Jump to content

Need help answering a Christian's Questions on the nature of Waheguru in Sikhi


TheeTurbanator
 Share

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, GurjantGnostic said:

Islam is a beautiful religion, and the teachings of the Prophet Mohammed are quite good. 

I would seriously reconsider this viewpoint.

11 minutes ago, GurjantGnostic said:

If there was not truth in Islam Guru Nanak Ji would not have had anything to do with muslims.

Expand on this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, GurjantGnostic said:

 

Islam is a beautiful religion, and the teachings of the Prophet Mohammed are quite good.  Let it be a lesson to us all that if we are not careful any religion can be corrupted. 

Oh, wow, you are quite naive, brother. Blows my mind.

Are you trying to say the Koran is wonderful, and it's only the stuff that's written outside of the Koran that's bad? If so, have you checked out the Koran?

15 minutes ago, GurjantGnostic said:

If there was not truth in Islam Guru Nanak Ji would not have had anything to do with muslims.

"to do" as in merely talking with them? So the mere fact of talking with someone means you think there's truth in their religion/philosophy/whatever? Among other things, this proposition of yours means that people could never talk to other people for fear of validating their thinking.

Do you believe that a news reporter that does an interview with a vile person, say a Nazi, means that the National Socialism has truth?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BhForce said:

Oh, wow, you are quite naive, brother. Blows my mind.

Are you trying to say the Koran is wonderful, and it's only the stuff that's written outside of the Koran that's bad? If so, have you checked out the Koran?

"to do" as in merely talking with them? So the mere fact of talking with someone means you think there's truth in their religion/philosophy/whatever? Among other things, this proposition of yours means that people could never talk to other people for fear of validating their thinking.

Do you believe that a news reporter that does an interview with a vile person, say a Nazi, means that the National Socialism has truth?

EDIT: I cannot stand by what I said in this post.  I was totally wrong, except the following part

I know what the Moghuls and Pakistani did to Sikhs it's the definition of Evil.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, GurjantGnostic said:

My understanding of the Quaran is not good enough to go into great detail.  But consider this.  The prophet Mohammed preached equality of race, and sex, and also did not believe in caste.  When he took Mecca, and destroyed the idols, he ldid not destroy the rock I think it was placed there by Abraham?, as it was not an idol, but represented monotheism.  He commanded that no innocents and no property be harmed, and that if the enemy were to surrender they would not be hurt.  Fast forward to mass terror, conversion by the sword, and bombings that Islam is linked with today and how can we say these people are Muslims?

Was not Guru Nanak Ji's closest companion a Muslim, at the birth of SIkhi? 

Bro this is what they want you to believe. By their own law they are allowed to lie about the nature of their faith to keep it prospering. Mass terror and conversion by the sword have been policies of islam since day one. If you spend enough time around muslims you'll see what I mean. They have been doing everything you said from the beginning. You just need to look at their own history. We are fed all these lies and have been bombarded with them so much, they have now become the norm and if you speak out the truth you are labeled an "Islamaphobe". Islam is a disgusting and vile cult and God ain't got nothing to do with it. Hell even Satan (pun intended) wouldn't go next to them.

It's a huge misconception that Guru Nanak Dev Ji's companion was a muslim. Many of the friendly stories and interactions between Sikhs and islamists are a load of bollocks barring a few. Any even those were with muslims who are considered heretics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, MrDoaba said:

Bro this is what they want you to believe. By their own law they are allowed to lie about the nature of their faith to keep it prospering. Mass terror and conversion by the sword have been policies of islam since day one. If you spend enough time around muslims you'll see what I mean. They have been doing everything you said from the beginning. You just need to look at their own history. We are fed all these lies and have been bombarded with them so much, they have now become the norm and if you speak out the truth you are labeled an "Islamaphobe". Islam is a disgusting and vile cult and God ain't got nothing to do with it. Hell even Satan (pun intended) wouldn't go next to them.

It's a huge misconception that Guru Nanak Dev Ji's companion was a muslim. Many of the friendly stories and interactions between Sikhs and islamists are a load of bollocks barring a few. Any even those were with muslims who are considered heretics.

They should live up to their lies rather than their truths then.  Lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, GurjantGnostic said:

The prophet Mohammed preached equality of race, and sex, and also did not believe in caste.

Well, if that's how you want to define "Muslim" maybe I'll call myself a Muslim. But that's not how 99.99% of Muslims define Muslim. They define it as believing in the Koran, and the Hadith, too.

4 minutes ago, GurjantGnostic said:

When he took Mecca, and destroyed the idols, he ldid not destroy the rock I think it was placed there by Abraham?, as it was not an idol, but represented monotheism

Right, which is why the Muslims destroy churches, temples, and idols of Hindu gods, Buddha, and Jesus and Christian iconography when they conquer a territory. How's this a good thing?

6 minutes ago, GurjantGnostic said:

He commanded that no innocents and no property be harmed,

"Innocents" are defined as Muslims. Property is not to be harmed because they are going to take it over.

