Jump to content

Isis Threat In India Pakistan And Punjab


Recommended Posts

This ISIS map is a hoax. It wasn't made by ISIS but by some right wing group in the west to scare westerners and called it five year expansion plan of ISIS.

But that's not to say that Islamists in afpak area don't have any planning for India. They believe that in future an Islamic army will re conquer India. They call it Ghazwa e Hind in which Islamic armies will clash with Hindus for control of Hind(Indian sub continent).

The right wing Hindus are equally crazy. They also are planing for Akhand Bharat in which they believe they will re unite all of Indian sub continent under right wing Hindu rule which will even include Afghanistan.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

IMO Akhand Bharat would be nice, then in Ardas Sahib we won't have to include Sri Gurdwaras which have been let go because of borders, everything would be back with Khalsa :D

Not if this hypotehtical Akhand Bharat is controlled by enemies of the Sikhs, which it would be if it arose beneath the aegis of Hindutva.

re unite all of Indian sub continent under right wing Hindu rule which will even include Afghanistan.

What was their logic behind that bit of nonsense? Afghanistan was never part of Hindustan, it's beyond the Hindu Khush.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What was their logic behind that bit of nonsense? Afghanistan was never part of Hindustan, it's beyond the Hindu Khush.

`Their logic behind this is that Afghanistan once was an extension of Indic civilisation. Before it was conquered by central Asians, it was called Gandhara. The population was a mix of HIndus and Buddhists back then.

Link to post
Share on other sites

`Their logic behind this is that Afghanistan once was an extension of Indic civilisation. Before it was conquered by central Asians, it was called Gandhara. The population was a mix of HIndus and Buddhists back then.

Was that the same kingdom ruled by Shakuni, uncle of Duryodhana? I'm certain Shakuni was referred to as Gandhar Naresh.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yup, that's the same Gandhara.

Got to wonder what happened to the Kshatriya spirit of the Indians of that time, and the later fellas who were invaded on various occasions that saw the rise of the appeasing, cowardly politician-type figures that facilitated the Mughals and the British.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Got to wonder what happened to the Kshatriya spirit of the Indians of that time, and the later fellas who were invaded on various occasions that saw the rise of the appeasing, cowardly politician-type figures that facilitated the Mughals and the British.

The Hindutva types blame the Buddhists because they introduced ahimsa.

Personally, I think it has been the popularity of Chanakya.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Got to wonder what happened to the Kshatriya spirit of the Indians of that time, and the later fellas who were invaded on various occasions that saw the rise of the appeasing, cowardly politician-type figures that facilitated the Mughals and the British.

The original Kshatriyas of ancient India are the Khatris. It is said that as they abandoned their warrior Dharam and took on the profession of dukaandhari they lost their warrior spirit.

Another problem with India had been the caste system. Only those who belonged to the warrior/kshatriya caste were allowed to or able to fight. Once the invader would destroy the armies of india the rest of the population quietly submitted since they were not kshatriyas. The Gurus changed this where any Sikh belonging to any caste/ethnic background can take up arms and fight the enemy.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sure it would rather be controlled by Sikhs if Sri Vaheguru allows this to happen. & Yeah I think it was part of India, known as Ghandara (scented area? gandha=smell). Ghandari was from there, and that was part of Bharat soo.

`Their logic behind this is that Afghanistan once was an extension of Indic civilisation. Before it was conquered by central Asians, it was called Gandhara. The population was a mix of HIndus and Buddhists back then.

I did not know that, interesting.

