Donald Trump Attacks Sikhs

[ghettosikh]

Leave it upto some naive, fool of a Sikh to go pick a battle with Trump when he has said nothing about Sikhs.

Hit the nail right on the head bro, this guy had no reason to b doing this also how many times do u see Muslims showing support for Sikhs? Barely so why do our ppl go out of their way to do this, I mean when that whole Israel thing was peaking couple years back the amount of apney showing support was huge but I hardly ever saw them speak up for Sikh rights....

[ghettosikh]

Applying's OP asinine logic to the time of 9th guru sahib:

"Leave it upto some naive, fool of a Sikh Guru to go pick a battle with Aurangzeb when he has said nothing about Sikhs"

So you're comparing Trump to Aurangzeb ok.....

[dallysingh101]

What about the wider issue of apnay standing up to political trouble makers in general. Forget this particular Trump case, but in general.

Are people suggesting that Sikhs in their diasporas sit out and say and do nothing against rabble rousing politicians, when these 'leaders' moves are likely to have a negative impact on them? Are some people suggesting that we say and do nothing?

I'd say Trump may turn out to be the US's equivalent of Enoch Powell (if he isn't already).

[Guest Jacfsing2]

What about the wider issue of apnay standing up to political trouble makers in general. Forget this particular Trump case, but in general.

Are people suggesting that Sikhs in their diasporas sit out and say and do nothing against rabble rousing politicians, when these 'leaders' moves are likely to have a negative impact on them? Are some people suggesting that we say and do nothing?

I'd say Trump may turn out to be the US's equivalent of Enoch Powell (if he isn't already).

Sikhs in the diaspora, (U.S. especially) feel that it's best not to get involved in politics or anything that takes too much time.

[thesoldier]

You can't even vote, also isn't the U.K. debating on banning Trump?

The debate already happened, he will not be banned.

Link: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3405405/Trump-faces-UK-debate-barring-entering-country-Members-Parliament-call-dangerous-fool-fuels-flames-terrorism-don-t-want-turn-right-wing-martyr.html#comments

The politicians in UK (and US) are politically correct. They spoke against the idea of moslem no-go-zones where police are afraid to enter. But have a look at the article of police officers backing Trumps observation below anonymously

Trump was right that there are no-go-areas in uk where police are afraid of entering.

But one serving officer in west London said: 'Islamification has and is occurring', adding: 'You have to have extra vigilance in certain parts when you are working'.

He told right-wing website Breitbart: 'When I was a teenage lad in Burnley there were no go white areas. This is the case still nationally, including London where you have to have extra vigilance in certain parts when you are working'.

A Lancashire Police officer, who wished to remain anonymous, told MailOnline: 'There are Muslim areas of Preston that, if we wish to patrol, we have to contact local Muslim community leaders to get their permission'.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3352406/Scotland-Yard-mocks-Trump-s-claims-London-police-terrified-Muslim-areas-officers-claim-tycoon-RIGHT.html

These wealthy billionaire moslem arabs support political parties by giving them money and the elected politicians all have to tip toe when discussing islam and terrorism. Donald Trump is the first businessman politician that is self funding and doesnt have to be P.C. Trump says what the silent majority feel, he speaks our mind. I wish UK had a self funding politician that aint bought out by arab oil money.

That <banned word filter activated> sikh was protesting so he was kicked out, not because of his turban. This is why i believe islamic/leftist supporting parties sent the well paid sikh there to make Trump look like a racist to try and reduce his vote bank

[thesoldier]

Why do you think Trump pointed to the front of the audience and asked 'He wasn't wearing one of those hats was he? Do you think there was another Sikh at the front? Second question. Why did he follow up the question with 'and he never will'? The answer is because Trump was talking about the 'Trump for president' baseball hats that some in the audience were wearing. So, Trump asks if he was wearing a Trump for president hat and the DM and readers complain at him for calling a turban a hat. So, who's the ignoramus?

Trump with his sense of humour wasn't racist/ anti-sikh at all. I copied and pasted quote above from a news article comment. Thought you all should read

[Ranjeet01]

I know that we as Sikhs must stand up against tyranny and oppression but we also must not become "useful idiots" either.

[WaljinderSingh]

Trump supporters are bigger idiots than that bigot.

[khalsaman1]

So you're comparing Trump to Aurangzeb ok.....

ghettosikh, guru da pyareo...

If a muslim was bleeding to death on the road with no one else around, would you help him?

[genie]

This is why racist muslim pakistanis and racist hindu indians make, share and laugh at "pathan jokes" and "sikh jokes" because both communities (pathan and sikh) are seen as brave but useful idiots and cannon fodder to be used for anyone's agenda.

Sikhs must stop aligning themselves for communities that wish to see our conversion or death and destruction as their final end goal. We know islam wants to do this with all non-muslim communities because its explicit in quran and hadiths we know that's their agenda so we must stop defending muslims who are 1.6 billion strong (1/4 of humanity with 35+ nations) and we are 30 million at most currently with no countaries. We can not afford to be pawns in deadly political games where our innocent brothers and sisters get attacked by ignorants in america because they keep seeing "turbanators" defending muslims yet not defending america against islamification and islamic jihadi terrorists.