Jump to content

SGPC and RSS published a book full with disrespect of Sikh Guru Sahib's and false history


Recommended Posts

If that is the case then didn't they read and agree with the translations before publishing?

I'm sorry about the constant editting, Bhaji.

The reason why I removed this bit is because I realised that the book isn't really the issue anymore (still waiting to find out whether it's still in market or not)...but that why had Day and Night news uploaded an old video to spark the issue now? After the apologies etc. are done....

This actually is a dead issue in India.

No wonder Sangat tv hasn't ever broadcast this interview because it's even before they started re-broadcasting Day and Night new's broadcasts!!

It seems the couple of users like Dasamsarblohgranth who had guessed that it was all about politics were right all along!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If that is the case then didn't they read and agree with the translations before publishing?

This is an area which needs addressing. Not so long ago, Kala afghana wrote a book and sent it to Sri Akal Takht Sahib for approval. Vedanti without reading it, signed it, and hey presto! Kala-afghana publishes the book, causes uproar, and then Sri Akal Takht Sahib take action against him, but then he plays his ace. Vedantis signature and approval of content. Then Vedanti admitted he hadnt even read the book. DOH!

Any books that come to Sri Akal Takht Sahib, should be either vetted by a committee, to speed things up, or the author given a timeframe of when he can expect a reply.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A meeting was also held at Akal Takht Sahib about the controversy that has been stirred by the book. The panel of five Singh Sahibs has asked the SGPC to provide details about the publication of the book in full detail within seven days. Decisions on this issue have been delayed until the report is submitted to Akal Takht Sahib.

This was on 7-9-2007.

What action did SGPC take to ban this book and what action was taken against the authors?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From Facebook:

Joseph Davey Cunningham wrote History of the Sikhs in 1848.
Many Sikh Scholars and Historians praise Him for this act of His. And take His name with Respect for writing History.
BUT when This History written by Him is TRANSLATED WORD-TO-WORD in Hindi (Book Sikh Itihaas) , it is an issue and probably conspiracy of RSS.....Dhan Guru Ke Sikh.

NOTE - Cunningham's book was translated word to word in 1998 and published in March 1999 , but due to Blashpemy it contains, it was Banned and Recalled by SGPC.

Not everything is RSS Singho.....

Read for urself what JD Cunningham writes about Guru Sahib (And Still Sikhs praise Him)!

http://www.facebook.com/kamaljeet.shaheedsar/posts/10200738382519199

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cunninghams first hand observations of the Sikhs, their religious practices and the Sikh rule,can be taken as accurate,as he wrote on what he saw himself, but he along with the early western writers of earlier Sikh history, based their history on the muslim and hindu versions of history, as the Sikhs were not so forthcoming in meticulous documentation of their history.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That thug Baldev sirsa was raising a dead issue. The book was published under guidance of missionary dilgeer when he was incharge of sikh reference library and Tohra was president of SGPC.

So beware of agents like Baldev sirsa who was raising this issue inspite of prior knowledge that book is already banned. Even Darshan Ragi's website that displayed the video wrote that Baldev sirsa was lying. Where is the credibility of this congress puppet channel and supposed to be sikh leader lying nakedly and misleading sikh sangat. Shame on such characters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Open your ears and listen to the video posted by the OP and then check for yourself if S Baldev Singh raised this issue with Akal Takht Sahib or not?

This is the sorry state of affairs of today's so called Sikhs who instead of protesting as one against this insult to our Gurus find suspicians in intentions

of those who raise these issues.

Did you open ears to hear the false propaganda by dummies making an issue when it was settled years before?

If not pl read this

http://www.punjabspectrum.com/2013/03/2084

ਮਾਮਲਾ ਗੁਰੂ ਸਹਿਬਾਨ ਬਾਰੇ ਭੱਦੀ ਸ਼ਬਦਾਵਲੀ ਵਾਲੀ "ਸਿੱਖ ਇਤਿਹਾਸ" ਨਾਮਕ ਕਿਤਾਬ ਦਾ - ਪੰਚ ਪ੍ਰਧਾਨੀ ਆਗੂ ਅਨੁਸਾਰ ਡਾ. ਦਿਲਗੀਰ ਦੀ ਸਾਜਿਸ਼

