Jump to content

Sikhs v Mughals


Big_Tera
 Share

Recommended Posts

Guest Jacfsing2

Almost every Punjabi is mixed with a whole bunch of races of the conquerors regardless what caste they are. Examples include the traditional Aryan and Dravidians, Greeks, Synthians, Mongols, and finally a whole bunch of Middle Eastern and Afghan tribes, (because of the Sikh faith rising in Punjab most Punjabi people don't have Mughal blood). If you compared a Punjabi Jatt and Punjabi Khatri, they both will have more genetic similarities because of the conquerors of Punjab than a Non-Punjabi Rajput would have with a Punjabi Khatri, (despite them both being the same caste). So give-up all this caste non-sense since most Punjabis aren't pure-breeds of anything, the only group historically more mixed than Punjabis would be Hispanics. (Let's not make the same mistake that the Hindu Kahashatriya groups made, and allow more equal respect for everyone).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also

In reply to Makhaal who says jatts only reciieved high praise from historians. That is hogwash. 

There are many quotes and praise for Tharkaans. Ie they were known as skilled craftsman who were highly educated and wealthy.  wheras the jatts were illiterate when they came to the uk. Also there are quotes of Bhattra who were highly succesfull entrepeneurs who ran busineses. Most of my close relatives are rich and own succesfull retail entriprises and warehouses. Jatts are on the other are known to do unskilled work such as working in marks and spencer and debenhams lol as they are so greedy for money. they send their wifes to work in the retail stores. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Big_Tera said:

Also

In reply to Makhaal who says jatts only reciieved high praise from historians. That is hogwash. 

There are many quotes and praise for Tharkaans. Ie they were known as skilled craftsman who were highly educated and wealthy.  wheras the jatts were illiterate when they came to the uk. Also there are quotes of Bhattra who were highly succesfull entrepeneurs who ran busineses. Most of my close relatives are rich and own succesfull retail entriprises and warehouses. Jatts are on the other are known to do unskilled work such as working in marks and spencer and debenhams lol as they are so greedy for money. they send their wifes to work in the retail stores. 

 

Its weird how if someone says anything against nonjatts it casteist, but if ppl say things against jatts, its not. I didnt even find ur post offensive, just egoist trying to big up ur own caste. But since we should be fair, all attacks on all shud be called out. I wonder if insults against jatts dont matter the same way its not considered racist to make fun of white ppl: cuz in reality they  have it better than the other castes/races

Also i think  working im retail is a good job, nothing hard or immodest about it. Its better than giving women no choice but to stay home at all times like the muslims. Im pretty sure the women werent forced and chose it themselves

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Not2Cool2Argue said:

Its weird how if someone says anything against nonjatts it casteist, but if ppl say things against jatts, its not. I didnt even find ur post offensive, just egoist trying to big up ur own caste. But since we should be fair, all attacks on all shud be called out. I wonder if insults against jatts dont matter the same way its not considered racist to make fun of white ppl: cuz in reality they  have it better than the other castes/races

Also i think  working im retail is a good job, nothing hard or immodest about it. Its better than giving women no choice but to stay home at all times like the muslims. Im pretty sure the women werent forced and chose it themselves

I see plenty of hijabans working all over the place. So it's not true that they don't work.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

 I wonder if insults against jatts dont matter the same way its not considered racist to make fun of white ppl: cuz in reality they  have it better than the other castes/races

Certain fudhus would like everyone to think so, but the reality is that there are plenty of poor jutts. They themselves are victims of all the attempted jutt supremacy, where the show off jutts overshadow them and because of their over projection of their financial success (which they invariably link to their caste), the poor ones are ignored. Many end up committing suicide. That's how stupid the other type of jutt is - he'll be bigging himself up about his money to no end, whilst the next struggling jutt is jumping into wells over his poverty. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, dallysingh101 said:

Certain fudhus would like everyone to think so, but the reality is that there are plenty of poor jutts. They themselves are victims of all the attempted jutt supremacy, where the show off jutts overshadow them and because of their over projection of their financial success (which they invariably link to their caste), the poor ones are ignored. Many end up committing suicide. That's how stupid the other type of jutt is - he'll be bigging himself up about his money to no end, whilst the next struggling jutt is jumping into wells over his poverty. 

can you stop with the f word ...you do know how to make your point without it I'm sure veer ji

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Jonny101 said:

Mahakaal ji, it is a huge blunder on your part to divide our Shaheeds and warriors of the past in something so silly as caste. As a Jat you are claiming Baba Deep Singh Jee Baba Budha Jee and others while Ramgarias are claiming Jassa Singh Ramgaria as their own, Khatris are claiming our Gurus and Hari Singh Nalwa, Rajputs are claiming Baba Banda Singh Bahadur and Brahmins are claiming Bhai Mati Das, Bhai Sati Das and Bhai Dayal Das as their own not realizing that all the accomplishments they attained and Shaheedis they gave was ONLY for Sikhi and the casteless principles that Sikhi upholds.

