Jump to content

20+ Indian troops killed by chinese troops in ladakh LAC border tension


genie
 Share

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, shastarSingh said:

india few days back signed military cooperation pact with Australia.

So GOI knows there will be war with China in future and indian army will need help of Australia ,Israel and America.

Australia is in a predicament. 

They are economically dependent on China as all their exports from their mining goes to China. A lot of agriculture product goes to China.

However, militarily they are allied with the West. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

According to reports there was a hand to hand combat fight and that's how they died that way not by firearms allegedly. Some reports say the indian troops got chucked off a cliff by chinese troops.

So there is room for diplomatic maneuvers however both sides seem to be ready for a fight with heavy weapons of war over the disputed border and not backing down.

I don't think india is going to reply directly yet they will use and fund groups to commit terrorism within china, subversion, sabotage and hit china in these ways just like how they do with pakistan.

India establishment will now rely on its western allies and economic partners to try isolate china. Dangers for indian establishment is that it has diplomatically isolated itself from its neighbors. it's failure to exert pressure on it's neighbors to be friendly with new delhi is a significant weakness.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My assessment so far is that timing of china's aggression comes at a time india made strategic move to incorporate all of kashmir into the indian union formally and announced plans to take back PoK and gilgit soon. China being pakistan's regional ally is making a pre-empetive step to keep india busy on the eastern border area's so that india's plans for pakistan are either dissuaded or limited in scope. China also wants to protect its aksai chin region of kashmir that india lays claim to and further cement its claim on ladakh. China also wants to cut off and prevent india's military supply line to its only air force base near the saichin glacier region (the worlds highest battlefield region on going between indian troops and pakistani troops)

If india thinks russia will come to its aid and mediate fairly then they are mistaken its not the 1960s, china and russia have are more stronger strategic relationship now than the days of soviet union. Russia is always going to side with china than india as india is an ally that stays neutral and friendly with most nations which can be a strength but also a weakness as it behaves like a whoore flirting with country to country seeking favorable terms rather than strong loyal committed strategic relationships with major world powers like russia and usa.

Modi being a strong hindu nationalist leader is waiting for public pressure to build up to capitalise and act militarily on china. Meanwhile i'm sure R&AW is forming various separatists groups to be trained and funded to be unleashed on china. So action will take place just a matter of timing and place

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, genie said:

My assessment so far is that timing of china's aggression comes at a time india made strategic move to incorporate all of kashmir into the indian union formally and announced plans to take back PoK and gilgit soon. China being pakistan's regional ally is making a pre-empetive step to keep india busy on the eastern border area's so that india's plans for pakistan are either dissuaded or limited in scope. China also wants to protect its aksai chin region of kashmir that india lays claim to and further cement its claim on ladakh. China also wants to cut off and prevent india's military supply line to its only air force base near the saichin glacier region (the worlds highest battlefield region on going between indian troops and pakistani troops)

If india thinks russia will come to its aid and mediate fairly then they are mistaken its not the 1960s, china and russia have are more stronger strategic relationship now than the days of soviet union. Russia is always going to side with china than india as india is an ally that stays neutral and friendly with most nations which can be a strength but also a weakness as it behaves like a whoore flirting with country to country seeking favorable terms rather than strong loyal committed strategic relationships with major world powers like russia and usa.

Modi being a strong hindu nationalist leader is waiting for public pressure to build up to capitalise and act militarily on china. Meanwhile i'm sure R&AW is forming various separatists groups to be trained and funded to be unleashed on china. So action will take place just a matter of timing and place

 

 

India will be forging closer links with Japan and Vietnam. 

Japan can very easily build up the military and they have the knowhow to create nuclear capability. 

The Chinese will be very worried about a resurgent Japan if the Japanese ever get past their WW2 guilt. 

