Jump to content

What Made Maharaja Ranjit Singh Such A Great Sikh Leader


Recommended Posts

ok so you have no real evidence to back your previous comment that he was not Amritdhari !

please refrain from misleading people / sangat as we already have many people doing this and it does not help sikhi / panth !!

Dont listen to hear say from people who call themselves sikhs and make up stories to justify there reason for not taking Amrit.

if he did take Amrit - then why was womanising - drinking alchol -- tell me that - there is proof of this - he was not amritdhari .

however don't get twisted just on this - i have deep respect for him for what he did which was kick some real a** and get on with whats at hand. now stop quoting me willy nillly and get on with you need to get on with - and stick to the topic- stop knit picking

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest dasguruka

apologies as i quoted this in a previous post but forgot to give a reply.

Hazoor Sahib was built well after Guru Gobind Singh's going to Sachkhand. The place where Guru Ji, left this earth, was marked out, but the site was washed away by a flood soon after.

The area was identified and a new gurdwara was built, and it was this building that Maharaja Ranjit Singh had built. Guru Ji supposedly said that whoever builds a Gurdwara in his name will have their family line end, but i havent actually seen or read anything that confirms this, rather it seems to be a tale to explain why Maharaja's family ended. What was shocking for me especially is that the symbol of dedication to the sewa of Gurdwaras, which we ask Waheguru for whenever we do Ardas, can be ignored and people can perpetuate the myth that Guru Ji would say this. In the lives of previous Guru's many Sikhs built Gurdwaras, but there was no such injunction then.

A few years, Nishkam Sewak Jatha guilded the dome at hazoor Sahib, but i havent noticed anything happening to their organisation as per 10th Guru's "saying". Rather they have strenghtened as a result if this sewa.

Maharaja also gave the equivalent weight in gold to Somnath Mandir, that he gave to Darbar Sahib.

It wasn't about the Kaami aspect that I was pointing out Khalsa Ji, rather that Sikhs aren't allowed to engage/marry with Muslims. I heard it in a Katha by Giani Thakur Singh Ji where he also points out that the reason his line ended was because he covered a lot of major places with gold.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

if he did take Amrit - then why was womanising - drinking alchol -- tell me that - there is proof of this - he was not amritdhari .

however don't get twisted just on this - i have deep respect for him for what he did which was kick some real a** and get on with whats at hand. now stop quoting me willy nillly and get on with you need to get on with - and stick to the topic- stop knit picking

you obviously can not have a debate ! but instead now choose to get irate because i have questioned you about your comment in a previous post and shown that you make statements without any proof, i will not be taking any more interest in your comments as they are likely to be made up!!

Well then thats why he lost everything in the end just goes to show may be he should have taken amrit, followed the rehat ,so look at history and learn my friend instead of admiring something that could have lasted a lot longer if there had been some discipline. Maybe you should take your own advice first about sticking to the topic, which is what made him a great leader instead of saying he is not amritdhari, which has no relevance to the topic and is you clearly attacking amritdharis., but thats just your own guilt and you will have to deal with that yourself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you obviously can not have a debate ! but instead now choose to get irate because i have questioned you about your comment in a previous post and shown that you make statements without any proof, i will not be taking any more interest in your comments as they are likely to be made up!!

Well then thats why he lost everything in the end just goes to show may be he should have taken amrit, followed the rehat ,so look at history and learn my friend instead of admiring something that could have lasted a lot longer if there had been some discipline. Maybe you should take your own advice first about sticking to the topic, which is what made him a great leader instead of saying he is not amritdhari, which has no relevance to the topic and is you clearly attacking amritdharis., but thats just your own guilt and you will have to deal with that yourself.

no one is geting irate - if you reread my comments prorperly i have never said cos he wasn't amritdhari - he didn't achieve what he should have - or would have lived longer - how absurd are you.your making up as you go along. LISTEN - HE WAS GREAT BUT THE FACT IS HE NEVER TOOK AMRIT- FOR THAT REASON WE SHOULD ALL REPECT AMRITDHARI OR NON AMRITDHARI - AS AT PRESENT WE DON;T IN THe KAUM- even NON AMRITDHARI HAVE AND CAN ACHEIVE GREATLY AS HE DID. AMRITDHARI DOESN'T MAKE ONE SPECIAL - WE SHOULD ALL TRY OUR BEST AT CONTRIBUTING TO SIKHE NO MATTER WHAT-

