Jump to content

the abrahamic author of 10 commandments profit moses was a mass murderer of israelite pagan/hindus


genie
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, TejS said:
2 hours ago, puzzled said:

 But Im just saying that Sikhi does not deny that god chose these people to spread his message.. 

Sikhi pretty much criticizes and goes against their tenets, sayings and practices, and so I think indirectly it does deny the authenticity of their claim of being chosen by God.

No, bro, in the Dasam Granth, Guru Gobind Singh ji states that these other prophets (other than dhan dhan Guru Nanak Dev ji) were indeed "sent" by God. The problem is they didn't stick to the plan when they got here, and they promoted other names (other than the Satnam).

So just the fact that Gurbani criticizes their religious approach doesn't mean they weren't sent by God. They were, but they also went astray or didn't preach the complete and total truth. Same for the "Hindu" avtars.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ਤਿਨ ਤਿਨ ਅਪਨੇ ਰਾਹ ਚਲਾਏ ॥

Tin Tin Apane Raaha Chalaaee ॥

All the great Purushas created by me started their own paths.

ਬਚਿਤ੍ਰ ਨਾਟਕ ਅ. ੬ - ੨੬/੨ - ਸ੍ਰੀ ਦਸਮ ਗ੍ਰੰਥ ਸਾਹਿਬ

ਮਹਾਦੀਨ ਤਬਿ ਪ੍ਰਭ ਉਪਰਾਜਾ ॥

Mahaadeena Tabi Parbha Auparaajaa ॥

ਬਚਿਤ੍ਰ ਨਾਟਕ ਅ. ੬ - ੨੬/੩ - ਸ੍ਰੀ ਦਸਮ ਗ੍ਰੰਥ ਸਾਹਿਬ

ਅਰਬ ਦੇਸ ਕੋ ਕੀਨੋ ਰਾਜਾ ॥੨੬॥

Arba Desa Ko Keeno Raajaa ॥26॥

Then I created Muhammed, who was made the master of Arabia.26.

ਬਚਿਤ੍ਰ ਨਾਟਕ ਅ. ੬ - ੨੬/(੪) - ਸ੍ਰੀ ਦਸਮ ਗ੍ਰੰਥ ਸਾਹਿਬ

ਤਿਨ ਭੀ ਏਕੁ ਪੰਥੁ ਉਪਰਾਜਾ ॥

Tin Bhee Eeku Paanthu Auparaajaa ॥

ਬਚਿਤ੍ਰ ਨਾਟਕ ਅ. ੬ - ੨੭/੧ - ਸ੍ਰੀ ਦਸਮ ਗ੍ਰੰਥ ਸਾਹਿਬ

ਲਿੰਗ ਬਿਨਾ ਕੀਨੇ ਸਭ ਰਾਜਾ ॥

Liaanga Binaa Keene Sabha Raajaa ॥

He started a religion and circumcised all the kings.

ਬਚਿਤ੍ਰ ਨਾਟਕ ਅ. ੬ - ੨੭/੨ - ਸ੍ਰੀ ਦਸਮ ਗ੍ਰੰਥ ਸਾਹਿਬ

ਸਭ ਤੇ ਅਪਨਾ ਨਾਮੁ ਜਪਾਯੋ ॥

Sabha Te Apanaa Naamu Japaayo ॥

ਬਚਿਤ੍ਰ ਨਾਟਕ ਅ. ੬ - ੨੭/੩ - ਸ੍ਰੀ ਦਸਮ ਗ੍ਰੰਥ ਸਾਹਿਬ

ਸਤਿਨਾਮੁ ਕਾਹੂੰ ਨ ਦ੍ਰਿੜਾਯੋ ॥੨੭॥

Satinaamu Kaahooaan Na Drirhaayo ॥27॥

He caused all to utter his name and did not give True Name of the Lord with firmness to anyone.27.

ਬਚਿਤ੍ਰ ਨਾਟਕ ਅ. ੬ - ੨੭/(੪) - ਸ੍ਰੀ ਦਸਮ ਗ੍ਰੰਥ ਸਾਹਿਬ

ਸਭ ਅਪਨੀ ਅਪਨੀ ਉਰਝਾਨਾ ॥

Sabha Apanee Apanee Aurjhaanaa ॥

ਬਚਿਤ੍ਰ ਨਾਟਕ ਅ. ੬ - ੨੮/੧ - ਸ੍ਰੀ ਦਸਮ ਗ੍ਰੰਥ ਸਾਹਿਬ

ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮ ਕਾਹੂੰ ਨ ਪਛਾਨਾ ॥

Paarabarhama Kaahooaan Na Pachhaanaa ॥

Everyone placed his own interest first and foremost and did not comprehend the Supreme Brahman.