Our atma has no caste. You could have very well have been born a non Jat in your previous lifetimes and who knows, if you show too much Jaat Abhiman, you might reincarnate into a caste that you deem as low or inferior to your own as God's way of teaching you a lesson. Jaat Paat is only skin deep. Improve your spiritual life, keep as much Rehit as possible while Japping Naam is what really counts in the Dargah of Vaheguru. All these caste issues are useless and are of no benefit to the Panth

 

It is a waste of time getting this across backward minded, so called Sikhs.

These kind of people are thankfully an isolated minority in our quam today.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was searching igurbani.com which gives correct pronunciation of Gurbani. I can’t remember all of it at once. I guess it relies on more practice, like more Sehaj Paths. The meaning becomes clearer. I have noticed slight variants in it. This could be because it’s written in old Punjabi.  
    • Veer Manpreet Singh, a lay preacher, claims that -Sikhs aren't supposed to worship Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We are only supposed to worship God as is written in Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We only "revere" Guru Granth Sahib ji.     He says a lot of other things in this video, some are good refutations of Hindu superstitions, but the reformers often go too far. Anyways, what he is saying about not worshipping Guru Granth Sahib ji is totally wrong. The reason is Guru Granth Sahib ji is Guru. Guru is Satguru. Satguru is God. We worship God. Therefore, we also worship Satguru (Guru Granth Sahib ji).   There are innumerable verses in Gurbani equating God and Guru. ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਗੁਰੁ ਡੁਬਦਾ ਲਏ ਤਰਾਇ ॥੨॥ The Guru is the Supreme Lord and the Transcendent Master. The Guru floats (saves) the drowning one. p49   ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਏਕੋ ਜਾਣੁ ॥ Know the Guru and God as One. p864   ਗੁਰ ਨਾਲਿ ਤੁਲਿ ਨ ਲਗਈ ਖੋਜਿ ਡਿਠਾ ਬ੍ਰਹਮੰਡੁ ॥ There is no one at par with the Guru. I have searched and seen the whole universe. p49 (If the Guru is the greatest in the whole universe, shouldn't we worship the Guru?)   I'd like to ask Manpreet Singh what is worship? Any reasonable definition would include obeisance, remembrance, and praise. Those are exactly the same things Gurbani says to do regarding Guru! Remembrance and obeisance: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੁ ਅਪਨਾ ਸਦ ਸਦਾ ਸਮ੍ਹਾਰੇ ॥ Ever, ever, I think of the True Guru, ਗੁਰ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਕੇਸ ਸੰਗਿ ਝਾਰੇ ॥੧॥ and the Guru's feet I brush with my head's hair. p387   Praise: ਗੁਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਆਪਿ ॥ The Guru himself is the transcendent Lord and the supreme master. ਆਠ ਪਹਰ ਨਾਨਕ ਗੁਰ ਜਾਪਿ ॥੪॥੧੬॥੬੭॥ Throughout the eight watches of the day, O Nanak meditate thou on the Guru. p387   In fact, Gurbani says the way to find God is to worship (puja) of Guru: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੂ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਧੋਇ ਧੋਇ ਪੂਜਹੁ ਇਨ ਬਿਧਿ ਮੇਰਾ ਹਰਿ ਪ੍ਰਭੁ ਲਹੁ ਰੇ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ Washing and bathing the True Guru's feet, worship thou them. In this way thou shall obtain my Lord Master. Pause. p1118   Could it be any clearer that we are to worship Guru ji?
    • Bro, reciting a shorter Chaupai Sahib is hardly "anti-Dasam". It's fine to argue that the longer Chaupai is more traditional, but the short one isn't anti-Dasam. That's like claiming shorter Rehras is anti-Guru Granth Sahib ji just because there are fewer selections from Guru Granth Sahib. It might not be traditional, but it's not anti-Guru Granth Sahib. I prefer the longer versions, but let's not exaggerate. Every tradition has a slightly different Rehras version. Nanaksar vs Taksal vs Nihangs and so on. The basic template for Rehras is at the beginning of Guru Granth Sahib ji. Later, Chaupai Sahib was added and Anand Sahib always follows as the end of a process. Then some sangats added more saloks to start Rehras and others were added at the end. Some additional selections from Dasam Bani were also added, but it wasn't the same ones for every sangat. The important thing is to not hate on each other for these variations.
    • Umm, so you're upset that this jatha did Chaupai the same way it's being done at Harimandar Sahib for 100 years? Shouldn't you be upset at the manager of Darbar Sahib? I'm not saying that Sikhs who are aware of certain issues shouldn't do the longer Chaupai, but there are only so many battles you can fight. Instead of calling some jatha traitors because they're doing the (for better or worse) "standard" Chauapai published by the SGPC, it would be better to change things from the central point. You can't fault the average Sikh for picking up the average Gutka and doing paath.
    • It's the same here in Toronto. Alot of the gudwaras here are political orientated and get tons of funding from the government-probably want them stay hush hush with all the BS that has been happening with India.  These guys are skewing gurbani. A complaint was sent to a ragi singh a couple of days ago in regards to a hukamnama. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use