Jump to content

Criminal Amitabh Bachan


Recommended Posts

It's weird I was thinking about Amitabh yesterday while looking through the thread about letting 1984 go. I was so close to typing something up about him, then come on here a few hrs later and see this thread.

He's even played a role of a sikh and stepped into a gurdwarra in a film. How he is still treated like a god shows the power of Bollywood and Indian polictics and also shows how we are not able to spot deception if its staring us right in the face- he must be laughing everytime a sardar asks for his autograph- it is truly Kalyug.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anyone have any concrete evidence about his role in the Delhi genocide? I'm struggling to believe that he could get away with what he is alleged to have done without any video evidence or maybe numerous witness testimonies given that he is a demi-god in India.

Anybody?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anyone have any concrete evidence about his role in the Delhi genocide? I'm struggling to believe that he could get away with what he is alleged to have done without any video evidence or maybe numerous witness testimonies given that he is a demi-god in India.

Anybody?

Is there any concrete evidence that their were progroms in delhi which claimed the lives of thousands other than witness statements and a few pcitures of burnt out trucks and bodies lying on the floor?..not much evidence for a wide scale pogrom where countless lives were lost..lol..wake up...i cant believe your doubting the role of amitabh bachan in delhi pogrom...is someone a closet bollywood fan? lol...why would anyone want to accuse amitabh of this crime if there wasnt a ounce of truth in the claim...the thing is many people watched this live tv speech in which he said 'blood for blood'...which you dont need a rocket scientist to understand that statement..he called for the sikhs bloood...if you require evidence..ask ajmer singh randhawa..contact him on his blog..he has much video and audio evidence stockpiled..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is there any concrete evidence that their were progroms in delhi which claimed the lives of thousands other than witness statements and a few pcitures of burnt out trucks and bodies lying on the floor?..not much evidence for a wide scale pogrom where countless lives were lost..lol..wake up...i cant believe your doubting the role of amitabh bachan in delhi pogrom...is someone a closet bollywood fan? lol...why would anyone want to accuse amitabh of this crime if there wasnt a ounce of truth in the claim...the thing is many people watched this live tv speech in which he said 'blood for blood'...which you dont need a rocket scientist to understand that statement..he called for the sikhs bloood...if you require evidence..ask ajmer singh randhawa..contact him on his blog..he has much video and audio evidence stockpiled..

Oh look, the Khalistani Internet Fauj, sitting with their AK-47's at hand ready to liberate Khalistan. It's people like you have lost all sense of perception, to the point that you can no longer coherently read simple posts on a Sikh internet forum. I will take the time to dissect my post for your understanding:

Does anyone have any concrete evidence about his role in the Delhi genocide?

So here I am looking for perhaps video or audio of the alleged inciting comments made? I also very clearly refer to the events in November 1984 as genocide, do you know what genocide means? Clearly not after from what you wrote, I'll save you the trip to the dictionary:

"The deliberate and systematic destruction, in whole or in part, of an ethnic, racial, religious, or national group"

I'm struggling to believe that he could get away with what he is alleged to have done without any video evidence or maybe numerous witness testimonies given that he is a demi-god in India.

It is said he made these statements on Doordarshan, this is a national channel in India, and one of the very few available at the time given the absence of cable or satellite television. One would assume there would be numerous witness testimonies, or even video or audio evidence?

So, where anywhere in my comments have I doubted the validity of the claims, what because I asked for something a little more robust that may hold up in an international court of law?

As for Ajmer Singh Randhawa having audio and video stockpiled, I find it a little odd that he has not released anything for public viewing that may really prove beyond any reasonable doubt the veracity of these allegations against Amitabh Bachchan.

On a personal note however, I would not be in the least bit surprised if he did say these things, it's a well known fact how close his mother was to Indira Gandhi, so this is entirely plausible. My point was being surprised at the fact that we have no video or audio evidence given the enormity of who made these inciting comments.

