it for self defense or fighting tactics then pls don't, because what worked then won't work now and Nihangs were probably quite limited in hand to hand combat training cos they're armed to the teeth, deterring any unarmed attacker and killing one if they tried to fight
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use