Jump to content

20+ Indian troops killed by chinese troops in ladakh LAC border tension


genie
 Share

Recommended Posts

39 minutes ago, MisterrSingh said:

Yes, that does surprise me. You'd think they'd kind of begrudgingly respect the "seva" (not my perception) undertaken by the Gandhi dynasty, especially against Sikhs, but Modi's crew don't seem to like them at all.

You're very mistaken my brother . The  people who today run the show here never were at disadvantage , even during golden era of congress party during indira's reign . They used Indira , Nehru , Rajeev as and when it suited them.

Let me tell you brief history of indian politcs if you will : 

It was the supposedly soft-spoken gentleman Atal bihari vajpayee (later on would become PM) and the other guy Advani , both BJP stalwarts who pressurized Indira to send army to harmandar sahib in view of the "persecution of hindus in punjab" . 

Now stories changed quickly within a decade of op bluestar. Assassination of Indira in 1984 led to sikh genocide but also got sympathies of public to Rajiv (his mother died, not because he killed sikhs ). Now Rajiv got assassinated in 1991 because of his unnecessary fingering in Tamil Tigers . He was blown to smithereens . Now the widow italian lady Sonia comes to the reins . She gets party sympathizers and probably had learnt tricks of trade from her MIL and husband , she was quite successful in Indian politics and managed to keep her party in power. 

With Indira and Rajiv dead, 1992 was perfect opportunity for hindu nationalists (also above mentioned two stalwarts) to get big big rallies behind mask of religion to bring down the babri mosque and set BJP into national politics. (Again they use congress PM Narsimha rao for this which again shows BJP did use congress when convenient) 

Fast forward a decade in 2000s , BJP is very strong in parliament as opposition and ruthless. I remember a brief conversation between leader of opposition of BJP (late Sushma swaraj) with a journalist that she would shave her head bald if Sonia (italian) were to become PM. Reason being she's european , and indian martyrs worked hard to kick out britishers from india . BJP thinks its custodian of patriotism certificate lol. 

So in 2014 , congress was given a death knell , as son of Rajiv is basically a doofus of indian politics and ridiculed in india as trump s in US. So now BJP is pretty much all in power.

NOW THAT Nehru-Gandhi family is of no use , their kashmir brahmin ancestry is conveniently changed to muslim . and all of them demonized for their blunders , incl Indira gandhi who is rumoured to be muslim as well and a USSR spy. Thats what they believe.

B..U...T........ Indira is still durga and did a big "SEWA" when it comes to eliminating terrorists like bhindrawale. 

Did I just map their brain ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, proactive said:

Looks like there are four Sikhs out of the 20. Really sad that they lost their lives defending the interests of the country which committed genocide on their people. 

Maybe they are in the same position that Sikh sepoys were in during the colonial period, with families that can't support themselves with their traditional occupations? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MisterrSingh said:

Yes, that does surprise me. You'd think they'd kind of begrudgingly respect the "seva" (not my perception) undertaken by the Gandhi dynasty, especially against Sikhs, but Modi's crew don't seem to like them at all.

They hate muslims far more than Sikhs. They are angry at Gandhi and Nehru's family appeasement of muslims and rightly so. The muslims got to have Pakistan and Bangladesh so why are there still an equal amount of muslims in India as those two countries?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Until china admits it has lost 43 soldiers and does not make it clear they did by showing their bodies and funerals then I don't think the indian public and establishment will be satisfied leaving the matter there they will want chinese soldiers blood and revenge. The face saving thing for india is not forth coming from chinese side which makes the likelihood for further conflict high as indian establishment can not be shown to be weak infront of its public and the world.

Already modi has just said indian army will not be backing down from its stance and will a reply will come. So looks like india is on a war footing making it clear to china the engagement rules on the LAC border will change and bullets will fly if india is stopped from constructing infrastructure on the land they say is there's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, genie said:

Until china admits it has lost 43 soldiers and does not make it clear they did by showing their bodies and funerals then I don't think the indian public and establishment will be satisfied leaving the matter there they will want chinese soldiers blood and revenge. The face saving thing for india is not forth coming from chinese side which makes the likelihood for further conflict high as indian establishment can not be shown to be weak infront of its public and the world.

Already modi has just said indian army will not be backing down from its stance and will a reply will come. So looks like india is on a war footing making it clear to china the engagement rules on the LAC border will change and bullets will fly if india is stopped from constructing infrastructure on the land they say is there's.

Well, we know what'll probably be next then, aerial bombing of the infrastructure by the Chinese. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use