Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Just now, intrigued said:

Did they give a source for that claim?

Nope, I think it was Kushwant Singh's book. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 55
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Think his death anniversary is coming up according to the calendar. Here are some eyewitness accounts of his funeral, i read them years ago and the sati part left me thinking about it for several days

Another instance when a cultural practice that was unequivocally forbidden by the Gurus was perpetuated without remorse by the very people who should have shunned it. What exactly was "Sikh" about thi

Ranjit Singh himself wasn't even a religious Sikh. Don't get me wrong, I still appreciate his efforts, and he did a lot. But the true emperor/king of the empire, and any sort of Khalsa Raj is and alwa

Posted Images

A degrading poster the British created of Rani Jind Kaur, they then spread it all over South Asia and Britain.

Just shows you how far they went. This would have been the worst way to attack a 19th century Indian woman. I'm surprised she didn't commit suicide after this poster was released, because that's how offensive it would have been considered in those days.

I've used black marks to cover parts of it. 

They called her the Messalina of Punjab, Messalina was a Roman empress who was addicted to pleasures. 

Untitled.jpg.57983dc985270ec3c5bb6ddac92486d9.jpg

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, puzzled said:

A degrading poster the British created of Rani Jind Kaur, they then spread it all over South Asia and Britain.

Just shows you how far they went. This would have been the worst way to attack a 19th century Indian woman. I'm surprised she didn't commit suicide after this poster was released, because that's how offensive it would have been considered in those days.

I've used black marks to cover parts of it. 

They called her the Messalina of Punjab, Messalina was a Roman empress who was addicted to pleasures. 

Untitled.jpg.57983dc985270ec3c5bb6ddac92486d9.jpg

 

 

 

 

When you think about it, english culture (despite trying to act otherwise) has a longstanding appalling attitude towards vulnerable women.

Think about how many African girls they raped on ships coming to their plantations, and then groomed and raped them once they were there too. Then think about how they put that prima nochta law in with the Scottish where they would take someone's wife away on their wedding night. 

Then think about how they were ready to pull out machine guns for a peaceful protest in Jallianwala Bagh, but twiddled their thumbs when mass rape and murder was going on at partition. 

If you read about Victorian times, the poverty of the working class here (like in areas like East London) was horrific, and prostitution normalised. Think of how many hoes Jack the Ripper slaughtered, and what pushed so many women into that trade in so called enlightened england.  

Most of the 'childrens TV presenters' I grew up watching turned out to be pedos too...... 

Then think about just how much grooming has been going on here for decades, and just how vehemently they denied it and covered it up, and attacked Sikhs who've tried to highlight it. I've talked to clued up white boys on sites I've worked in, they think that their own elites are riddled with pedos, and that's why they allow it to happen. 

Strange people.........

Given this, is it any surprise that they treated M. Jind Kaur so bad? It's just normal form for them. Cultural norm. 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

There is a blog post on Maharaja Ranjit Singh that attempts to explain some of the historical gaps. Though I'm not advocating for its veracity nevertheless it's worth reading as many of the facts have already been mentioned in this thread. 

Mod Note: Link Deleted. 

The site ahead contains harmful programs

Attackers on ajitvadakayil.blog..... might attempt to trick you into installing programs that harm your browsing experience (for example, by changing your homepage or showing extra ads on sites you visit).

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, dallysingh101 said:

When you think about it, english culture (despite trying to act otherwise) has a longstanding appalling attitude towards vulnerable women.

Think about how many African girls they raped on ships coming to their plantations, and then groomed and raped them once they were there too. Then think about how they put that prima nochta law in with the Scottish were they would take someone's wife away on their wedding night. 

Then think about how they were ready to pull out machine guns for a peaceful protest in Jallianwala Bagh, but twiddled their thumbs when mass rape and murder was going on at partition. 

