Jump to content

Kuljinder Sidhu Wants To Make A Movie On Blue Star


Pappi9
 Share

Recommended Posts

A film focusing on Operation Blue Star cannot be dealt with the light touch of a Panjabi crowd-pleaser, whether Panjabi audiences are receptive to these style of movies or not.

Bluestar is the single most tragic event in modern Sikh history. To shoe-horn in "gaane" and formulaic Panjabi-movie tropes to keep audiences interested would denigrate the aforementioned events of that time.

I can't agree more. This needs to be a cinematic documentary if anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't agree more. This needs to be a cinematic documentary if anything.

There's a documentary film called 'Shoah' from 1985 which consisted survivors of the Holocaust being interviewed along with footage from the time. It's gone down as one of the best films ever, period. It was the basis for Spielberg's Schindler's List (not for the story but overall). That's the kind of deftness of touch and respect the events of Bluestar deserve. Tackling the matter with broad brush strokes will lessen with Bluestar, IMO, in the eyes of the world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's a documentary film called 'Shoah' from 1985 which consisted survivors of the Holocaust being interviewed along with footage from the time. It's gone down as one of the best films ever, period. It was the basis for Spielberg's Schindler's List (not for the story but overall). That's the kind of deftness of touch and respect the events of Bluestar deserve. Tackling the matter with broad brush strokes will lessen with Bluestar, IMO, in the eyes of the world.

I need to watch this.

Someone should also forward this movie to Kuljinder Sidhu. Thanks for pointing this out!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He should make a movie based on the SARAGARHI. It's an amazing story that's also important to Sikh culture, and has never been done.

I really enjoyed Sadda Haq, it managed to keep things musical without going full on Bollywood cheesy with ridiculous dance routines. The subject matter was treated with utmost respect, and he covered the important topics (like what motivated Rajoana and Dilawar Singh) without being too gruesome to watch. All in all, the kind of important film Bollywood can't seem to do.

What Kuljinder achieved as a brand new director with such a low budget (1.5 million crore, less than £200,000) was very impressive, but he needs to learn and improve as an action director. Saragarhi would be the perfect film for that. It's got plenty of action, but it's also a small scale human story.

I just don't think he is ready to make something as explosive as a film about Operation Blue Star, he needs more experience.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He made SADDA HAQ pretty interactive. He should go interactive with this concept as well. We can all advice him to the do's and don'ts as a majority of us will be the targeted audience.

How was Sadda Haq "interactive" ?

I think you mean 'target' audience rather than 'targeted' audience. Targeted audience means after watching it in the theatre we will be targetted by death squads.

Anyway if we're his target audience than he'd be preaching to the already converted. Thus even £10,000 would be money wasted. What we need is for him to make the type of movie that can be entered into international film festivals and are appreciated by the influential educated elite...i.e the people in powerful positions in things such as media etc. Studies have shown such people overwhelmingly appreciate movies such as those that come out of Iran which cost far less than the £200,000 Kuljinder Singh spent on Sadda Haq. The melodramatic bad over-acting and cheesy dialogue of Sadda Haq is about as opposite of the quality end as you can get.

Judging by his first movie, Kuljinder Singh is wanting to run before he can walk. We all appreciate the good thing he did but he's clearly not up to the job of making a mega expensive large scale war movie type film of quality. Thats why I'm saying he'd do a far better job by concentrating on dialogue, acting and editing to tell the story on a low budget.

If the Sikh public are crying out for a '300' type mega movie to tell the story then perhaps we should make efforts to bring the director Tarsem Singh back into the Sikh fold.

As an established name he was given a mega budget by Hollywood studios to make the film 'Immortals' in the same vein as '300'. Clearly, in naming his film 'Immortals' he was reminded of his Sikh roots (the Akalis).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also another veerjee suggested to fund or give sewa for sikhlighar sikhs or other important projects. I simply have to disagree with that. We should have a system like a democratic country and budget (Sewa funds) should be allotted to categories (like media, school, hospital, prachar etc..) We simply cannot say or justify that money/sewa spent on media is waste. Everything is connected to each other. With media help, people become aware of situations and when they do then they research and further down the road they DONATE. Awareness via media is more important than simply giving out cash to gareeb people.

No one talked of giving cash to gareeb people, we are talking of education here, veer. The money spent on media is not waste but the 100 crore for the movie NO DOUBT is because you can make the movie at 30 crores.

A movie on Bhai Lachman Singh Babbar would be amazing - perfect movie type material, a Muslim Police informer joins militants and ends up becoming one of them after seeing their just fight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If relationship with Guru is strong, then kanga is done twice a day, and turban should never be taken off or put on like a hat, there is a lot wrong with that as it is against rehit! maryada is to take off every layer of turban/pagh/dumalla individually, and tie fresh turban each time!
    • the whole 'your husband/wife is chosen for you'/sanjog thing is real, it's just that a lot of people end up marrying the wrong person. they did not end up with the person that was meant for them. my friend, you should marry someone who you feel a connection with and love. there are millions of sikh girls, i'm sure you can find someone who aligns with your sensibilities and who you can truthfully say that you love. sikhi does not say anything against love marriages. you can also be in a loveless arranged marriage which is a safe option b/c both families are more inclined to keep the union intact. i was one of those people who was like meh, i guess i'll just get arranged to some sikh. well i finally started dating for the first time this year and i'm getting married to someone that i love and cannot even imagine leaving. i think it's better to have lost & lost than never loved at all. unfortunately, a lot of people confuse love w/ looks & lust. a lot of men go for the fittest girl they can find and think they won the jackpot or something. in reality, your partner should be like an extremely loved best friend. there's a reason why it's a fact that the most stable and long-lasting relationships started as friendships.  i also think a lot of women are petty and divorce over small reasons, but there's other terrible things like high cheating rates as well. that's why the divorce rate in the west is high. be careful out there.
    • andrew tate praises sikhi too & likes sikhs. his brother also donated to sikh families iirc. they just like any "alpha" religion and tbh islam is the most "alpha" in their eyes. islam is very good at promoting that image. but imo a real alpha man doesn't command respect by beating up his wive(s) or forcing them to wear a burqa. a real man will have his woman listen to him w/o raising a hand or his voice, and command respect by being respectful. he leads by example and integrity. that's true masculinity. you get the idea. + yes, it's definitely true that islam is growing rapidly and making massive inroads. strength in numbers + belief will do that. but rlly it's just because of the birth rate. a lot of them are muslim b/c it's their "identity" just like how a lot of young sikhs will say they're "culturally sikh" or whatever. there just aren't billions of sikhs who lambast their identity everywhere and have strict and linear rules like in islam. besides, the reality is that islam and its followers are some of the most morally bankrupt. you can see all the weird trans rules in iran, bacche baazi in afghanistan, visiting brothels, watching p*rn, p*dophilia what goes on behind the scenes in countries like uae & qatar, etc, and come to your conclusions. you can google all the stats yourself and see which countries do the most of these ^.   
    • stop associating with hinduism, that's the absolutely worst thing you can do as a sikh. not sure if you noticed but the entire world looks down upon and spits at india & hindus, literally no one respects them and considers them weak and cowardly. literally 1+ billion of them but not perceived as a strong religion commandeering respect. 
    • you wrote a whole lot but told us nothing. what exactly did you do wrong to make you feel this way?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use