Jump to content

Veerjis/Bhainjis


Akaali
 Share

Recommended Posts

I guess im lukier than some of you guys, im the oldest in my family so all my younger brothers and sisters call my bhaji, and if they dont..... mum gives them a thupar!!

lol :@

I always been bought up to call my elder cousins bhaji etc, and id feel weird with my family members calling them by their names alone, sometimes you would use their name as a prefix eg, simra bhaji... but not alone.

As far as with your mates, i agree with some that it depends on your relationship with the person, often you dont actuly know their name so you have no choice but to call them bhaji or penji. other times with people that you know it just depends on the way ur feeling at the time, i find that if your in a good sikhi mood, ie feeling guru ji's pyar and are feeling humble then you would tend to call everyone bhaji etc, or bhai sahib or bibi ji.

Else if someone of particular respect is being spoken to, then if not using brother or sister, you would say their full name eg, Baljinder Singh etc.

And of course theirs always the good old 'OIIIII'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest mehtab

AK-47 Posted on Apr 9 2004, 05:54 PM

i find that if your in a good sikhi mood, ie feeling guru ji's pyar and are feeling humble then you would tend to call everyone bhaji etc, or bhai sahib or bibi ji.
THAT IS IT !!!!!!!!!!! :@ :@ :) :wub: :wub: :lol: wub.gif :lol: :lol:
Link to comment
Share on other sites

wjkk,wjkf.

its important for people to understand that treating someone with the same respect as eg bro/sis doesn't neccessarily mean you see them as such. its more about setting the boundries;

its sort of just become a fashionable thing to call everyone paaji/panji.

personally i refuse to call someone paaji/panji unless i truely see them as such, afterall this kind of relationship is so pure & strong, it shouldn't be chucked around lightly... calling someone paaji completely removes the possibility for me to even consider any marital stance for the future with him & as mentioned before, make everyone a panji/paaji you've no one left to make your better half. B)

...its comes down to this; whatever you do, be sincere - not for show...

bhul chuk maaf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with 'kaur @ guru's feet', I would only call someone a veerji/bhainji if I regard them as that. If I call them a bhainji/veerji, then I would have to accept them as my brother or sister.

Vicky veerji brought out a solid point..

Everybody that i know i always call/chat/use their first name..

most of the time using bhaenje/veerjee to me is a fakepan..

:@
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest mehtab

kaur @ gurus feet Posted on Apr 10 2004, 06:56 AM

calling someone paaji completely removes the possibility for me to even consider any marital stance for the future with him & as mentioned before, make everyone a panji/paaji you've no one left to make your better half...its comes down to this; whatever you do, be sincere - not for show...
kaur @ gurus feet, i m at ur feet ^_^ :WW: ...u juz said it out plain, clear and perfect :@:@

and another thing i have noticed is that the ones whom i really love as my sisters, i hardly call them penji, and they being younger do address me as veerjee...the only time i remember calling them penji is when i have to tell them something out of love...its more of love from inside that matters rather than external verbal respect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

wow, nice topic...

Abs. rite, Rochak (no veer ji).......yaar i call u rochak on phone, y to use veer ji here.. :@

Rest...i have very rarely called anyone Bhain ji....... :@

I always prefer to call by name, if i know i'm elder. (exceptions are there)...(rochak dont get angry....talking about kaurs... :) ) otherwise, you/tusi......lolz

Bhul Chuk Maaf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Waheguruji Ka Khalsa!

Waheguruji Ki Fateh!!

"Kaur@guruji's feet" said the right thing..... Its the respect that matters and we dont have to tell each other how much respect we have for each other.... we know that a fellow sikh has utmost respect for their brethern............We all are guruji's kids.....and i guess we could simply call each other by their name with "JI" or preferrably reffring each other "khalsaji"...coz thats what we are trying to be and thats motive of each one of us.........

bhul chuk maaf karni...... blush.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah, that's one possibility. Another I initially thought is that it's a Muslim trying to gather info. But then, you might ask, how does he know about Sikh textual sources. Well, you'd be surprised at their resourcefulness. A final possibility is he's a weak Sikh who was asked a question by a non-Sikh and now he's suddenly feverishly wondering where it's "written" that you can't marry a young child. To the latter, I would say, you're looking in the wrong spot. Gurbani isn't a 1428 page rulebook, like Leviticus or the Vedas: ਸਿਮ੍ਰਿਤਿ ਸਾਸਤ੍ਰ ਪੁੰਨ ਪਾਪ ਬੀਚਾਰਦੇ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ਗੁਰੂ ਬਾਝਹੁ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ The Simritis and Shastras discriminate between charity and sin, but know not the essence of the Real Thing. Without the Guru, they know not the essence of the Reality, know not the essence of the Reality. Anand Sahib.
    • You're confusing two different things: One is merely adding starch to a turban to get a certain feel to the fabric. The other is tying your turban once and taking it off like a hat. It is this that people have a problem with. What's wrong with it is that Rehit says to tie your turban afresh every time. If you ask, "Where is that written?", it's written in Bhai Nand Lal ji's Rehitnama. @ipledgeblue didn't just make it up. Umm, no, bro. We're not evangelical Christians like President George W Bush of the US claiming to "talk to God" who told him to invade Iraq. "Speaking to him directly" basically ends up being doing whatever you feel like with the excuse that Guru ji told you to do it. If you still want to take your turban off like a hat, feel free to do so, but don't claim that it's Rehit.
    • You don't need to wear either a pag or dumalla in the gym. You can simply wear a meter or 1.5m small turban (gol pagg or round turban). It doesn't come off.
    • The reason you don't see anything wrong with it is because like a fish in water, you grew up in Western culture and imbibed it fully. It's very difficult to for parents to inculcate traditional culture while in the West. The reason there is a problem is because a kiss between a man and wife is a sexual act (I didn't say it's coitus, but it's still sexual.) By contrast a kiss between a mother and a child, for example, is not sexual. And in our culture, sexual acts are not allowed in public. Goras do allow it. And that's also the reason they have gay pride parades now with people walking around naked with children in attendance and so forth.
    • The printer is C J Amritsar… They have given a mobile number for India …
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use