Jump to content

How should India govt handle the Chinese army incursion on the border?

genie

By genie,
in WHAT'S HAPPENING?

 Share

Recommended Posts

GurjantGnostic

GurjantGnostic

Posted
Posted
6 hours ago, proactive said:

It's over 20 now according to the news. Let's see if Modi will try a fake surgical strike. That <banned word filter activated> Bikram Singh the former Indian army chief said on TV that the India army should kill 20 PLA soldiers in revenge.. lol.

Shoot you gonna go for revenge go big. 

0
Link to comment
Share on other sites
genie Grand Master

genie

Posted
  • Author
Posted

If the indian army wants to remove the chinese troops on indian land without using bullets they should use tear gas cannisters and non-lethal anti-personal devices to make life difficult to stay in illegal occupied area's. And if the chinese resort to firing bullets then its game on the indian army can start opening up their own gun's on them.

0
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest

Guest

Posted
Posted

The thing is the Indian govt and pretty much everyone else in Indian establishment is still clueless behind why all of a sudden PLA has decided to intrude into Indian territory or atleast a disputed territory , especially considering Modi and Xi have been "shaking hands", "laughing together", "smiling", "eating together" and kind of such diplomatic facades. 

The plausible various reasons (which I think covers most scenarios) are as follows : 

1) To deter a newly invigorated nationalistic govt from building border roads in remote areas of ladakh to give it cutting edge at par with PLA in the area

2) To show India as a possible ground of war and deter foreign companies leaving China (due to covid) to go to India. By showcasing India as an enemy of India , companies leaving china will be reluctant to move there for obvious reasons

3) India's recent romance with US

4) To distract the growing possible discontent in Chinese population and possibly communist party itself against Xi . Nationalism is a strong binding factor, esp when against an enemy

5) To break the overall morale of the nationalistic bjp govt.

6) This one is deep : Pakistan cajoled China, its all-weather friend, into intruding into India , so that the govt's inability get shown to its public , who then will lose confidence in govt and not vote for them next time . And the possible return of congress or some other "secular" party will help continue the paused islamization agenda of india and crush the hindutva movement. My god this would be deep lol. This one is also plausible due to govt beating the drums about beating pakistan and doing surgical strikes against them and using it brownie points to win electorate.

 

Jokes apart, I live in a prime metro city , and if the push comes to a shove, and things get out of hand , and nuclear options start coming into equation, I fear (and its a very justified one), the chinese might launch something like missile or something against big cities. I PRAY it doesn't come to that. :/ 

0
Link to comment
Share on other sites
proactive Grand Master

proactive

Posted
Posted

I think the flare up was to teach India a lesson just as the Chinese did in 1962. Modi's action in Kashmir as well as stating that he will take back Pakistani Kashmir was bound to either cause a flare up with Pakistan or with China. China occupied Aksai Chin which was a part of Ladakh and which China took in 1962. Modi's sabre rattling bought this flare up and now he has to either put up or shut up. China holds all the cards, their military is better trained and better motivated than any of the bhaiyas India can send against them. China will win any border war and Modi knows this. Taiwan, Japan, Phillipines and Australia won't do anything apart from give statements of support to India. Trump is in the pocket of the Wall St globalists who make billions out of China so although he may make noises against China he knows that he needs Wall St to win him the next election. He also knows that his core followers do not  want any foreign wars so he will just put sanctions on China and sell some outdated weapons to India but little else. India will be all alone if there is a border war and there is no doubt that if there is a border war, Pakistan will ramp up shelling in Jammu and send more terrorists into Kashmir. 

1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
shastarSingh

shastarSingh

Posted
Posted
14 minutes ago, proactive said:

I think the flare up was to teach India a lesson just as the Chinese did in 1962. Modi's action in Kashmir as well as stating that he will take back Pakistani Kashmir was bound to either cause a flare up with Pakistan or with China. China occupied Aksai Chin which was a part of Ladakh and which China took in 1962. Modi's sabre rattling bought this flare up and now he has to either put up or shut up. China holds all the cards, their military is better trained and better motivated than any of the bhaiyas India can send against them. China will win any border war and Modi knows this. Taiwan, Japan, Phillipines and Australia won't do anything apart from give statements of support to India. Trump is in the pocket of the Wall St globalists who make billions out of China so although he may make noises against China he knows that he needs Wall St to win him the next election. He also knows that his core followers do not  want any foreign wars so he will just put sanctions on China and sell some outdated weapons to India but little else. India will be all alone if there is a border war and there is no doubt that if there is a border war, Pakistan will ramp up shelling in Jammu and send more terrorists into Kashmir. 

when will Taliban join in this mess?

