Jump to content

Suleman Ghost


Singh1989
 Share

Recommended Posts

On 11/26/2020 at 10:43 AM, MisterrSingh said:

You disingenuous cowards and frauds always resort to deception in order to feel like you have the higher moral ground.

An assessment of a particular type of woman, of which there are many in today's age, is NOT an attack on all womankind. 

The distinction is lost on you clowns.

Down-vote away, it gives me strength! ?

Are u married? Or are u still at school?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, MisterrSingh said:

Is there a footnote or addendum for Chatropokhiyan that states, "Not All Women"? Or is it something that's considered to be assumed and not worth mentioning? 

You can play with words and claim others who highlight these issues are slandering all women, but nothing in what's been stated targets every single woman alive. You can lie and force through your agenda, but then that just reveals your spiritual posturing to be as hollow and meaningless as your arguments.

Do you know what statistical data is? It's drawing on information and data to present an inference based on various characteristics that are a broad occurrence, with the theory of probability, that doesn't take into account outlying extremes. 

It is as simple as that. And if this needs to be stated anytime a sensitive discussion occurs on this site, then you folk are in serious trouble up ahead.  

There are generalisations which are actually truth.

Here is a generalisation, men are physically stronger than women and are quite capable of overpowering one and getting his way if he so chooses to do so. Men are far more physically aggressive, that is a truth. But as men the vast majority of us will not do that.

No one will ever dispute that.

Women in general because they are less physically imposing understand this very well, so they have to deploy other things at their disposal, like cunning. To get what they need they will utilise the methods of manipulation. That is a fact. It is not that every woman will, but every woman could.

This is part of the base nature of women. This is not any hatred, this is just an objective reality.

Now if a man was to impose physically his will on any female, if caught doing so, will be in a physical altercation with other men as it is natural for men to protect those who are weaker.

However, how many women will defend a man (other than his mother or sister) if he is being psychologically or emotionally tortured by a highly cunning manipulative woman.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Koi said:

Sant Isher Singh Ji Maharaj verify this in one of their recorded kathas (available online), as do Sant Waryam Singh Ji Ratwara Sahib Wale in 2 of their kathas (also available online, the mention Suleman by name). I can't remember what the links are to their katha, as it's been many years since I heard them. They are available on gurmatveechar.com.

All true.

I think one of the reasons that people question the recording is because the ghost speaks Urdu though it claims to come from Persia, but people don't realize that ghosts have the ability to do pretty much anything! they can lie and deceive us too, and do some pretty evil things and ruin peoples lives. I think they lack that human compassion. 

Just because it is speaking Urdu does not mean its fake, ghosts/spirits can be very powerful. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Khalsa2012 said:

I didnt actually mean it in insulting way. 

 

Btw dont have what?

 

 

Do you actual think its a good idea to ask your wife if she has been or thinking about cheating?  If you do, than you are very naive.  

The current generation has proven one thing.  Their basic desires are the forces driving them further away from institutions like religion.  Women have made it a righteous action to put their bodies on display by wearing skin tight clothes and/or clothes that cover very little.  The percentage of women who are from the age of 16 to 45 who don't dress in this manner or behave like self entitled twats is maybe 10%.  Then there are the ones who try to fit in but they also are a small minority,  maybe 5%.  Instagram even has the bibi with a dastar on her head but she is wearing revealing clothing or skin tight clothes to show case her body to men.  

Sikhi camps have been experiment centers.  These camps have revealed how women have degraded themselves to objects because they put themselves on display for men. Human instincts like sexual appeal was hidden by older generations.  Not for the current generations coming up.  They completely put it on display in the open and flaunt it.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Akalifauj said:

Do you actual think its a good idea to ask your wife if she has been or thinking about cheating?  If you do, than you are very naive.  

The current generation has proven one thing.  Their basic desires are the forces driving them further away from institutions like religion.  Women have made it a righteous action to put their bodies on display by wearing skin tight clothes and/or clothes that cover very little.  The percentage of women who are from the age of 16 to 45 who don't dress in this manner or behave like self entitled twats is maybe 10%.  Then there are the ones who try to fit in but they also are a small minority,  maybe 5%.  Instagram even has the bibi with a dastar on her head but she is wearing revealing clothing or skin tight clothes to show case her body to men.  

Sikhi camps have been experiment centers.  These camps have revealed how women have degraded themselves to objects because they put themselves on display for men. Human instincts like sexual appeal was hidden by older generations.  Not for the current generations coming up.  They completely put it on display in the open and flaunt it.  

