Jump to content

Good gesture by Muslim brothers


Recommended Posts

19 minutes ago, jkvlondon said:

the plot was BOUGHT by the Gurdwara so they were just being  picked on by the neighbouring masjid ...

What will happen is that our brothers in India are going to (likely) be slow and dimwitted as hell about other communities intentions towards us, until some serious crap eventually stanks out the situation (possibly after decades). Like here in the UK with grooming. 

Plus hordes of 'Sikh'Juts with their twisted culture of biraderi over dharam will be giving out passes for any nastiness directed towards us by tonday Juts because of their loyalty towards this over dharam. 

Many fully grown apnay and apneean are susceptible to false flattery to astonishing levels! Even as 'grown ups' they fall for wiles that a streetwise teenager would see through. There is some truth behind the dumbo stereotype with many in my opinion (sadly). 

Look carefully at when some apna gets TV publicity for doing a 'good deed' by outsiders - look at their face. They actually resemble bashful three year olds. That's where their heads are at. It's like they are so love starved that they are overwhelmed by any positive attention from outside. lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, jkvlondon said:

the plot was BOUGHT by the Gurdwara so they were just being  picked on by the neighbouring masjid ...

The Gurdwara bought the plot next door and when they started to extend the Gurdwara the Muslims kicked up a fuss and there were riots in which four people were killed. The Gurdwara were wrong to even offer the money to the Muslims as they had already paid for the plot.  The Gurdwara probably thought it was easier to enter into an agreement and be shaken down by the Muslims rather than waste years in endless litigation. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, proactive said:

The Gurdwara bought the plot next door and when they started to extend the Gurdwara the Muslims kicked up a fuss and there were riots in which four people were killed. The Gurdwara were wrong to even offer the money to the Muslims as they had already paid for the plot.  The Gurdwara probably thought it was easier to enter into an agreement and be shaken down by the Muslims rather than waste years in endless litigation. 

Is this the same gurdwara which is in UP and there were riots a few yrs back? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And this is why sangat Ji that most mainstream muslims who are politically and religiously far right. See us as a harmless weak low IQ liberal left wing community. While they way they work is more calculated, muslim nationalist right wing and shrewd.

The non-sikh invaders/aggressors who assessed the Sikhs before going into battle with them saw Sikhs as easily pleased and won over with flattery, very gullible/naive politically, more braun than brains. And again to this day we most of our low IQ publicity hungry people fit that narrative perfectly.

People need to remember muslims only give to muslim charities. Sikhs generally are too well meaning and generous to help everyone even though they have hugely lower population than muslims and end up helping no one significantly in the end.

Sikhs need to remember when babri masjid was attacked by RSS hindutva mobs in 1992. The muslims used that excuse aboard to rally up their fellow brothers and sisters in faith attack innocent Sikhs and gurdwara's destroyed in afghanistan, pakistan and in the west we had uk gurdwara's attacked too by muslim zealots. The muslims from non-south asian background always lump us Sikhs as hindus and encourage south asian muslims to attack us and justify it by labelling us as all kafir non-muslim indian hindus.

So we although we have got some short term browine from the muslim community in india and aboard. It will be short lived because just like when Sikhs from khalsa aid had helped royhinga muslims in bangaldesh and then few months later 23 afghan Sikhs were murdered by islamic sunni salafi pathan extermists in afghanistan. During the kashmir incorperation into indian union crisis Sikhs helped kashmiris safely get to their homes in kashmir. However after few months later many indian Sikh soldiers were killed by an jihadi islamic terrorist sparking india's retaliatory fighter jet attacks in pakistan balakot.

