Jump to content

** Boycott Prof Sarbjit Dhunda - Sri Akaal Takht Sahib Aadesh**


Recommended Posts

Sangat should find an independent company, who can analyze the voice of the person who is doing beadbi of Sri Jaap Sahib in the video and see if that matches up with regular dhunda's audio/video (we all know that it will). Then send the result to Sri Akal Takht Sahib and call him to Takht and find out what he has to say. That alone will clear the shanka that some missionary followers in the west.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you look at the video of Jathedhar ji, you see people disliking it. Please support the video and "like it" before it gets flagged. Also he himself may not be perfect but we still have to respect the jathedhar.

His backers will do their best to take this off and insult jathedar. Jathedar sahib has done what should have been done

by him long time before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you look at the video of Jathedhar ji, you see people disliking it. Please support the video and "like it" before it gets flagged. Also he himself may not be perfect but we still have to respect the jathedhar.

agree. please press the like button on that video. Plus if you can also add a comment supporting the Jathadar please. These Kala Afghanis are already disliking this vid and also posting bad comments.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please post comments on youtube in favour of jathedar's action and combat the kala afghni elements who are rushing

and posting in favour of dhundha.

link

Also please phone sell out khalistanis that are controlling Gurudwara dashmesh darbar and are bent upon in continuing

entertaining dhundha by providing Guru ghar platform to him inspite of akal takhat verdict.

Akal takhat has called dhundha as "akhauti preacher" and that is the right term for him.Dhundha does no preaching

and only spreads hate towards sikh scriptures and traditions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is the original video where Sarbjit Dhunda insults Sri Darbar Sahib. Forward the video to 17:00 minutes to listen to the beginning of the episode. But forward to 18:40 minutes where Sarbjit dhunda directly insults Sri Darbar Sahib. The video that includes just the insult has not been altered one bit. That video presents the insult to the Sikh sangat all over the world. the original video is more than an hour long. It is obvious in such a long video, only the insult would be presented as that is the main reason for making the video. No altering has been done, this becomes very clear once you watch the original video. These nastik people are trying to make up excuses for their insults toward our Sikh institutions and our Gurus Bani.

Do not listen to this preacher as Sri Akal Takht Sahib has ordered us. If you do, then before Sri Vaheguru Ji Maharaj, you will be questioned on why you didn't listen to Sri Akal Takht Sahib. Rehat is more dear to Satguru Sri Guru Gobind Singh Sahib ji Maharaj than the Sikh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sangat should find an independent company, who can analysize the voice of the person who is doing beadbi of Sri Jaap Sahib in the video and see if that matches up with regular dhunda's audio/video (we all know that it will). Then send the result to Sri Akal Takht Sahib and call him to Takht and find out what he has to say. That alone will clear the shanka that some missionary followers in the west.

A simple logic would be more than enough to implicate Dhunda. What are the odds that Dhunda's financier, Jeonwala's Singh Sabha Canada (which made that video) has another anti-Sikh pracharak in its pocket, who sounds exactly like Dhunda but has never appeared anywhere else apart from that video!

Yes but if one wants to file a court case against Dhunda for blasphemy then a more technical proof could be gathered.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dashmesh Darbar Gurudwara *edited* are taking a stand against Akal takhat Hukamnama. They are committing a double crime. To entertain a so called anti sikh preacher *edited* is a fraud with sikh sangat.This shows that these people have anti sikh agenda wherein they are entertaining a person who propagates against sikh scriptures, sikh history and traditions.

When akal takhat takes on this heretic self styled preacher, *edited* dashmesh darbar, surrey deliberately confronts akal takhat. This unbares these thugs. They are the ones who call Harjinder dilgeer and other anti sikh historians to their Gurudawara. It is time such fake khalistanis are exposed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In a democratic way, I want to ask just 1 question to Mr. Dhundha - Which Raagi have done Ucharan of which Rachna (Baani) which according to him "Veshvaavan nun vi maat paaundi hai". Does he has a record of what has been ucharan? Which raagi did ucharan of that? I hear Gurbaani from Darbaar Sahib Amritsar, approx. 3-4 hours a day, I would like to hear his response, as I always hear Nirol Keertan from Amritsar Sahib, no Kachchi Baani at all. Dasam Granth as well - most of the recited baani is from Akal Ustaat, some shabad's from Swayee Sahib. Even if he is from the gang not endorsing to Dasam Granth, can he still provide response as to which Baani/Pankti he is referring to??? Quite insulting ...

OR is that - he got carried away because he got little publicity which has given him sufficient HAUME (Arrogance) to speak anything derogatory against anybody.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Singhs kaurs here, please phone Dashmesh darbar committee members and ask them why they are entertaining Dhunda despite the fact he had insulted Darbar Sahib's kirtan. What kind of Khalistanis are they?

