Jump to content

Why Didn't "low-caste" People In India Become Sikh?


Guest Jacfsing2
 Share

Recommended Posts

Guest Jacfsing2

It is possible to have ekta while keeping your tribal identity. Before genders were split up too, and now all genders have equal status in Sikhi. In the same way it is possible to keep your identity while becoming Sikh since Sikhi teaches that all castes are equal.

Even if what you said was true, the people in the video were be far more extreme than just being happy of their heritage, it was clearly discrimination. Also it clearly violates the very idea of being a Sikh, since it's about bringing humanity together.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Jacfsing2

Can anyone explain to me how the people accepted this in the first place, (caste creation)? Also how'd some Sikhs just start believing in Caste after being Sikhs when Gurbani is clearly Manas Ki Jaat Sabh Ekai Pechanbo? (I'd assume it's before some RSS pakhand influencing lost Sikhs?) I also assume that people regardless of castes would be treated better at Harmandir Sahib then if they wanted to go Jaganath Puri, (where only Brahmans can go) or something?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Discrimination can happen through anything.. It is possible for any individual to be proud of anything and bully people. Using caste or any issue to hurt people's feelings is not a very Sikh thing to do indeed. It is of no use to blame this all on caste, or even hinduism because hate springs from the individual's ego, not from any object. I am sure you are understanding what I am trying to say.. Say there was no such thing as caste, there would still be problems as these because it has nothing to do with caste, only ego.

Actually it is possible to control gender and skin color. Caste is not the issue at all, it is ahankar which can be sprouted from anything.

The caste system is not against Sikhi, what is against Sikhi are people who discriminate and hurt people's feelings, Kaur ji.

Watch the video. What do you mean it is possible to change gender and skin colour. One is born the way they are, your idea of changing gender and skin colour is not even relevant to caste system. Hurting people's feelings has nothing to do with the topic of caste.

Caste only exists in society, by people who want to hold on to it, not in Sikhi. It has no relation to spirituality.

Guruji tells us:

ਜਾਣਹੁ ਜੋਤਿ ਨ ਪੂਛਹੁ ਜਾਤੀ ਆਗੈ ਜਾਤਿ ਨ ਹੇ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥

जाणहु जोति न पूछहु जाती आगै जाति न हे ॥१॥ रहाउ ॥

Jāṇhu joṯ na pūcẖẖahu jāṯī āgai jāṯ na he. ||1|| rahā▫o.

Recognise Lord's light within all and inquire not the caste, as there is no caste in the next world. Pause.

SGGS Ji Ang 349

?? Dhan Guru Nanak Dev Ji.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guruji tells us castes, social classes exist, but not in Sikhi they don't. A persons caste is irrelevant, only the Lords Name, will carry us across.

ਜਿਹ ਕੁਲ ਸਾਧੁ ਬੈਸਨੌ ਹੋਇ ॥

जिह कुल साधु बैसनौ होइ ॥

Jih kul sāḏẖ baisnou ho▫e.

The family, in which the Lord's saint is born,

ਬਰਨ ਅਬਰਨ ਰੰਕੁ ਨਹੀ ਈਸੁਰੁ ਬਿਮਲ ਬਾਸੁ ਜਾਨੀਐ ਜਗਿ ਸੋਇ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥

बरन अबरन रंकु नही ईसुरु बिमल बासु जानीऐ जगि सोइ ॥१॥ रहाउ ॥

Baran abran rank nahī īsur bimal bās jānī▫ai jag so▫e. ||1|| rahā▫o.

whether it be of high or low caste, poor or rich, shall have its umblemished fragrance and fame is blazoned through the world. Pause.

ਬ੍ਰਹਮਨ ਬੈਸ ਸੂਦ ਅਰੁ ਖ੍ਯ੍ਯਤ੍ਰੀ ਡੋਮ ਚੰਡਾਰ ਮਲੇਛ ਮਨ ਸੋਇ ॥

ब्रहमन बैस सूद अरु ख्यत्री डोम चंडार मलेछ मन सोइ ॥

Barahman bais sūḏ ar kẖa▫yṯarī dom cẖandār malecẖẖ man so▫e.

Whether he be a Brahman a cultivator, menial, a warrior, a bard, a pariah and a low-mind person,

ਹੋਇ ਪੁਨੀਤ ਭਗਵੰਤ ਭਜਨ ਤੇ ਆਪੁ ਤਾਰਿ ਤਾਰੇ ਕੁਲ ਦੋਇ ॥੧॥

होइ पुनीत भगवंत भजन ते आपु तारि तारे कुल दोइ ॥१॥

Ho▫e punīṯ bẖagvanṯ bẖajan ṯe āp ṯār ṯāre kul ḏo▫e. ||1||

he becomes pure by the Lord's meditation and saves himself and saves the families of both his parents.

SGGS Ji Ang 858

?? Dhan Bhagat Ravidas Ji

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Gurbani Sahib ji presented states that caste hierarchy(ego) has no importance, but does that mean we have lost all ties to our tribes? Skin color and gender was only discussed because someone has specifically brought up the issue to me. Hurting people's feelings is the main point of why a lot of people are feeling negative about castes. If you are interested, you can read my replies to others which might help you see what I am trying to convey to everyone judging. Ego may be present in any vastu or status, the status or item which someone possesses may not be wrong, what is wrong is when someone uses their ego to hurt other people's feelings by making anyone feel inferior to themselves. This is where nimrata comes into play, which is a key factor in a Gurmukh. Nimrata can be present while keeping your identity.

If you are interested you can read Guruji's words in Gurbani, what they say about caste.

There are many pangtis, which you can clearly understand from what Guruji says.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know what, certain people are so obsessed and entwined with their caste identity, that they can't live without them. The truth is, for them, this identity is more important than their Sikh one.