If you read about Victorian times, the poverty of the working class here (like in areas like East London) was horrific, and prostitution normalised. Think of how many hoes Jack the Ripper slaughtered, and what pushed so many women into that trade in so called enlightened england.  

Most of the 'childrens TV presenters' I grew up watching turned out to be pedos too...... 

Then think about just how much grooming has been going on here for decades, and just how vehemently they denied it and covered it up, and attacked Sikhs who've tried to highlight it. I've talked to clued up white boys on sites I've worked in, they think that their own elites are riddled with pedos, and that's why they allow it to happen. 

Strange people.........

Given this, is it any surprise that they treated M. Jind Kaur so bad? It's just normal form for them. Cultural norm. 

We took a vote. Wasps and white supremacist imperials have been voted off the island. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 6/28/2020 at 9:00 PM, dharamyudh said:

Ranjit Singh himself wasn't even a religious Sikh. Don't get me wrong, I still appreciate his efforts, and he did a lot. But the true emperor/king of the empire, and any sort of Khalsa Raj is and always will be Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji Maharaj. If Sikhs manage any raj in the future, it's a must we place SatGuru Maharaj on the highest seat of authority. True Khalsa rule. 

The 5 thieves won again, the empire was filled with it. Egos, lust and so on. You would think a Sikh Empire would make a lot of it's inhabitants Sikh instead of kissing up to them. I'm pretty sure, Bhai Ram Singh (Who I read was a gursikh and never claimed to be a Guru) split for that very reason. Just imagine the court of Ranjit Singh. Dancers, alcohol, all the typical stuff of a raja. That isn't Khalsa Raj though. It's crazy to see the shift in mentality once gaining power. Just imagine how the raj would've looked like if we had true gursikhs running it.     

singhs used to drink alchohol in puratan times. Naveen panth prakash by gyani gian singh mentions it. Even sooraj prakash mentions it. theres nothing wrong in drinking alchohol if u believe in puratan granths. 

 

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Tamansingh123 said:

singhs used to drink alchohol in puratan times. Naveen panth prakash by gyani gian singh mentions it. Even sooraj prakash mentions it. theres nothing wrong in drinking alchohol if u believe in puratan granths. 

Just because they did it in puratan times doesn't make it right

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Tamansingh123 said:

singhs used to drink alchohol in puratan times. Naveen panth prakash by gyani gian singh mentions it. Even sooraj prakash mentions it. theres nothing wrong in drinking alchohol if u believe in puratan granths. 

 

Hence the reason why I believe our Raaj fell in the first place. We strayed away from Sikhi. Not all of the Sikhs during the Misl period were perfect saints. We had some, however, the trends we see today were present there as well. Also, I believe those granths were written during the Raj and towards the end (panth parkash I believe) and Singhs were definitely consuming alcohol at that time. These are some of the reasons why you had groups like the Sant Khalsa who are now the Namdharis.   

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/14/2021 at 8:42 AM, Tamansingh123 said:

singhs used to drink alchohol in puratan times. Naveen panth prakash by gyani gian singh mentions it. Even sooraj prakash mentions it. theres nothing wrong in drinking alchohol if u believe in puratan granths. 

 

Yeah there's always gonna be those who are not fully rehitvaan 

Doesnt mean puratan granths promoted that, just stating the facts 

Link to post
Share on other sites
40 minutes ago, dharamyudh said:

Hence the reason why I believe our Raaj fell in the first place. We strayed away from Sikhi. Not all of the Sikhs during the Misl period were perfect saints. We had some, however, the trends we see today were present there as well. Also, I believe those granths were written during the Raj and towards the end (panth parkash I believe) and Singhs were definitely consuming alcohol at that time. These are some of the reasons why you had groups like the Sant Khalsa who are now the Namdharis.   

Yeah pretty sure misldars were drinking alcohol by very end of 18th century 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I dont get why people are so defensive and why maharani jindan is so romanticized culturally 

She was a pretty bad administrator 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use