Jump to content

A Crazy Story From Partition


mrggg123
 Share

Recommended Posts

Tragic story of this woman. But at least now she and her children have been re united. Partition was a huge mistake and disaster in the social fabric of Punjab. Nothing like this has ever happened in the history of Punjab. A million people dead, countless women abducted and raped, so many children turned into orphans. We can't even imagine the amount of suffering this partition caused on both sides of the border.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where does it say she was forced to convert?

lol

well she was young and it was either that or die? A young sikh girl in a 100% azad kashmir muslim population, would she be allowed to stay sikh? You tell me son?! You must have seen this in history its well documented :biggrin2: you every read the history of punjab? Its not just sikh people saying this people from outside have observed forced conversions for centuries. Do you know where raja and chowdhury comes from? People from kashmir and mirpur are so proud of these two castes, who were their ancestors?

I really didnt know pakistani punjabis like you existed, i.e hypocrites who deny everything but now I know there are bad apples like you. I heard on the radio one muslim guy from faislabad he said hes proud that his family originate from jahalandhar and hindustan,he knows his roots and he would be happy for his son or daughter to marry a non muslim and he wouldnt like to convert them, he says hes not a perfect muslim... This is a true punjabi not a fake which has been brainwashed by pathans and arabs lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

well she was young and it was either that or die? A young sikh girl in a 100% azad kashmir muslim population, would she be allowed to stay sikh? You tell me son?! You must have seen this in history its well documented :biggrin2: you every read the history of punjab? Its not just sikh people saying this people from outside have observed forced conversions for centuries. Do you know where raja and chowdhury comes from? People from kashmir and mirpur are so proud of these two castes, who were their ancestors?

I really didnt know pakistani punjabis like you existed, i.e hypocrites who deny everything but now I know there are bad apples like you. I heard on the radio one muslim guy from faislabad he said hes proud that his family originate from jahalandhar and hindustan,he knows his roots and he would be happy for his son or daughter to marry a non muslim and he wouldnt like to convert them, he says hes not a perfect muslim... This is a true punjabi not a fake which has been brainwashed by pathans and arabs lol

Yea bro, i also heard that faisalabad fellow, he came on the asian network on monday, on nihals show.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You would be surprised to know how many Pakistanis actually believe that Pakistanis did not kill any Sikhs and Hindus while believing that all the violence that took place only happened in east Punjab at the hands of the Sikhs. I know a Pakistani Muslim man who is very friendly with me. Actually he is of Sikh ancestry. His Sikh grand father was a wealthy land owner in Faislabad/Lailpur. During partition he decided to convert to Islam instead of losing his huge land holdings. He told me that while he was young he was always taught that Muslims never killed Sikhs during partition and all the violence happened only by the Sikhs in east Punjab. But then one day he had a talk with his grand father who dispelled this myth and told him the truth. He told him that during partition Sikhs and Hindus were chopped like Gaajar & Moolis all over west Punjab. And it was because of this that the whole Sikh population left for east Punjab while some Sikhs(like his grand father) who did not want to leave had to become Muslim. The only Sikhs that were safe were the ones who lived in the tribal Pashtun territory of FATA where the Pathan tribals would not let Muslim league men touch any Sikh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You would be surprised to know how many Pakistanis actually believe that Pakistanis did not kill any Sikhs and Hindus while believing that all the violence that took place only happened in east Punjab at the hands of the Sikhs. I know a Pakistani Muslim man who is very friendly with me. Actually he is of Sikh ancestry. His Sikh grand father was a wealthy land owner in Faislabad/Lailpur. During partition he decided to convert to Islam instead of losing his huge land holdings. He told me that while he was young he was always taught that Muslims never killed Sikhs during partition and all the violence happened only by the Sikhs in east Punjab. But then one day he had a talk with his grand father who dispelled this myth and told him the truth. He told him that during partition Sikhs and Hindus were chopped like Gaajar & Moolis all over west Punjab. And it was because of this that the whole Sikh population left for east Punjab while some Sikhs(like his grand father) who did not want to leave had to become Muslim. The only Sikhs that were safe were the ones who lived in the tribal Pashtun territory of FATA where the Pathan tribals would not let Muslim league men touch any Sikh.

