Jump to content

The Black Prince - New Film Based On Sikh Maharajah Duleep Singh


genie
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...
On 22/02/2017 at 2:45 PM, TigerForce1 said:

Let's face it Sikhi was sidelined by Maharaja Ranjit Singh way before the British set their sights on the Punjab.  The Nihung Singhs had already started to protest against Ranjit Singhs anti-Sikh ways and it would have just been a matter of time before there would have been a violent clash between the secular monarchy and the real Sikhs of the time.  Duleep Singhs fate was already destined to be separated from Sikhi.  Maharaja Ranjit Singh had brilliant qualities of a leader but his lavish and anti-Sikh lifestyle is the reason we are facing the problems of being stateless today.

Although the story of Duleep Singh is sad we must not forget that the Sikh 'nishaana' of the time was never to be ruled by a secular Monarch but to establish 'Khalsa Raj' and to be led by the 'Khalsa'.

But, it wasn't really. Even before he rose to power the misls were already doing what he did, at a smaller scale of course. Each misl had their own turf, ruled by one man, and were always fighting each other. Also, let's not pretend the misls were hardcore gursikhs, simply the truth, in no way am I looking down on them. Point being, Maharaja Ranjit Singh, just took the misls game to a whole new level. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Jacfsing2
1 hour ago, KhoonKaBadlaKhoon said:

Also, let's not pretend the misls were hardcore gursikhs, simply the truth, in no way am I looking down on them. 

The Shaheedian Misl was led by Baba Deep Singh Ji; who on a daily basis did 22 hours Simran; (these would happen sometimes while he was training), he also led the Taksal; wrote Saroops of Dhan Dhan Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji in different languages, and was one to fight for righteousness. I'm not even equal to the dust of the feet of Baba Deep Singh Ji, and you are here saying he's not some Gursikh? 

Just for the record Sukhdev Singh Babbar was also a Gursikh of high behavior, as was Jugraj Singh Toofan and others. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The misls were 12 clans ruled by 12 chieftains and your assuming it was these clans that were consolidated into one and ruled by one Chieftain who established Khalsa Raj.  No this would not have been possible without the support of everyday GurSikh man and women of Punjab who gave their blood and souls for establishing Khalsa Raj not a kingdom for a Chieftan/Monarch of a secular state.  The Chieftain Ranjit Singh and the previous Chieftains of the 12 misls misused the support of GurSikhs to establish Kingdoms or rule turfs as you put it in their own names.  The same has been seen in recent times where politicians such as Badal have played the Sikh card for gaining Sikh votes in the name of a Sikh Akali Party and totally misused the power they were entrusted with and done complete opposite to a Party in line with a Sikh ethos.  

Basically what I am saying is these leaders such as Ranjit Singh and Badals and so on would have nothing without Sikh support and they've turned their backs on their faith and Guru that enabled them to scale such heights.  The everyday people eventually turn their backs on these type of leaders too and all that is left is a 'Black Prince' who wants to return to the his fathers Kingdom to reclaim something that should never have been.  When Khalsa Raj does come to this world it will be for the GURU and it will be permanent!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 26/02/2017 at 5:54 AM, Jacfsing2 said:

+1 Not that big of an issue; I can understand why some people would assume me being fake, especially since some people don't really know what it means.

Believe me lol, we know what it means. You're just so stuck in your own world that you convinced yourself it's "ignorant fools" calling you out, and that's the only reason. Definitely it's their "ignorance," surely not something youre doing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Jacfsing2 said:

The Shaheedian Misl was led by Baba Deep Singh Ji; who on a daily basis did 22 hours Simran; (these would happen sometimes while he was training), he also led the Taksal; wrote Saroops of Dhan Dhan Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji in different languages, and was one to fight for righteousness. I'm not even equal to the dust of the feet of Baba Deep Singh Ji, and you are here saying he's not some Gursikh? 

Just for the record Sukhdev Singh Babbar was also a Gursikh of high behavior, as was Jugraj Singh Toofan and others. 

Where did I say that? Worst "rebuttal" ever. 

