Jump to content

middle aged Punjabi couples


puzzled
 Share

Recommended Posts

if divorce was an option and not a taboo back in the 70s and 80s do you think many of the aunties and uncles would be divorced today?  I think yes they would, i look at some of these couples and their marriage seems to be more of a contract and duty. It seems the only thing that binds these flop marriages together are the kids in the middle. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On ‎12‎/‎16‎/‎2018 at 9:02 PM, puzzled said:

if divorce was an option and not a taboo back in the 70s and 80s do you think many of the aunties and uncles would be divorced today?  I think yes they would, i look at some of these couples and their marriage seems to be more of a contract and duty. It seems the only thing that binds these flop marriages together are the kids in the middle. 

that always been marriages mate.

shrek and Fiona were a one off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest GuestSingh

imo that fear of shame and honour on the family name and reputation was just as strong if not more so than the attachment to their kids..

no doubt those troubles and hard times made them even more tolerant and resilient as individuals to the ongoing racism and different culture/language they had to deal with - fair to say the diaspora wouldnt be as successful as it is today without all these values which most couples either disregard or lack today..and thats why we're witnessing the destruction and near-end of the panjabi family construct as more continue to bow and give their head to whitey..

sad to say but panjabis just arent as strong and courageous anymore..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/16/2018 at 1:02 PM, puzzled said:

if divorce was an option and not a taboo back in the 70s and 80s do you think many of the aunties and uncles would be divorced today?  I think yes they would, i look at some of these couples and their marriage seems to be more of a contract and duty. It seems the only thing that binds these flop marriages together are the kids in the middle. 

Today kids are getting married for love and divorce during or after the honeymoon.   Clearly love marriages are not successful as everyone makes them look out to be.  

What is a love marriage based on

Physical attraction( what they call love at first site) physical attraction becomes boring and flirting gets boring with time with the same person.  Doesn't matter if you are married to the most beautiful woman in the world from your perspective and the worlds.  You will start noticing the imperfections in her and that will make her ugly.  Celebrity couples are a prime example.  They have money and looks but they are divorcing their spouse because the grass is always greener on the other side.  They hook up with another beautiful actress and she turns out to be boring with time.  If these love marriage couples were happy.  They would not have the need to flirt and fantasize about other people as their one night stand, boy friend or spouse.  Their lives are dull.   So they seek pleasure else where but that flame burns out because its no different than the first one.  Ask a person who owns a Ferrari.   Are you as excited about the Ferrari as the first time you bought one.  And he will tell you, don't buy a Ferrari.  Lamborghini is better, that's what I am buying next. The mind is not satisfied with what it has.  It wants more and better. 

True love is when a someone is willing to step on a hot plate and not complain about it or hold it over your head. Or when someone is willing to give their head and not complain about it or hold it over your head. The sooner you learn this in life.  The sooner you will comes to terms with reality. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/17/2018 at 2:32 AM, puzzled said:

if divorce was an option and not a taboo back in the 70s and 80s do you think many of the aunties and uncles would be divorced today?  I think yes they would, i look at some of these couples and their marriage seems to be more of a contract and duty. It seems the only thing that binds these flop marriages together are the kids in the middle. 

??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Akalifauj said:

Today kids are getting married for love and divorce during or after the honeymoon.   Clearly love marriages are not successful as everyone makes them look out to be.  

What is a love marriage based on

Physical attraction( what they call love at first site) physical attraction becomes boring and flirting gets boring with time with the same person.  Doesn't matter if you are married to the most beautiful woman in the world from your perspective and the worlds.  You will start noticing the imperfections in her and that will make her ugly.  Celebrity couples are a prime example.  They have money and looks but they are divorcing their spouse because the grass is always greener on the other side.  They hook up with another beautiful actress and she turns out to be boring with time.  If these love marriage couples were happy.  They would not have the need to flirt and fantasize about other people as their one night stand, boy friend or spouse.  Their lives are dull.   So they seek pleasure else where but that flame burns out because its no different than the first one.  Ask a person who owns a Ferrari.   Are you as excited about the Ferrari as the first time you bought one.  And he will tell you, don't buy a Ferrari.  Lamborghini is better, that's what I am buying next. The mind is not satisfied with what it has.  It wants more and better. 

True love is when a someone is willing to step on a hot plate and not complain about it or hold it over your head. Or when someone is willing to give their head and not complain about it or hold it over your head. The sooner you learn this in life.  The sooner you will comes to terms with reality. 