Hopefully that may clarify wheere iam coming from - no more on this from me.goodness me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AMRITDHARI DOESN'T MAKE ONE SPECIAL

Thats why we do not have a khalsa raj today,The Tenth Maharaj thought it was important that we take Amrit and keep rehat , but i suppose you know better, its these kinds of views that has caused divisions, views like its not a necessity to take amrit to be sikh!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

do you feel good now - i love the way you twisted my words and came out with all this garbage - stick to the topic - amritdhari or not - we all have to contribute to sikhe - some more than others -whether amritdhari or not - we all owe sikhe. Calm down darling stop twisting and taking my words out of context - this is what is wrong with youth - hope admins are paying attention

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • was researching this and came back to this thread. Also found an older thread:    
    • Net pay after taxes. If you don't agree, think about this: If you were a trader and started off in China with silk that cost 100 rupees and came to India, and you had to pay total 800 rupees taxes at every small kingdom along the way, and then sold your goods for 1000 rupees, you'd have 100 rupees left, right? If your daswandh is on the gross, that's 100 rupees, meaning you have nothing left. Obviously, you owe only 10% of 100, not 10% of 1000. No, it's 10% before bills and other expenses. These expenses are not your expenses to earn money. They are consumption. If you are a business owner, you take out all expenses, including rent, shop electricity, cost of goods sold, advertising, and government taxes. Whatever is left is your profit and you owe 10% of that.  If you are an employee, you are also entitled to deduct the cost of earning money. That would be government taxes. Everything else is consumption.    
    • No, bro, it's simply not true that no one talks about Simran. Where did you hear that? Swingdon? The entire Sikh world talks about doing Simran, whether it's Maskeen ji, Giani Pinderpal Singh, Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi, or Sants. So what are you talking about? Agreed. Agreed. Well, if every bani were exactly the same, then why would Guru ji even write anything after writing Japji Sahib? We should all enjoy all the banis. No, Gurbani tells you to do Simran, but it's not just "the manual". Gurbani itself also has cleansing powers. I'm not saying not to do Simran. Do it. But Gurbani is not merely "the manual". Reading and singing Gurbani is spiritually helpful: ਪ੍ਰਭ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਬਦੁ ਸੁਭਾਖਿਆ ॥  ਗਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਣਹੁ ਪੜਹੁ ਨਿਤ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰ ਪੂਰੈ ਤੂ ਰਾਖਿਆ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The Lord's Bani and the words are the best utterances. Ever sing hear and recite them, O brother and the Perfect Guru shall save thee. Pause. p611 Here Guru ji shows the importance of both Bani and Naam: ਆਇਓ ਸੁਨਨ ਪੜਨ ਕਉ ਬਾਣੀ ॥ ਨਾਮੁ ਵਿਸਾਰਿ ਲਗਹਿ ਅਨ ਲਾਲਚਿ ਬਿਰਥਾ ਜਨਮੁ ਪਰਾਣੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The mortal has come to hear and utter Bani. Forgetting the Name thou attached thyself to other desires. Vain is thy life, O mortal. Pause. p1219 Are there any house manuals that say to read and sing the house manual?
    • All of these are suppositions, bro. Linguists know that, generally, all the social classes of a physical area speak the same language, though some classes may use more advanced vocabulary. I'm talking about the syntax. That is, unless the King is an invader, which Porus was not. When you say Punjabi wasn't very evolved, what do you mean? The syntax must have been roughly the same. As for vocabulary, do you really think Punjabis at the time did nothing more than grunt to express their thoughts? That they had no shades of meaning? Such as hot/cold, red/yellow/blue, angry/sweet/loving/sad, etc? Why must we always have an inferiority complex?
    • I still think about that incident now and then, just haven't heard any developments regarding what happened, just like so many other things that have happened in Panjab!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use