Jump to content

The lost Sikh turban style


Guest
 Share

Recommended Posts

38 minutes ago, AjeetSinghPunjabi said:

I am always in disbelief whenever someone says that Guru Gobind singh ji were short in height . Yogi bhajan said 10th guru were only 5feet 4 inches. and his hands reached till his knees when standing . I heard this from other people also.

I always thought puratan singhs were always 6 feet tall or more . Pathans are very tall , so if you gotta fight them, u have to be tall . Marathas were known to be short-heighted on the other hand. 

I am only 5'5" in height . Whenever I come across a well-built singh who is taller than 6 feet, I feel like he's from olden times lol 

genetically speaking sons are always taller than their fathers (studies indicate average of 5cm) , so being the grandson of Guru Har Gobind ji I would imagine him to be fairly tall and having seen his swords and arms that indicates it too. I would put everything Yogi Harbhajan in to the bin , he had total disrespect of Guru Sahiban and has openly said that Guru Pita ji didn't know what he was doing . 

The statement about Guru Pita ji's arms was lifted from those who have had partak darshan and sakhis .

Mai Bhago was a six footer as well ...My Mother was telling me as she had kirpa of going to Nanded to do darshan . 

Dairy makes people tall -Dutch are major dairy eaters and they are the tallest country in Europe .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, AjeetSinghPunjabi said:

I am always in disbelief whenever someone says that Guru Gobind singh ji were short in height . Yogi bhajan said 10th guru were only 5feet 4 inches. and his hands reached till his knees when standing . I heard this from other people also.

I always thought puratan singhs were always 6 feet tall or more . Pathans are very tall , so if you gotta fight them, u have to be tall . Marathas were known to be short-heighted on the other hand. 

I am only 5'5" in height . Whenever I come across a well-built singh who is taller than 6 feet, I feel like he's from olden times lol 

The 6th guru was over 7 feet. The 9th guru who was the 6th gurus son would be at least 6 feet. The 10th guru would have to be at least 6 feet if not more if you look at genetics. It's not possible for the grandfather to be 7 feet or higher and the grandson being 5 foot four

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Singh123456777 said:

The 6th guru was over 7 feet. The 9th guru who was the 6th gurus son would be at least 6 feet. The 10th guru would have to be at least 6 feet if not more if you look at genetics. It's not possible for the grandfather to be 7 feet or higher and the grandson being 5 foot four

Genetics certainly plays a role. I'm told my paternal grandfather was 6ft 6. My mum says my father was 5ft 5 yet I was just under 6ft 3 at my peak, but I'm now just over 6ft due to a none permanent back injury that placed a lot of stress on my spine for a long time. I guess I shrunk, lol. It's a lottery at times. Pertaining to Dasme Paatshah, most who've had darshan claim they are no less than 6ft but certainly nowhere near the height of Guru Hargobind Sahib. Ultimately it's irrelevant as their legacy is not to be found in their height. Like skin tone, we Punjabis love to obsesss over height. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/26/2017 at 6:43 AM, Singh123456777 said:

Seli topi of Sri Guru Arjan Dev Ji Maharaj 

IMG_7342.PNG

Some of the sources I have speak of a semi (silk) thread. Not being a doubting Thomas, but other than Giani Gian Singh Nirmala- I believe- no other scholar mentions any topis. Guru Nanak Dev Ji, obviously, dressed as per the cultures of the regions he traveled. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/27/2017 at 5:29 AM, Balkaar said:

The Guru Sahibaan may have worn earrings, I don't know enough about Sikh art to say and I don't really believe its a big deal. 

But art isn't always a mirror of the truth, rather a reflection of the artist. There is no certainty that the Gurus commissioned these paintings of themselves, or that they were even present as subjects for the painter. How else does one explain all the portrayals of the same Guru which look completely different from one another? As OP has said, there is not enough consistency in these images for us to come to a conclusion about this. Every one of these paintings was painted well after the decease of the Gurus they depict, as well as by Pahari Hindu masters. Just as European artists are always representing Christ as a white guy, why wouldn't a Hindu or Mughal painter depict Guru Sahib in the manner of a Hindu Raja? Accuracy clearly wasn't the intention of these artists - that painting of Akali Phoola Singh posted earlier shows him wearing red garments when we know for a fact that Akalis were forbidden from wearing red as per puraatan rehtinamaay. 

Some of these pictures were commissioned by disciples, the Baba Bidhi Chand Dal still has one commissioned by their namesake which depicts the sixth master. I think it has already been posted on this thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/26/2017 at 6:26 AM, Singh123456777 said:

The first pic is a pic of Sri Guru gobind singh ji maharaj in his youth( notice the earrings)

Second pic is of Akali Baba Phula Singh(again notice the earrings)

Third pic is of Sri Guru Har Rai Sahib Ji Maharaj(earrings!!!)

Fourth pic is of Sri Guru Tegh Bahadur Ji Maharaj(again earrings!!!)

The next two pictures are of Sri Guru Har Gobind Sahib Maharaj which are in Baba Atal Rai Gurduwara(earrings on most of the Sikhs)

The second to last picture is a picture that somebody made which depicts Sri Guru Gobind Singh Ji Maharaj meeting Sri Guru Nanak Dev Ji Maharaj(Notice that Sri Guru Gobind Singh Ji Maharaj is wearing earrings and Sri Guru Nanak Dev Ji Maharaj wearing a seli topi which was worn from the 1st Guru up until the 6th Guru)

And the last picture is of Sri Guru Gobind Singh Ji Maharaj(earrings galore!!)

Some of these pics are contemporary pics that were made at the times of the gurus such as the Sri Guru Har Rai Sahib Ji Maharaj picture.