7 minutes ago, GurjantGnostic said:

if the enemy were to surrender they would not be hurt.

Right, so they are demanding that Europe surrender to their demands, otherwise they will be hurt. The head of Turkey (Erdogan) actually warned that Europeans "will not walk safely on the streets" if they don't give in to his demands. That's not some ISIS nutso, that's the President of Turkey, a NATO ally!

How you can say "they won't be hurt if they surrender" is a good thing is beyond my comprehension.

11 minutes ago, GurjantGnostic said:

Fast forward to mass terror, conversion by the sword, and bombings that Islam is linked with today and how can we say these people are Muslims?

Because, bro, the basis for this is contained right within the Koran:

Quran (9:29) - "Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued." 

12 minutes ago, GurjantGnostic said:

Was not Guru Nanak Ji's closest companion a Muslim, at the birth of SIkhi? 

You are referring to Bhai Mardana, who was a Muslim by birth. By keeping the company of Guru Nanak ji, Bhai Mardana effectively became a kafir (apostate). Simply singing is forbidden in Islam, singing what is purported to be divine revelation by a prophet coming after the Prophet Mohammed is definitely apostasy. 

Put it this way: If you want to say that Bhai Mardana was still a Muslim after worshipping according to the way taught by Guru Nanak, I want to ask if you think Guru Nanak ji was still a Hindu?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Its called a “fifty” becuase when Singhs were fighting in the British army, they would recieve an 8 metre pagg, with a cour four base, because the base layer was half (50%) of the main turban, it’s called a fifty. The practise of tying a keski under your main one is now seen as pretty weird (except for a patka), but the small coloured strip inder the pagg is still used as a fashion statement since its pretty visually appealing. And so, people now just tie a small little “kung-fu strip” sort of thing under their pagg to imitate that effect.
    • Found how to do it. For anybody else wondering, heres how. No one even helped me btw. So much for Guru Ji’s lhalsa always ready to help (and having their Singhs’ backs smh). (Notes: Aim to do this on a hot summer’s day, and dedicate a full day to this, since you only have to do this once every 4 months at least (normally the turban will stay in shape until you wish to untie it and physically pull it open again). This helps it to dry faster, since you have to starch it, HALF DRY IT, pooni it, tie it and then wear it for around four hours for the rest of it to dry, all in the same day. It’s a one day process but it serves you for months). This works for both the UK/Kenyan style (starch is best for this style) as well as the normal Punjabi paghs (such as Patiala shahi, wattan wali and morni paghs). Not sure about dumallas though. Probably not . Pagg Starch: 1) Boil 6 cups of water in a saucepan on low heat (always low heat) 2) Seperately dissolve 4 tablespoons of maida (all purpose flower) with a little water until it is 100% smooth.  You could also use rice or corn starch. Add more water if it is not a smooth liquid 3) Once completely smooth, pour this mixture through a strainer (to make it even smoother) into the boiling water. 4) Now continuously stir it until it goes completely see through. Keep on stirring it on the low heat until it goes totally transparent (it can take a little while to cook, but the pagg will last you for months!) It will at become a thick paste first, but keep stirring until it becomes see through and thinner.    5) Once it’s transparent, pour the starch (again through a strainer) into a big enough, clean bucket to cool down. 6) Once cool, take a clean, dry turban and completely and mix it in with the starch for around 5 minutes. Make sure that it is all evenly and completely soaked and wet with the starch. (Most people use mal-mal material, but I use full voile and I have used Rubia too. They’re all fine. Maybe use Rubin for smaller turbans and mal mal for larger ones) 7) Leave it out in the sun to HALF DRY ONLY!!!!!!! (Don’t ever let your starched turban fully dry before you tie it. If you do, then you will have to spray/ sprinkle water on it which will weaken the starch and ruin the turban) ONLY HALF DRY THE TURBAN IN THE SUN!!! 😎 Once HALF DRY ONLY take the now semi damp turban, and fold/pooni and then tie it like normal (straight on your head, with no base layer such as a Keski or patka underneath). Leave it on your head for around 4 hours just to fully dry and it will be ready and set for months now. Like I said, do try to tie your dastar every day, but if you can’t or really don’t want to, I hope this helps! Like I said this works on both the traditional Punjabi/Indian style paggs, and the more recent UK/Kenyan style paggs. It does for my morni pagg, but the first larr slips up in to the pagg. This is normal dw. Wjkk, Wjkf
    • I guess easier ways of learning have taken precedence. There are so many Youtube channels and podcasts available that people are more ready to listen for knowledge at their own leisure. There are so many great kathas available online that take months to listen, so that people may not really get the time to come here and write.
    • *Bump The current conflict (w/ Iran getting involved) is being orchestrated by a 3rd party in my opinion. We all are going to blame the Jewish community (how they run the banks, how they are brutal and etc.) but they have a point in this conflict.  As soon as people start finding about the truth that's when the real movement will begin. 
    • https://www.youtube.com/live/FcXcuvkIT9I?si=qzOSWY7EEOXDaNv2
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use