The Chinese are scared of the Vietnamese as they have fought them before. I think the Vietnamese beat them before and the Chinese have not forgotten. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was searching igurbani.com which gives correct pronunciation of Gurbani. I can’t remember all of it at once. I guess it relies on more practice, like more Sehaj Paths. The meaning becomes clearer. I have noticed slight variants in it. This could be because it’s written in old Punjabi.  
    • Veer Manpreet Singh, a lay preacher, claims that -Sikhs aren't supposed to worship Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We are only supposed to worship God as is written in Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We only "revere" Guru Granth Sahib ji.     He says a lot of other things in this video, some are good refutations of Hindu superstitions, but the reformers often go too far. Anyways, what he is saying about not worshipping Guru Granth Sahib ji is totally wrong. The reason is Guru Granth Sahib ji is Guru. Guru is Satguru. Satguru is God. We worship God. Therefore, we also worship Satguru (Guru Granth Sahib ji).   There are innumerable verses in Gurbani equating God and Guru. ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਗੁਰੁ ਡੁਬਦਾ ਲਏ ਤਰਾਇ ॥੨॥ The Guru is the Supreme Lord and the Transcendent Master. The Guru floats (saves) the drowning one. p49   ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਏਕੋ ਜਾਣੁ ॥ Know the Guru and God as One. p864   ਗੁਰ ਨਾਲਿ ਤੁਲਿ ਨ ਲਗਈ ਖੋਜਿ ਡਿਠਾ ਬ੍ਰਹਮੰਡੁ ॥ There is no one at par with the Guru. I have searched and seen the whole universe. p49 (If the Guru is the greatest in the whole universe, shouldn't we worship the Guru?)   I'd like to ask Manpreet Singh what is worship? Any reasonable definition would include obeisance, remembrance, and praise. Those are exactly the same things Gurbani says to do regarding Guru! Remembrance and obeisance: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੁ ਅਪਨਾ ਸਦ ਸਦਾ ਸਮ੍ਹਾਰੇ ॥ Ever, ever, I think of the True Guru, ਗੁਰ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਕੇਸ ਸੰਗਿ ਝਾਰੇ ॥੧॥ and the Guru's feet I brush with my head's hair. p387   Praise: ਗੁਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਆਪਿ ॥ The Guru himself is the transcendent Lord and the supreme master. ਆਠ ਪਹਰ ਨਾਨਕ ਗੁਰ ਜਾਪਿ ॥੪॥੧੬॥੬੭॥ Throughout the eight watches of the day, O Nanak meditate thou on the Guru. p387   In fact, Gurbani says the way to find God is to worship (puja) of Guru: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੂ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਧੋਇ ਧੋਇ ਪੂਜਹੁ ਇਨ ਬਿਧਿ ਮੇਰਾ ਹਰਿ ਪ੍ਰਭੁ ਲਹੁ ਰੇ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ Washing and bathing the True Guru's feet, worship thou them. In this way thou shall obtain my Lord Master. Pause. p1118   Could it be any clearer that we are to worship Guru ji?
    • Bro, reciting a shorter Chaupai Sahib is hardly "anti-Dasam". It's fine to argue that the longer Chaupai is more traditional, but the short one isn't anti-Dasam. That's like claiming shorter Rehras is anti-Guru Granth Sahib ji just because there are fewer selections from Guru Granth Sahib. It might not be traditional, but it's not anti-Guru Granth Sahib. I prefer the longer versions, but let's not exaggerate. Every tradition has a slightly different Rehras version. Nanaksar vs Taksal vs Nihangs and so on. The basic template for Rehras is at the beginning of Guru Granth Sahib ji. Later, Chaupai Sahib was added and Anand Sahib always follows as the end of a process. Then some sangats added more saloks to start Rehras and others were added at the end. Some additional selections from Dasam Bani were also added, but it wasn't the same ones for every sangat. The important thing is to not hate on each other for these variations.
    • Umm, so you're upset that this jatha did Chaupai the same way it's being done at Harimandar Sahib for 100 years? Shouldn't you be upset at the manager of Darbar Sahib? I'm not saying that Sikhs who are aware of certain issues shouldn't do the longer Chaupai, but there are only so many battles you can fight. Instead of calling some jatha traitors because they're doing the (for better or worse) "standard" Chauapai published by the SGPC, it would be better to change things from the central point. You can't fault the average Sikh for picking up the average Gutka and doing paath.
    • It's the same here in Toronto. Alot of the gudwaras here are political orientated and get tons of funding from the government-probably want them stay hush hush with all the BS that has been happening with India.  These guys are skewing gurbani. A complaint was sent to a ragi singh a couple of days ago in regards to a hukamnama. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use