Jump to content

Would you call our moneh boys "sikhs" ?


Guest
 Share

Recommended Posts

19 minutes ago, KhoonKaBadlaKhoon said:

I meant that towards the Sikhs he posted in that video, ones who fought a British war, not a Sikh war for Sikhi/Guru Sahibs etc. 

 

Edit: we should have a minimum age limit on this forum to avoid immature teenagers like muscleman and akalifauj. 

I'm confused Bro but that happens a lot 

Apologies 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, harsharan000 said:

 Just see how a coward and antigurmat chap he is; following is his cr@p  in his very own words a couple of years back:

"so long as the shabad Guru is the teacher of the body it is the real mandir.".

Can you tell me, how can such a foolish statement proudly  be made, which is totally against Gurmat.

Can´t you the see the harm and confussion he can create in the inmature minds, with his filthy words.

Since when the Shabad Guru is the teacher of the body?

Which shameless baba has infused in him, such antigurmat  thinking?

Here is a link to see how he takes what I originally said out of context.  This besharam is notorious for taking Gurbani and writing based on Gurmat out of context.

He keeps bringing this up as if he's got something special.  He's got nothing. He's a crusty old man with nothing better to do than pick on young girls on forums. This is not a joke either.  There is a member here who showed us its true, she has not written here in a short while. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2017-6-22 at 3:31 AM, ipledgeblue said:

A solution is, if amrit-dharis followed rehit, IF, then, only then more people might want to be Singhs.

When I say rehit, I don't mean just the paper rehit maryada people have now. I mean following the active lifestyle rehit like in the rehitnaamas, rehit that has been followed since Guru Hargobind. Doing things like learning archery, shooting, horse-riding etc Follow Gurus hukam of learning shastar everyday, and also learn martial arts. (See Nihang Singh dals for example)

Instead of being people that religiously follow football and cricket matches, they would be involved in these activities. Then they would be an actual "practising" amrit dhari, as opposed to someone who took amrit just to do paat, which any sehajdhari or "mona" can actually do! Can gurdwaras and sikh associations organise such activities? Organising kabaddi tournaments isn't really going  to make sangat proper amrit dharis. However, organising kabaddi and wrestling training for sangat to be involved in would help!

WE absolutely should not act like the disarmed sikhs of colonial times. Instead of becoming like the naamdharis who put the kirpaan symbol in the kanga, we should get out of this colonial compromise of not following martial rehit and get back to actually being Singhs. Can the community do this?

A lot of these liberal extremist, including the leader moni as he quoted this post to say the post hit the nail on the head, have failed to recognize when Sikhs started to carry weapons and use weapons for fighting.  Moni claims to be a self proclaimed sikh historian and doesn't even know this simple fact. These liberals claim Amritdharis have failed to train with weopons and so have the sehajdhari because it was Sri Guru Hargobind Sahib ji who introduced weapons into the Khalsa Panth. Sikhs didn't wait till the Punj Pyare were formed. These guys keep on ragging on amritdharis but lets simply look at the meaning of sehajdhari.  Sehaj is to move forward in something and in this context, its toward following more of the Guru teachings.  A sehajdhari Sikh is a person who recognizes the teaching to keep hair uncut is from the Guru and does it.  Moni ji implies he's a sehajdhari.  Moni ji has been on sikh forums for over 20 odd years.  In these 20 odd years moni has not kept his hair uncut.  Instead he continues to cut his hair.  He keeps moving away from the Guru.  Sehajdhari move toward keeping hair.  When an amritdharis commits a wrong act they present themselves before the punj pyare who are the Saroops of the Guru. The amritdharis becomes patit until he presents himself before the punj pyare.  Moni ji has been committing the wrong act of cutting hair for more than 20 odd years, who does he answer too?  Moni is the guy in the langar hall who enjoys all the food but when it comes to cleaning the dishes, he wants to claim he doesn't answer to the Guru.  Look further into these liberal extremist cheating and lying.  Bhai Gurdas ji vaars tell us Sri Guru Nanak Dev ji started the Nirmal Panth.  Nirmal means pure and so does Khalsa.  Sri Guru Nanak Dev ji gave Amrit and gave his Sikhs instructions to keep hair uncut and Sri Guru Gobind Singh Sahib ji gave Amrit and gave his Sikhs instructions to keep hair uncut.  Many Sikhs were carrying weapons by the order of Sri Guru Hargobind Sahib ji instructions.  Were already tying dastar, wearing kachera, carrying combs, and Kara. Sikhs were taking charan pahul from the Guru.  Why is it today these extremist refuse to take the Gurus hukam to keep hair uncut and take Amrit seriously?  Because they have no intentions of being Sikhs.  They just want to enjoy the benefits from the Gurus golak and distance themselves from the Guru when it does not favor them.  When Sri Guru Tegh Bahadur Sahib jis gave his head Sikhs hid in the crowd.  Today the very same Sikhs want to claim they are somehow something special for not following the Guru teachings.   Sehajdhari look at the four kurhits and don't go near them.  Yet moni wants to keep cutting his hair and claim to be sehajdhari Sikh.  Where is the logic and rationale in such stupidity.  Remember 20 odd years this guy has been doing this.  He's so deep in his own filth, he can't see what is pure and what is filth

