Jump to content

Interview Of Sikh Girl Who Used To Have Mulsim Boyfreind


Hammertime007
 Share

Recommended Posts

That doesnt really make sense as the main reason the pindus of Punjab faced extinction in the first place was due to them being proper sikhs. If they had been sellouts then the mughals would have given them the option of conversion and circumcision in order to allow them to be the way they wanted to be. As for the effects of sikhi on Punjab, let's face it, no one can rule a country with religion alone as a solid political structure is needed. The fact our Gurudwaras cant even respond to the needs of the community reflects our people's inability to form even the basic sikhi-inspired political/social structures.

You've hit the nail on the head!! HSD1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It seems to me that it's the Sikh Girls who lack knowledge of their Sikh History & Religion that fall prey to these predators!

When something is explained in Guru Ji's presence within the Sangat it has a lot more meaning and power!

So if a Girl can't 9 to 19yrs, who can't speak Punjabi (or speaks very basic punjabi), goes to the Gurdwara with her Parents on a Sunday morning, what will she understand about her religion or History? If it's only available in High level educated Punjabi?

Why isn't there Parchaar at the Gurdwara in English on a Sunday Morning?? As part of the Parchaar in English a few dozen Gurmukhi words could be translated every Sunday. That way each Sunday the english speaking Sikhs would walk away knowing more Gurmukhi words, each week, not to mention understand something too, before it's too late!!

Have you seen the Parchaar where a Gursikh/Giani reads a sentence of Paath, and then a 2nd Giani translates into in Punjabi. This keeps going on sentence after sentence! Wouldn't it be brilliant if the 1st Gursikh/Giani read the paath, and then 2nd Giani transalated it into Punjabi, and then a 3rd Giani translated the sentence into English!!!

Why is English excluded on a Sunday Morning from the Gurdwara, even though we know full well that the majority of British Born Sikhs can't understand the high level educated Punjabi the Gianis speak????????????????

Agree or even a over head projecter whee you can follow it with translation. Good ideas but Most old fogee Bhais dont care they just want Akand Paath Money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I disagree totally; you have start with the most basic but the mist important. Which would be

Mool Mantra – (Translated)

Names of the Gurus

Significant Contributions by each Guru, i.e. Guru Nanak –'s basic beliefs , Guru Amar Das further institutionalized Langar, Guru Arjan Dev laid the foundation of the Harmandir Sahib and first shaeed Guru, Guru Gobind Singh created the Khlasa, along with all other contribution each of each Guru. These basic things.

Values of Sikhi which people can easily inforce, Kirt Karo Vand Shacko, Naam Jappo.

The above is where you start 84 and history comes after.

Personally, I think history comes before shabad (unless, you're one of the lucky ones whose heart gets peirced by a shabad just on hearing it).

Only, I think if somebody knows even basic Sikh History (the History of the Gurus) then you know the shabad is going to mean something!!!

There is no history like Sikh history!!!!:waheguru:

Agree or even a over head projecter whee you can follow it with translation. Good ideas but Most old fogee Bhais dont care they just want Akand Paath Money.

You're right!! Sikhi to the max should be complusory now, at the very least!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That doesnt really make sense as the main reason the pindus of Punjab faced extinction in the first place was due to them being proper sikhs.

I don't know man. Aurengzab was going on pretty ignorant with Hindus too. I think all nonsullay were under threat myself. Some other people called Satnamis got wiped off the face of the earth too I heard.

If they had been sellouts then the mughals would have given them the option of conversion and circumcision in order to allow them to be the way they wanted to be.

I'm not saying they were straight 'sell out' as you're implying. I'm suggesting some people may have piggy backed on the faith when it was successfully dealing with it's enemies during the early Khalsa guerrilla war stage. People who didn't really have much loyalty or even belief in core principles of the faith like egalitarianism. Only to later subvert things according to their beliefs. (Guru ji is quoted giving a warning of this by Chaupa Singh). Or alternatively, people just naturally reverted to their backward thinking over generations? Humans seem to have a natural predilection for corruption and selfishness, so it's no big shocker I guess?

As for the effects of sikhi on Punjab, let's face it, no one can rule a country with religion alone as a solid political structure is needed. The fact our Gurudwaras cant even respond to the needs of the community reflects our people's inability to form even the basic sikhi-inspired political/social structures.

Fair point, although I'm pretty sure some muslay would argue that they do have a political system derived from their religion?

Anyway, you read Prem Sumarag yet? Do so if you haven't. It shows our people weren't always politically clueless like now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally, I think history comes before shabad (unless, you're one of the lucky ones whose heart gets peirced by a shabad just on hearing it).