Of course it does nothing to diminish the stupidity of the claim. These Hindutva windbags are deploying the exact same logic as ISIS. Hindustan was ruled by Muslim dynasties for hundreds and hundreds of years, and during this time it was technically part of Islamic civilization.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just how much these wasps are now owned:   Seven Sandhurst cadets and instructors from the UAE are expelled in scandal     The Sovereign's Parade concluded in traditional manner at the Royal Military Academy Sandhurst yesterday, albeit in the Queen's absence. But I can reveal that the parade-ground pomp and splendour masked a deeply embarrassing chapter in Sandhurst's history. Only days ago, its Commandant, Major General Duncan Capps, felt obliged to expel no fewer than seven overseas cadets — all of them from the United Arab Emirates (UAE).   'The cadets' instructors got the boot too,' my man on parade tells me. 'It was because of what are described as 'disciplinary incidents'.' Capps won't have taken such decisive action lightly, not least because of the diplomatic discomfort it will cause the Foreign Office — and because of the potential cost to the Treasury.      Oil-rich countries pay handsomely for their links with Sandhurst; the UAE recently built a new accommodation block there, the Zayed Building, at a cost of £15 million. The expulsions come at a time of fraught relations with the UAE. The ruler of Dubai was ordered to pay a record £554 million to his former wife and their two children by a British court last December. Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum, a horse race-loving friend of the Royal Family, will have to pay for Princess Haya's security for the rest of her life after she fled to Britain to escape him. It followed previous High Court judgments that the sheikh orchestrated the abductions of two of his daughters and used military-grade surveillance software to launch a phone-hacking operation on British soil. He has denied the findings. At Sandhurst, there can be cultural differences between Arab princelings and British officer cadets.   Capps did his best to sound a warning of this last year, when, in an interview for a Middle East readership, he said: 'Regardless of background or position, officer cadets are treated the same. Monarchs are treated just like everyone else.' Some find this hard to accept. 'One of them in my intake wanted to be excused early morning stag [guard duty],' a Sandhurst alumnus tells me, 'so he went up to the company sergeant major with a bunch of £10 notes — a whole wad — in his hand. 'The company sergeant major took his head off. Figuratively. And put him on guard at two in the morning.' At one point, the problem became so severe that the military police investigated allegations of 'huge bribes' — BMWs and Mercedes cars, Rolexes and foreign holidays — being offered to Sandhurst instructors. More recently, there have, I've been told, been difficulties on 'cultural days' to London. 'You'd go up to see a play or go to a museum — and it descended into chaos when alcohol was introduced to the equation,' explains another Sandhurst man. The less impressive overseas cadets were, he adds, known as 'Floppies' – 'F****** lazy overseas potential enemies'. An Army spokesman declines to comment.
    • She spoke bhai veer singh type of panjabi. Hosi. Etc. It is a sad letter. Both her and her son came to a bad end. 
    • Defence Secretary Ben Wallace admits 20-year military campaign in Afghanistan ended in failure - and fears grieving parents will think their sons and daughters died for nothing Defence Secretary Ben Wallace said the Afghanistan campaign was a failure He fears families of dead personnel will feel their sacrifice was for nothing  He said Britain and her allies were right to stay in Afghanistan for 20 years  The Defence Secretary has admitted the 20-year military campaign in Afghanistan – which cost the lives of hundreds of British troops – ended in failure. A year after the Taliban swept back into power, Ben Wallace said he feared grieving parents would wonder: ‘What was it all for?’ Monday marks the anniversary of the Islamist militants walking unopposed into Kabul, sparking a frantic fortnight that saw Western troops pack up and leave. In an exclusive interview, Mr Wallace described his feelings as everything UK troops had fought and died for ‘crumbled before our eyes’.   British service personnel, including the Royal Marine Commandos, pictured, spent 20 years battling the Taliban before withdrawing almost one year ago     Mr Wallace spoke to the Daily Mail to mark the first anniversary of Operation Pitting, the UK’s largest evacuation effort since the Second World War. More than 1,000 personnel were involved in a death-defying mission to rescue UK nationals and entitled locals after the Taliban swept aside Western-trained Afghan forces with embarrassing ease. Mr Wallace, a father of three, was working all hours and suffering sleepless nights after receiving death threats from animal rights extremists – who thought dogs should be prioritised as part of the airlift. He was enjoying a rare opportunity to spend time with his 11-year-old son when they saw a memorial to Guardsman Michael Sweeney, 19, in Blyth, Northumberland. Mr Wallace said: ‘It was a rare evening off and we had been working all hours. I wasn’t getting to see much of my family. ‘But my son and I went for a walk and saw Gdsm Sweeney’s war memorial, which was immaculately kept. He was the only soldier from Blyth killed in Afghanistan. I looked at the picture of him and I looked at my son. ‘Then it occurred to me – this young man had died for the very event that was collapsing before our eyes. ‘And I thought about his mother and father who’d lost a teenage son, and experienced such loss. And what was it all for? ‘I worried that was the question the families of fallen troops would ask themselves. I worried they’d think it was for nothing, when actually Afghanistan meant so much. ‘We’d gone there for the right reasons and stayed for 20 years, we’d done security, economic development, education, but we’d failed. ‘And history told us when the West left the country, it was going to go back to how it had been. We were leaving people behind, conceding the country to the Taliban... mainly because the West didn’t really want to stay. And if they didn’t want to stay, why did they go there at all?’ Asked why he felt it so personally, Mr Wallace, a former Scots Guards officer, said: ‘Because I’m a soldier. Because it is sad and the West has done what it’s done. We have to do our best to get people out and stand by our obligations.’ The Taliban’s resurgence in late 2020 and early 2021 had severe implications for a brave cohort of Afghans who had risked their lives to support British military and diplomatic operations in the country. The Daily Mail’s award-winning Betrayal of the Brave campaign led to the Government gradually doing more to help the thousands of former translators, guards and other staff resettle in the UK. But the consensus remains among campaigners that Britain moved too slowly to help. Mr Wallace said: ‘When we started the relocation scheme they were not queuing up in their thousands, the country was stable enough. What we hadn’t done then was bring many people back. ‘But suddenly, as the fabric of the country began to fold, these people suddenly became very vulnerable. We didn’t just turn up at the airport and there was a coherent plan. Given another ten days we would have got almost everyone out. ‘Launching Operation Pitting, it was one of those times in government when you don’t know the outcome of what you’re intending to do. ‘We’d done a reconnaissance visit some months beforehand but even so, when the Paras and 16 Air Assault went down there, they didn’t know what they’d find. Nobody could have predicted such a rapid collapse of the Afghan government. In the aftermath we didn’t know whether the Afghans were going to turn nasty.’ Mr Wallace’s worst fears were realised on August 26 when an Islamic State suicide bomber killed 13 US troops and at least 170 Afghans outside Kabul’s Hamid Karzai airport. A year after Operation Pitting, Mr Wallace told the Mail: ‘In terms of the British Government’s response, I don’t have regrets. I am proud of the Afghan relocation scheme (ARAP) – it is still going and will keep going. More people are arriving here every week. We stood by our word and got those people out. On my watch, we did our very best.’   https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11107691/Defence-Secretary-Ben-Wallace-admits-20-year-military-campaign-Afghanistan-ended-failure.html    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use