Jump to content

Prof Dhunda - Need A Few Videos - Plz Help


Recommended Posts

Vjkk Vjkf

Need a few videos of prof dhunda, ones where he talks anti jot, narial, toof, dasam, vaheguru simran, anti sants, anti ithas, anti bhagats, anti everything

I have the jaap sahib one,

Am looking for the one where he says baba deep singhs head didnt come off, and bhai taru singh jis hair didnt turn to metal, and ** main one is when him, dilgeer and thailand wala gurbachan are sitting together and cussing simran''

Could the sangat please post these videos up or pm me with the links etc.

Thank You - we all need to be weary of such parcharaks and put up there bakwaas to let the other sangat know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 25
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

bhai khalistan-zindabaad jeeo

Unfortunately it seems many are impressed with sarbjit singh's katha and have no problem with his anti-jaap sahib video. Many sangat may adopt his views on sri Dasam bani which is not good.

Therefore if we are going to counter his parchar its important we produce a professional article. We should use Gurbani quotes to show the importance of simran. We should use quotes from Jaap sahib and other Dasam bani to prove that it is in accordance with Gurbani.......................etc

Both sides tend to get heated in this debate and use language such as naastik, traitor, idol-worshipper and whatnot. This name-calling will get us nowhere and is not constructive.

It will be easy to counter sarbjit singh's parchar by just using quotes from Gurbani and historical documents such as rehitname, bhai Nand Lal ji's bani etc

I did respond to one e-mail on sikhphilosophy - http://www.sikhphilosophy.net/hard-talk/36858-professor-sarbjit-singh-dhunda.html

Its dissapointing that so many individuals on this site so easily dismiss sri Jaap sahib, in the end they had to close the thread. This forum is anti-Dasam bani in general. I actually learned quite a lot when I responded because I had to do some research myself. I am now 100% convinced that sri Jaap sahib is rachna of sri Guru Gobind Singh ji.

I've noticed that they have deleted some of my posts because this thread was 4-5 pages long. They have also posted another video of sarbjit singh right at the end of the thread! The admin obviously are biased towards Srabjit Singh. Anyway, I tried.

Panth Nuu Chardi Kala ate Ekta Baksho Satguru ji

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vjkk Vjkf Need a few videos of prof dhunda, ones where he talks anti jot, narial, toof, dasam, vaheguru simran, anti sants, anti ithas, anti bhagats, anti everything.

Here a vid where he's anti-Kamlesh Ahir...which I think is a good thing.

Ok.. how about this one...presented by Tiger Jatha UK...Grrr...

[shiny red shirt?...someone call the fashion police]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In my view the best way to counter them is using their own words against them. What I mean by that is, on one hand they say that they are followers of Singh Sabha movement and follow the words of it's writers. So concerned Gursikhs should make youtube videos or write articles in which on one hand they show what Dhunda is saying then show what Singh Sabha writers like Prof Sahib Singh, Prof Gurmukh Singh, Giani Ditt Singh say on the same subject because Prof Sahib Singh, Prof Gurmukh Singh, Giani Ditt Singh believed in Dasam Granth, they believed in Naam and many of the Sikh traditions that these heretic-Kala Afghanis are discarding.

One may have noticed how these Kala Afghanis like to use the name of Sant Jarnail Singh Bhindranwalay in their videos and writings. Sant Jee would also be a good point of reference since we know that Sant jee and these Kala Afghanis are worlds apart in regards to Sikhi.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good points Jonny101 ji

I used Gurmukhs like bhai Vir Singh ji and prof. Sahib Singh ji as well as the SRM (SGPC Rehit Maryada).

All Gurmukhs from the singh sabha era as well as sampdaia/taksal believed and recited sri Dasam Bani. SRM clearly states that sri Jaap sahib and sri Choupai sahib are mandatory banis for amrit sanchar.

It is better to use Gurmukhs that are not directly affiliated with any jatha/samprada, above post has given good examples, as the anti-Dasam group tend to be anti-taksal,akj etc. They claim to 'follow' panthic maryada (SRM) which is hypocritical as SRM approves of Dasam banis.

Recently more and more people are dismissing sri Dasam bani which is a huge mistake. It is important that we counter the anti-dasam group that we use Gurbani, Gurmat literature, Prominent Gurmukhs, Sikh History etc as a basis. Name-calling from both sides is wrong.

Sri Dasam Granth should be debated on a panthic level by the top scholars from both sides to settle this issue once and for all, likewise Ragmala. Discussing these subjects on forums might create confusion for newcomers to Sikhi which would be unfortunate.