Only, I think if somebody knows even basic Sikh History (the History of the Gurus) then you know the shabad is going to mean something!!!

There is no history like Sikh history!!!!:waheguru:

You're right!! Sikhi to the max should be complusory now, at the very least!!

History isn’t belief or philosophy both of which are at the core of religion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

History isn't belief or philosophy both of which are at the core of religion.

I don't disagree with your statement whatsoever. However, some Sikhs lack belief and are not very Philosophical. However, if you give them the hard historical facts then that alone will draw them to what Shabads the Gurus left us with, those Gurus who lead such Truthful, Courageous, Compassionate lives!!!

I just saying it's one way of drawing them in!!:waheguru:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not saying they were straight 'sell out' as you're implying. I'm suggesting some people may have piggy backed on the faith when it was successfully dealing with it's enemies during the early Khalsa guerrilla war stage. People who didn't really have much loyalty or even belief in core principles of the faith like egalitarianism. Only to later subvert things according to their beliefs. (Guru ji is quoted giving a warning of this by Chaupa Singh). Or alternatively, people just naturally reverted to their backward thinking over generations? Humans seem to have a natural predilection for corruption and selfishness, so it's no big shocker I guess?

Truth is people will always do stupid things if they arent taught better. It's really a case of changing their view of what is acceptable and what is an absolute wrong.

Fair point, although I'm pretty sure some muslay would argue that they do have a political system derived from their religion?

If they have, it hasnt done them any good as they still need things like military dictatorships or democracy, just like christians or buddhists and everyone else. Politics is inherently different to religion, but religion plays (or should play) a big part in the formation of political creeds. Unfortunately we sikhs only have the parties in East Punjab to reflect what we believe are 'political parties'. But who knows what the future holds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't disagree with your statement whatsoever. However, some Sikhs lack belief and are not very Philosophical. However, if you give them the hard historical facts then that alone will draw them to what Shabads the Gurus left us with, those Gurus who lead such Truthful, Courageous, Compassionate lives!!!

I just saying it's one way of drawing them in!!:waheguru:

You need a balance of both.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • the whole 'your husband/wife is chosen for you'/sanjog thing is real, it's just that a lot of people end up marrying the wrong person. they did not end up with the person that was meant for them. my friend, you should marry someone who you feel a connection with and love. there are millions of sikh girls, i'm sure you can find someone who aligns with your sensibilities and who you can truthfully say that you love. sikhi does not say anything against love marriages. you can also be in a loveless arranged marriage which is a safe option b/c both families are more inclined to keep the union intact. i was one of those people who was like meh, i guess i'll just get arranged to some sikh. well i finally started dating for the first time this year and i'm getting married to someone that i love and cannot even imagine leaving. i think it's better to have lost & lost than never loved at all. unfortunately, a lot of people confuse love w/ looks & lust. a lot of men go for the fittest girl they can find and think they won the jackpot or something. in reality, your partner should be like an extremely loved best friend. there's a reason why it's a fact that the most stable and long-lasting relationships started as friendships.  i also think a lot of women are petty and divorce over small reasons, but there's other terrible things like high cheating rates as well. that's why the divorce rate in the west is high. be careful out there.
    • andrew tate praises sikhi too & likes sikhs. his brother also donated to sikh families iirc. they just like any "alpha" religion and tbh islam is the most "alpha" in their eyes. islam is very good at promoting that image. but imo a real alpha man doesn't command respect by beating up his wive(s) or forcing them to wear a burqa. a real man will have his woman listen to him w/o raising a hand or his voice, and command respect by being respectful. he leads by example and integrity. that's true masculinity. you get the idea. + yes, it's definitely true that islam is growing rapidly and making massive inroads. strength in numbers + belief will do that. but rlly it's just because of the birth rate. a lot of them are muslim b/c it's their "identity" just like how a lot of young sikhs will say they're "culturally sikh" or whatever. there just aren't billions of sikhs who lambast their identity everywhere and have strict and linear rules like in islam. besides, the reality is that islam and its followers are some of the most morally bankrupt. you can see all the weird trans rules in iran, bacche baazi in afghanistan, visiting brothels, watching p*rn, p*dophilia what goes on behind the scenes in countries like uae & qatar, etc, and come to your conclusions. you can google all the stats yourself and see which countries do the most of these ^.   
    • stop associating with hinduism, that's the absolutely worst thing you can do as a sikh. not sure if you noticed but the entire world looks down upon and spits at india & hindus, literally no one respects them and considers them weak and cowardly. literally 1+ billion of them but not perceived as a strong religion commandeering respect. 
    • you wrote a whole lot but told us nothing. what exactly did you do wrong to make you feel this way?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use