These Khalistanis uncles in the west are a disgrace. They have betrayed the cause of Sant Jarnail Singh Bhindranwalay and the thousands of Shaheeds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Ik i'm a few (13) years late but basically: Get a single Mal-mal dastar (around 3-5 metres) and starch it. You just whisk 2 ladles of starch (Kershaw's, cornstarch or maida) with around 5 cups of water until it's completely smooth and mix it on low heat flame for around 20 mins until it goes clear and think like water. When this cools off, take a clean but damp turban and soak it into the starch and make sure you coat the whole dastar evenly You leave it out to hang dry in the sun/air. Once dry u can store it in a cool, dry place until you wanna tie it (for about 4 months) Take the dastar, sprinkle some water all throughout the turban to make it slightly wet and just soft enough to tie. Then you and another person hold the dastar at each end to make a stretched rectangle (two people holding one corner in each of their hands). Fold it in half width-wise 3 times. Tie the turban like this quite loosely. The starch will make it tighter as it dries BUT TIE IT STAIGHT ONTO YOUR HEAD. NO MINi-TURBAN BENEATH IT. JUST TIE YOUR FLATTENED JOORA ON TOP OF YOUR HEAD AND THE DASTAR DIRECTLY ON TOP Secure it with pins and wear it on your head until it has dried from the water you sprinkled before the pooni. After it has completely dried (give it around 3-4 hours just to make sure) you take it off your head DO NOT UNWRAP IT TAKE IT OFF IN IT'S SHAPE and the next time you need to wear you can just place it on your head over your flattened joora instead of tying this. You can do this for around 5 months after you first tied it until you have to ever tie it again.
    • I tie a Punjabi style dastar with starch. Why do people hate this so much? Once when I was tying my dastar my neck seized up and the apna doctor said staying in that position daily for more than 5 mins is dangerous. He recommended a starched pagg like his dad. And I respect my pagg more than my life. I put it on the top shelf of my cupboard whenever it isn't on my head, recite Waheguruji da naam whenever I am tying my joora, fifty and when i place the Dastar on my head and I mata thek and kiss  it before I do. And when I do tie it (every 4 months when the starch starts to weaken) I make sure that I pooni and tie it with much love and whilst reciting paath. I get that if someone treats their turban like a hat (eg: throwing it on the floor, cramping it or just disrespecting it) then this is unacceptable but just cos one puts their pagg on their head rather than tying it each time doesn't mean they treat it as such. (and let's be honest, starched or not we've all put our dad's pagg on our head like a hat when we were kids as a joke and meant no disrespect. Intention is everything). Ik Singhs who get angry tying their pagg and start doing maa/phen di gaaliyan, and when they take it off they just throw to the side and wait to tie it again next time. (Also, I'm from a Jat Sikh family so pls don't try to make this about "starched paggs are tarkhan/caste based" or anything stupid like that). PS: I do remember that stupidness in the 90s/early 2000s UK when Sikh men used to have a tiny starched paggs and were completely clean shaven or had a little goatee like Herbie Sahara/ Vijay from achanak. Now THAT was stupid and deserves all the hate but I just mean the concept of a starched dastar whether it's Punjabi Style, Kenyan style or whatever
    • Anyone know how to tie this turban? My Nani's dad tied it, it was starched but i can't work out whether the pooni was kenyan orpunjabi (like folded or an actual pooni). This was very common before partition, and uses a single dastar (not double stitched). Is it js Kenyan pagg with a higher larr?
    • It doesn't matter. What the nihangs did 100 years ago has no relevance today. Because people fight differently now. As a karate black belt, 90% of what we learn is useless, cos it revolves around how people fought 100 years ago. Today, most teenage boys likely to cause fights (at least in the uk) do boxing. But when boxing was really popular, people used to throw punches, hence why the "man to man fist fight" image was there. But now that UFC is popular, people do all sorts like grappling, knees and all (even with no training).  And also, I highly doubt anyone ever attacked a nihang Singh unarmed back then, just by seeing their saroop with shastaraan. What they did do, however, was Loh Mushti but that was more of a sport than a combat system. They definitely would have trained in basic fighting like wrestling and strikes but not a system. Because any good fighter knows that trying to find a "code" to fight by is stupid. But in terms of unarmed fighting, it was rare and probably revolved around disarming an armed attacker (do NOT even attemp to learn that, you will get killed and there's no point even trying to learn).   If you're interested for historical/ preservation purposed then great, but if you want to learn it for self defense or fighting tactics then pls don't, because what worked then won't work now and Nihangs were probably quite limited in hand to hand combat training cos they're armed to the teeth, deterring any unarmed attacker and killing one if they tried to fight
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use