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, muscleman said:

Surely you know the answer to this one.  If you are refering to Bhagat Sain Ji definitely he is a sikh according to Bhai Gurdas Ji's Vaar number10 (Pauri 16) where he states:

'Soon partaap Kabir da dujja sikh hoya Sain Nayee,

Prem bhagat raati kare balkey raj duarey jaayee,

Aayei sant praahney kirtan renn sabayee,

Chadd na sakey sant jan raj duare ne sev kamaayee,

Sain roop har jaayee ke aaya raaney no rijaayee,

Sadh janna no vida ker raj duaar gaya sirmaayee,

Raaney doorohn sadke gallohn kawayee khol penaayee,

Wuss keeta hon tudh aj bolley raj sooney lukaayee,

Pargat karre bhagat wadiyaayee.'

Once you begin to understand the meanings of the above Pauri, you will begin to understand why Bhai Gurdas Ji describes him as a sikh. Sain ji was definitely a barber by profession but he was also a disciple of Ramanand Ji. He was a lover of ONE GOD.

'Puran jot jaggey gat mein tab khalas tahi nakhalas jaaney,

Jaagat jot jappe nis basur ek bina mun naik na aaney,

Puran prem parteet sajje brutt gor marri mut bhool na maaney,

Teerath daan daya tapp sanjam ek bina nah ek pachaaney.' (Sri Guru Gobind Singh)

Start reading the great Sikh Granths from now on to understand the great Sikh philosophical concepts and to widen your knowledge.

Bhagat Sain Ji was not an ordinary barber. He was a great soul having attained a very high avastha by meditating on One God. He was not like your ordinary barbers in your local downtown barbers' shops.

The authority rests with Bhai Gurdas Ji when it comes to defining or assigning a Sikh status in this case and not with all and sundry. Dhan Dhan Bhai Gurdas Ji.

I wasn't referring to Bhagat Sain. I was referring to Bhai Dhinga, the barber.  The concept of keeping Kesh was started from Guru Nanak Dev Ji, yet an Ordinary barbar is described as being liberated here. By your logic he wouldn't be considered a Sikh surely purely based on his profession. Bhai Dhinga was an amritdhari because he took Charan Pahul, yet he served the Guru DESPITE doing something modern day Sikhs consider a Kureit. The verse is below for you to read and decipher. 

ਨਾਈ ਧਿੰਙ ਵਖਾਣੀਐ ਸਤਿਗੁਰ ਸੇਵਿ ਕੁਟੰਬੁ ਤਰਾਵੈ।
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Barbers, Or Nais have other functions these days besides cutting hairs. They might be involved in matrimonial match-making stuff for example.

 

I need to add about sehajdhari sikhs, and it will become controversial for many on this forum.

Firstly, there are many sehajdhari sikhs that have existed from the times of various sikh Gurus. But many of these civilian sikhs and samprdaiye have kind of been disowned by Singh Sabha lehar.

Some of the samprdaiye which include sehajdhari sampradaiye have been mentioned in the Anandpur Resolution to be brought back into the panth. At the moment, most of these sampradaiye are even less visible than the Namdharis. I think Nirmalas have some visibility in the visibly panth. But also Udasis also had large roles, especially when the Singhs had been out fighting before the british Raaj. I am unsure where Sewapanthis fit in besides Bhai Khanaiya's system of helping people with first Aid and stuff.

Then it gets more controversial, there's civilian sikhs who call themselves Nanakpanths, such as sikhs who were in Sindh before partition; are there some in Bihar as well?

I am pretty sure most of these sehajdhari sikhs, especially the sampradaiye are doing more in preserving bani and paat, and also principles of sikhi at least from Guru Nanak. Compared to these, the monas are just drunk or drugged up, the only thing they might have is the name Singh in their name which tries to connect with the panth. The proper sehajdhari sikhs were involved in spreading and preserving sikhi before the angrej arrived, with the sampradaiye being connected to Guru Sahibs in one way or another, but all 3 of the ones I mentioned being blessed or even started by Dasam Patshah. With these sehajdharis, the amridhari Singhs would have been more active in martial rehat. The panth kept in-tune, in balance, like this. However, since the panth is now unbalanced, there's a lot of juggling stuff going on. With martial rehat and bani and keertan and seva. We have become more jack-of-all-trade sikhs than being good at following maryada. 