ਬਚਿਤ੍ਰ ਨਾਟਕ ਅ. ੬ - ੨੮/੨ - ਸ੍ਰੀ ਦਸਮ ਗ੍ਰੰਥ ਸਾਹਿਬ

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, TejS said:

God instructed people out of the blue in Abrahamic religions to spread God's message because they descended from Abraham, therefore based on lineage. There is nothing of that sort in the Dharmic religions.

Are you sure about that, bro?

I don't know why you had to bring up lineage to denigrate the Abrahamics. Dasam Patshah has already denigrated them (and the "Hindus") by stating that they fall short of the 100% truth of Satguru Nanak ji (which I agree with, of course). By bringing up lineage, you are forcing me to compare Satguru to a bunch of imperfect prophets, which I don't really want to do, but here goes:

Did not the entire line of Gurus from Guru Ram Dass ji to Guru Gobind Singh ji receive Guruship based on lineage? Is it not specifically mentioned that someone in the lineage of some Sodhi king will become the Guru in Kalyug (reference to Guru Nanak Dev ji)? Bedis/Sodhis, it's all based on lineage to Ram Chander ji, in the "lineage" of the Sun.

I think it's a losing proposition to denigrate the Abrahamic prophets based on lineage. Suffice it to say they were short of the truth.

3 hours ago, TejS said:

But if you have specific citations that claim this, please post them.

There won't be specific citations because Guru Gobind Singh ji did not write a 12-volume history of the Abrahamics, a la Arnold Toynbee. Guru Sahib just wrote a short composition that glances over the history of God sending individuals to preach the truth, and them failing.

You're being entirely too literal in taking the line that says God made Mohammed a king, and saying "See! It just says God made Mohammed a king. It doesn't say God made him a saint." I'm not even saying he was a saint. Merely that he was sent by God to preach the truth. 

And you can see that in the context of that section of Bachittar Natak, because that's how Guru Sahib brackets the mentions of the specific prophets/avatars/etc. It clearly shows how God is sending/instructing one prophet/avatar/whatever to preach the truth, and they fail.

3 hours ago, TejS said:

Also,  Muhammad was visited by Jibreel and there is no mention of this individual in the Guru Granth Sahib at all, so I'm not sure if Muhammad is referred to as a saint or simply a trickster.

Agreed that there's no mention (directly) of this in Guru Granth Sahib, but why does that matter? Not everything not mentioned in Gurbani is false. It doesn't even matter, though, if it's false or not, the point is simply that even if he did have some level of enlightenment, it wasn't 100% enlightenment, and he (like the others) made a mess of things.

By the way, I'm sure you're familiar with the fact that I'm one of the biggest anti-jihadis on this website, so I think you should know I'm in no way trying to big up the Prophet Mohammed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, BhForce said:

Are you sure about that, bro?

I don't know why you had to bring up lineage to denigrate the Abrahamics. Dasam Patshah has already denigrated them (and the "Hindus") by stating that they fall short of the 100% truth of Satguru Nanak ji (which I agree with, of course). By bringing up lineage, you are forcing me to compare Satguru to a bunch of imperfect prophets, which I don't really want to do, but here goes:

Did not the entire line of Gurus from Guru Ram Dass ji to Guru Gobind Singh ji receive Guruship based on lineage? Is it not specifically mentioned that someone in the lineage of some Sodhi king will become the Guru in Kalyug (reference to Guru Nanak Dev ji)? Bedis/Sodhis, it's all based on lineage to Ram Chander ji, in the "lineage" of the Sun.

I think it's a losing proposition to denigrate the Abrahamic prophets based on lineage. Suffice it to say they were short of the truth.

There won't be specific citations because Guru Gobind Singh ji did not write a 12-volume history of the Abrahamics, a la Arnold Toynbee. Guru Sahib just wrote a short composition that glances over the history of God sending individuals to preach the truth, and them failing.

