British Police Misdemeanours (Sarah Everard case onwards)

[dallysingh101]

On 3/12/2021 at 12:28 PM, Ranjeet01 said:

If the suspect did indeed murder and he is a police officer, how did he even think he could get away with it?

By his alleged actions he actually seems like a real life, dyed in the wool serial killer. I think they are looking at other places because they suspect this. This is unlikely to be his first victim.

Also, we have to ask, what sort of cover up took place when this guy was apparently arrested/questioned[???] for exposing himself a few days prior to the alleged kidnap and murder. Most guys would have been put on a sex-offenders list for this, but here they seem to have let him go. You'd expect them to at least suspend him from employment whilst they looked into the indecent exposure thing. But no, they let him carry on, not even taking his gun from him. 

If so, it isn't much of a stretch to think that emboldened by his colleagues inactions - the nutjob took it even further. 

They said they had to identify the victim through dental records.............. 

[dallysingh101]

17 hours ago, Ranjeet01 said:

He is 48 and only joined the met police 2 years ago.

Don't forget he was an ex TA 'soldier' too.

[Ranjeet01]

56 minutes ago, dallysingh101 said:

By his alleged actions he actually seems like a real life, dyed in the wool serial killer. I think they are looking at other places because they suspect this. This is unlikely to be his first victim.

Also, we have to ask, what sort of cover up took place when this guy was apparently arrested/questioned[???] for exposing himself a few days prior to the alleged kidnap and murder. Most guys would have been put on a sex-offenders list for this, but here they seem to have let him go. You'd expect them to at least suspend him from employment whilst they looked into the indecent exposure thing. But no, they let him carry on, not even taking his gun from him. 

If so, it isn't much of a stretch to think that emboldened by his colleagues inactions - the nutjob took it even further. 

They said they had to identify the victim through dental records.............. 

Sarah went missing on 3rd March, Wayne was arrested on 9th March.

That is less than one week that he was apprehended.

It was known in the press of his identity by the 11th March.

What kind of cover up could possibly have taken place?

What is the evidence that he was a sex offender?

[dallysingh101]

1 minute ago, Ranjeet01 said:

Sarah went missing on 3rd March, Wayne was arrested on 9th March.

That is less than one week that he was apprehended.

It was known in the press of his identity by the 11th March.

What kind of cover up could possibly have taken place?

What is the evidence that he was a sex offender?

Sarah Everard suspect probed over 'indecent exposure' at South London restaurant 3 days before she disappeared

The police watchdog has opened an investigation into how Met Police officers handled an allegation of indecent exposure against Wayne Couzens

https://www.mylondon.news/news/south-london-news/sarah-everard-suspect-indecent-exposure-20094705

 

 

[dallysingh101]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9352321/Indecent-exposure-allegation-reported-police-four-days-Sarah-Everard-vanished.html

 

Riddle over 'flashing' incident: Watchdog probes Met as it emerges Sarah Everard suspect kept working as gun cop for days after report of 'indecent exposure'

• Wayne Couzens, 48, remains in police custody after arrest in Sarah Everard case 
• Met Police received report of indecent exposure in London on February 28 
• Force made referral to IOPC over whether officers responded 'appropriately' 

The police watchdog is investigating the Met after it emerged murder suspect Wayne Couzens continued to work as an armed officer for three days after an allegation of indecent exposure was made. 

Couzens, 48, was arrested late on Tuesday on suspicion of the kidnap and murder of marketing executive Sarah Everard, 33, and indecent exposure to a second unnamed victim.

The Metropolitan Police tonight confirmed an investigation has been launched into whether two officers responded 'appropriately' to the report of indecent exposure, which was received by Scotland Yard days before Sarah vanished.

Couzens - an armed Metropolitan Police officer based in Westminster - is alleged to have exposed himself at a fast food restaurant in south London on February 28. 

It is understood he continued working following the incident and had been on shift at the US Embassy in Battersea shortly before Miss Everard's disappearance on March 3. 

