Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
mahandulai

Is homosexuality a mental illness?

Recommended Posts

I would love to know your thoughts, on why homosexuality is deemed not normal in Sikhi (are they allowed to take amrit?)

**Is it just a mental illness? And can people be turn heterosexual via paat and naam simran, or is it allowed via God or I dont know how to phrase this question properly?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest AjeetSinghPunjabi

homosexuality like other innate aspects of an individuality is a fruit of previous life's karams. And no gays can't change to heterosexuals. It is not possible ! Sexual orientation is decided before birth. So no gay person ever made a choice to be gay, it was selected for them before birth . 

Its not a mental illness , but homos tend to have brain wiring typical of opposite sex. 

I am gay. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 hours ago, lostconfussedsingh said:

I have heard of ex homosexuals. Do a search on it it was really interesting as its about people who talk before and after being gay.

 

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, mahandulai said:

theres no proof as to who any of these people are and their recorded history lmao

He clearly said he's not gay no more; he's delivert, and he likes women, women, wyminnn... How much more proof do you need? 😂

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 9/2/2018 at 4:54 PM, mahandulai said:

I would love to know your thoughts, on why homosexuality is deemed not normal in Sikhi (are they allowed to take amrit?)

**Is it just a mental illness? And can people be turn heterosexual via paat and naam simran, or is it allowed via God or I dont know how to phrase this question properly?

I am beginning to think a certain member by the name of mister. Is also a homo or bi. Judging by the amount he likes to talk about the whole homo issues and the amount of time he chats with ajeet 😊

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is homosexuality a mental illness?   

  I don't know...….But, if a "mental illness" is about Mind, then yes, we all have diseases of  mind. Gurbani tells us that this life is all about the mann. The mann is what we have to win over and conquer. The mann is what leads to our actions and karams, via the feelings and emotions it expresses.  ….it's ALL about the mann and we have to find the jyot through it via japna since "mann tu jot saroop hai"


However, if mental illness is about brain neurochemical deficiencies or imbalances, then it is a brain chemistry thing that can be corrected with psychiatric meds. It's a biological and physiological issue.  I'm pretty sure there haven't been  reports of brain chemicals that can cause gay orientation, because if there were, then we would have people being treated in psychiatric units.

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, Big_Tera said:

I am beginning to think a certain member by the name of mister. Is also a homo or bi. Judging by the amount he likes to talk about the whole homo issues and the amount of time he chats with ajeet 😊

ahh so your saying that homosexuality is a disease of the mind like any other disease of the mind

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, MisterrSingh said:

He clearly said he's not gay no more; he's delivert, and he likes women, women, wyminnn... How much more proof do you need? 😂

people can say anything.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One thing I don't understand is why so many gay people act and dress feminine, does that naturally come to them. And why many(not all) lesbians look and dress like blokes.    Apparently homosexuality does exist in animals but I don't think it's got anything to do with attraction or pleasure.

Sikhi doesn't say anything about gays but I think I did come across a gay couple in charitropakhyan lol 

I don't agree with gay couples being allowed to adopt kids! 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, puzzled said:

One thing I don't understand is why so many gay people act and dress feminine, does that naturally come to them. And why many(not all) lesbians look and dress like blokes.    Apparently homosexuality does exist in animals but I don't think it's got anything to do with attraction or pleasure.

Sikhi doesn't say anything about gays but I think I did come across a gay couple in charitropakhyan lol 

I don't agree with gay couples being allowed to adopt kids! 

gay animals exist, dolphins and monkeys have homosexual intercourse for fun. or bi.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The politicisation of homosexuality is the focal issue rather than any individual gays and their leanings. Ask yourself why and for what purpose, and then trace these developments to their natural conclusion. It'll all make sense.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, mahandulai said:

gay animals exist, dolphins and monkeys have homosexual intercourse for fun. or bi.

 

But even paedophiles exist in the monkey world . So I don't understand why gays try to justify their sexuality by saying "gay animals exist"     next pedos are gonna try and justify their sickness by saying "pedo monkeys exist"  

Not that I am against gays ...

It's stupid to compare human sexuality with animals. Animals mainly mate for babies, instinct/survival. Humans have sex mainly for fun and pleasure.  Very little is still known about animals and their mating behaviour.

gays say their feelings are natural but then paedophiles actually say the same ..

One interesting thing is animals are aware of how unhealthy inbreeding is, many male animals leave ther clans/groups to prevent inbreeding and deformed babies. Animals basically know stuff that many Muslims are still yet to realize 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, puzzled said:

But even paedophiles exist in the monkey world . So I don't understand why gays try to justify their sexuality by saying "gay animals exist"     next pedos are gonna try and justify their sickness by saying "pedo monkeys exist"  

Not that I am against gays ...

It's stupid to compare human sexuality with animals. Animals mainly mate for babies, instinct/survival. Humans have sex mainly for fun and pleasure.  Very little is still known about animals and their mating behaviour.

gays say their feelings are natural but then paedophiles actually say the same ..

One interesting thing is animals are aware of how unhealthy inbreeding is, many male animals leave ther clans/groups to prevent inbreeding and deformed babies. Animals basically know stuff that many Muslims are still yet to realize 

lol this stuff about animals, the leaving of the groups are to do with animals gangs in primates -  tournament species get as much as they can, AND also monogamous species which i dont think it matters that much. but Also inbreeding communities trust each other more uno, they work better in some aspects lol, and reliable to each other,

that peadophile idea saying they just feel right doing it, is an interesting concepyt, the next years will uncover more info on this.

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  



  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Funny thing is it's true, yet as I've mentioned on previous occasions, it's trying to guide someone onto that path when they aren't ready to make that leap of faith. The Christian tries to bridge that gap by being personable, relatable, and sympathetic (whether it's genuine care or a ploy for the purposes of recruitment is debatable), understanding that for the vast majority of people with issues, the afflicted just want to unburden themselves and be heard before even thinking about making that next step to actively responding to the problems plaguing them. There's no to very little of this approach in our community, because we generally lack those traits in our demeanour as a people (although the younger generations are better in this respect), and this attitude seems to be even more significant in religious circles, which is madness because of all the areas where compassion and understanding should be in evidence, the spiritually floundering or just the generally forlorn and disenfranchised should be made to feel they're being listened to, not dismissed with a course of treatment that's abstract at best.
    • I think showing vulnerability can be problematic because it is seen as a weakness.  Showing vulnerability is a largely a female trait because women emote more as it is part of their make up. It does not work the same for men because we tend to prioritise being rational and our nature is to solve problems.  But if you need help there are people that can help you.
    • I totally agree with above quote.   There is nothing wrong with the program listed. It is normal to see Amrit sanchar programs in various jathabandis. Using same argument method, tomorrow Someone will be saying.. it is not ok for taksal jathabandi to stamp on santhiyaa programs.    Rather than finding mistakes in any jathbandees, we need to work together for panth’s benefits despite of having few differences. 
    • Dharam seems like more of a verb to me. Like truth in action.  It's one thing to believe exercise makes you fit it's another thing to actually train and get the benefit. 
    • well I wouldn't know. Nor am I amritdhari nor am I married. But I would expect that love and lust are two different things even when it comes to physical human relationship. Right? Or maybe both persons in relationship have to be at a high level to differentiate between lust and love and act accordingly.?  and if we are on this topic,  is it not lust to use a natural mechanism, that is meant for procreation, to get the pleasure, and at the end simply pull out (sorry for being explicit). Is there a difference between making love and fu**ing? 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use