Jump to content

Should Sikhs do a March


Big_Tera
 Share

Recommended Posts

Why dont Sikhs do a solidarity march against the terror attacks. It will shows that Sikhs are a separate people who not aligned with muslims.

It will show we are with the british people and condemn these acts of terror.  It will also educate people who we are and that we should not be mistaken for muslims. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Big_Tera said:

Why dont Sikhs do a solidarity march against the terror attacks. It will shows that Sikhs are a separate people who not aligned with muslims.

It will show we are with the british people and condemn these acts of terror.  It will also educate people who we are and that we should not be mistaken for muslims. 

they joined in with vigils, issued statements etc ,you must not have being paying attention

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, jkvlondon said:

they joined in with vigils, issued statements etc ,you must not have being paying attention

Its not the same as a march is it? Im not talking about large scale marches. 

To let the british people know were are against these attacks. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Big_Tera said:

Why dont Sikhs do a solidarity march against the terror attacks. It will shows that Sikhs are a separate people who not aligned with muslims.

It will show we are with the british people and condemn these acts of terror.  It will also educate people who we are and that we should not be mistaken for muslims. 

Your heart's in the right place, but I think this would be mistaken.

1. First of all, we didn't do the terror attack, so why should we march?

2. The mere fact of our marching will lead some viewers to think that our people were in some way responsible, and we're apologizing for it (to say "not all Muslims" agree with terrorism).

3. The news media has shown again and again that it will flat out lie and project Sikhs as Muslims. They are always looking for a "moderate Muslims marching" story, even going to the extent of stage-managing a protest for viewer consumption:

4. So the only reason for marching would appear to be to say "We hate the Muslims", which doesn't seem to be a great idea.

5. I do admit that it might be a good idea to march as part of another, general march. Just hold a banner that says "Sikhs are against terror attacks" or whatever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Big_Tera said:

To let the british people know were are against these attacks. 

I understand the sentiment but it would seem an excessive form of ingratiation on our part. There's no need. We have no reason to set ourselves apart, in such a visible manner, from other non-Muslim groups in order to condemn these attacks. In situations like these you keep your head down and observe the games being played. You don't take to the streets and start drawing attention to yourselves. That's the kind of foolishness that is unfortunately associated with our people. It serves no purpose whatsoever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Jacfsing2
58 minutes ago, Big_Tera said:

Why dont Sikhs do a solidarity march against the terror attacks. It will shows that Sikhs are a separate people who not aligned with muslims.

It will show we are with the british people and condemn these acts of terror.  It will also educate people who we are and that we should not be mistaken for muslims. 

Don't be marching and protesting unless it's a cause worth being Shaheed for. Today we got protests and marches for some of the most extra reasons, that I don't think there should be these protests in the first place. If you were looking for not being mistaken for Muslims, that's not a cause worth protesting and marching for, that's something you just educate someone on.

There are three questions you should answer before going on a protest?

1. Is it worth your life?

2. Is it important or just some side-thing?

3. Will there be any REAL effect of it?

This is not an important cause by any of the three questions asked, it is a useless protest. We, (humans), already have enough weak protests that fall on death, (yes death, not deaf) ears.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Jacfsing2
11 minutes ago, BhForce said:

Woah -- that escalated quickly. Marching in the UK doesn't entail the police spraying Sikhs down with bullets!

I know that, but now a days, people just protest anything. Second I'm not talking about the police beating you, but your fellow protesters. I read your statements and it seemed you agree with me, that protesting "not being Muslim", is not a worthy thing to protest. If you look at the old-age protesters like MLK in America, they believed their idea of "equality", to the death, which is why they had so much power. The Hippy revolution also in America genuinely believed they were fighting for something worth while, whereas our protests have been reduced to eating Samosas and other snacks. (That's actually the only reason some Sikhs go to Gurdwaras as well).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Jacfsing2 said:

I know that, but now a days, people just protest anything. Second I'm not talking about the police beating you, but your fellow protesters. I read your statements and it seemed you agree with me, that protesting "not being Muslim", is not a worthy thing to protest. If you look at the old-age protesters like MLK in America, they believed their idea of "equality", to the death, which is why they had so much power. The Hippy revolution also in America genuinely believed they were fighting for something worth while, whereas our protests have been reduced to eating Samosas and other snacks. (That's actually the only reason some Sikhs go to Gurdwaras as well).