0
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Dsinghd
      Gurbani Santhiya

      By Dsinghd · Posted

      I was searching igurbani.com which gives correct pronunciation of Gurbani. I can’t remember all of it at once. I guess it relies on more practice, like more Sehaj Paths. The meaning becomes clearer. I have noticed slight variants in it. This could be because it’s written in old Punjabi.  
    • BhForce
      Veer Manpreet Singh claims we shouldn't worship Guru Granth Sahib ji

      By BhForce · Posted

      Veer Manpreet Singh, a lay preacher, claims that -Sikhs aren't supposed to worship Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We are only supposed to worship God as is written in Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We only "revere" Guru Granth Sahib ji.     He says a lot of other things in this video, some are good refutations of Hindu superstitions, but the reformers often go too far. Anyways, what he is saying about not worshipping Guru Granth Sahib ji is totally wrong. The reason is Guru Granth Sahib ji is Guru. Guru is Satguru. Satguru is God. We worship God. Therefore, we also worship Satguru (Guru Granth Sahib ji).   There are innumerable verses in Gurbani equating God and Guru. ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਗੁਰੁ ਡੁਬਦਾ ਲਏ ਤਰਾਇ ॥੨॥ The Guru is the Supreme Lord and the Transcendent Master. The Guru floats (saves) the drowning one. p49   ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਏਕੋ ਜਾਣੁ ॥ Know the Guru and God as One. p864   ਗੁਰ ਨਾਲਿ ਤੁਲਿ ਨ ਲਗਈ ਖੋਜਿ ਡਿਠਾ ਬ੍ਰਹਮੰਡੁ ॥ There is no one at par with the Guru. I have searched and seen the whole universe. p49 (If the Guru is the greatest in the whole universe, shouldn't we worship the Guru?)   I'd like to ask Manpreet Singh what is worship? Any reasonable definition would include obeisance, remembrance, and praise. Those are exactly the same things Gurbani says to do regarding Guru! Remembrance and obeisance: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੁ ਅਪਨਾ ਸਦ ਸਦਾ ਸਮ੍ਹਾਰੇ ॥ Ever, ever, I think of the True Guru, ਗੁਰ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਕੇਸ ਸੰਗਿ ਝਾਰੇ ॥੧॥ and the Guru's feet I brush with my head's hair. p387   Praise: ਗੁਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਆਪਿ ॥ The Guru himself is the transcendent Lord and the supreme master. ਆਠ ਪਹਰ ਨਾਨਕ ਗੁਰ ਜਾਪਿ ॥੪॥੧੬॥੬੭॥ Throughout the eight watches of the day, O Nanak meditate thou on the Guru. p387   In fact, Gurbani says the way to find God is to worship (puja) of Guru: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੂ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਧੋਇ ਧੋਇ ਪੂਜਹੁ ਇਨ ਬਿਧਿ ਮੇਰਾ ਹਰਿ ਪ੍ਰਭੁ ਲਹੁ ਰੇ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ Washing and bathing the True Guru's feet, worship thou them. In this way thou shall obtain my Lord Master. Pause. p1118   Could it be any clearer that we are to worship Guru ji?
    • BhForce
      Khalsa Secondary School (West London)

      By BhForce · Posted

      Bro, reciting a shorter Chaupai Sahib is hardly "anti-Dasam". It's fine to argue that the longer Chaupai is more traditional, but the short one isn't anti-Dasam. That's like claiming shorter Rehras is anti-Guru Granth Sahib ji just because there are fewer selections from Guru Granth Sahib. It might not be traditional, but it's not anti-Guru Granth Sahib. I prefer the longer versions, but let's not exaggerate. Every tradition has a slightly different Rehras version. Nanaksar vs Taksal vs Nihangs and so on. The basic template for Rehras is at the beginning of Guru Granth Sahib ji. Later, Chaupai Sahib was added and Anand Sahib always follows as the end of a process. Then some sangats added more saloks to start Rehras and others were added at the end. Some additional selections from Dasam Bani were also added, but it wasn't the same ones for every sangat. The important thing is to not hate on each other for these variations.
    • BhForce
      Khalsa Secondary School (West London)

      By BhForce · Posted

      Umm, so you're upset that this jatha did Chaupai the same way it's being done at Harimandar Sahib for 100 years? Shouldn't you be upset at the manager of Darbar Sahib? I'm not saying that Sikhs who are aware of certain issues shouldn't do the longer Chaupai, but there are only so many battles you can fight. Instead of calling some jatha traitors because they're doing the (for better or worse) "standard" Chauapai published by the SGPC, it would be better to change things from the central point. You can't fault the average Sikh for picking up the average Gutka and doing paath.
    • realist17
      Khalsa Secondary School (West London)

      By realist17 · Posted

      It's the same here in Toronto. Alot of the gudwaras here are political orientated and get tons of funding from the government-probably want them stay hush hush with all the BS that has been happening with India.  These guys are skewing gurbani. A complaint was sent to a ragi singh a couple of days ago in regards to a hukamnama. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use

  I accept