sujjon.jpg

ਅੰਮ੍ਰਿਤਸਰ
- (19 ਮਾਰਚ)
- ਸ਼੍ਰੋਮਣੀ ਗੁਰਦਵਾਰਾ ਪ੍ਰਬੰਧਕ ਕਮੇਟੀ ਵਲੋਂ ਛਪਵਾਈ ਗਈ
"
ਸਿੱਖ ਇਤਿਹਾਸ
"
ਕਿਤਾਬ ਵਿੱਚ ਗੁਰੂਆਂ ਖਿਲਾਫ ਇੰਨੀ ਭੱਦੀ ਸ਼ਬਦਾਬਲੀ ਲਿਖੀ ਗਈ ਹੈ ਕਿ ਕੋਈ ਸਿੱਖ ਇਸ ਨੂੰ ਪੜ
ਵੀ ਨਹੀਂ ਸਕਦਾ। ਇਸ ਕਿਤਾਬ ਨੂੰ ਐਪਰੈਲ 1999 ਵਿੱਚ ਛਾਪਿਆ ਗਿਆ ਸੀ ਅਤੇ ਅਕਾਲੀ ਦਲ ਪੰਚ ਪ੍ਰਧਾਨੀ ਦੇ ਆਗੂ ਭਾਈ ਬਲਦੇਵ ਸਿੰਘ ਸਿਰਸਾ ਨੇ ਇਸ ਖਿਲਾਫ ਅਵਾਜ ਬਲੰਦ ਕਰਕੇ ਇਸ ਨੂੰ ਛਾਪਣ ਦੇ ਦੋਸ਼ ਵਿੱਚ ਸ਼੍ਰੋਮਣੀ ਕਮੇਟੀ ਨੂੰ ਅਦਲਾਤ ਵਿੱਚ ਘਸੀਟਣ ਦੀ ਅਰੰਭਤਾ ਕੀਤੀ ਹੈ,ਜਦ ਇਸ ਬਾਰ ਪੂਰੀ ਖੋਜ ਕੀਤੀ ਤਾਂ ਜੋ ਅਸਲੀਅਤ ਸਾਹਮਣੇ ਆਈ ਉਸਦਾ ਦਾ ਖੁਲਾਸਾ ਅਕਾਲੀ ਦਲ ਪੰਚ ਪ੍ਰਧਾਨੀ ਦੇ ਆਗੂ ਭਾਈ ਚਰਨਜੀਤ ਸਿੰਘ ਸੁੱਜੋਂ,
ਭਾਈ ਮਨਵੀਰ ਸਿੰਘ ਅਤੇ ਭਾਈ ਹਰਜੀਤ ਸਿੰਘ ਵਲੋਂ ਅੱਜ ਅੰਮ੍ਰਿਤਸਰ ਵਿਖੇ ਕੀਤਾ ਗਿਆ।

