Naamdharis Given Air On Sangat Tv

[chatanga 1,058]

Akal Takht Sahib has not taken action for many wrong actions going on in the Sikh community. There inability to handle important issues in a timely manner or at all does not result in the acceptance of Naamdhari wrong actions.

I am not disputing that here. I am disputing singh 900 assertion that namdharis have been excommunicated.

[BritishSingh 96]

I am not disputing that here. I am disputing singh 900 assertion that namdharis have been excommunicated.

Naamdharis are NOT SIKHS. Namdharis are Namdharis. if they were Sikhs then they would call themselves Sikhs. Namdharis are are different religion/organisation just like Ravidasia, Radhasoami, Nirankari, Jain, Jew, Hindu, Islam, Christianity, Budhism etc.... They do NOT beleive Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji Maharaj as their true Satguru. As stipulated in the Sikh Rehat Maryada from Sri Akal Takht Sahib a Sikh is one who beleives in Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji as their Guru.

Therefore Sri Akal Thakht Sahib Hukamnamas shouldn't apply to Namdharis as they are NOT Sikhs.

[chatanga 1,058]

Naamdharis are NOT SIKHS. Namdharis are Namdharis. if they were Sikhs then they would call themselves Sikhs. Namdharis are are different religion/organisation just like Ravidasia, Radhasoami, Nirankari, Jain, Jew, Hindu, Islam, Christianity, Budhism etc.... They do NOT beleive Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji Maharaj as their true Satguru. As stipulated in the Sikh Rehat Maryada from Sri Akal Takht Sahib a Sikh is one who beleives in Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji as their Guru.

Therefore Sri Akal Thakht Sahib Hukamnamas shouldn't apply to Namdharis as they are NOT Sikhs.

So are you trying to say that there has been no ex-communication of Naamdharis as they were never Sikhs anyway?

[jaspreet1 92]

I am not disputing that here. I am disputing singh 900 assertion that namdharis have been excommunicated.

Has every Hukamnama issued from day one or from the day Naamdhari started worshipping Bhai Ram Singh been noted down that is easily accessible to every Sikh? Sikhs are not defense lawyers that see the truth but choose to ignore it because exposing the truth would mean they will lose in an argument.

Do you know of any of the current or past Jathedars of the 5 Takhts that have spoken out against the Naamdhari and said they are not Sikhs? Why hide knowledge? Are you not acting like a Brahmin when you hide knowledge? Brahmins had hidden the knowledge of the vedas from the lower caste and women for centuries. They did not let Bhagat Naamdev Ji into a Mandir and the Mandir face was turned toward Bhagat Naamdev ji. Do you not feel ashamed for your actions by purposely hiding information to your own selfish benefits?

Let the truth unfold, if you stand before God then you should not be afraid to share information openly and be vocal about it.

[chatanga 1,058]

Has every Hukamnama issued from day one or from the day Naamdhari started worshipping Bhai Ram Singh been noted down that is easily accessible to every Sikh?

Most if not all humumnamas are noted and remebered. this is our law.

Do you know of any of the current or past Jathedars of the 5 Takhts that have spoken out against the Naamdhari and said they are not Sikhs?

To date I have not heard anything.

Why hide knowledge?

I m not hiding it, im seeking it, which is why i asked singh900 to provide evidence of his claim.

Are you not acting like a Brahmin when you hide knowledge?

see above.

Do you not feel ashamed for your actions by purposely hiding information to your own selfish benefits?

see above.

Let the truth unfold, if you stand before God then you should not be afraid to share information openly and be vocal about it.

I will wait to see what evidence singh900 provides to back up his claim, and then surely share it openly with everyone.