Ok? What do they have to do with this?...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Jacfsing2
3 hours ago, KhoonKaBadlaKhoon said:

Believe me lol, we know what it means. You're just so stuck in your own world that you convinced yourself it's "ignorant fools" calling you out, and that's the only reason. Definitely it's their "ignorance," surely not something youre doing. 

I've never called any Sangat member here a fool, what I was referring to were some guests that come here trying to learn about Sikhi, (If you are one of those people, I'd recommend reading bani online, instead of being on this forum, especially if you know absolutely nothing).

3 hours ago, KhoonKaBadlaKhoon said:

Where did I say that? Worst "rebuttal" ever. 

Ok? What do they have to do with this?...

Your statement vaguely lumped the Misls together: and the guy that posted right after me decided to insult the Misls even more. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your statement vaguely lumped the Misls together: and "the guy that posted right after me decided to insult the Misls even more". 

 

I have no intention to insult Misls or Sardars!  I have merely tried to state that at certain times during our history individuals such as Ranjit Singh, Badal and countless others have misused the support given to them by GurSikhs.  At no point was support given to individuals or statesmen for personal conquests and expansion only for establishing Khalsa Raj.  I apologise if I have offended anyone!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If relationship with Guru is strong, then kanga is done twice a day, and turban should never be taken off or put on like a hat, there is a lot wrong with that as it is against rehit! maryada is to take off every layer of turban/pagh/dumalla individually, and tie fresh turban each time!
    • the whole 'your husband/wife is chosen for you'/sanjog thing is real, it's just that a lot of people end up marrying the wrong person. they did not end up with the person that was meant for them. my friend, you should marry someone who you feel a connection with and love. there are millions of sikh girls, i'm sure you can find someone who aligns with your sensibilities and who you can truthfully say that you love. sikhi does not say anything against love marriages. you can also be in a loveless arranged marriage which is a safe option b/c both families are more inclined to keep the union intact. i was one of those people who was like meh, i guess i'll just get arranged to some sikh. well i finally started dating for the first time this year and i'm getting married to someone that i love and cannot even imagine leaving. i think it's better to have lost & lost than never loved at all. unfortunately, a lot of people confuse love w/ looks & lust. a lot of men go for the fittest girl they can find and think they won the jackpot or something. in reality, your partner should be like an extremely loved best friend. there's a reason why it's a fact that the most stable and long-lasting relationships started as friendships.  i also think a lot of women are petty and divorce over small reasons, but there's other terrible things like high cheating rates as well. that's why the divorce rate in the west is high. be careful out there.
    • andrew tate praises sikhi too & likes sikhs. his brother also donated to sikh families iirc. they just like any "alpha" religion and tbh islam is the most "alpha" in their eyes. islam is very good at promoting that image. but imo a real alpha man doesn't command respect by beating up his wive(s) or forcing them to wear a burqa. a real man will have his woman listen to him w/o raising a hand or his voice, and command respect by being respectful. he leads by example and integrity. that's true masculinity. you get the idea. + yes, it's definitely true that islam is growing rapidly and making massive inroads. strength in numbers + belief will do that. but rlly it's just because of the birth rate. a lot of them are muslim b/c it's their "identity" just like how a lot of young sikhs will say they're "culturally sikh" or whatever. there just aren't billions of sikhs who lambast their identity everywhere and have strict and linear rules like in islam. besides, the reality is that islam and its followers are some of the most morally bankrupt. you can see all the weird trans rules in iran, bacche baazi in afghanistan, visiting brothels, watching p*rn, p*dophilia what goes on behind the scenes in countries like uae & qatar, etc, and come to your conclusions. you can google all the stats yourself and see which countries do the most of these ^.   
    • stop associating with hinduism, that's the absolutely worst thing you can do as a sikh. not sure if you noticed but the entire world looks down upon and spits at india & hindus, literally no one respects them and considers them weak and cowardly. literally 1+ billion of them but not perceived as a strong religion commandeering respect. 
    • you wrote a whole lot but told us nothing. what exactly did you do wrong to make you feel this way?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use