Regardless as SRM accepts banis from sri Dasam bani, no-one has authority to remove these banis from nitnem, sri Rehras sahib or amrit sanchar. Dasam banis have been recited for 100's of years and this tradition will remain in majority of the panth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was searching igurbani.com which gives correct pronunciation of Gurbani. I can’t remember all of it at once. I guess it relies on more practice, like more Sehaj Paths. The meaning becomes clearer. I have noticed slight variants in it. This could be because it’s written in old Punjabi.  
    • Veer Manpreet Singh, a lay preacher, claims that -Sikhs aren't supposed to worship Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We are only supposed to worship God as is written in Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We only "revere" Guru Granth Sahib ji.     He says a lot of other things in this video, some are good refutations of Hindu superstitions, but the reformers often go too far. Anyways, what he is saying about not worshipping Guru Granth Sahib ji is totally wrong. The reason is Guru Granth Sahib ji is Guru. Guru is Satguru. Satguru is God. We worship God. Therefore, we also worship Satguru (Guru Granth Sahib ji).   There are innumerable verses in Gurbani equating God and Guru. ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਗੁਰੁ ਡੁਬਦਾ ਲਏ ਤਰਾਇ ॥੨॥ The Guru is the Supreme Lord and the Transcendent Master. The Guru floats (saves) the drowning one. p49   ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਏਕੋ ਜਾਣੁ ॥ Know the Guru and God as One. p864   ਗੁਰ ਨਾਲਿ ਤੁਲਿ ਨ ਲਗਈ ਖੋਜਿ ਡਿਠਾ ਬ੍ਰਹਮੰਡੁ ॥ There is no one at par with the Guru. I have searched and seen the whole universe. p49 (If the Guru is the greatest in the whole universe, shouldn't we worship the Guru?)   I'd like to ask Manpreet Singh what is worship? Any reasonable definition would include obeisance, remembrance, and praise. Those are exactly the same things Gurbani says to do regarding Guru! Remembrance and obeisance: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੁ ਅਪਨਾ ਸਦ ਸਦਾ ਸਮ੍ਹਾਰੇ ॥ Ever, ever, I think of the True Guru, ਗੁਰ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਕੇਸ ਸੰਗਿ ਝਾਰੇ ॥੧॥ and the Guru's feet I brush with my head's hair. p387   Praise: ਗੁਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਆਪਿ ॥ The Guru himself is the transcendent Lord and the supreme master. ਆਠ ਪਹਰ ਨਾਨਕ ਗੁਰ ਜਾਪਿ ॥੪॥੧੬॥੬੭॥ Throughout the eight watches of the day, O Nanak meditate thou on the Guru. p387   In fact, Gurbani says the way to find God is to worship (puja) of Guru: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੂ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਧੋਇ ਧੋਇ ਪੂਜਹੁ ਇਨ ਬਿਧਿ ਮੇਰਾ ਹਰਿ ਪ੍ਰਭੁ ਲਹੁ ਰੇ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ Washing and bathing the True Guru's feet, worship thou them. In this way thou shall obtain my Lord Master. Pause. p1118   Could it be any clearer that we are to worship Guru ji?
    • Bro, reciting a shorter Chaupai Sahib is hardly "anti-Dasam". It's fine to argue that the longer Chaupai is more traditional, but the short one isn't anti-Dasam. That's like claiming shorter Rehras is anti-Guru Granth Sahib ji just because there are fewer selections from Guru Granth Sahib. It might not be traditional, but it's not anti-Guru Granth Sahib. I prefer the longer versions, but let's not exaggerate. Every tradition has a slightly different Rehras version. Nanaksar vs Taksal vs Nihangs and so on. The basic template for Rehras is at the beginning of Guru Granth Sahib ji. Later, Chaupai Sahib was added and Anand Sahib always follows as the end of a process. Then some sangats added more saloks to start Rehras and others were added at the end. Some additional selections from Dasam Bani were also added, but it wasn't the same ones for every sangat. The important thing is to not hate on each other for these variations.
    • Umm, so you're upset that this jatha did Chaupai the same way it's being done at Harimandar Sahib for 100 years? Shouldn't you be upset at the manager of Darbar Sahib? I'm not saying that Sikhs who are aware of certain issues shouldn't do the longer Chaupai, but there are only so many battles you can fight. Instead of calling some jatha traitors because they're doing the (for better or worse) "standard" Chauapai published by the SGPC, it would be better to change things from the central point. You can't fault the average Sikh for picking up the average Gutka and doing paath.
    • It's the same here in Toronto. Alot of the gudwaras here are political orientated and get tons of funding from the government-probably want them stay hush hush with all the BS that has been happening with India.  These guys are skewing gurbani. A complaint was sent to a ragi singh a couple of days ago in regards to a hukamnama. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use