Jump to content

Ethnic And Religious Cleansing Of


JRoudh
 Share

Recommended Posts

The most 'Sikhs' who convert out are monas anyways. As if they really did anything dharmic anyways when they were shamal in Sikhi lol. They usually convert out if whatever religion bribes them with something, as if they'd take the new religion they converted out seriously too... lol.

Honestly, I think you're all as crazy as each other. One dillusional man starts a thread about something that he just made up in his head and, through the power of suggestion, his crazy dillusional thoughts get transplanted into the next gullible man's head.

Seriously, many of you have got to be the most pessimistic, negative, glass half empty people that have ever lived. I mean you're living in a time and country where Sikhi, keeping kes and becoming amritdhari is at its highest than its ever been before....a real Sikhi rennaisance, and yet you're so naturally depressive your eyes can't see it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the way the closet atheist Punjabis are also the fault of their parents and our Gurdwara committees. The first teacher of any human being are parents. Almost all Punjabi Sikh parents are only interested in the worldly success of their children. They are not interested in imparting Sikhi or even the Punjabi language to their children as dutiful Sikh parents should be doing. Sure their children might gain worldly success, but they have lost their culture and religion. Many times such children are made to adopt the western culture mixed with the Bhangra culture which in reality is kunjar culture. The result is, those children grow up with out any sense of Sharam o Haya and put khay on the heads of their parents when they go out drinking and sleeping around with abdul or omar

Likewise the Gurdwara committees who have untold amounts of money in their bank accounts do not use it as they should be doing. A Gurdwara is not just a building where rituals happen. It should be a place where spiritual seekers should go to get knowledge on matters of dharam and deep spirituality.

realest post I've seen in a while.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL what can we do? What part bothered you about my post?

Everything.

When a dillusional man starts a thread with the premise that "in the UK so many Sikhs are leaving Sikhi" the messages that follow should not be messages containing support for what that man just made up in his head. Every message on this thread should be reminding him that he is wrong.....That in fact, the opposite of what he said is true in the UK, i.e. :

  • More 'hair-cut' Sikhs now deciding to keep their hair
  • More Sikh children with kes and patkas than we have ever had before in the last 50 years
  • More of those Sikh children getting their fathers to stop their 'pub' ways and getting into Sikhi.
  • More and more 2nd generation British born fathers with their hair cut ensuring their sons don't make the same mistake they did and have kes
  • More Amritdharis than we have ever had before in the last 50 years.

I am simply at a loss to understand how and why any Sikh in the UK could still be negative when we have such a Sikhi rennaissance going on.

This is the best we've ever had it and if we're still complaining now even though we have it so good you can understand why our international reputation is as negative cry-babies. We can see why the Australians call us 'whinging poms' and north Americans see us as dour pessimists..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everything.

When a dillusional man starts a thread with the premise that "in the UK so many Sikhs are leaving Sikhi" the messages that follow should not be messages containing support for what that man just made up in his head. Every message on this thread should be reminding him that he is wrong.....That in fact, the opposite of what he said is true in the UK, i.e. :

  • More 'hair-cut' Sikhs now deciding to keep their hair
  • More Sikh children with kes and patkas than we have ever had before in the last 50 years
  • More of those Sikh children getting their fathers to stop their 'pub' ways and getting into Sikhi.
  • More and more 2nd generation British born fathers with their hair cut ensuring their sons don't make the same mistake they did and have kes
  • More Amritdharis than we have ever had before in the last 50 years.
I am simply at a loss to understand how and why any Sikh in the UK could still be negative when we have such a Sikhi rennaissance going on.

This is the best we've ever had it and if we're still complaining now even though we have it so good you can understand why our international reputation is as negative cry-babies. We can see why the Australians call us 'whinging poms' and north Americans see us as dour pessimists..

Here here Jagsaw. +1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The UK is known in all the world Sikh diaspora as the stronghold of Sikhism. Where there are far more patka wearing children than there have ever been before. Where there are far more Amritdharis than there have ever been before. The one place on earth where the worldwide trend for cutting kes is actually happening in reverse as more and more 'haircut' Sikhs have started growing their hair.

Does anyone have any theories as to why this might be?

Why the UK, what is so special about the place?

Is it somethig to do with Sikh faith schools maybe?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anyone have any theories as to why this might be?

Why the UK, what is so special about the place?

Is it somethig to do with Sikh faith schools maybe?

No, nothing to do with faith schools, not in my opinion at least. My own theory - therefore with little scientific evidence - is there's something about Sikhi as well as the positive, honourable aspects of Punjabi culture that is congruent with the English (or British if you like) mentality of stoicsm and "let's just get on with it with the minimum of fuss." This down to earth way of approaching life is a natural fit for many Sikhs with their head screwed on right IMO.

None of us exist in a vacuum, and we must, surely, pick up certain traits of our surroundings knowingly or not. I can't comment definitively on North American Sikhs as I've never encountered any, but from what ive observed and second-hand accounts of the way their approach to life, they seem to be more concerned with ingratiating themselves with their hosts and becoming good Americans and whatnot, relegating their religious duties to a distant afterthought. Of course there are exceptions, so NA Sikhs don't get too offended at my theory, lol!

