Question Bout Khalistan - Technicalities

[MKaur89]

^^^

Fair comment ...

Also a concern is who will run our Gurdwara outside of Khalistan ie in dehli Mumbia etc, as all Sikhs living in these cities will leave dehli and Mumbia and Move to Khalistan, and Hindu Punjabis will have to leave what was Punjab. what wil happen to their Mandirs ??

I guess a simple one is housing, the Sikhs who come from dehli and mumbia to live in Khalistan can have the houses that Hindu Punjabis have vacated and vicer versea.

Whether Delhi will be included in Khalistan or not (as suggested by JasSinghKhalsa) what's the guarantee that Sikhs living in the non-Khalistan parts of India will want to move to Khalistan? I can't imagine 100% of Sikhs in India who live outside Panjab will give up their livelihoods, homes and jobs to move to Khalistan.

[Hammertime007]

^^Unless we have partition

[Hammertime007]

Would Chamarrs and Chura live in Khalistan as some are Sikh or Hindu some are confused and say they are both.

What bout Bee-yer i dont think people want to go back to doing the dirty work when we got them, although theres too many in punjab and they make the place look un tidy

[Deletedkp]

Khalistan will be another Pakistan. A disaster.

[proactive]

Khalistan will be another Pakistan. A disaster.

Kphull is an id,iot just like that Bitta muppet.

Just using your logic.

[SevadaarEKhalsa]

Delhi is part of Khalistan

[Mehtab Singh]

I honestly feel Khalistan should be among the last states formed once India starts breaking up and not the first. Hang on, the reason I say this is because I cannot comprehend a bloody holocaust that is a combination of the tragedies Sikhs have already faced in 1947 and 1984, i.e. a holocaust that is worse than both these previous ones. Think about it, when other states have already broken away on the basis of language or culture or whatever reason, people would have become used to the idea of freedom and of various distinct identities. In fact, for the first time ever Indians may (just may) start respecting each other's diversity, and could (for once) dispose off the retarded notion that we're first Indian and then Hindu/Muslim/Sikh/Christian. In such an atmosphere, the rise of Khalistan as a sovereign Sikh state will be looked upon with acceptance by other Indians as they too would have broken off by then.

Wait, I am not saying Sikhs should be a scared minority fearing for their lives, fearing bloodshed, fearing loss of property and wealth etc. No, we've been through the worst already. What I am saying is that once Khalistan arises in the midst of an entity that is already going through a "subcontinent spring" (such as the Arab Spring, lol), the mindset of the general masses would have changed, and it wouldn't be what it was like in 1947 or 1984 (just a speculation added with wishful thinking for a country like India).

I would also want Pakistan broken as they cannot be trusted for a single day once Khalistan has become a reality. West Punjab can remain an entity separate from Khalistan but it should not be Pakistan. Sindh, Baluchistan, Pakhtunkhwa should all be independant entities, thereby lessening the chances of a larger Pakistan causing any trouble for us in future. They might be our Punjabi brothers, but these same Punjabi "brothers" have shown their warm brotherhood to us in 1947 and all those wars they had with India. So its better if their power is comparatively reduced than it is now, for our own good. You don't want the red-capped Jaahil Hameed jumping towards Khalistan moaning Ghazwa-E-Hind on the top of his voice.

[proactive]

Excellent post Mehtab Singh. The notion that massacres need to accompany the creation of new nations is not necessarily true. No massacres occurred when the Soviet union broke up or when the Slovaks parted with the Czechs. The Indian establishment is very adept at putting forward the belief that a break up would lead to massacres. It suits it's agenda to keep the people frightened of ever asking for freedom.

[Mehtab Singh]

Thats exactly the reason I want both India and Pakistan to have their respective "springs". People on both sides of the border have had it, they all need and deserve azaadi. Once every community and sub-community has tasted the svaad of azaadi, and when Sikhs achieve their azaadi as well, everyone will be in a position to relate to us in one way or another and what happened in 1947 and 1984 will HOPEFULLY NOT repeat.

Here is a counter question that came in mind to my own theory. God knows when the Indian spring will happen. So should Sikhs wait till then?

[simran721]

Sikhs can't live in unity now never mind Khalistan. I think we should concentrate more on how much we are remembering Akal Purakh.