You're being entirely too literal in taking the line that says God made Mohammed a king, and saying "See! It just says God made Mohammed a king. It doesn't say God made him a saint." I'm not even saying he was a saint. Merely that he was sent by God to preach the truth. 

And you can see that in the context of that section of Bachittar Natak, because that's how Guru Sahib brackets the mentions of the specific prophets/avatars/etc. It clearly shows how God is sending/instructing one prophet/avatar/whatever to preach the truth, and they fail.

Agreed that there's no mention (directly) of this in Guru Granth Sahib, but why does that matter? Not everything not mentioned in Gurbani is false. It doesn't even matter, though, if it's false or not, the point is simply that even if he did have some level of enlightenment, it wasn't 100% enlightenment, and he (like the others) made a mess of things.

By the way, I'm sure you're familiar with the fact that I'm one of the biggest anti-jihadis on this website, so I think you should know I'm in no way trying to big up the Prophet Mohammed.

I'd like to direct you to Sri Kalgidhar Chamatkar. A short summary of this incident involving various past prophets is described there. 

Before Guru Ji came to earth, he was still meditating on Hemkunt Parbat and while he was meditating there, there were also other people doing similar penances. But they all considered Guru Ji their superior (or elder/Principle) due to the fact that Guru Ji had attained Waheguru and met with him. 

Anyways the other beings doing Tapisya all had their Gurus and all of their teachers came to them in their visions and told them about Guru Ji and why Guru Ji was going to earth and not to stop him in any way. These beings included Krishna, Buddha, Muhammad, Shiva. Most of the Tapisyees there were cautious about going to earth in the first place as they could see how it would trap anyone. 

Sant Harnam Singh Ji also had a vision with Jesus (along with others) coming to visit him and telling him how he wished his followers would adopt the path of Guru Nanak Dev Ji.

10 minutes ago, TejS said:

Guru Nanak Devi Ji contemplated and searched for the truth and eventually he found God. The Gurgaddi was then passed on to individuals that were deemed worthy, and this is evident in Guru Nanak Dev Ji passing over the Gurgaddi to someone who was not related to him by blood, Guru Angad Dev Ji, rather than his own negligent sons. This demonstrates that there was no monopoly on the Truth by a single bloodline. There was a certain circumstance that led for the Gurgaddi to stay within the family of Guru Amar Das Ji, and that was Bibi Bhani's request in return for her seva, whereby she was granted her wish for the Gurgaddi to continue on throughout the Sodhi family - her in-laws and the line of Guru Ram Das Ji. But I guess you already knew this, so I'm surprised you would equate this with the familial covenant that God chose on Abraham as if they were his "chosen people".

Guru Nanak Dev Ji and Bhai Lehna Ji were from the same family tree (the Bedis) so were blood related biologically, In Dasam Guru Granth Sahib Ji, Guru Ji mentions how the Gaddhi would always stay in these families (Sodhis and Bedis).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mahakaal96 said:

Not true.

Guru Nanak Dev Ji was Bedi lineage

Guru Angad Dev Ji was bhalla lineage

Guru Amar Das Ji was trehan lineage

Guru Ram Das Ji to Guru Gobind Singh Ji were Sodhi lineage

Read bachitter natak, it covers how long the gurgaddi would stay in the bedi lineage & the Sodhi lineage.... once you get a grasp of that you realise the sons of Guru Nanak were never meant to get gurgaddi..... so people who say Baba Sri Chand & Baba Lakmi Chand ‘failed’ as the sons of Guru Nanak don’t know what they are talking about!