The US Embassy last night refused to comment on the claim, telling MailOnline: 'We were shocked and saddened to hear the news of Sarah Everard's disappearance. Our thoughts and prayers are with her family and friends during this difficult time.' 

Sources told The Daily Mail the allegation may not have reached 'command level' so colleagues were unlikely to be aware of it, meaning he was able to continue working as an armed officer right up until his arrest. 

[Ranjeet01]

15 minutes ago, dallysingh101 said:

Don't forget he was an ex TA 'soldier' too.

He was in the Army Reserves for 2 years I believe. 

[Ranjeet01]

5 minutes ago, dallysingh101 said:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9352321/Indecent-exposure-allegation-reported-police-four-days-Sarah-Everard-vanished.html

 

Riddle over 'flashing' incident: Watchdog probes Met as it emerges Sarah Everard suspect kept working as gun cop for days after report of 'indecent exposure'

• Wayne Couzens, 48, remains in police custody after arrest in Sarah Everard case 
• Met Police received report of indecent exposure in London on February 28 
• Force made referral to IOPC over whether officers responded 'appropriately' 

The police watchdog is investigating the Met after it emerged murder suspect Wayne Couzens continued to work as an armed officer for three days after an allegation of indecent exposure was made. 

Couzens, 48, was arrested late on Tuesday on suspicion of the kidnap and murder of marketing executive Sarah Everard, 33, and indecent exposure to a second unnamed victim.

The Metropolitan Police tonight confirmed an investigation has been launched into whether two officers responded 'appropriately' to the report of indecent exposure, which was received by Scotland Yard days before Sarah vanished.

Couzens - an armed Metropolitan Police officer based in Westminster - is alleged to have exposed himself at a fast food restaurant in south London on February 28. 

It is understood he continued working following the incident and had been on shift at the US Embassy in Battersea shortly before Miss Everard's disappearance on March 3. 

The US Embassy last night refused to comment on the claim, telling MailOnline: 'We were shocked and saddened to hear the news of Sarah Everard's disappearance. Our thoughts and prayers are with her family and friends during this difficult time.' 

Sources told The Daily Mail the allegation may not have reached 'command level' so colleagues were unlikely to be aware of it, meaning he was able to continue working as an armed officer right up until his arrest. 

Thanks for this. You are correct, this man should have been suspended. 

But they did not. 

Being in a position of authority, ideally you are in a position of being responsible for your conduct. 

He should be reprimanded but the police as per usual close ranks and protect their own.

[Ranjeet01]

What is interesting how different media covers a story.

The Daily Mail (thanks to Dally) gave a fuller picture of the history on the suspect.

But the Guardian went straight into "men are evil" narrative. The BBC did the same thing.

[Premi5]

Maybe it would be easier for the police to just remove all male officers and employ only females

That way no woman can complain about feeling safe 

[dallysingh101]

Just now, Ranjeet01 said:

Thanks for this. You are correct, this man should have been suspended. 

But they did not. 

Being in a position of authority, ideally you are in a position of being responsible for your conduct. 

He should be reprimanded but the police as per usual close ranks and protect their own.

Dude, you know if this was a brown man flashing himself in a restaurant, he'd have been sitting at home, with his badge and gun taken off him whilst an investigation was going on.

And there would have been no way that he wouldn't have been reprimanded in some way, if not sacked. 

There is something strange going on with the filth right now. They've been pulling up females from various protest groups like BLM and low key harassing them.  

I just heard they did it to a young bibi whose been at the Farmer protest things over here, and has posted on Facebook about it - she was on her own in her car. They pulled her up and started asking all sorts of weird questions.

Advice to bibis (and brothers) who get pulled up by the police (this is where streetwiseness helps!):

Get your phones out and record the exchange. Don't talk too much and get embroiled in their 'debates'. Take pictures of their badge numbers and faces and straight away text/whatsapp it to a trusted friend.