Here is what they fail to accept though. That the identity itself is based on ego and supremacism. The idea that we are better than another jaat because of x,y,z is at the centre of the concept. That's the truth of it. The caste identity is just a vehicle to bolster ego in the ugliest way. And where haughty pride manifests in this way, it's only a matter of time before it translates into the behaviour of the people holding these views. Pretty soon these appalling attitudes and behaviours becomes deeply rooted everyday norms for the society.

That's what we see in the video.

Don't ever accept it or tolerate the bull5hit excuses of people who try and justify or play it down in any way. That is what they are counting on with their convoluted defences of the undefendable.

The time will come when we will tell them to sod off back to Hinduism where they belong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can you post this in simple English so I can understand what you mean.

People make excuses for caste in society, and for the way they behave. And that should be stopped.

Lokh jaat-paat de leyi behane baut banaunde hunde, te is soch nu rokna chaida.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are good & bad people in all castes, class, religion, race, nationality, age groups.

Thing is to praise good & condemn bad irrespective of community.

Choice is ours whether to opt for peace or hate.

Don't turn a blind eye to cultural practices that are at the root of these problems in our society. Even if they stem from the sub-society you might identify with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was searching igurbani.com which gives correct pronunciation of Gurbani. I can’t remember all of it at once. I guess it relies on more practice, like more Sehaj Paths. The meaning becomes clearer. I have noticed slight variants in it. This could be because it’s written in old Punjabi.  
    • Veer Manpreet Singh, a lay preacher, claims that -Sikhs aren't supposed to worship Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We are only supposed to worship God as is written in Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We only "revere" Guru Granth Sahib ji.     He says a lot of other things in this video, some are good refutations of Hindu superstitions, but the reformers often go too far. Anyways, what he is saying about not worshipping Guru Granth Sahib ji is totally wrong. The reason is Guru Granth Sahib ji is Guru. Guru is Satguru. Satguru is God. We worship God. Therefore, we also worship Satguru (Guru Granth Sahib ji).   There are innumerable verses in Gurbani equating God and Guru. ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਗੁਰੁ ਡੁਬਦਾ ਲਏ ਤਰਾਇ ॥੨॥ The Guru is the Supreme Lord and the Transcendent Master. The Guru floats (saves) the drowning one. p49   ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਏਕੋ ਜਾਣੁ ॥ Know the Guru and God as One. p864   ਗੁਰ ਨਾਲਿ ਤੁਲਿ ਨ ਲਗਈ ਖੋਜਿ ਡਿਠਾ ਬ੍ਰਹਮੰਡੁ ॥ There is no one at par with the Guru. I have searched and seen the whole universe. p49 (If the Guru is the greatest in the whole universe, shouldn't we worship the Guru?)   I'd like to ask Manpreet Singh what is worship? Any reasonable definition would include obeisance, remembrance, and praise. Those are exactly the same things Gurbani says to do regarding Guru! Remembrance and obeisance: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੁ ਅਪਨਾ ਸਦ ਸਦਾ ਸਮ੍ਹਾਰੇ ॥ Ever, ever, I think of the True Guru, ਗੁਰ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਕੇਸ ਸੰਗਿ ਝਾਰੇ ॥੧॥ and the Guru's feet I brush with my head's hair. p387   Praise: ਗੁਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਆਪਿ ॥ The Guru himself is the transcendent Lord and the supreme master. ਆਠ ਪਹਰ ਨਾਨਕ ਗੁਰ ਜਾਪਿ ॥੪॥੧੬॥੬੭॥ Throughout the eight watches of the day, O Nanak meditate thou on the Guru. p387   In fact, Gurbani says the way to find God is to worship (puja) of Guru: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੂ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਧੋਇ ਧੋਇ ਪੂਜਹੁ ਇਨ ਬਿਧਿ ਮੇਰਾ ਹਰਿ ਪ੍ਰਭੁ ਲਹੁ ਰੇ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ Washing and bathing the True Guru's feet, worship thou them. In this way thou shall obtain my Lord Master. Pause. p1118   Could it be any clearer that we are to worship Guru ji?
    • Bro, reciting a shorter Chaupai Sahib is hardly "anti-Dasam". It's fine to argue that the longer Chaupai is more traditional, but the short one isn't anti-Dasam. That's like claiming shorter Rehras is anti-Guru Granth Sahib ji just because there are fewer selections from Guru Granth Sahib. It might not be traditional, but it's not anti-Guru Granth Sahib. I prefer the longer versions, but let's not exaggerate. Every tradition has a slightly different Rehras version. Nanaksar vs Taksal vs Nihangs and so on. The basic template for Rehras is at the beginning of Guru Granth Sahib ji. Later, Chaupai Sahib was added and Anand Sahib always follows as the end of a process. Then some sangats added more saloks to start Rehras and others were added at the end. Some additional selections from Dasam Bani were also added, but it wasn't the same ones for every sangat. The important thing is to not hate on each other for these variations.
    • Umm, so you're upset that this jatha did Chaupai the same way it's being done at Harimandar Sahib for 100 years? Shouldn't you be upset at the manager of Darbar Sahib? I'm not saying that Sikhs who are aware of certain issues shouldn't do the longer Chaupai, but there are only so many battles you can fight. Instead of calling some jatha traitors because they're doing the (for better or worse) "standard" Chauapai published by the SGPC, it would be better to change things from the central point. You can't fault the average Sikh for picking up the average Gutka and doing paath.
    • It's the same here in Toronto. Alot of the gudwaras here are political orientated and get tons of funding from the government-probably want them stay hush hush with all the BS that has been happening with India.  These guys are skewing gurbani. A complaint was sent to a ragi singh a couple of days ago in regards to a hukamnama. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use