Jump to content

Question Bout Khalistan - Technicalities


Recommended Posts

^^^

Fair comment ...

Also a concern is who will run our Gurdwara outside of Khalistan ie in dehli Mumbia etc, as all Sikhs living in these cities will leave dehli and Mumbia and Move to Khalistan, and Hindu Punjabis will have to leave what was Punjab. what wil happen to their Mandirs ??

I guess a simple one is housing, the Sikhs who come from dehli and mumbia to live in Khalistan can have the houses that Hindu Punjabis have vacated and vicer versea.

Whether Delhi will be included in Khalistan or not (as suggested by JasSinghKhalsa) what's the guarantee that Sikhs living in the non-Khalistan parts of India will want to move to Khalistan? I can't imagine 100% of Sikhs in India who live outside Panjab will give up their livelihoods, homes and jobs to move to Khalistan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would Chamarrs and Chura live in Khalistan as some are Sikh or Hindu some are confused and say they are both.

What bout Bee-yer i dont think people want to go back to doing the dirty work when we got them, although theres too many in punjab and they make the place look un tidy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Excellent post Mehtab Singh. The notion that massacres need to accompany the creation of new nations is not necessarily true. No massacres occurred when the Soviet union broke up or when the Slovaks parted with the Czechs. The Indian establishment is very adept at putting forward the belief that a break up would lead to massacres. It suits it's agenda to keep the people frightened of ever asking for freedom.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thats exactly the reason I want both India and Pakistan to have their respective "springs". People on both sides of the border have had it, they all need and deserve azaadi. Once every community and sub-community has tasted the svaad of azaadi, and when Sikhs achieve their azaadi as well, everyone will be in a position to relate to us in one way or another and what happened in 1947 and 1984 will HOPEFULLY NOT repeat.

Here is a counter question that came in mind to my own theory. God knows when the Indian spring will happen. So should Sikhs wait till then?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • was researching this and came back to this thread. Also found an older thread:    
    • Net pay after taxes. If you don't agree, think about this: If you were a trader and started off in China with silk that cost 100 rupees and came to India, and you had to pay total 800 rupees taxes at every small kingdom along the way, and then sold your goods for 1000 rupees, you'd have 100 rupees left, right? If your daswandh is on the gross, that's 100 rupees, meaning you have nothing left. Obviously, you owe only 10% of 100, not 10% of 1000. No, it's 10% before bills and other expenses. These expenses are not your expenses to earn money. They are consumption. If you are a business owner, you take out all expenses, including rent, shop electricity, cost of goods sold, advertising, and government taxes. Whatever is left is your profit and you owe 10% of that.  If you are an employee, you are also entitled to deduct the cost of earning money. That would be government taxes. Everything else is consumption.    
    • No, bro, it's simply not true that no one talks about Simran. Where did you hear that? Swingdon? The entire Sikh world talks about doing Simran, whether it's Maskeen ji, Giani Pinderpal Singh, Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi, or Sants. So what are you talking about? Agreed. Agreed. Well, if every bani were exactly the same, then why would Guru ji even write anything after writing Japji Sahib? We should all enjoy all the banis. No, Gurbani tells you to do Simran, but it's not just "the manual". Gurbani itself also has cleansing powers. I'm not saying not to do Simran. Do it. But Gurbani is not merely "the manual". Reading and singing Gurbani is spiritually helpful: ਪ੍ਰਭ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਬਦੁ ਸੁਭਾਖਿਆ ॥  ਗਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਣਹੁ ਪੜਹੁ ਨਿਤ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰ ਪੂਰੈ ਤੂ ਰਾਖਿਆ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The Lord's Bani and the words are the best utterances. Ever sing hear and recite them, O brother and the Perfect Guru shall save thee. Pause. p611 Here Guru ji shows the importance of both Bani and Naam: ਆਇਓ ਸੁਨਨ ਪੜਨ ਕਉ ਬਾਣੀ ॥ ਨਾਮੁ ਵਿਸਾਰਿ ਲਗਹਿ ਅਨ ਲਾਲਚਿ ਬਿਰਥਾ ਜਨਮੁ ਪਰਾਣੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The mortal has come to hear and utter Bani. Forgetting the Name thou attached thyself to other desires. Vain is thy life, O mortal. Pause. p1219 Are there any house manuals that say to read and sing the house manual?
    • All of these are suppositions, bro. Linguists know that, generally, all the social classes of a physical area speak the same language, though some classes may use more advanced vocabulary. I'm talking about the syntax. That is, unless the King is an invader, which Porus was not. When you say Punjabi wasn't very evolved, what do you mean? The syntax must have been roughly the same. As for vocabulary, do you really think Punjabis at the time did nothing more than grunt to express their thoughts? That they had no shades of meaning? Such as hot/cold, red/yellow/blue, angry/sweet/loving/sad, etc? Why must we always have an inferiority complex?
    • I still think about that incident now and then, just haven't heard any developments regarding what happened, just like so many other things that have happened in Panjab!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use