KhalistaniGunMan - Think before you talk next time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was searching igurbani.com which gives correct pronunciation of Gurbani. I can’t remember all of it at once. I guess it relies on more practice, like more Sehaj Paths. The meaning becomes clearer. I have noticed slight variants in it. This could be because it’s written in old Punjabi.  
    • Veer Manpreet Singh, a lay preacher, claims that -Sikhs aren't supposed to worship Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We are only supposed to worship God as is written in Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We only "revere" Guru Granth Sahib ji.     He says a lot of other things in this video, some are good refutations of Hindu superstitions, but the reformers often go too far. Anyways, what he is saying about not worshipping Guru Granth Sahib ji is totally wrong. The reason is Guru Granth Sahib ji is Guru. Guru is Satguru. Satguru is God. We worship God. Therefore, we also worship Satguru (Guru Granth Sahib ji).   There are innumerable verses in Gurbani equating God and Guru. ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਗੁਰੁ ਡੁਬਦਾ ਲਏ ਤਰਾਇ ॥੨॥ The Guru is the Supreme Lord and the Transcendent Master. The Guru floats (saves) the drowning one. p49   ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਏਕੋ ਜਾਣੁ ॥ Know the Guru and God as One. p864   ਗੁਰ ਨਾਲਿ ਤੁਲਿ ਨ ਲਗਈ ਖੋਜਿ ਡਿਠਾ ਬ੍ਰਹਮੰਡੁ ॥ There is no one at par with the Guru. I have searched and seen the whole universe. p49 (If the Guru is the greatest in the whole universe, shouldn't we worship the Guru?)   I'd like to ask Manpreet Singh what is worship? Any reasonable definition would include obeisance, remembrance, and praise. Those are exactly the same things Gurbani says to do regarding Guru! Remembrance and obeisance: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੁ ਅਪਨਾ ਸਦ ਸਦਾ ਸਮ੍ਹਾਰੇ ॥ Ever, ever, I think of the True Guru, ਗੁਰ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਕੇਸ ਸੰਗਿ ਝਾਰੇ ॥੧॥ and the Guru's feet I brush with my head's hair. p387   Praise: ਗੁਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਆਪਿ ॥ The Guru himself is the transcendent Lord and the supreme master. ਆਠ ਪਹਰ ਨਾਨਕ ਗੁਰ ਜਾਪਿ ॥੪॥੧੬॥੬੭॥ Throughout the eight watches of the day, O Nanak meditate thou on the Guru. p387   In fact, Gurbani says the way to find God is to worship (puja) of Guru: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੂ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਧੋਇ ਧੋਇ ਪੂਜਹੁ ਇਨ ਬਿਧਿ ਮੇਰਾ ਹਰਿ ਪ੍ਰਭੁ ਲਹੁ ਰੇ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ Washing and bathing the True Guru's feet, worship thou them. In this way thou shall obtain my Lord Master. Pause. p1118   Could it be any clearer that we are to worship Guru ji?
    • Bro, reciting a shorter Chaupai Sahib is hardly "anti-Dasam". It's fine to argue that the longer Chaupai is more traditional, but the short one isn't anti-Dasam. That's like claiming shorter Rehras is anti-Guru Granth Sahib ji just because there are fewer selections from Guru Granth Sahib. It might not be traditional, but it's not anti-Guru Granth Sahib. I prefer the longer versions, but let's not exaggerate. Every tradition has a slightly different Rehras version. Nanaksar vs Taksal vs Nihangs and so on. The basic template for Rehras is at the beginning of Guru Granth Sahib ji. Later, Chaupai Sahib was added and Anand Sahib always follows as the end of a process. Then some sangats added more saloks to start Rehras and others were added at the end. Some additional selections from Dasam Bani were also added, but it wasn't the same ones for every sangat. The important thing is to not hate on each other for these variations.
    • Umm, so you're upset that this jatha did Chaupai the same way it's being done at Harimandar Sahib for 100 years? Shouldn't you be upset at the manager of Darbar Sahib? I'm not saying that Sikhs who are aware of certain issues shouldn't do the longer Chaupai, but there are only so many battles you can fight. Instead of calling some jatha traitors because they're doing the (for better or worse) "standard" Chauapai published by the SGPC, it would be better to change things from the central point. You can't fault the average Sikh for picking up the average Gutka and doing paath.
    • It's the same here in Toronto. Alot of the gudwaras here are political orientated and get tons of funding from the government-probably want them stay hush hush with all the BS that has been happening with India.  These guys are skewing gurbani. A complaint was sent to a ragi singh a couple of days ago in regards to a hukamnama. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use