Jump to content

Accepting Roti From Sehajdhari Mother


Recommended Posts

when bhai jarnail singh became bibeki his dad didnt talk 2 him 4 10yrs

i dont think any 1 here has the jeevn or buddhi to question the rehat ( i mtie be wrong) wud u have questioned the likes of gurbachan singh bhindrawale or bhai randhir singh ... even if they gave us ligitement answers our stupid mind never agrees and always wats to be naive and prove others wrong

go a amrit sanchar and ask panj pyareh about the rehat

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 133
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

when bhai jarnail singh became bibeki his dad didnt talk 2 him 4 10yrs

i dont think any 1 here has the jeevn or buddhi to question the rehat ( i mtie be wrong) wud u have questioned the likes of gurbachan singh bhindrawale or bhai randhir singh ... even if they gave us ligitement answers our stupid mind never agrees and always wats to be naive and prove others wrong

go a amrit sanchar and ask panj pyareh about the rehat

I so agree with you, I was going to say ask the Panj pyaray (mind you when i had Amrit, I broke it now, because of being forced when i wasnt ready) I didnt get told that I should not share food with anybody else, but I remain secretive about verything else what was told to me. What ever they say you must obey, because its Guru ji himself. :D d_oh.gif :TH:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not taking any sides here, I know nothing, but I am just trying to present all sides of the debate. As far as RehitNaamays go, I was referring to the ones written by the original Panj Payarays as guided by Guru Gobind Singh Ji.

Also I think that if you take Amrit and your Panj Payarays say that only eat from Amritdharis, how can one debate that? Why would one debate that?

Something to think about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not taking any sides here, I know nothing, but I am just trying to present all sides of the debate. As far as RehitNaamays go, I was referring to the ones written by the original Panj Payarays as guided by Guru Gobind Singh Ji.

Also I think that if you take Amrit and your Panj Payarays say that only eat from Amritdharis, how can one debate that? Why would one debate that?

Something to think about.

I got told i shudnt eat the "Jhoot" but i didnt get told at all I shudnt have food prepared by others, I am sure I didnt, but I take your point Veera!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking at my kitchen the following should not be eaten;

sainsbury's biscuits

walkers crisps

heinz ketchup

loaf of bread

jam

marmite

vegetable pasty.

veggie fingers

cheese

yoghurt

tomatoe soup

bar of chocolate

amb da achar

barfi

ladoo

bibek dhan - in the ardas does not mean not eating from non-amritdharis.

I am amritdhari - well i thought i was until reading this topic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest s133k_s1kh

Looking at my kitchen the following should not be eaten;

sainsbury's biscuits

walkers crisps

heinz ketchup

loaf of bread

jam

marmite

vegetable pasty.

veggie fingers

cheese

yoghurt

tomatoe soup

bar of chocolate

amb da achar

barfi

ladoo

bibek dhan - in the ardas does not mean not eating from non-amritdharis.

I am amritdhari - well i thought i was until reading this topic.

FATEH!!!

LOL.gifLOL.gifLOL.gif

You still are amritdhari d_oh.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

just a few of my opinions on bibek......

we shoud try and keep bibek IF we can

there isnt one person out there that fully keeps every rehit so we shouldnt look down on those that dont keep bibek and hurt the feelings of those who are trying to do our seva by giving us food

its tru that the food we cook from was probly originally prepared by next people in factories or farms unless u grew it urself which is doubtful!!

are ur hands better than the hands of the other people who cook ur food???

Isnt the food in the langar still not guru ka langar.....rejection of guru ka langer???

why sit in the langar hall and allow chances to reject langar if your not gna eat it anyway?

a tru bibekee wouldnt have anyone know that he/she is bibekee and wouldnt even allow for a chance to reject food and hurt sum1s feelings and if they did have to reject food they would never say its becoz im bibek.....out of pure humbleness!

try to keep bibek if u can as it is rehit.......and if u do dont let it create ego - coz thats what i always tend to see in bibekees, the tru bibekees dnt let any1 know they out of nimrata!

bhul chuk maaf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest s133k_s1kh

just a few of my opinions on bibek......

we shoud try and keep bibek IF we can

there isnt one person out there that fully keeps every rehit so we shouldnt look down on those that dont keep bibek and hurt the feelings of those who are trying to do our seva by giving us food

its tru that the food we cook from was probly originally prepared by next people in factories or farms unless u grew it urself which is doubtful!!

are ur hands better than the hands of the other people who cook ur food???

