Jump to content

Sikhs /Sikhi in UK vs USA


Premi5
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Ranjeet01 said:

I am just a fascist, racist, sexist and homophobic bigot. 

I do not know where to start because I am an intolerant person.

But since you are in line with Gurmat, you should know better. 

A Gursikh leads by example so like I said before please can you guide us.

And you are not those things. Your mind is intoxicated with those things. Naam is the Panacea. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, GurjantGnostic said:

And you are not those things. Your mind is intoxicated with those things. Naam is the Panacea. 

Please guide us

 

4 minutes ago, GurjantGnostic said:

And you are not those things. Your mind is intoxicated with those things. Naam is the Panacea. 

And you don't think I naam Jaap daily.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Ranjeet01 said:

Please guide us

 

And you don't think I naam Jaap daily.

I don't bro. I fear not. I don't sense it from you except about ten minutes ago. Your posts are devoid of it and Gursikhi in general. That's what I've been tellimg you for months? Years?

You only reference the cultures and their thinking that have plagued Sikhi. You don't reference Sikhi bro. Just Sikhs through the imperialist lense past to present. 

You want to go backwards and model the Paanth after its opressors. Make Gurmukhs into succesful Kaliyugi Manmukhs bro. 

You admire the imperials Ji. Not the Gurus. Not Gursikhs, as far as I can tell. 

And its why your homework is what it is. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, GurjantGnostic said:

I don't bro. I fear not. I don't sense it from you except about ten minutes ago. Your posts are devoid of it and Gursikhi in general. That's what I've been tellimg you for months? Years?

That is because this is the wordly thread. This deals with contemporary issues.

I speak my mind. It maybe uncomfortable to some people then so be it.

I share my analysis with people here so we can connect the dots. 

You are a convert you see things from a different perspective, from an outsiders perspective. 

I see things differently because I have been brought up in the tradition. 

Your point of a view is valid as much as mine is.

I see this concept have similarities with Nirgun and Sargun in some ways. 

If you only knew what kind of thoughts go through my head and how Gurmat can be applied to so many things. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Due to the nature of trolling, its monatized politicized nature, the way it focuses on the Paanth and this site combined with a known prolific troll whos banned that you're somehow a fan of...

Makes it impossible to know if you're talking to a person who is who they say they are. 

A person acting as many people.

Many people acting as a person. 

Many people acting not as who they are. 

But what is always obvious is when those people are not familiar with Gurmat, and when they have political agendas not in line with Gurmat. 

So I will treat you as you say you are. Descended from Sikhs but woefully ignorant of the treasure your ancestors embraced, you've yet to embrace. 

And I have done my best to turn you to the Gurmat that will help you best become a Sikh. 

The wretch only speaks to the wretched when Ji is busy. Take it from a wretch. Your understanding of Gurbani and Gurmat is less than wretched. 

I can tell where you've been and what you've been immersed in when you post. 

And it makes me fundamentally concerned about you on several levels bro. 

If you are who you say you are bro. Unplug yourself from all that current garbage and dive...dive into the Sarovar ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Ranjeet01 said:

see things differently because I have been brought up in the tradition. 

What I'm telling you is it doesn't show to the point I don't necessarily believe you. 

6 minutes ago, Ranjeet01 said:

speak my mind

I know. That's what I've been telling you. And it sounds just like kaliyugi manmat.

7 minutes ago, Ranjeet01 said:

Your point of a view is valid as much as mine is

No. Our view is only valid to the degree it's in line with Gurmat. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, GurjantGnostic said:

What I'm telling you is it doesn't show to the point I don't necessarily believe you. 

I know. That's what I've been telling you. And it sounds just like kaliyugi manmat.

No. Our view is only valid to the degree it's in line with Gurmat. 

 

Where has my point of view not been in line with Gurmat. Where has it gone against Gurmat 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah, that's one possibility. Another I initially thought is that it's a Muslim trying to gather info. But then, you might ask, how does he know about Sikh textual sources. Well, you'd be surprised at their resourcefulness. A final possibility is he's a weak Sikh who was asked a question by a non-Sikh and now he's suddenly feverishly wondering where it's "written" that you can't marry a young child. To the latter, I would say, you're looking in the wrong spot. Gurbani isn't a 1428 page rulebook, like Leviticus or the Vedas: ਸਿਮ੍ਰਿਤਿ ਸਾਸਤ੍ਰ ਪੁੰਨ ਪਾਪ ਬੀਚਾਰਦੇ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ਗੁਰੂ ਬਾਝਹੁ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ The Simritis and Shastras discriminate between charity and sin, but know not the essence of the Real Thing. Without the Guru, they know not the essence of the Reality, know not the essence of the Reality. Anand Sahib.
    • You're confusing two different things: One is merely adding starch to a turban to get a certain feel to the fabric. The other is tying your turban once and taking it off like a hat. It is this that people have a problem with. What's wrong with it is that Rehit says to tie your turban afresh every time. If you ask, "Where is that written?", it's written in Bhai Nand Lal ji's Rehitnama. @ipledgeblue didn't just make it up. Umm, no, bro. We're not evangelical Christians like President George W Bush of the US claiming to "talk to God" who told him to invade Iraq. "Speaking to him directly" basically ends up being doing whatever you feel like with the excuse that Guru ji told you to do it. If you still want to take your turban off like a hat, feel free to do so, but don't claim that it's Rehit.
    • You don't need to wear either a pag or dumalla in the gym. You can simply wear a meter or 1.5m small turban (gol pagg or round turban). It doesn't come off.
    • The reason you don't see anything wrong with it is because like a fish in water, you grew up in Western culture and imbibed it fully. It's very difficult to for parents to inculcate traditional culture while in the West. The reason there is a problem is because a kiss between a man and wife is a sexual act (I didn't say it's coitus, but it's still sexual.) By contrast a kiss between a mother and a child, for example, is not sexual. And in our culture, sexual acts are not allowed in public. Goras do allow it. And that's also the reason they have gay pride parades now with people walking around naked with children in attendance and so forth.
    • The printer is C J Amritsar… They have given a mobile number for India …
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use