Jump to content

Bammans are liars!


Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, MisterrSingh said:

A while ago I decided I really needed to understand what's going on in India without the biased Western filter that still sees the country through a colonial lens regardless of political or ideological persuasion, and also without the Sikh filter that I know is just all over the place in terms of reality.

They're beginning to produce intellectuals and thinkers grounded in Indian civilisational values who can stand against anyone from the West. They're establishing a mood which rejects the West's so-called values and ideology that are based on the Abrahamic systems, and instead arguing that Abrahamic philosophies and their contemporary derivatives have no place among Dharmic people and nations. It's basically decolonising a mass consciousness but not in the way cowardly Westerners do it by completely jettisoning reason and perspective. IF this movement gathers steam, we could see the cancerous current World Order come to an end in the coming centuries.

The desire to disassociate from Brahmins who, as you incisively point out, historically aligned with outsiders (Mughals, British, and now the shadowy Globalist elites of the West) to actively oppress their own kind by colluding with invaders, is something that is not lost on this emerging class of thinkers and speakers. They're defining a clear vision and an identity for themselves. They're identifying Islam as a real and unavoidable threat that can't be ignored in the hope they regulate their own excesses.

Sure, there's statecraft and propaganda involved like with all issues of rajneeti, but overall there's something in the air that I feel these people are striving to achieve, and you simply cannot begrudge them their desire to not exist under the boot of others while also striving for the stars. I wish we had people  on our side who had that kind of vision. We don't produce them anymore. Or if we do they're denied a voice. We're mired in the mitti of village skirmishes while these people are agitating for change on the global stage. I'm seriously tired of our hollow and boisterous bluster when there's nothing of substance behind it.

You talk about decolonization lol but these people talk about it for sometime then they are back to boot licking whites. I mean a white person making a commentary on Indian movies will get a million views. Alot of things are just talks but I dont see any decolonization happening in that population. Even in Canada they will align with these right wing types to defame Sikhs and khalistan. A few people here and there taking a stand against whites or stuff means nothing when you see how much self hate runs in the people of that country. They will talk about kicking out abrahamic religions and Christian missionaries but then see their behaviour with the white people on social media and you wonder why they go back to acting like subordinates.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, SinghPunjabSingh said:

You are absolutely right.

Brahmin's are 3% of the Indian population and control at max perhaps 5% of the Indian economy.

The vast majority of Brahmins live in poverty albeit there was a "creamy layer" which had succeeded politically.

But the Gujarati's openly boast of having ended Brahmin "Dynasty" Raj and having replaced it with "Bania Raj".

Yet a lot of our people are still living in the stone ages blaming Brahmins for having "enslaved" them. It's bizarre.

The most popular Amritdhari poster on this site (Mehtab Singh) was a former (Hindu) "Brahmin" too!

Are you aware that most of the Kashmiri Sikhs are predominantly of Brahmin ancestry?

Have you ever heard of Shaheed Bhai Mati Das Ji and Shaheed Bhai Sati Das Ji?

Are you aware of the seven (Amritdhari) Sharma brothers from Patiala who defied Indira's tanks in June 1984?

Have you heard of Pandit Kirpa Singh Dutt? Bhat Sikhs laid the foundations for Sikhi in the UK. 

Were the Bhat's who wrote Gurbani (Shabad Guru) also liars according to your opinion?

If you are aware of the above facts then instead of complaining about "bahmans" and "bhaapay" why don't you concentrate on educating some of the 40 million Hindu Brahmin's to join the Sikh Panth instead of hating us?

Well I'm pretty sure he is talking about Hindu Brahmins not the ones that became Sikhs. Do they remain Brahmins after becoming Sikhs?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/3/2022 at 3:04 AM, MisterrSingh said:

We need to stop obsessing over these "bammans". They've set their sights beyond us, and want to elevate their nation to top status, while we're crying about things that were socially relevant 500+ years ago. The Brahmin upper classes are whatever they are. There are social elites in every single society on this planet. The question is HOW are WE improving our OWN situation?

Just because it exists in other societies doesnt mean it's okay. We can clearly see what these certain elite societies plan to do all over the world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Net pay after taxes. If you don't agree, think about this: If you were a trader and started off in China with silk that cost 100 rupees and came to India, and you had to pay total 800 rupees taxes at every small kingdom along the way, and then sold your goods for 1000 rupees, you'd have 100 rupees left, right? If your daswandh is on the gross, that's 100 rupees, meaning you have nothing left. Obviously, you owe only 10% of 100, not 10% of 1000. No, it's 10% before bills and other expenses. These expenses are not your expenses to earn money. They are consumption. If you are a business owner, you take out all expenses, including rent, shop electricity, cost of goods sold, advertising, and government taxes. Whatever is left is your profit and you owe 10% of that.  If you are an employee, you are also entitled to deduct the cost of earning money. That would be government taxes. Everything else is consumption.    
    • No, bro, it's simply not true that no one talks about Simran. Where did you hear that? Swingdon? The entire Sikh world talks about doing Simran, whether it's Maskeen ji, Giani Pinderpal Singh, Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi, or Sants. So what are you talking about? Agreed. Agreed. Well, if every bani were exactly the same, then why would Guru ji even write anything after writing Japji Sahib? We should all enjoy all the banis. No, Gurbani tells you to do Simran, but it's not just "the manual". Gurbani itself also has cleansing powers. I'm not saying not to do Simran. Do it. But Gurbani is not merely "the manual". Reading and singing Gurbani is spiritually helpful: ਪ੍ਰਭ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਬਦੁ ਸੁਭਾਖਿਆ ॥  ਗਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਣਹੁ ਪੜਹੁ ਨਿਤ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰ ਪੂਰੈ ਤੂ ਰਾਖਿਆ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The Lord's Bani and the words are the best utterances. Ever sing hear and recite them, O brother and the Perfect Guru shall save thee. Pause. p611 Here Guru ji shows the importance of both Bani and Naam: ਆਇਓ ਸੁਨਨ ਪੜਨ ਕਉ ਬਾਣੀ ॥ ਨਾਮੁ ਵਿਸਾਰਿ ਲਗਹਿ ਅਨ ਲਾਲਚਿ ਬਿਰਥਾ ਜਨਮੁ ਪਰਾਣੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The mortal has come to hear and utter Bani. Forgetting the Name thou attached thyself to other desires. Vain is thy life, O mortal. Pause. p1219 Are there any house manuals that say to read and sing the house manual?
    • All of these are suppositions, bro. Linguists know that, generally, all the social classes of a physical area speak the same language, though some classes may use more advanced vocabulary. I'm talking about the syntax. That is, unless the King is an invader, which Porus was not. When you say Punjabi wasn't very evolved, what do you mean? The syntax must have been roughly the same. As for vocabulary, do you really think Punjabis at the time did nothing more than grunt to express their thoughts? That they had no shades of meaning? Such as hot/cold, red/yellow/blue, angry/sweet/loving/sad, etc? Why must we always have an inferiority complex?
    • I still think about that incident now and then, just haven't heard any developments regarding what happened, just like so many other things that have happened in Panjab!
    • There was a young Singh from abroad who went to Anandpur Sahib Hola and got into a fight with some Punjabis who were playing loud non-religious music. He had bana and a weapon or two. There were more of them than him.  He ended up losing his life. Don't be like that. Not worth it to fight manmukhs. @californiasardar1 ਮੂਰਖੈ ਨਾਲਿ ਨ ਲੁਝੀਐ ॥੧੯॥ Argue not with a fool. p473
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use