I mean calling these sikhs as hindus isn't helping. If 'our' moneh could even be sikhs like that then our panth would be so enriched! At he moment it seems some sehajdhari sikhs are called hindu-punjabis because they don't happen to use the name Singh in their name. Throwing around the hindu term isn't going to help, especially if we recognise what the Firanghi did to divide the panth into something unrecognisable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • There is nothing wrong with starched pagg. The Guru is omniscient (all-knowing). You think he doesn't know our intentions? If somebody wears a starched pagg but still respects it as a crown then whats wrong with that? People think that starch automatically makes people lose their respect for their pagg but thats just false.  And dont make this a caste thing I’m Rajput Jatt sikh (not an ounce of Tarkhan or anything else) and we all starch our INDIAN style punjabi paggs (patiala shahi), but respect them as our crowns and our literal lives. A respected starch pagg is better by far than a freshly tied one which people just disrespect. And people forget that these are not ready made or pre-tied turbans. You still tie them initially but just of course not as frequently. What’s wrong with that?  When your relationship is that strong with the Guru then you know what he means. Speak to him directly, explain why and ask him if it’s okay. Btw I know people who dont starch their turbans (all punjabi/morni style btw) and they just wear it again the next day without tying it if they have toed it really nicely the day before. 😂 You cant really even tell who had tied it and who just wore it again without starch. At least we’re open about it. Bhul chuk maaf    
    • Its called a “fifty” becuase when Singhs were fighting in the British army, they would recieve an 8 metre pagg, with a cour four base, because the base layer was half (50%) of the main turban, it’s called a fifty. The practise of tying a keski under your main one is now seen as pretty weird (except for a patka), but the small coloured strip inder the pagg is still used as a fashion statement since its pretty visually appealing. And so, people now just tie a small little “kung-fu strip” sort of thing under their pagg to imitate that effect.
    • Found how to do it. For anybody else wondering, heres how. No one even helped me btw. So much for Guru Ji’s lhalsa always ready to help (and having their Singhs’ backs smh). (Notes: Aim to do this on a hot summer’s day, and dedicate a full day to this, since you only have to do this once every 4 months at least (normally the turban will stay in shape until you wish to untie it and physically pull it open again). This helps it to dry faster, since you have to starch it, HALF DRY IT, pooni it, tie it and then wear it for around four hours for the rest of it to dry, all in the same day. It’s a one day process but it serves you for months). This works for both the UK/Kenyan style (starch is best for this style) as well as the normal Punjabi paghs (such as Patiala shahi, wattan wali and morni paghs). Not sure about dumallas though. Probably not . Pagg Starch: 1) Boil 6 cups of water in a saucepan on low heat (always low heat) 2) Seperately dissolve 4 tablespoons of maida (all purpose flower) with a little water until it is 100% smooth.  You could also use rice or corn starch. Add more water if it is not a smooth liquid 3) Once completely smooth, pour this mixture through a strainer (to make it even smoother) into the boiling water. 4) Now continuously stir it until it goes completely see through. Keep on stirring it on the low heat until it goes totally transparent (it can take a little while to cook, but the pagg will last you for months!) It will at become a thick paste first, but keep stirring until it becomes see through and thinner.    5) Once it’s transparent, pour the starch (again through a strainer) into a big enough, clean bucket to cool down. 6) Once cool, take a clean, dry turban and completely and mix it in with the starch for around 5 minutes. Make sure that it is all evenly and completely soaked and wet with the starch. (Most people use mal-mal material, but I use full voile and I have used Rubia too. They’re all fine. Maybe use Rubin for smaller turbans and mal mal for larger ones) 7) Leave it out in the sun to HALF DRY ONLY!!!!!!! (Don’t ever let your starched turban fully dry before you tie it. If you do, then you will have to spray/ sprinkle water on it which will weaken the starch and ruin the turban) ONLY HALF DRY THE TURBAN IN THE SUN!!! 😎 Once HALF DRY ONLY take the now semi damp turban, and fold/pooni and then tie it like normal (straight on your head, with no base layer such as a Keski or patka underneath). Leave it on your head for around 4 hours just to fully dry and it will be ready and set for months now. Like I said, do try to tie your dastar every day, but if you can’t or really don’t want to, I hope this helps! Like I said this works on both the traditional Punjabi/Indian style paggs, and the more recent UK/Kenyan style paggs. It does for my morni pagg, but the first larr slips up in to the pagg. This is normal dw. Wjkk, Wjkf
    • I guess easier ways of learning have taken precedence. There are so many Youtube channels and podcasts available that people are more ready to listen for knowledge at their own leisure. There are so many great kathas available online that take months to listen, so that people may not really get the time to come here and write.
    • *Bump The current conflict (w/ Iran getting involved) is being orchestrated by a 3rd party in my opinion. We all are going to blame the Jewish community (how they run the banks, how they are brutal and etc.) but they have a point in this conflict.  As soon as people start finding about the truth that's when the real movement will begin. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use