lets be fair was it more muslims converting sikhs or vice versa? I know some muslims converted to sikihi, especially in a bhullar village (I read this somewhere)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was searching igurbani.com which gives correct pronunciation of Gurbani. I can’t remember all of it at once. I guess it relies on more practice, like more Sehaj Paths. The meaning becomes clearer. I have noticed slight variants in it. This could be because it’s written in old Punjabi.  
    • Veer Manpreet Singh, a lay preacher, claims that -Sikhs aren't supposed to worship Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We are only supposed to worship God as is written in Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We only "revere" Guru Granth Sahib ji.     He says a lot of other things in this video, some are good refutations of Hindu superstitions, but the reformers often go too far. Anyways, what he is saying about not worshipping Guru Granth Sahib ji is totally wrong. The reason is Guru Granth Sahib ji is Guru. Guru is Satguru. Satguru is God. We worship God. Therefore, we also worship Satguru (Guru Granth Sahib ji).   There are innumerable verses in Gurbani equating God and Guru. ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਗੁਰੁ ਡੁਬਦਾ ਲਏ ਤਰਾਇ ॥੨॥ The Guru is the Supreme Lord and the Transcendent Master. The Guru floats (saves) the drowning one. p49   ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਏਕੋ ਜਾਣੁ ॥ Know the Guru and God as One. p864   ਗੁਰ ਨਾਲਿ ਤੁਲਿ ਨ ਲਗਈ ਖੋਜਿ ਡਿਠਾ ਬ੍ਰਹਮੰਡੁ ॥ There is no one at par with the Guru. I have searched and seen the whole universe. p49 (If the Guru is the greatest in the whole universe, shouldn't we worship the Guru?)   I'd like to ask Manpreet Singh what is worship? Any reasonable definition would include obeisance, remembrance, and praise. Those are exactly the same things Gurbani says to do regarding Guru! Remembrance and obeisance: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੁ ਅਪਨਾ ਸਦ ਸਦਾ ਸਮ੍ਹਾਰੇ ॥ Ever, ever, I think of the True Guru, ਗੁਰ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਕੇਸ ਸੰਗਿ ਝਾਰੇ ॥੧॥ and the Guru's feet I brush with my head's hair. p387   Praise: ਗੁਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਆਪਿ ॥ The Guru himself is the transcendent Lord and the supreme master. ਆਠ ਪਹਰ ਨਾਨਕ ਗੁਰ ਜਾਪਿ ॥੪॥੧੬॥੬੭॥ Throughout the eight watches of the day, O Nanak meditate thou on the Guru. p387   In fact, Gurbani says the way to find God is to worship (puja) of Guru: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੂ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਧੋਇ ਧੋਇ ਪੂਜਹੁ ਇਨ ਬਿਧਿ ਮੇਰਾ ਹਰਿ ਪ੍ਰਭੁ ਲਹੁ ਰੇ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ Washing and bathing the True Guru's feet, worship thou them. In this way thou shall obtain my Lord Master. Pause. p1118   Could it be any clearer that we are to worship Guru ji?
    • Bro, reciting a shorter Chaupai Sahib is hardly "anti-Dasam". It's fine to argue that the longer Chaupai is more traditional, but the short one isn't anti-Dasam. That's like claiming shorter Rehras is anti-Guru Granth Sahib ji just because there are fewer selections from Guru Granth Sahib. It might not be traditional, but it's not anti-Guru Granth Sahib. I prefer the longer versions, but let's not exaggerate. Every tradition has a slightly different Rehras version. Nanaksar vs Taksal vs Nihangs and so on. The basic template for Rehras is at the beginning of Guru Granth Sahib ji. Later, Chaupai Sahib was added and Anand Sahib always follows as the end of a process. Then some sangats added more saloks to start Rehras and others were added at the end. Some additional selections from Dasam Bani were also added, but it wasn't the same ones for every sangat. The important thing is to not hate on each other for these variations.
    • Umm, so you're upset that this jatha did Chaupai the same way it's being done at Harimandar Sahib for 100 years? Shouldn't you be upset at the manager of Darbar Sahib? I'm not saying that Sikhs who are aware of certain issues shouldn't do the longer Chaupai, but there are only so many battles you can fight. Instead of calling some jatha traitors because they're doing the (for better or worse) "standard" Chauapai published by the SGPC, it would be better to change things from the central point. You can't fault the average Sikh for picking up the average Gutka and doing paath.
    • It's the same here in Toronto. Alot of the gudwaras here are political orientated and get tons of funding from the government-probably want them stay hush hush with all the BS that has been happening with India.  These guys are skewing gurbani. A complaint was sent to a ragi singh a couple of days ago in regards to a hukamnama. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use