Bill Gates (again)

[Premi5 386]

what is his agenda here? I am anti-beef but he seems to be promoting  a dangerous practice and I doubt he will be doing the same. Why not stop eating meat altogether ?

Separately, is meat-eating manmat or has it been promoted deliberately by ‘elites’?

https://news.sky.com/story/amp/rich-countries-should-eat-synthetic-beef-says-bill-gates-12219763

Bill Gates has urged rich nations to move to "100% synthetic beef" in order to address the greenhouse gas emissions driving global climate change.

In his new book, How to Avoid a Climate Disaster, the billionaire philanthropist stresses that while it remains possible for humanity to avert the disaster through technological achievements, government policy will ultimately be needed.

Speaking to the MIT Technology Review magazine, he said that some governments would be constrained by their wealth: "I don't think the poorest 80 countries will be eating synthetic beef. I do think all rich countries should move to 100% synthetic beef."

[intrigued 482]

4 minutes ago, Premi5 said:

Why not stop eating meat altogether ?

Some ppl may not want to do that. This is aimed toward those people who want to still have the taste of meat in their lives. It will reduce the greenhouse gas emissions. 

[Arsh1469 441]

The thing is cows give out farts which are bad for thr environment. Worse then driving your car for hours.

[Premi5 386]

1 hour ago, intrigued said:

 It will reduce the greenhouse gas emissions. 

So synthetic food will be safe ? 

 I would like the opinion of our resident health expert, @jkvlondon

[intrigued 482]

1 hour ago, Arsh1469 said:

The thing is cows give out farts which are bad for thr environment.

They are trying to fix that and while it does contribute a lot to the emissions, there are more emissions made by man-made stuff

https://gizmodo.com/do-cow-farts-actually-contribute-to-global-warming-1562144730

There are currently approximately 1.3 to 1.5 billion cows grazing, sleeping, and chewing their cud at any given time on planet Earth. And these 1,300 pound (average weight for both a beef and dairy cow) animals eat a lot. Much like humans, when they eat, gas builds up inside of their guts and has to be expelled. (See Why Beans Make You Fart) Cows fart and burp… a lot. The result is a large amount of methane being introduced into the atmosphere.

In a 2006 United Nations' Food and Agricultural Organization report, it claims that the livestock sector, most of which are cows, "generates more greenhouse gas emissions as measured in CO2 equivalent – 18 percent – than transport." According to a Danish study, the average cow produces enough methane per year to do the same greenhouse damage as four tons of carbon dioxide. So is this significantly contributing to global warming?

Let's start with how and why cows produce so much methane gas. Cows, sheep, goats, giraffes, and deer belong to a class of mammals called ruminants. Most ruminants have four stomachs, two-toed feet, and store their food in the first chamber of the stomach, called the rumen, before regurgitating it. This regurgitated food is called "cud" and the animals chew it again to help further break it down to make it easier to digest. Inside of the rumen, over four hundred different kinds of microbes exist that also play a critical role in the digestion process. Several of these microbes create methane gas as a byproduct. Due to the sheer number of cows on the planet, along with the large size per cow, our tasty friends produce more methane gas than all other ruminants combined.

Why could this potentially be bad? Methane is twenty one times more potent at trapping heat from the Sun than carbon dioxide. Though it is less prevalent in the atmosphere than carbon dioxide, it is, by unit, the most destructive of the greenhouse gases. Since the turn of the 19th century, methane gas emissions have increased by 150%, according to NASA's Goddard Institute.

Methane gas, like all other greenhouse gases (which includes water vapor), acts like a blanket around our planet, trapping heat. The right amount and the planet has an average temperature of a life-supporting 59 degrees Fahrenheit. Too little and the greenhouse effect becomes weak, like on Mars. Too much and the surface of the planet becomes so hot "it can melt lead," like on Venus.

Livestock is the largest source of methane gas emissions worldwide, contributing over 28 percent of total emissions. Wetlands, leaks from oil refineries and drills, and landfills also contribute methane gas to the atmosphere. In fact, unlike the ratios on a global scale, in the United States livestock is only the third largest contributor, behind the mining and transportation of natural gas and rotting landfill waste.

In actuality it's not as much the farting that's the problem, cows' burping and manure contribute more methane gas than flatulence. According to researchers at New Zealand's largest Crown Research Institute, AGResearch, up to 95 percent of the emissions comes from the cow's mouth rather than its behind. It's estimated, through whichever orifice, that each individual cow lets out between thirty and fifty gallons of methane per day. With an estimated 1.3 to 1.5 billion cattle in the world today, this adds up fast.

Exactly how significant this it to our global environment isn't something that anyone can easily put a number on, but the EPA, NASA, various global agriculture organizations, and the United Nations all recognize that this is a real problem. In recent years, several different solutions have been proposed. Scientists and experts have experimented with cows' diets to see if that could help cut down on the amount of methane gas. For instance, Welsh scientists studied the effects of putting garlic into cows' feed. According to BBC News, "Garlic directly attacks the organisms in the gut that produce methane." So far, results have been positive.