I was under the impression that Bhalla/Trehan lineages also relate back to Bedi Clan as well and thus technically they were one giant lineage (extensions of the Bedi Clan) as they date back to the same forefather, or am I getting confused here? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol dal panth Panj told me explicitly not to associate with Vadhbhag Singh Sodhi followers!
    • We have lamp (or Jyot) the pure unscented candle for a reason. Traditionally, Patis used candle light (jyot), so they could read SGGS in darkness. Light, elec didn't exist. Dhoop is used to attract the "Good spirits" but also keep freshness where Maharaj will be.  Interestingly and coincidentally I heard Sakhi a few dsys ago. During Dasa Pitha's time these souls were roaming the Earth and even Sangat noticed. Maharaj asked them "y u here?" They replied during recitation of SGGS and making Degh they didn't bother lighting candle. THAT WAS THEE ONLY REASON NO GATI WAS GIVEN TO THEM!!!  AUTHENTICITY NOT CHECKED I heard once on YT like 2 days ago.  If u apply dhoop in one room of your house twice a week u will notice a difference esp in the smell and freshness of that room. 
    • Sangat ji, With the hot weather as per Guru's Hukm, how can we look after our kes?  First of all the beard! Working in Construction, factory and any other heated environment I UNDERSTAND! At my workplace it's over 32 degree celcius and sometimes we have to lift 20kg ALL! DAY! My tips, regularly shampoo the beard during ishnan. APPLY OIL! The technique of applying oil is by rubbing it thoroughly in the roots. Pay attention to the noise esp on the chin. You will hear this "crosh crosh" noise. Keep rubbing oil until u can't hear it no more! This means the oil has blended in properly.  Second tip on beard, keep an extra kanga in your pocket. Every two, three hours give your beard a proper comb down to get rid of any sweat or stickiness. SECOND BENEFIT! Do this all 12 months every single day your beard will look like it's been professionally groomed. TRY IT! People will ask you "What gel u use? How can yer beard be naturally like that?" You can say all I use is coconut oil or whaeva oil but just comb the beard every 2-3 hours for a minute.  As for the kes, morning time get rid of all the gronjra (or knots - forgotten English word), in the morning. However, during evening comb down make sure you get rid of small remaining gronjra and comb yer hair nice and straight. You will feel soooo so relaxed. Yes our hair will go unnoticed due to Dastar, but our hair demands time and self grooming!So proper combing down, spending a good 15-20 mins most evenings is an absolute MUST!  Most evenings I let my hair down and cover hair with my parna for 2-3 hours so it gets to relax from the tying up.  FINAL TIP! We are Sikhs so we keep fighting and remember this! The tradition of Dastar and uncut hair started in India, where the weather is twice as hot. Everytime we bring this thought in the mind, Guru ji will bless us and make us feel cooled down by a notch.  Fateh.       
    • Been so much nindya and attacking Shastarvidiya since the 2000s, however if we look at gatka now it's still mostly as poor and poorly taught as it was back then, still morris dancing moves and still behzti moves in BBC shows about sikhi and vaisakhi. If people were going to attack shastarvidiya, wouldn't have made sense to improve gatka instead and make it more effective? Additionally, the Nihang Singh presence has improved greatly now, and the cracks within the the SGPC and affiliated jatha jathebandis are showing more greatly as panth becomes more knowledgable with dasam bani and itihas day-by-day, so much gyaan which was lost within panjabi sikhs during colonial times. In the 2000s, the groups were able to talk down this bani and  gyaan by associating it with  RSS and hindus, brahminwaad etc. Not working so well now is it? However with gyaan it would be also good for us to try and preserve our martial arts and keertan vidiya as well! More and more crazy keertan videos are coming out from jatha members that are being made fun of and making sangat annoyed and upset, on tiktok and instagram reels.  
    • Author Posted April 24   On 4/21/2025 at 2:43 PM, ipledgeblue said: sirr should not be nanga because keski is usually worn.   Sikhs can sleep nanga-sirr if they choose to . Being from Punjab, almost every Sardaarji i know (amritdhari or not) sleeps/showers with their hair uncovered. I don't think Guru Sahib asked us to wear Dastar to sleep and I don't think it is in SRM.   The idea of "keski being worn to sleep" is cos in Bollywood films (Bachna Ae Haseeno) Sikh characters usually tie a gol parna when sleeping since the actor's usually Hindu. So they gotta cover his head somehow or he'd have cut hair. Same reason Diljit wore a pagg to bed in the El Sueno vid. Only time they didn't do that was in Gadar with Sunny Deol which just looked odd tbh   What in the world? What sikh or even a decent human would base their knowledge of their culture or religion on a movie industry, that too Bollywood?  Believe me, no sikh ever said, I must cover my head becasue an actor did so in a movie. I've been doing it all wrong, I must start covering mh head because the sikh in that movie did.  Just because every panjabi and sardaar you know, does something, also doesn't make it right..  Follow the guru. And if you have a medical condition, then exemptions can be made.  Just admit it, because of my medical condition, I am not able to follow this rehit. Why are you getting everyone else to drop to your level?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use