What u on about?? Why u quoting this to me??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was searching igurbani.com which gives correct pronunciation of Gurbani. I can’t remember all of it at once. I guess it relies on more practice, like more Sehaj Paths. The meaning becomes clearer. I have noticed slight variants in it. This could be because it’s written in old Punjabi.  
    • Veer Manpreet Singh, a lay preacher, claims that -Sikhs aren't supposed to worship Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We are only supposed to worship God as is written in Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We only "revere" Guru Granth Sahib ji.     He says a lot of other things in this video, some are good refutations of Hindu superstitions, but the reformers often go too far. Anyways, what he is saying about not worshipping Guru Granth Sahib ji is totally wrong. The reason is Guru Granth Sahib ji is Guru. Guru is Satguru. Satguru is God. We worship God. Therefore, we also worship Satguru (Guru Granth Sahib ji).   There are innumerable verses in Gurbani equating God and Guru. ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਗੁਰੁ ਡੁਬਦਾ ਲਏ ਤਰਾਇ ॥੨॥ The Guru is the Supreme Lord and the Transcendent Master. The Guru floats (saves) the drowning one. p49   ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਏਕੋ ਜਾਣੁ ॥ Know the Guru and God as One. p864   ਗੁਰ ਨਾਲਿ ਤੁਲਿ ਨ ਲਗਈ ਖੋਜਿ ਡਿਠਾ ਬ੍ਰਹਮੰਡੁ ॥ There is no one at par with the Guru. I have searched and seen the whole universe. p49 (If the Guru is the greatest in the whole universe, shouldn't we worship the Guru?)   I'd like to ask Manpreet Singh what is worship? Any reasonable definition would include obeisance, remembrance, and praise. Those are exactly the same things Gurbani says to do regarding Guru! Remembrance and obeisance: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੁ ਅਪਨਾ ਸਦ ਸਦਾ ਸਮ੍ਹਾਰੇ ॥ Ever, ever, I think of the True Guru, ਗੁਰ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਕੇਸ ਸੰਗਿ ਝਾਰੇ ॥੧॥ and the Guru's feet I brush with my head's hair. p387   Praise: ਗੁਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਆਪਿ ॥ The Guru himself is the transcendent Lord and the supreme master. ਆਠ ਪਹਰ ਨਾਨਕ ਗੁਰ ਜਾਪਿ ॥੪॥੧੬॥੬੭॥ Throughout the eight watches of the day, O Nanak meditate thou on the Guru. p387   In fact, Gurbani says the way to find God is to worship (puja) of Guru: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੂ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਧੋਇ ਧੋਇ ਪੂਜਹੁ ਇਨ ਬਿਧਿ ਮੇਰਾ ਹਰਿ ਪ੍ਰਭੁ ਲਹੁ ਰੇ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ Washing and bathing the True Guru's feet, worship thou them. In this way thou shall obtain my Lord Master. Pause. p1118   Could it be any clearer that we are to worship Guru ji?
    • Bro, reciting a shorter Chaupai Sahib is hardly "anti-Dasam". It's fine to argue that the longer Chaupai is more traditional, but the short one isn't anti-Dasam. That's like claiming shorter Rehras is anti-Guru Granth Sahib ji just because there are fewer selections from Guru Granth Sahib. It might not be traditional, but it's not anti-Guru Granth Sahib. I prefer the longer versions, but let's not exaggerate. Every tradition has a slightly different Rehras version. Nanaksar vs Taksal vs Nihangs and so on. The basic template for Rehras is at the beginning of Guru Granth Sahib ji. Later, Chaupai Sahib was added and Anand Sahib always follows as the end of a process. Then some sangats added more saloks to start Rehras and others were added at the end. Some additional selections from Dasam Bani were also added, but it wasn't the same ones for every sangat. The important thing is to not hate on each other for these variations.
    • Umm, so you're upset that this jatha did Chaupai the same way it's being done at Harimandar Sahib for 100 years? Shouldn't you be upset at the manager of Darbar Sahib? I'm not saying that Sikhs who are aware of certain issues shouldn't do the longer Chaupai, but there are only so many battles you can fight. Instead of calling some jatha traitors because they're doing the (for better or worse) "standard" Chauapai published by the SGPC, it would be better to change things from the central point. You can't fault the average Sikh for picking up the average Gutka and doing paath.
    • It's the same here in Toronto. Alot of the gudwaras here are political orientated and get tons of funding from the government-probably want them stay hush hush with all the BS that has been happening with India.  These guys are skewing gurbani. A complaint was sent to a ragi singh a couple of days ago in regards to a hukamnama. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use