Yeah, maybe we agree. I think that we should not march to antagonize the Muslims just for the sake of it, i.e., for nothing at all other than saying we're not Muslims. There's no reason to become the specific, number 1 targets of jihadi Muslims. Marching as part of an anti-terror march would be a different matter, because the focus is not on us specifically, and we also show that we have empathy with the victims, so we avoid the negative, and gain a bit of positive, as opposed to the scenario above, which is all negative, and little positive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Big_Tera said:

Its not the same as a march is it? Im not talking about large scale marches. 

To let the british people know were are against these attacks. 

I think there is a lot of guilt on all sides with these things. Foreign shenanigans abroad, and attempts to control oil resources play their part in the mess. Ar5se-licking Saudis who then blatantly fund fundamentalist mosques/parchaar and whatnot all contribute to these things. Covert everyday racism as well.  I think a lot of Brits themselves know this (although they would never dare articulate it because they are sheeplike people).

So I think Sikhs jumping into the middle of this self-induced quagmire with some grand statement like marches is fudhuuness of the highest order myself. 

Let these war loving people people kill each other. Let's just try and minimise Sikh casualties if possible. 

People from the factions involved need to speak up about their own societies contributions to the mess. As Sikhs we should look on in disgust at all sides actions which have led to all this. 

Right now as Sikhs, we are as clean as can be in all this. I'm just waiting for some rectal parasite type peasant to jump in with some grand gesture of bhund-yaary. Any minute now... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If relationship with Guru is strong, then kanga is done twice a day, and turban should never be taken off or put on like a hat, there is a lot wrong with that as it is against rehit! maryada is to take off every layer of turban/pagh/dumalla individually, and tie fresh turban each time!
    • the whole 'your husband/wife is chosen for you'/sanjog thing is real, it's just that a lot of people end up marrying the wrong person. they did not end up with the person that was meant for them. my friend, you should marry someone who you feel a connection with and love. there are millions of sikh girls, i'm sure you can find someone who aligns with your sensibilities and who you can truthfully say that you love. sikhi does not say anything against love marriages. you can also be in a loveless arranged marriage which is a safe option b/c both families are more inclined to keep the union intact. i was one of those people who was like meh, i guess i'll just get arranged to some sikh. well i finally started dating for the first time this year and i'm getting married to someone that i love and cannot even imagine leaving. i think it's better to have lost & lost than never loved at all. unfortunately, a lot of people confuse love w/ looks & lust. a lot of men go for the fittest girl they can find and think they won the jackpot or something. in reality, your partner should be like an extremely loved best friend. there's a reason why it's a fact that the most stable and long-lasting relationships started as friendships.  i also think a lot of women are petty and divorce over small reasons, but there's other terrible things like high cheating rates as well. that's why the divorce rate in the west is high. be careful out there.
    • andrew tate praises sikhi too & likes sikhs. his brother also donated to sikh families iirc. they just like any "alpha" religion and tbh islam is the most "alpha" in their eyes. islam is very good at promoting that image. but imo a real alpha man doesn't command respect by beating up his wive(s) or forcing them to wear a burqa. a real man will have his woman listen to him w/o raising a hand or his voice, and command respect by being respectful. he leads by example and integrity. that's true masculinity. you get the idea. + yes, it's definitely true that islam is growing rapidly and making massive inroads. strength in numbers + belief will do that. but rlly it's just because of the birth rate. a lot of them are muslim b/c it's their "identity" just like how a lot of young sikhs will say they're "culturally sikh" or whatever. there just aren't billions of sikhs who lambast their identity everywhere and have strict and linear rules like in islam. besides, the reality is that islam and its followers are some of the most morally bankrupt. you can see all the weird trans rules in iran, bacche baazi in afghanistan, visiting brothels, watching p*rn, p*dophilia what goes on behind the scenes in countries like uae & qatar, etc, and come to your conclusions. you can google all the stats yourself and see which countries do the most of these ^.   
    • stop associating with hinduism, that's the absolutely worst thing you can do as a sikh. not sure if you noticed but the entire world looks down upon and spits at india & hindus, literally no one respects them and considers them weak and cowardly. literally 1+ billion of them but not perceived as a strong religion commandeering respect. 
    • you wrote a whole lot but told us nothing. what exactly did you do wrong to make you feel this way?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use