dilgeer1.jpg

ਇਹਨਾਂ ਸਿੱਖ ਆਗੂਆਂ ਨੇ ਇਸ ਕਿਤਾਬ ਪਿੱਛੇ ਇਤਿਹਾਸਕਾਰ ਡਾ
.
ਹਰਜਿੰਦਰ ਸਿੰਘ ਦਿਲਜੀਰ ਨੂੰ ਸਾਜਿਸ਼ਕਾਰੀ ਦੱਸਿਆ। ਇਹਨਾਂ ਨੇ ਦਾਅਵਾ ਕੀਤਾ ਕਿ ਦਿਲਗੀਰ ਸ਼੍ਰੋਮਣੀ ਕਮੇਟੀ ਦੇ ਰਿਸਰਚ ਬੋਰਡ ਦਾ ਡਾਇਰੈਕਟਰ ਸੀ ਅਤੇ ਇਹ ਅਹੁਦਾ ਇਸ ਨੇ ਜਥੇਦਾਰ ਗੁਰਚਰਨ ਸਿੰਘ ਟੌਹੜਾ ਨੂੰ ਪਿਤਾ ਬਣਾ ਕੇ ਪ੍ਰਾਪਤ ਕੀਤਾ ਸੀ।
ਇਸ ਗੱਲ ਦਾ ਸਬੂਤ ਇਹ ਹੈ ਕਿ ਇਹ ਜਦੋਂ ਵੀ ਇੰਗਲੈਂਡ ਤੋਂ ਉਸ ਨੂੰ ਫੋਨ ਕਰਦਾ ਸੀ
,
ਤਾਂ ਪਿਤਾ ਜੀ ਆਖ ਹੀ ਸੰਬੋਧਨ ਕਰਿਆ ਕਰਦਾ ਸੀ। ਇਸ ਦੀਆਂ ਇਹ ਗੱਲਾਂ ਇੰਗਲੈਂਡ ਦੀ ਇੱਕ ਅਖਬਾਰ ਕੋਲ ਰਿਕਾਰਡ ਵੀ ਹਨ
,
ਜਿਹਨਾਂ ਵਿੱਚ ਇਹ ਟੌਹੜੇ ਨੂੰ ਪਿਤਾ ਜੀ,
ਬਾਪੂ ਜੀ ਆਖਦਾ ਹੈ। ਡਾਇਰੈਕਟਰ ਹੁੰਦਿਆਂ ਇਸ ਨੇ ਸ਼੍ਰੋਮਣੀ ਕਮੇਟੀ ਵਿੱਚ ਮੌਜੂਦ ਸਿੱਖ ਇਤਿਹਾਸ ਦੇ ਲਿਟਰੇਚਰ ਨੂੰ ਚੋਰੀ ਕਰ ਲਿਆ ਅਤੇ ਹੋਰ ਕਈ ਅਜਿਹੀਆਂ ਹਰਕਤਾਂ ਕੀਤੀਆਂ।
ਜਿਸ ਕਰਕੇ ਸ੍ਰੋਮਣੀ ਕਮੇਟੀ ਨੇ ਇਸ ਨੂੰ ਬਰਤਰਫ ਕਰਨ ਲੱਗੀ ਸੀ
,
ਤਾਂ ਇਹ ਮਾਰਚ 1999 ਦੇ ਅਖੀਰ ਵਿੱਚ ਭੱਜ ਕੇ ਫੇਰ ਵਿਦੇਸ਼ ਚਲਾ ਗਿਆ। ਉਦੋਂ ਤੱਕ ਇਸ ਵਲੋਂ ਇਹ ਸਿੱਖ ਇਤਿਹਾਸ ਨਾਮ ਦੀ ਕਿਤਾਬ ਭਜਵਾਈ ਛਪਣ ਵਾਸਤੇ ਭਿਜਵਾਈ ਜਾ ਚੁੱਕੀ ਸੀ ਅਤੇ ਐਪਰੈਲ ਮਹੀਨੇ ਵਿੱਚ ਹੀ ਇਹ ਹਿੰਦੀ ਵਿੱਚ ਛਪ ਗਈ
,
ਜਿਸ ਨੂੰ ਦਿੱਲੀ ਅਤੇ ਹੋਰ ਰਾਜਾਂ ਵਿੱਚ ਵੱਡੀ ਗਿਣਤੀ ਵਿੱਚ ਵੰਡਿਆ ਗਿਆ।

ਇਸ ਕਿਤਾਬ ਵਿੱਚ ਗੁਰੁ ਤੇਗ ਬਹਾਦਰ ਜੀ ਨੂੰ ਚੋਰ ਲਿਖਿਆ ਗਿਆ ਹੈ ।ਗੁਰੂ ਅਰਜਨ ਦੇਵ ਜੀ ਦੀ ਸ਼ਹਾਦਤ ਬਾਰੇ ਲਿਖਿਆ ਹੈ ਕਿ ਉਸ ਨੇ ਆਤਮ ਹੱਤਿਆ ਕਰ ਲਈ ਸੀ ਅਤੇ ਬਾਅਦ ਹਰਗਬਿੰਦ ਜੀ ਆ ਗਿਆ, ਜੋ ਕਿ ਬਹੁਤ ਹੀ ਡਰਪੋਕ ਸੀ,
ਅਰਜਨ ਕੇ ਮਰਨੇ ਕੇ ਬਾਅਦ ਹਰਗਬਿੰਦ ਦਾ ਦਿਮਾਗੀ ਸੰਤੁਲਨ ਖੋ ਗਿਆ। ਹਰਗਬਿੰਦ ਜਬ ਸੋਤਾ ਥਾ ਤੋ ਸਾਥ ਬੰਦੂਕਧਾਰੀ ਪਹਿਰੇ ਪੇ ਖੜੇ ਰਹਿਤੇ,
ਹਰ ਰਾਏ ਕੇ ਦੋ ਬੇਟੇ ਥੇ,
ਵੱਡੇ ਬੇਟੇ ਕੀ ਉਮਰ 15 ਅਤੇ ਛੋਟੇ ਕੀ 6 ਸਾਲ ਥੀ।
ਵੱਡੇ ਬੇਟੇ ਕੋ ਗੱਦੀ ਇਸ ਲਈ ਨਹੀਂ ਦੀ ਕਿਉਂਕਿ ਵੋਹ ਨੌਕਰਾਣੀ ਕਾ ਬੇਟਾ ਥਾ”। ਇਸ ਕਿਤਾਬ ਵਿੱਚ ਅਜਿਹੀ ਹੋਰ ਵੀ ਬਹੁਤ ਦੁੱਖਦਾਈ ਗੱਲਾਂ ਹਨ ਜੋ ਗੁਰੁ ਸਾਹਿਬ ਜੀ ਦਾ ਰੱਜ ਕੇ ਅਪਮਾਨ ਕਰਦੀਆਂ ਹਨ।
ਭਾਈ ਸੁੱਜੋਂ ਨੇ ਕਿਹਾ ਕਿ ਦਿਲਗੀਰ ਨੇ ਆਪਣੀ ਬਕਵਾਸ ਰੂਪੀ ਤਵਾਰੀਖ ਵਿੱਚ ਵੀ ਗੁਰੁ ਅਰਜਨ ਦੇਵ ਜੀ ਦੀ ਸ਼ਹਾਦਤ ਦਾ ਰੱਜ ਕੇ ਅਪਮਾਨ ਕੀਤਾ ਹੈ । ਉਸ ਵਲੋਂ ਲਿਖੀ ਹੋਈ ਤਵਾਰੀਖ ਅਤੇ ਇਸ ਕਿਤਾਬ ਦੀ ਹਜਾਰਾਂ ਗੱਲਾਂ ਆਪਸ ਵਿੱਚ ਮਿਲਦੀਆਂ ਹਨ ।

