Jump to content

20+ Indian troops killed by chinese troops in ladakh LAC border tension


genie
 Share

Recommended Posts

Looks like its over 20 dead indian troops Its so embarrassing and devastating for the Indian army's morale not just an act of extreme deadly aggression on part of the chinese army. And they didnt even use weapons just hand to hand combat with each other using batons, large rocks. I'm guessing the indian troops were either caught by suprise during the night when they were sleeping or they took on a large number of chinese troops that outnumbered them and killed them all.

Now the indian establishment has to respond by killing chinese troops or forever be seen as cowards and weak in front of china by pakistan and rest of the world powers. The loud mouth fools in the indian media establishment are barking that they killed 40+ Chinese troops i very much doubt that unless they can prove their claims.

I remember when Bangladesh troops killed about 20 indian soldiers few years ago in a border skirmish it was one of the most embarrassing events for indian army. Not to mention 83+ indian troops and special commando's (official govt figures but we know there was many more) who got killed when they took on the villager singhs with ww1 and ww2 rifles defending darbar sahib in 1984.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It really would be a clash of the Titans if a full on war takes place! Even the thought is scary

I think some Sikhs would get involved, Sikhs are emotionally attached to that country in some ways despite what its done to us. I think when a people have done so much for a land and sacrificed its young men for it, they remain emotionally attached in some ways ...  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, puzzled said:

Battered Chinese soldiers    China released the photo 

Pro-Beijing social media accounts recently posted images purporting to show Indian troops battered and bound with rope on the banks of a lake in the disputed region on the Himalayan border

This is the old photo from earlier encounter where both sides had a punch up.

No one has released the fight that happened yesterday where there was deaths of soldiers.

6 minutes ago, puzzled said:

It really would be a clash of the Titans if a full on war takes place! Even the thought is scary

I think some Sikhs would get involved, Sikhs are emotionally attached to that country in some ways despite what its done to us. I think when a people have done so much for a land and sacrificed its young men for it, they remain emotionally attached in some ways ...  

bro its fairly obviously they always use the unfortunate sikh slave soldiers to do their bidding when they in trouble. Hope Sikhs in india are wise enough to stay out of the fight and look after their families in punjab and elsewhere. Indian establishment is no friend of the Sikhs they just need to see what they doing to 300 sikh families in utter pardesh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, genie said:

This is the old photo from earlier encounter where both sides had a punch up.

No one has released the fight that happened yesterday where there was deaths of soldiers.

bro its fairly obviously they always use the unfortunate sikh slave soldiers to do their bidding when they in trouble. Hope Sikhs in india are wise enough to stay out of the fight and look after their families in punjab and elsewhere. Indian establishment is no friend of the Sikhs they just need to see what they doing to 300 sikh families in utter pardesh.

Very true. Those Sikh slaves will stupidly give their lives thinking they are defending 'their' country when the country has committed genocide against their people. Modi doesn't have the guts to take military action and he will be hoping that China will de-escalate and he can use the unverified ANI report than there were 43 Chinese casualties as some  kind of victory. From the looks of it  appears the Indian army got their backsides kicked which is always a good thing for an oppressive army. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, MisterrSingh said:

I want to know what exactly happens in these non-gunfight encounters. Do they literally brawl and punch each other until death? I wonder if the Chinese use kung-fu, and the Indians use kushti?