 

You married?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even when their husband/wife dies they more upset about the kids being fatherless/motherless than actually being upset over their spouse dying.

none of the middle aged people in my family look happy, they all look like thunder and are miserable. They seriously could do with a break from each other. 

never seen the older lot in my family sit over a table and discuss problems, the "discussing" ends up becoming shouting.

why do so many Punjabi men come back from work and start drinking alone sitting before the tv? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/16/2018 at 9:02 PM, puzzled said:

if divorce was an option and not a taboo back in the 70s and 80s do you think many of the aunties and uncles would be divorced today?  I think yes they would, i look at some of these couples and their marriage seems to be more of a contract and duty. It seems the only thing that binds these flop marriages together are the kids in the middle. 

way to go generalising people , Yesterday a close family friend died and his wife was inconsolable, there are many sikh marriages of the 60s,70s where the people are very clear as to what marriage is and understand that loyalty, respect and being empathetic is a huge part of  the deal, kids will come and also go their own way , the couple remains under Waheguru ji

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, puzzled said:

Even when their husband/wife dies they more upset about the kids being fatherless/motherless than actually being upset over their spouse dying.

none of the middle aged people in my family look happy, they all look like thunder and are miserable. They seriously could do with a break from each other. 

never seen the older lot in my family sit over a table and discuss problems, the "discussing" ends up becoming shouting.

why do so many Punjabi men come back from work and start drinking alone sitting before the tv? 

because they watched to many stupid movies which promote that is the only solution for sadness, betrayal, boredom etc etc , Think back to bollywood of that time period all the heroes got tanked whenever they had a disappointment instead of finding a solution .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, jkvlondon said:

way to go generalising people , Yesterday a close family friend died and his wife was inconsolable, there are many sikh marriages of the 60s,70s where the people are very clear as to what marriage is and understand that loyalty, respect and being empathetic is a huge part of  the deal, kids will come and also go their own way , the couple remains under Waheguru ji

i think there is a difference between the older 60s couples and the 80s couples 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Uncle, realistically are you gonna challenge it in real life? I could fully jhatka and eat a steak wearing Bana bilkul tere samne but on God you could do nothing about that 😂
    • Flintstone Saab, can't you type in one message? Or must you drop the full Godfather trilogy with every response, minimum 3 responses? 1) They don't jhatka cows at Hazur Sahib because it's in a country called "India", in a state called "Maharashtra" - and beef is strictly illegal there 2) I said a quote from Adi/Dasam Granth saying "you can't eat beef" - "protection of cows" could be Maharaj talking about defending them for Hindus, same reason we do Aarti-Aarta. If u reference a quote, u gotta say the context of the verse. Otherwise there are verses in SGGS Ji which seemingly tell you to convert to Islam; of course that's not what Maharaj is saying but without context many quotes from Baani seem misleading 3) Why does 90% of your "evidence" come from living people, like "the head of Taruna Dal" or "Baba Pala Singh" - very rarely (like less than 10%) of it is from the Gurus' direct words. Do you realise that these people are humans with flaws/bias? Maharaj ended the line of human Gurus for a reason 4) Funnily enough, even Budha Dal's maryada in the Sundar gutka does not ban beef. If individual Akaalis taboo it, that doesn't mean it's the actual hukam lol 5) You mention Naamdharis guarding cows but they are also vegetarians who do not carry a kirpan and say Guru Granth Sahib Ji is not a Guru - using them as an example is funny 😂   6) Bro who uses "diapers" and "mate" in the same sentence? 😂 Man really tried sounding like Andrew Tate with the British/American accent mix 7) So you're about 30 years old and still beefing strangers online? Brooooo where's your MOTHER, did Aunty Ji never shout you away from ur keyboard? "Oy Flentstone puttar, thalle aa hun, roti ban gyi!!!!" 8 ) Wait since you're some Uncle, how do you balance work life with ur keyboard warrior shift? Or do u just sit vailah at home, like unemployed? SERIOUS QUESTION: Is your account rank on this forum the only thing on your CV ?😂😂😂  9) Can you imagine Maharaj condoning you calling me names like "mughal"? You keep reading about these "heads of Taruna Dal" but you need to google "Guru Nanak Dev Ji's teachings on kindness and anger" instead - you're basically trying to solve degree level maths equations when you can't even understand "1 + 1 = 2"  (prediction - I bet he's gonna respond debating one little detail of this post like my joke about accents, but fully miss the bigger picture, or get upset again. He also will likely reference another "sant" or author, or pull a random quote completely out of context😂)
    • ਕੇਵਲ ਰਾਮ ਨਾਮੁ ਮਨਿ ਵਸਿਆ ਨਾਮੇ ਹੀ ਮੁਕਤਿ ਪਾਈ ॥ Kaeval Raam Naam Man Vasiaa Naamae Hee Mukath Paaee || केवल राम नामु मनि वसिआ नामे ही मुकति पाई ॥ The Naam, the Name of the Lord alone abides in the mind; and through the Naam, the Name of the Lord, one finds liberation.
    • Shame if our past these modern days jatts sgpc lost are . One question I have is...where were the Nihangs and the anti jar Seva when anandgarh was town down and kshgarh remade to what it is now....mughals couldn't even destroy the qila. Yet we did at multiple places with our own hands..shame on sangat flr not stopping precious ones and lakh lanat to the destructors of Sikh puratan asthaans all these kar Seva babeh of the past 
    • Reason behind it is.  You can't get mass sangat in to fill the golak up.... that's why they are all the same in design etc .probs some mafia rAcket related to the mass marbeling of gurughars. Such a shame. Hardly any pictures of the original anandgar qila..only one in the toor collection 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use