ਜਾਣਕਾਰੀ
- ਸਾਨੂੰ ਮਿਲੀ ਜਾਣਕਾਰੀ ਮੁਤਾਬਕ ਇਹ ਕਿਤਾਬ ਉਦੋਂ ਹੀ ਬੈਨ ਕਰ ਦਿੱਤੀ ਗਈ ਸੀ। ਪਰ ਉਸ ਦਿਨ ਡੇ ਐਂਡ ਨਾਈਟ ਨਿਊਜ਼ ਤੇ ਭਾਈ ਸਿਰਸਾ ਦੀ ਇੰਟਰਵਿਊ ਦੇਖ ਕੇ ਇਸ ਤਰ੍ਹਾਂ ਨਹੀਂ ਲੱਗਦਾ। ਕਿਤਾਬ ਤੇ ਪਾਬੰਦੀ ਸੰਬੰਧੀ ਸਾਨੂੰ ਮਿਲੀ ਜਾਣਕਾਰੀ ਦਾ ਕੋਈ ਪੁਖਤਾ ਅਧਾਰ ਨਹੀਂ ਹੈ। ਕੋਈ ਵੀ ਵਿਅਕਤੀ ਇਸ ਵਾਰੇ ਆਪਣੀ ਜਾਣਕਾਰੀ ਸਾਂਝੀ ਕਰ ਸਕਦਾ ਹੈ। ਉਪਰੋਕਤ ਪ੍ਰੈਸ ਨੋਟ ਪੰਚ ਪ੍ਰਧਾਨੀ ਦੇ ਆਗੂ ਚਰਨਜੀਤ ਸਿੰਘ ਸੁਜੋਂ ਵਲੋਂ ਭੇਜਿਆ ਗਿਆ ਹੈ। ਇਸ ਸੰਬੰਧੀ ਸਾਰੀਆਂ ਧਿਰਾਂ ਦਾ ਵੀ ਵਿਚਾਰ ਭੇਜਣ ਲਈ ਹਮੇਸ਼ਾਂ ਸਵਾਗਤ ਹੈ।

Source: Punjab Spectrum

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cunninghams first hand observations of the Sikhs, their religious practices and the Sikh rule,can be taken as accurate,as he wrote on what he saw himself, but he along with the early western writers of earlier Sikh history, based their history on the muslim and hindu versions of history, as the Sikhs were not so forthcoming in meticulous documentation of their history.

Cunningham was dismissed from British service as he exposed the treachery of the Dogras and collusion with the British in getting the Sikhs defeated in the Anglo Sikh wars. He writes quite highly of the Sikhs and for years was the only Sikh history book. he was so shocked by his dismissal he died an early death.

