Jump to content

amrit is essentail 4 salvation.


Mkhalsa
 Share

Recommended Posts

i think it is so wrong and manmat when people say you dont need amrit in order to obtain salvation. even sri guru gobind singh ji had to take amrit. that should simply answer everything. without amrit u can not become a gurmukh, salvation is only obtained by gurmukhs. amrit is away to obtain guru jis blessing and ur promise to devote ur life to guru ji. i.e the panj pairyea gave their head for amrit. in the same concept you have to devote ur life to guru ji.

plz dont listen to people who think salvation is possible without amrit.

"take amrit prepared with double edged sword, so that ur life becomes sucessful and blessed".

bhai gurdas ji 2 // 41

amrit is distributed by panj pairyea who are the physical form of guru ji.

if the amrit is being prepared by kirpan and not khanda, do not take it. if there is a women acting as 1 of the 5, then again do not take it. only amrit which is prepared by 5 singhs and is mixed with the khanda(double-edged sword) is to be taken.

in sikhi women and men are equal, but guru ji gave 5 singhs the order to distribute amrit. if i give u a cd with 5 tracks on it. in order to reproduce the same cd, u cant change any of the tracks can u. the same concept works here. sri guru gobind singh ji mixed the water with a khanda, hence Khande da pahul, it is not known as kirpan da pahul. it is only amrit if it is prepared in the same way as sri guru gobind singh ji prepared amrit 4 the first time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 32
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

this may have been discussed already but in our city there was a huge bru ha ha about women being part of the panj pyaare in a nagar kirtan.

the two sides had the following arguments:

for women:

-the Gurus did not discriminate against females

-Women after taking amrit are also khalsa

-panj pyaare means five sikh females or males

against women:

-the panj pyaare represent the original panj pyaare who were all men

-history cannot be changed, if women wanted they could have answered Guru Sahib's call for five heads

-this is just a plot to create controversy.

I have my own views but would like to hear this forum's view especially since there are some real good singhs and singhniyah here who know their stuff.

again if this has already been discussed, my bad.

-peace

Link to comment
Share on other sites

guru ji gave permission to 5 singhs to distribute amrit. he called 5 singhs his pyhsical body. hence the name panj piaryea. it is not panj piaryeaeeh. Guru ji said panj pairyea meaning 5 singhs. guru ji didnt say 4 singhs and 1 kuar. he didn,t say 5 kuars. this doesnt show discrimination. it is the way it is. u could say all the guru,s were men. but that is the way it is. the same principle applies to this argument. there should not be an argument, people should just accept things the way they are. :wub:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeh woteva. The body is a means of transportation whilst in this mortal life. To gain mukhti, we aim to go beyond this body.. beyond our mind.

I think ure wrong. Amrit is amrit yes... whether its given by a certain jatha or a certain gender. Tell me, does that mean that all the panj pyaare have to change their names to the same names that the panj pyaarae had? They cant be a "gorah" Sikh? People with disabilities cant be one of the panj pyaarae? People who are blind cant give amrit?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no where in SGGS ji does it say men and women are equal , especially in the western sense...

all guru ji says is we have to respect women cuz from them we are bron, kigns are born, etc...

we are equal in the sense that both genders can achieve mukti...

but 'feminists' take it to far,,, wats next are we gonna change waheguru ji ka khalsa , waheguru ji ki fateh, tooo waheguru ji KI khalsI, waheguru ji KI FATEHI...

or will ppl say that the bibi should lead 2 lama, at an anand karaj, and the man the other 2...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Waheguroo Jee Ka Khalsa!

Waheguroo Jee Kee Fateh!!

For God's sake, people, don't argue about things that have already been argued about several times - it's a waste of time (hint hint, Admins).

machete -- you coming on here and preaching those beliefs (not to say they are wrong - thousands of Gursikhs think they are right, including Sant Jarnail Singh Jee Khalsa Bhinderawale) is the same thing as an AKJ Singh coming on here and saying "ok guys, keski is a kakaar and all of you should accept that." Even if a Singh believes that, he's smart enough not to come on a forum and try to enforce those beliefs, knowing that it will spur arguments.