Researchers have also studied adding plants that are high in tannins to the diet, which are believed to lower methane levels in ruminants. Another branch of study focuses on not lowering the amount of methane gas, but figuring out a way to contain it and repurpose it. Some farms have experimented with having their livestock live in a plastic bubble, which takes the expelled gas and converts it into electricity. But this process is both expensive, inefficient, and considered somewhat inhumane, forcing animals to live inside an artificial bubble.

Methane gas emitted by cows and other livestock does have a significant impact on the amount of greenhouse gases in our atmosphere, which are the main culprits behind climate change and global warming. While farts aren't the only way cows are expelling methane, it is, at least, accurate to say that cow farts play a part in our planet's climate growing hotter.

[jkvlondon 5,631]

22 minutes ago, Premi5 said:

So synthetic food will be safe ? 

 I would like the opinion of our resident health expert, @jkvlondon

looking at the devious antics of the Gates's I can see him playing all sides gmo crops, factory farmed /synth meats with restriction to access to fresh fruit and veg  ,  pharma drugs/vaccines leading to cancer and its and treatment and ultimately chronic disease generation to hike up health care costs per capita /denial of medical treatment leading to death

[MisterrSingh 4,760]

They want to degrade humans. They want us drinking tatti and eating bugs and insects under the guise of progressiveness and environmental sustainability.

[GurjantGnostic 1,101]

3 hours ago, MisterrSingh said:

They want to degrade humans. They want us drinking tatti and eating bugs and insects under the guise of progressiveness and environmental sustainability.

That's the water my people drink. Sigh. So...lovely..you only get trace amounts of everyone's meds. Lol. 

[GurjantGnostic 1,101]

7 hours ago, jkvlondon said:

looking at the devious antics of the Gates's I can see him playing all sides gmo crops, factory farmed /synth meats with restriction to access to fresh fruit and veg  ,  pharma drugs/vaccines leading to cancer and its and treatment and ultimately chronic disease generation to hike up health care costs per capita /denial of medical treatment leading to death

How long until the adverse effects of his garbage vaccines became evident?

Safe to assume if people got jabbed, the infertility and all the other side effects, didn't jump out immediately and make news?

[GurjantGnostic 1,101]

The article is about Senegal suprisingly. We've been using that tech in nevada for decades. 

We have the most famous plant for that so I assumed he lined up to drink our recyc pee like everyone else. 

[jkvlondon 5,631]

33 minutes ago, GurjantGnostic said:

How long until the adverse effects of his garbage vaccines became evident?

Safe to assume if people got jabbed, the infertility and all the other side effects, didn't jump out immediately and make news?

reading studies vaccinated kids are more likely to die  before adulthood the more they take , so I would guess those damaged people are about to enter the workforce but they are so damaged their brains cannot cope with normal frustrations and challenges.i.e. they are disable to maintain a career/job

interesting vid asking  similar questions as us

 

[GurjantGnostic 1,101]

5 minutes ago, jkvlondon said:

reading studies vaccinated kids are more likely to die  before adulthood the more they take , so I would guess those damaged people are about to enter the workforce but they are so damaged their brains cannot cope with normal frustrations and challenges.i.e. they are disable to maintain a career/job

interesting vid asking  similar questions as us

 

Mmm.. I'll wait on that covid vaccine. Sounds like the timetable for testing a vaccine and knowing it's effects is a lot longer than "if the vaccine was bad we'd know already because the paramedics would be dead". 

 

[asinghb 40]

2 hours ago, GurjantGnostic said:

Mmm.. I'll wait on that covid vaccine. Sounds like the timetable for testing a vaccine and knowing it's effects is a lot longer than "if the vaccine was bad we'd know already because the paramedics would be dead". 

 

I would check out @cv19vaccinereactions on instagram. They are trying to take it down but it has some really eye-opening accounts of what some people are going through after getting the vaxx.

[MisterrSingh 4,760]

12 hours ago, GurjantGnostic said:

How long until the adverse effects of his garbage vaccines became evident?

Safe to assume if people got jabbed, the infertility and all the other side effects, didn't jump out immediately and make news?

It's becoming clear based on recent events they'll choose not to report anything that contradicts their narrative. Dark times, bro.

[MisterrSingh 4,760]

I've been browsing the BBC news site regularly for a few weeks now, and they're really pushing hard the news that Asians and Blacks in the UK aren't coming forward in droves to get vaccinated. That in itself isn't an issue IMO, but the fact that they're recruiting ethnic establishment figures from the entertainment world to speak down to us lowly pendus, is so friggin' patronising, as if they assume that we give a 5hit what our "community icons" have to say.  Do they really think that cock-eyed Romesh fella and Meera Syal have any say in what I think or feel? Dumb b*****s.