As for the RSS , Brahmin matt is alive and well in the Punjab and increasing. So many educated people are going to Astrologers and watching Hocus Pocus TV programmes coming on Indian TV. Yet very few know of their religion or history. Most of the youth cannot even name the Guru Sahibs names but know all about the latest haircuts. Its time we went out and told the population about the Sikh religion, just as happened at the time of the Gurus when the Gurus sent missionaries out around the Punjab and India.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was searching igurbani.com which gives correct pronunciation of Gurbani. I can’t remember all of it at once. I guess it relies on more practice, like more Sehaj Paths. The meaning becomes clearer. I have noticed slight variants in it. This could be because it’s written in old Punjabi.  
    • Veer Manpreet Singh, a lay preacher, claims that -Sikhs aren't supposed to worship Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We are only supposed to worship God as is written in Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We only "revere" Guru Granth Sahib ji.     He says a lot of other things in this video, some are good refutations of Hindu superstitions, but the reformers often go too far. Anyways, what he is saying about not worshipping Guru Granth Sahib ji is totally wrong. The reason is Guru Granth Sahib ji is Guru. Guru is Satguru. Satguru is God. We worship God. Therefore, we also worship Satguru (Guru Granth Sahib ji).   There are innumerable verses in Gurbani equating God and Guru. ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਗੁਰੁ ਡੁਬਦਾ ਲਏ ਤਰਾਇ ॥੨॥ The Guru is the Supreme Lord and the Transcendent Master. The Guru floats (saves) the drowning one. p49   ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਏਕੋ ਜਾਣੁ ॥ Know the Guru and God as One. p864   ਗੁਰ ਨਾਲਿ ਤੁਲਿ ਨ ਲਗਈ ਖੋਜਿ ਡਿਠਾ ਬ੍ਰਹਮੰਡੁ ॥ There is no one at par with the Guru. I have searched and seen the whole universe. p49 (If the Guru is the greatest in the whole universe, shouldn't we worship the Guru?)   I'd like to ask Manpreet Singh what is worship? Any reasonable definition would include obeisance, remembrance, and praise. Those are exactly the same things Gurbani says to do regarding Guru! Remembrance and obeisance: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੁ ਅਪਨਾ ਸਦ ਸਦਾ ਸਮ੍ਹਾਰੇ ॥ Ever, ever, I think of the True Guru, ਗੁਰ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਕੇਸ ਸੰਗਿ ਝਾਰੇ ॥੧॥ and the Guru's feet I brush with my head's hair. p387   Praise: ਗੁਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਆਪਿ ॥ The Guru himself is the transcendent Lord and the supreme master. ਆਠ ਪਹਰ ਨਾਨਕ ਗੁਰ ਜਾਪਿ ॥੪॥੧੬॥੬੭॥ Throughout the eight watches of the day, O Nanak meditate thou on the Guru. p387   In fact, Gurbani says the way to find God is to worship (puja) of Guru: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੂ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਧੋਇ ਧੋਇ ਪੂਜਹੁ ਇਨ ਬਿਧਿ ਮੇਰਾ ਹਰਿ ਪ੍ਰਭੁ ਲਹੁ ਰੇ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ Washing and bathing the True Guru's feet, worship thou them. In this way thou shall obtain my Lord Master. Pause. p1118   Could it be any clearer that we are to worship Guru ji?
    • Bro, reciting a shorter Chaupai Sahib is hardly "anti-Dasam". It's fine to argue that the longer Chaupai is more traditional, but the short one isn't anti-Dasam. That's like claiming shorter Rehras is anti-Guru Granth Sahib ji just because there are fewer selections from Guru Granth Sahib. It might not be traditional, but it's not anti-Guru Granth Sahib. I prefer the longer versions, but let's not exaggerate. Every tradition has a slightly different Rehras version. Nanaksar vs Taksal vs Nihangs and so on. The basic template for Rehras is at the beginning of Guru Granth Sahib ji. Later, Chaupai Sahib was added and Anand Sahib always follows as the end of a process. Then some sangats added more saloks to start Rehras and others were added at the end. Some additional selections from Dasam Bani were also added, but it wasn't the same ones for every sangat. The important thing is to not hate on each other for these variations.
    • Umm, so you're upset that this jatha did Chaupai the same way it's being done at Harimandar Sahib for 100 years? Shouldn't you be upset at the manager of Darbar Sahib? I'm not saying that Sikhs who are aware of certain issues shouldn't do the longer Chaupai, but there are only so many battles you can fight. Instead of calling some jatha traitors because they're doing the (for better or worse) "standard" Chauapai published by the SGPC, it would be better to change things from the central point. You can't fault the average Sikh for picking up the average Gutka and doing paath.
    • It's the same here in Toronto. Alot of the gudwaras here are political orientated and get tons of funding from the government-probably want them stay hush hush with all the BS that has been happening with India.  These guys are skewing gurbani. A complaint was sent to a ragi singh a couple of days ago in regards to a hukamnama. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use