i think they just start beating the crap out of each other. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was searching igurbani.com which gives correct pronunciation of Gurbani. I can’t remember all of it at once. I guess it relies on more practice, like more Sehaj Paths. The meaning becomes clearer. I have noticed slight variants in it. This could be because it’s written in old Punjabi.  
    • Veer Manpreet Singh, a lay preacher, claims that -Sikhs aren't supposed to worship Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We are only supposed to worship God as is written in Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We only "revere" Guru Granth Sahib ji.     He says a lot of other things in this video, some are good refutations of Hindu superstitions, but the reformers often go too far. Anyways, what he is saying about not worshipping Guru Granth Sahib ji is totally wrong. The reason is Guru Granth Sahib ji is Guru. Guru is Satguru. Satguru is God. We worship God. Therefore, we also worship Satguru (Guru Granth Sahib ji).   There are innumerable verses in Gurbani equating God and Guru. ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਗੁਰੁ ਡੁਬਦਾ ਲਏ ਤਰਾਇ ॥੨॥ The Guru is the Supreme Lord and the Transcendent Master. The Guru floats (saves) the drowning one. p49   ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਏਕੋ ਜਾਣੁ ॥ Know the Guru and God as One. p864   ਗੁਰ ਨਾਲਿ ਤੁਲਿ ਨ ਲਗਈ ਖੋਜਿ ਡਿਠਾ ਬ੍ਰਹਮੰਡੁ ॥ There is no one at par with the Guru. I have searched and seen the whole universe. p49 (If the Guru is the greatest in the whole universe, shouldn't we worship the Guru?)   I'd like to ask Manpreet Singh what is worship? Any reasonable definition would include obeisance, remembrance, and praise. Those are exactly the same things Gurbani says to do regarding Guru! Remembrance and obeisance: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੁ ਅਪਨਾ ਸਦ ਸਦਾ ਸਮ੍ਹਾਰੇ ॥ Ever, ever, I think of the True Guru, ਗੁਰ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਕੇਸ ਸੰਗਿ ਝਾਰੇ ॥੧॥ and the Guru's feet I brush with my head's hair. p387   Praise: ਗੁਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਆਪਿ ॥ The Guru himself is the transcendent Lord and the supreme master. ਆਠ ਪਹਰ ਨਾਨਕ ਗੁਰ ਜਾਪਿ ॥੪॥੧੬॥੬੭॥ Throughout the eight watches of the day, O Nanak meditate thou on the Guru. p387   In fact, Gurbani says the way to find God is to worship (puja) of Guru: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੂ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਧੋਇ ਧੋਇ ਪੂਜਹੁ ਇਨ ਬਿਧਿ ਮੇਰਾ ਹਰਿ ਪ੍ਰਭੁ ਲਹੁ ਰੇ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ Washing and bathing the True Guru's feet, worship thou them. In this way thou shall obtain my Lord Master. Pause. p1118   Could it be any clearer that we are to worship Guru ji?
    • Bro, reciting a shorter Chaupai Sahib is hardly "anti-Dasam". It's fine to argue that the longer Chaupai is more traditional, but the short one isn't anti-Dasam. That's like claiming shorter Rehras is anti-Guru Granth Sahib ji just because there are fewer selections from Guru Granth Sahib. It might not be traditional, but it's not anti-Guru Granth Sahib. I prefer the longer versions, but let's not exaggerate. Every tradition has a slightly different Rehras version. Nanaksar vs Taksal vs Nihangs and so on. The basic template for Rehras is at the beginning of Guru Granth Sahib ji. Later, Chaupai Sahib was added and Anand Sahib always follows as the end of a process. Then some sangats added more saloks to start Rehras and others were added at the end. Some additional selections from Dasam Bani were also added, but it wasn't the same ones for every sangat. The important thing is to not hate on each other for these variations.
    • Umm, so you're upset that this jatha did Chaupai the same way it's being done at Harimandar Sahib for 100 years? Shouldn't you be upset at the manager of Darbar Sahib? I'm not saying that Sikhs who are aware of certain issues shouldn't do the longer Chaupai, but there are only so many battles you can fight. Instead of calling some jatha traitors because they're doing the (for better or worse) "standard" Chauapai published by the SGPC, it would be better to change things from the central point. You can't fault the average Sikh for picking up the average Gutka and doing paath.
    • It's the same here in Toronto. Alot of the gudwaras here are political orientated and get tons of funding from the government-probably want them stay hush hush with all the BS that has been happening with India.  These guys are skewing gurbani. A complaint was sent to a ragi singh a couple of days ago in regards to a hukamnama. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use