All the credit goes to Bhagat Singh artist who found this information

Satpal Singh, a connoisseur of such art, informed me that the sixth picture is one of Guru Arjan Dev Ji. This was a few years back...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 13Mirch said:

Satpal Singh, a connoisseur of such art, informed me that the sixth picture is one of Guru Arjan Dev Ji. This was a few years back...

Actually we both are wrong. I just looked at the picture using zoom and it's written that it's sri Guru ram das Ji maharaj. The person who is putting the tika on guru sahib is sri Guru amar das Sahib Ji.

IMG_7392.PNG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Singh123456777 said:

Actually we both are wrong. I just looked at the picture using zoom and it's written that it's sri Guru ram das Ji maharaj. The person who is putting the tika on guru sahib is sri Guru amar das Sahib Ji.

IMG_7392.PNG

It might have been Guru Ramdass Ji, my memory is fuzzy but thank you for the clarification.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 10 months later...
On 2/25/2017 at 9:26 AM, Singh123456777 said:

Sri Guru Nanak Dev Ji Maharaj wearing a seli topi which was worn from the 1st Guru up until the 6th Guru

Can you please provide me with a source for this claim? Im genuinely curious 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was searching igurbani.com which gives correct pronunciation of Gurbani. I can’t remember all of it at once. I guess it relies on more practice, like more Sehaj Paths. The meaning becomes clearer. I have noticed slight variants in it. This could be because it’s written in old Punjabi.  
    • Veer Manpreet Singh, a lay preacher, claims that -Sikhs aren't supposed to worship Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We are only supposed to worship God as is written in Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We only "revere" Guru Granth Sahib ji.     He says a lot of other things in this video, some are good refutations of Hindu superstitions, but the reformers often go too far. Anyways, what he is saying about not worshipping Guru Granth Sahib ji is totally wrong. The reason is Guru Granth Sahib ji is Guru. Guru is Satguru. Satguru is God. We worship God. Therefore, we also worship Satguru (Guru Granth Sahib ji).   There are innumerable verses in Gurbani equating God and Guru. ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਗੁਰੁ ਡੁਬਦਾ ਲਏ ਤਰਾਇ ॥੨॥ The Guru is the Supreme Lord and the Transcendent Master. The Guru floats (saves) the drowning one. p49   ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਏਕੋ ਜਾਣੁ ॥ Know the Guru and God as One. p864   ਗੁਰ ਨਾਲਿ ਤੁਲਿ ਨ ਲਗਈ ਖੋਜਿ ਡਿਠਾ ਬ੍ਰਹਮੰਡੁ ॥ There is no one at par with the Guru. I have searched and seen the whole universe. p49 (If the Guru is the greatest in the whole universe, shouldn't we worship the Guru?)   I'd like to ask Manpreet Singh what is worship? Any reasonable definition would include obeisance, remembrance, and praise. Those are exactly the same things Gurbani says to do regarding Guru! Remembrance and obeisance: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੁ ਅਪਨਾ ਸਦ ਸਦਾ ਸਮ੍ਹਾਰੇ ॥ Ever, ever, I think of the True Guru, ਗੁਰ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਕੇਸ ਸੰਗਿ ਝਾਰੇ ॥੧॥ and the Guru's feet I brush with my head's hair. p387   Praise: ਗੁਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਆਪਿ ॥ The Guru himself is the transcendent Lord and the supreme master. ਆਠ ਪਹਰ ਨਾਨਕ ਗੁਰ ਜਾਪਿ ॥੪॥੧੬॥੬੭॥ Throughout the eight watches of the day, O Nanak meditate thou on the Guru. p387   In fact, Gurbani says the way to find God is to worship (puja) of Guru: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੂ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਧੋਇ ਧੋਇ ਪੂਜਹੁ ਇਨ ਬਿਧਿ ਮੇਰਾ ਹਰਿ ਪ੍ਰਭੁ ਲਹੁ ਰੇ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ Washing and bathing the True Guru's feet, worship thou them. In this way thou shall obtain my Lord Master. Pause. p1118   Could it be any clearer that we are to worship Guru ji?
    • Bro, reciting a shorter Chaupai Sahib is hardly "anti-Dasam". It's fine to argue that the longer Chaupai is more traditional, but the short one isn't anti-Dasam. That's like claiming shorter Rehras is anti-Guru Granth Sahib ji just because there are fewer selections from Guru Granth Sahib. It might not be traditional, but it's not anti-Guru Granth Sahib. I prefer the longer versions, but let's not exaggerate. Every tradition has a slightly different Rehras version. Nanaksar vs Taksal vs Nihangs and so on. The basic template for Rehras is at the beginning of Guru Granth Sahib ji. Later, Chaupai Sahib was added and Anand Sahib always follows as the end of a process. Then some sangats added more saloks to start Rehras and others were added at the end. Some additional selections from Dasam Bani were also added, but it wasn't the same ones for every sangat. The important thing is to not hate on each other for these variations.
    • Umm, so you're upset that this jatha did Chaupai the same way it's being done at Harimandar Sahib for 100 years? Shouldn't you be upset at the manager of Darbar Sahib? I'm not saying that Sikhs who are aware of certain issues shouldn't do the longer Chaupai, but there are only so many battles you can fight. Instead of calling some jatha traitors because they're doing the (for better or worse) "standard" Chauapai published by the SGPC, it would be better to change things from the central point. You can't fault the average Sikh for picking up the average Gutka and doing paath.
    • It's the same here in Toronto. Alot of the gudwaras here are political orientated and get tons of funding from the government-probably want them stay hush hush with all the BS that has been happening with India.  These guys are skewing gurbani. A complaint was sent to a ragi singh a couple of days ago in regards to a hukamnama. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use