Jump to content

Chairs And Tables At Gurudwara Langar Halls


Recommended Posts

I'm from Ontario and I went to Vancouver a few days ago while I was there at a Gurudwara in Surrey I saw chairs and Tables in the Langar Hall. I'm 14 and I asked my cousin who is 20 if it was allowed in Sikhi and he said there was no problem with it. I just want to ask your opinion on this, is it wrong or is there no problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

simranpreet singh,

Our guru jee started langar on floor for many reasons but main known reason is about equality. If you see important events such as games, shows, celebrity hosted events and in airlines etc you see they have different style of seating arrangement. Everything is divided into class system. They have luxury box for upper rich class during baseball games while plastic seats for working class.

Our guru sahib maybe lived several hundred years ago which was different world back then but their practical teachings and maryada/rehits (code) validity never expires.

Langar needs to be eaten while on floor because equality is being put in practice. All rich/poor, different races, nationality becomes ONE when they enter Gurdwara (Gurus house).

If you want to know anything specific or if you have any other questions, feel free to post it here :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I told someone that equality was the reason we should eat langar sitting on the floor and they asked, in a very respectful manner, "well if everyoneo sits on the table and chair even then they are all sitting on the same level so equality is maintained"

How would this question be answered.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I told someone that equality was the reason we should eat langar sitting on the floor and they asked, in a very respectful manner, "well if everyoneo sits on the table and chair even then they are all sitting on the same level so equality is maintained"

How would this question be answered.

Equality is a poor answer to the original question, the act of sitting on the floor is one of humility, like a slave sits on the floor of his masters house not just to eat, but even to listen to instruction from his master as well.

Equallity can be sitting on the floor, sitting on equal-level chairs. But humility is sitting at the lowest level, on the floor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

langar was started for two things- open/free community kitchen, making all equal.

if you are young and have no issues in sitting on the floor then sit on the floor.

if you are old, can't bend or disabled people, use chairs. no problem ji.

by the way langar is simple food NOT fine dining. too many sabjis, sweets is distorting the shape and thought of langar. "swad"of different things is making it loose the appeal behind the whole concept.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I told someone that equality was the reason we should eat langar sitting on the floor and they asked, in a very respectful manner, "well if everyoneo sits on the table and chair even then they are all sitting on the same level so equality is maintained"

How would this question be answered.

You have a very strong point.This is an argument that most gurdwaras tried to use previously.

I'm in North America now and have seen a huge variance in this matter across Canada and US.

Back in UK, many years ago ,-ALL gurdwaras had chairs and tables, NOBODY sat on the floor.

Apparently Akaal Takht got involved and made the requirement that all should sit on the floor.

Now, the gurdwaras all started to deal with it differently. I noticed that in UK some gurdwaras had the langar hall on the same level as the 'bir' ie.not on a seperate floor. -These were the 1st to get rid of the tables, since you would be sitting on the floor inside, then walk out and sit on a chair while the Granth Sahib remains on the same level. It made sense for these gurdwaras to abolish the chairs and tables as this disrespect to Guruji.

Then we had many Gurdwaras that had the langar hall below or on a separate floor below the 'birh'- these committees felt it was OK to carry on since the Granth Sahib was above- fair enough,no disrespect.

NOTE- at this time there were not 2 options such as you either sat on floor or table as you wish. EVERYBODY sat on chairs n tables.

Then there was the other gurdwaras like the original smethwick, that had langar hall in different building to Granth Sahib. These commitees felt it was ok to carry on as they were, as they were NOT offending Guru Ji in any way.

A few years past like this, but people could not fully understand why the difference.Thus, sangat became too choosy over which Gurdwaras to have weddings and akhand paths etc....AND certain gurdwaras started becoming more popular. Then the gurdwaras finally ALL agreed with exception of a few that they will ABOLISH all chairs and tables except a few for elderly/disabled.

This is how it has been ever since.

Generally, now majority of the gurdwaras in the west do not have seating, In UK, US and Vancouver only a few have chairs/tables, like the one the person attended. That is NOT how they all are in Surrey or Vancouver. It varies across the board.

In my opinion as long as everyone is equal and on the same level and there is no disrespect to the Granth Sahib, then it is fine by me wether chairs or floorr seating.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yes that was original Granth by Guru Arjan Dev in 1604. The original one still exists. 10th Guru added 116 hymns of his father. This is called copy of Damdama and declared Guru.  
    • Isn't there Adi Granth as well?
    • 1) Guru Granth Sahib with 5,894 hymns. (Note this Granth was given Guruship). It has 1430 pages. Granths by Guru Gobind Singh :-  2) Dasam Granth with 17,293 verses in 1428 pages. 3) Sarbloh Granth in 4,361 stanzas 862 pages in print. There are number of other works by various poets like Suraj Parkash, Bhai Gurdas and Nand Lal.
    • Man just learn boxing or take a shastar training. You don't have a 2 foot talwar or khanda in 2025's Western World. Today ur either gonna get stabbed (uk), shot (America) or attacked by a meth head (Punjab) in street fights. By the time u draw the sword that guy's got you on the floor probably searching your Kacherra for coins lol Only good thing he did was the Loh Mushti video (boxing with the kara as a knuckleduster) but even then just get a normal knuckleduster if you can. Though before ANYTHING any Sikh interested in martial arts has to train two things as the bare minimum: UNARMED FIGHTING (boxing preferably) and KIRPAN TRAINING. Loh Mushti is good but only when you lost ur kirpan somehow in a fight (which shouldn't rlly happen if you train on how to use it. If the bad guys wanna use knives n guns then the Khalsa who's here to stop em has to better at their own game than them. NO Sikh in America has an excuse not to own a gun, and if their state allows public carry they should be the first to accept it.
    • Sikhs have missed the point: Shastar Vidhiya means "the science of (hand-held) weapons", not just the style nihangs do or gatka. Gatka and "shastar vidhiya" are "bad" for 2 reasons: You can't actually practice them properly cos its deadly. Same issue with karate; you can't free spar full force with traditional techniques cos someone'd probably die, so its impracticality goes unchecked. But boxing spars full force, so you know what works. And if you ever do have to defend someone w gatka and the thug has a stick too (unlikely) you wouldn't know how to take a full force hit cos in training you had to take it light. That one hit will shake you more than you realise and probably make u lose if ur not used to it.  You likely don't carry a 2 foot sword/gatka stick in the West unless going to training. And a thug doesn't either; he's got a knife (uk) or a gun (USA . Gatka may beat knife, but even field hockey sticks will beat someone with a normal knife cos of reach, gatka di lorh nhi haegi specifically. But if they got a gun, the only defence is quicker draw time and better aim (which you'll learn at shooting class, never at gatka) Basically, Guru Gobind Singh Ji told us to learn "the science of weapons" to defend people, but we train an art with a weapon nobody carries today (nobody takes a gatka stick when they step out to get atta) and one that we can never spar with fully and thus we don't even know what it feels like to get hit with it properly. If you train to preserve history or perform shows, then that's fine. But it's NOT part of a Sikh's military training anymore and won't help you much in fights (for which we must be "tyaar by tyaar" , always ready).  (PS: Gatka may have a few skills like movement and observation that can help in fights, but all its practical stuff like that is also in MMA, plus much more. Nothing that's exclusive to arts like gatka will help practically).
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use