People keep their beliefs to themselves, rather than trying to start conflict. I mean honestly, hasn't this issue been discussed enough now? (on other forums too).

In my humble opinion, it's all a waste of time arguing about anything like this. Just follow the Maryada YOUR Panj gave you.

Humble opinion. Take it as that please.

vwihgurU jI kw Kwlsw!

vwihgurU jI kI &iqh!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Net pay after taxes. If you don't agree, think about this: If you were a trader and started off in China with silk that cost 100 rupees and came to India, and you had to pay total 800 rupees taxes at every small kingdom along the way, and then sold your goods for 1000 rupees, you'd have 100 rupees left, right? If your daswandh is on the gross, that's 100 rupees, meaning you have nothing left. Obviously, you owe only 10% of 100, not 10% of 1000. No, it's 10% before bills and other expenses. These expenses are not your expenses to earn money. They are consumption. If you are a business owner, you take out all expenses, including rent, shop electricity, cost of goods sold, advertising, and government taxes. Whatever is left is your profit and you owe 10% of that.  If you are an employee, you are also entitled to deduct the cost of earning money. That would be government taxes. Everything else is consumption.    
    • No, bro, it's simply not true that no one talks about Simran. Where did you hear that? Swingdon? The entire Sikh world talks about doing Simran, whether it's Maskeen ji, Giani Pinderpal Singh, Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi, or Sants. So what are you talking about? Agreed. Agreed. Well, if every bani were exactly the same, then why would Guru ji even write anything after writing Japji Sahib? We should all enjoy all the banis. No, Gurbani tells you to do Simran, but it's not just "the manual". Gurbani itself also has cleansing powers. I'm not saying not to do Simran. Do it. But Gurbani is not merely "the manual". Reading and singing Gurbani is spiritually helpful: ਪ੍ਰਭ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਬਦੁ ਸੁਭਾਖਿਆ ॥  ਗਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਣਹੁ ਪੜਹੁ ਨਿਤ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰ ਪੂਰੈ ਤੂ ਰਾਖਿਆ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The Lord's Bani and the words are the best utterances. Ever sing hear and recite them, O brother and the Perfect Guru shall save thee. Pause. p611 Here Guru ji shows the importance of both Bani and Naam: ਆਇਓ ਸੁਨਨ ਪੜਨ ਕਉ ਬਾਣੀ ॥ ਨਾਮੁ ਵਿਸਾਰਿ ਲਗਹਿ ਅਨ ਲਾਲਚਿ ਬਿਰਥਾ ਜਨਮੁ ਪਰਾਣੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The mortal has come to hear and utter Bani. Forgetting the Name thou attached thyself to other desires. Vain is thy life, O mortal. Pause. p1219 Are there any house manuals that say to read and sing the house manual?
    • All of these are suppositions, bro. Linguists know that, generally, all the social classes of a physical area speak the same language, though some classes may use more advanced vocabulary. I'm talking about the syntax. That is, unless the King is an invader, which Porus was not. When you say Punjabi wasn't very evolved, what do you mean? The syntax must have been roughly the same. As for vocabulary, do you really think Punjabis at the time did nothing more than grunt to express their thoughts? That they had no shades of meaning? Such as hot/cold, red/yellow/blue, angry/sweet/loving/sad, etc? Why must we always have an inferiority complex?
    • I still think about that incident now and then, just haven't heard any developments regarding what happened, just like so many other things that have happened in Panjab!
    • There was a young Singh from abroad who went to Anandpur Sahib Hola and got into a fight with some Punjabis who were playing loud non-religious music. He had bana and a weapon or two. There were more of them than him.  He ended up losing his life. Don't be like that. Not worth it to fight manmukhs. @californiasardar1 ਮੂਰਖੈ ਨਾਲਿ ਨ ਲੁਝੀਐ ॥੧੯॥ Argue not with a fool. p473
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use