Isnt the food in the langar still not guru ka langar.....rejection of guru ka langer???

why sit in the langar hall and allow chances to reject langar if your not gna eat it anyway?

a tru bibekee wouldnt have anyone know that he/she is bibekee and wouldnt even allow for a chance to reject food and hurt sum1s feelings and if they did have to reject food they would never say its becoz im bibek.....out of pure humbleness!

try to keep bibek if u can as it is rehit.......and if u do dont let it create ego - coz thats what i always tend to see in bibekees, the tru bibekees dnt let any1 know they out of nimrata!

bhul chuk maaf

FATEH!!

Awesome post d_oh.gif Very nicely said. its the EGO factor that plays a major role in not accepting things .

Bhul Chuk Maaf

GURU RAKHA!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can eat food, but make sure u never eat her jootha food or food she has ate or tasted.

Also thank vaheguru for food before eating or jap nam in ur head while cooking food

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Part of the problem is the hostilities between India and Pakistan. If the border were open, Amritsar would easily become a huge trading city. Secondly, the National Highways Authority of India is constructing a new 6-lane expressway from Kashmir, through Amritsar/Jalandhar/Ludhiana to Dehli which will be part of the Ludhiana-Delhi-Kolkatta Industrial Corridor.  Maps of the New Silk Road show Kolkata as a key part of the "road". The Punjab to Kolkata expressway and rail connections will fulfill the ability to hook up to the New Silk Road.  In addition, while crossing to Pakistan via AH1 (Asian Highway 1) is difficult, India does connect to AH1 on the other side, towards the East. Finally, Punjab can trade with the world via Mundra port in Gujurat. Rail to Mundra, then sea onwards. Dubai is very close with a free port. If you send products to Iran, there are ground links onward to Europe.
    • Yeah, that's one possibility. Another I initially thought is that it's a Muslim trying to gather info. But then, you might ask, how does he know about Sikh textual sources. Well, you'd be surprised at their resourcefulness. A final possibility is he's a weak Sikh who was asked a question by a non-Sikh and now he's suddenly feverishly wondering where it's "written" that you can't marry a young child. To the latter, I would say, you're looking in the wrong spot. Gurbani isn't a 1428 page rulebook, like Leviticus or the Vedas: ਸਿਮ੍ਰਿਤਿ ਸਾਸਤ੍ਰ ਪੁੰਨ ਪਾਪ ਬੀਚਾਰਦੇ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ਗੁਰੂ ਬਾਝਹੁ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ The Simritis and Shastras discriminate between charity and sin, but know not the essence of the Real Thing. Without the Guru, they know not the essence of the Reality, know not the essence of the Reality. Anand Sahib.
    • You're confusing two different things: One is merely adding starch to a turban to get a certain feel to the fabric. The other is tying your turban once and taking it off like a hat. It is this that people have a problem with. What's wrong with it is that Rehit says to tie your turban afresh every time. If you ask, "Where is that written?", it's written in Bhai Nand Lal ji's Rehitnama. @ipledgeblue didn't just make it up. Umm, no, bro. We're not evangelical Christians like President George W Bush of the US claiming to "talk to God" who told him to invade Iraq. "Speaking to him directly" basically ends up being doing whatever you feel like with the excuse that Guru ji told you to do it. If you still want to take your turban off like a hat, feel free to do so, but don't claim that it's Rehit.
    • You don't need to wear either a pag or dumalla in the gym. You can simply wear a meter or 1.5m small turban (gol pagg or round turban). It doesn't come off.
    • The reason you don't see anything wrong with it is because like a fish in water, you grew up in Western culture and imbibed it fully. It's very difficult to for parents to inculcate traditional culture while in the West. The reason there is a problem is because a kiss between a man and wife is a sexual act (I didn't say it's coitus, but it's still sexual.) By contrast a kiss between a mother and a child, for example, is not sexual. And in our culture, sexual acts are not allowed in public. Goras do allow it. And that's also the reason they have gay pride parades now with people walking around naked with children in attendance and so forth.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use