Edit: on second thoughts, there's many NA Sikhs who are good citizens and devout Sikhs, so that's probably unfair. What I was trying to say is there's a sizeable group of Sikhs (usually those that don't keep rehat) for whom Sikhi is an albatross around their neck, one of irritation not relevant to their seemingly modern, fast-moving lives as opposed to a source of goodness and inspiration.

There is a growing problem in the uk, despite what some will argue, amongst those from what you would term as traditionally Sikh families, I.e. non-practising couples in their 20s and 30s raising families. I have to rush off so I can't go into it as fully as I like, but this issue is related to class status, wealth, and confused identities. It ties into the points highlighted by Jonny Singh on the previous page.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The most 'Sikhs' who convert out are monas anyways. As if they really did anything dharmic anyways when they were shamal in Sikhi lol. They usually convert out if whatever religion bribes them with something, as if they'd take the new religion they converted out seriously too... lol.

thats an ugly post. says a lot about the poster.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anyone have any theories as to why this might be?

Why the UK, what is so special about the place?

Is it somethig to do with Sikh faith schools maybe?

Faith schools are a fairly recent thing. We have faith schools all over the world.

we're just very well established in britain. The second most financially successful community- i guess now that we've made our money, set our foundations, we're now concentrating on our faith. Thats my 2pennies anyways...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What does that have to do with my post? I'm happy about all the positive points you mentioned, but what I was saying was so what if a mona 'Sikh' decides to go to a different religion?? If they can't even listen to our Guru ji's vani (when they were mona 'Sikhs') they won't be successful in the other path they choose as well.

What part disturbs you about that post? I fail to understand what you're talking about.

Condescending. Completely arrogant. Quite assholeish...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The UK/Kenyan Style is actually the original Punjabi style modified. Look at Milkha Singh, this style (square/rectangle last larr) was tied by most Pre-partition Sikh men, My Nani Ji's dad also tied it (never visited Kenya or Africa). It's a single dastar, starched with punjabi style pooni tied with the last larr left longer/ "rectangular". Sikhs who left India for Kenya around 1940s took this style with them but adapted it to be smaller, with a chunj to substitute for a lack of nok (beak), or it just looked like a flat, v shaped dumalla). They changed the pooni to folded instead of corner/stretched too. In Punjab, the style changed to Patiala Shahi and fabrics which didn't need starch were developed so ppl started tying unstarched Shahi paggs, with double fabric. But before around 1940, there was almost NO Sardaarji who didn't starch his Pagg (even Granthis didn't tie everyday except gol dastars). The first "wave" of Sikhs to reach Britain were kenyans, not Punjabis so they brought this "Kenyan style" dastar with them to England, making it known as the "UK style Dastar" (a folded and starched Dastar with a triangle point at the front). Cos this was the norm in England, even Punjabi Sikhs (not Kenyan) who arrived later just followed suit Most Kenyan Sikhs were Tarkhans, so the first Sikhs in the UK were too for the most part. So this style's known as the Tarkhan Pagg, but this isn't true cos Tarkhans in India tie the Punjabi Style and some Jatts in Kenya tie the UK/Kenyan style. My family's Jatt Sikh from PUNJAB and we all tie Punjabi Style but with starch, so it's not a caste thing.
    • how to get the physical copy in uk or Panjab?
    • "sabh sikhan ko hukam hai, GURU MAYEYO GRANTH". If HUMAN BEINGS could show us how to be perfect sikhs then Guru Gobind Singh ji Maharaj wouldn't have ended the line of human Gurus and passed gurgaddi over to Guru Granth Sahib Ji Mahraj. Remember that Guru Nanak Dev Ji Maharaj predicted that we were only one of thousands of universes hundreds of years before science discovered this. The Gurus were capable of predicting the future; if they wanted us following one select human in the future they would have predicted them and told us who to follow. DON'T insinuate I'm a fake sikh loooool. Cos you know what "Sikhs" who follow humans like YOU do are called? Namdharis. Sikhs only listen and answer to the 10 Gurus, Guru Granth Sahib Ji and Waheguruji. Nobody else. That's part of why Sikhi is so beautiful, it's the simplicity. We can ACKNOWLEDGE what other people say but not when it goes against the orders or nature of our Gurus (in this case, using the most modern & effective martial arts/ weapons like they did instead of blindly trying to preserve history, then thinking a 300 year old martial art would still be effective today). If Sikhi was abt preserving history rather than practicality, then Guru Gobind Singh Ji Maharaj could've given us a caveman club instead of a kirpan/2 foot long sword. but then we go into the whole "is a gun a kirpan" argument...
    • Ridiculous. Just chuck your history away because it's not gurbani. What a joker.. typical modern day Sikh. "Sikhism" 🤣🤣🤣 If it wasn't for rattan Singh bhangu how would you even know of your itias? Someone like you just came out of thin air.
    • Shastar vidiya . The basis of the unarmed is foundation for the armed combat.  There can be a point where u can't get to your weapons. What will you do? Of course the khalsa had unrmed skills. If your sword or weapons broke. What would you do? Grappling etc. wrestling etc.    Unarmed combat is known as "platha"
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use