We as a kaum need to realise the muslims by quran and sunnah see us as opponents until we submit to their abrahamic nonsense of a religion and submit to the will of their prophet and 7th century arab edicts. Cos we dont believe in that rubbish they will always see us as the enemy of al-lah and want to fight us demographically, socially, ideologically, politically and economically.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • There's no debate that all Sikhs must recite Rehras Sahib daily but Chaupai Sahib and the short Anand Sahib were only added to "Rehras Sahib" by SGPC and other jathebandis in the 1900s. In Guru Granth Sahib Ji's saroop, "Sodar Rehras" appears from "So dar tera keha" to "Saran pare ki rakho sarma", which is basically the first half of "Rehras" in all standard Gutka Sahibaan. So why do we recite these? I agree doing more Baani can never be bad, but most Amritdharis recite Benti Chaupai and Anand Sahib in their morning Nitnem so why should we recite these two Baania again instead of a new one? That time could be used to read Shastar Naam Mala, Shabad Hazaare etc. And why do these two Baanis get more importance than the others? Surely if we recite Chaupai Sahib and (part of) Anand Sahib twice in a day then we should also recite Japji Sahib, Jaap Sahib and Tav Prasad Savaiya twice as well? Note: Pls correct me if I'm wrong about SGPC. My theory is that they added these into Rehras Sahib as they removed them from the morning Baania but still had to include them in the daily Nitnem somehow, but this doesn't explain why older Samparde like Budha Dal also have this version of Rehras Sahib in their Gutkeh - someone enlighten Daas pls Bhul Chuk Maaf
    • There's no debate that all Sikhs must recite Rehras Sahib daily but Chaupai Sahib and the short Anand Sahib were only added to "Rehras Sahib" by SGPC and other jathebandis in the 1900s. In Guru Granth Sahib Ji's saroop, "Sodar Rehras" appears from "So dar tera keha" to "Saran pare ki rakho sarma", which is basically the first half of "Rehras" in all standard Gutka Sahibaan. So why do we recite these? I agree doing more Baani can never be bad, but most Amritdharis recite Benti Chaupai and Anand Sahib in their morning Nitnem so why should we recite these two Baania again instead of a new one? That time could be used to read Shastar Naam Mala, Shabad Hazaare etc. And why do these two Baanis get more importance than the others? Surely if we recite Chaupai Sahib and (part of) Anand Sahib twice in a day then we should also recite Japji Sahib, Jaap Sahib and Tav Prasad Savaiya twice as well? Note: Pls correct me if I'm wrong about SGPC. My theory is that they added these into Rehras Sahib as they removed them from the morning Baania but still had to include them in the daily Nitnem somehow, but this doesn't explain why older Samparde like Budha Dal also have this version of Rehras Sahib in their Gutkeh - someone enlighten Daas pls Bhul Chuk Maaf
    • Uncle, realistically are you gonna challenge it in real life? I could fully jhatka and eat a steak wearing Bana bilkul tere samne but on God you could do nothing about that 😂
    • Flintstone Saab, can't you type in one message? Or must you drop the full Godfather trilogy with every response, minimum 3 responses? 1) They don't jhatka cows at Hazur Sahib because it's in a country called "India", in a state called "Maharashtra" - and beef is strictly illegal there 2) I said a quote from Adi/Dasam Granth saying "you can't eat beef" - "protection of cows" could be Maharaj talking about defending them for Hindus, same reason we do Aarti-Aarta. If u reference a quote, u gotta say the context of the verse. Otherwise there are verses in SGGS Ji which seemingly tell you to convert to Islam; of course that's not what Maharaj is saying but without context many quotes from Baani seem misleading 3) Why does 90% of your "evidence" come from living people, like "the head of Taruna Dal" or "Baba Pala Singh" - very rarely (like less than 10%) of it is from the Gurus' direct words. Do you realise that these people are humans with flaws/bias? Maharaj ended the line of human Gurus for a reason 4) Funnily enough, even Budha Dal's maryada in the Sundar gutka does not ban beef. If individual Akaalis taboo it, that doesn't mean it's the actual hukam lol 5) You mention Naamdharis guarding cows but they are also vegetarians who do not carry a kirpan and say Guru Granth Sahib Ji is not a Guru - using them as an example is funny 😂   6) Bro who uses "diapers" and "mate" in the same sentence? 😂 Man really tried sounding like Andrew Tate with the British/American accent mix 7) So you're about 30 years old and still beefing strangers online? Brooooo where's your MOTHER, did Aunty Ji never shout you away from ur keyboard? "Oy Flentstone puttar, thalle aa hun, roti ban gyi!!!!" 8 ) Wait since you're some Uncle, how do you balance work life with ur keyboard warrior shift? Or do u just sit vailah at home, like unemployed? SERIOUS QUESTION: Is your account rank on this forum the only thing on your CV ?😂😂😂  9) Can you imagine Maharaj condoning you calling me names like "mughal"? You keep reading about these "heads of Taruna Dal" but you need to google "Guru Nanak Dev Ji's teachings on kindness and anger" instead - you're basically trying to solve degree level maths equations when you can't even understand "1 + 1 = 2"  (prediction - I bet he's gonna respond debating one little detail of this post like my joke about accents, but fully miss the bigger picture, or get upset again. He also will likely reference another "sant" or author, or pull a random quote completely out of context😂)
    • ਕੇਵਲ ਰਾਮ ਨਾਮੁ ਮਨਿ ਵਸਿਆ ਨਾਮੇ ਹੀ ਮੁਕਤਿ ਪਾਈ ॥ Kaeval Raam Naam Man Vasiaa Naamae Hee Mukath Paaee || केवल राम नामु मनि वसिआ नामे ही मुकति पाई ॥ The Naam, the Name of the Lord alone abides in the mind; and through the Naam, the Name of the Lord, one finds liberation.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use