Jump to content

British Police Misdemeanours (Sarah Everard case onwards)


Premi5
 Share

Recommended Posts

Within a week, there has been on national news, there has been a vigil which turned into police brutality, it has been brought up in parliament and they have a suspect.

This has happened so quickly because it is a white woman.

I do not like the victim hierarchy/ inter-sectionality game.

How long before some women of colour writes in the Guardian how if this was a brown or black woman and that they have been excluded out of this discussion?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Ranjeet01 said:

Within a week, there has been on national news, there has been a vigil which turned into police brutality, it has been brought up in parliament and they have a suspect.

This has happened so quickly because it is a white woman.

I do not like the victim hierarchy/ inter-sectionality game.

How long before some women of colour writes in the Guardian how if this was a brown or black woman and that they have been excluded out of this discussion?

It's true, though, lol. A photogenic, middle-class, professional white lady is murdered by a cop, and they're proposing curfews and house arrest for every single man in the country, and an implicit anger towards the police for letting it happen. Would they dare suggest anything similar if it was a rough-looking black or Indian woman? Not a chance. Everyone's thinking it, but for the moment the rawness of the crime is preventing anyone from articulating it. I've no doubt Ash Sarkar or Afua Hirsch has drafted a potential article pointing out what we're talking out but she won't be submitting it just yet. ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, MisterrSingh said:

It's true, though, lol. A photogenic, middle-class, professional white lady is murdered by a cop, and they're proposing curfews and house arrest for every single man in the country, and an implicit anger towards the police for letting it happen. Would they dare suggest anything similar if it was a rough-looking black or Indian woman? Not a chance. Everyone's thinking it, but for the moment the rawness of the crime is preventing anyone from articulating it. I've no doubt Ash Sarkar or Afua Hirsch has drafted a potential article pointing out what we're talking out but she won't be submitting it just yet. ?

The place where it happened is Clapham Common. I think it has a history of abduction and it is in a very affluent part of London.

These type of "commons" normally have other things that go on between men of a particular sexual orientation particularly if there are public toilets around after dark.

I think there is a level of hubris amongst middle class white women here that a women of colour would not entertain.

But I reckon like yourself that Afua and Ash's hit piece will appear. It's only a matter of time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ranjeet01 said:

The place where it happened is Clapham Common. I think it has a history of abduction and it is in a very affluent part of London.

These type of "commons" normally have other things that go on between men of a particular sexual orientation particularly if there are public toilets around after dark.

I think there is a level of hubris amongst middle class white women here that a women of colour would not entertain.

It's depressing that what's in bold above will never be discussed in the public sphere out of fear of causing offense even though people are aware of these things on a personal basis. It's retarding thought, almost encouraging existing in a false or delusional state of mind. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, MisterrSingh said:

It's depressing that what's in bold above will never be discussed in the public sphere out of fear of causing offense even though people are aware of these things on a personal basis. It's retarding thought, almost encouraging existing in a false or delusional state of mind. 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Jody_Dobrowski

Clapham Common has a reputation as a place for men seeking anonymous sex with other men in public places.[9] When Welsh politician Ron Davies was robbed at knife point in 1998 after he gave a lift to strangers he had met in the park, there was speculation that the incident involved "cruising"; Davies resigned his position in the UK government, denying the incident had anything to do with drugs or sex.[10][11][12] There have been several attacks on men in the vicinity of the park, including one in 2005 on a young man, Jody Dobrowski, thought by his attackers to be gay, during which he was badly beaten and later died.[

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My concern is on the wider discussion.

I know that majority of the perpertrators of violence on women are men but now there is requests for curfews on men and even requested for undercover police officers in nightclubs. 

To make this happen women have to put their trust in men, but we are led to believe that is that men are trustworthy. 

I sometimes when walking notice if there is a woman about 10 to 15 yards in front of me they look behind and are quite nervous. So I keep my distance or walk across the street. 

I think sometimes as men we never realise how we can be physically intimidating for a woman.

It is like having a 8 foot grizzly bear walking behind us. We would also feel intimidated. 

But if they implement some of these laws, all that would happen is segregation between the sexes. 

For all the women that have genuine concerns, there will be other women who will exploit these laws. 

What could happen is that a man will have to be accompanied by his sister, daughter, wife or some female relative so that if another female accuses you of something, it will be your female relative that will back you up after all we must believe women. 

It's going to come to women to call out other women's bullsh1t.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • The title was changed to British Police Misdemeanours (Sarah Everard case onwards)

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If relationship with Guru is strong, then kanga is done twice a day, and turban should never be taken off or put on like a hat, there is a lot wrong with that as it is against rehit! maryada is to take off every layer of turban/pagh/dumalla individually, and tie fresh turban each time!
    • the whole 'your husband/wife is chosen for you'/sanjog thing is real, it's just that a lot of people end up marrying the wrong person. they did not end up with the person that was meant for them. my friend, you should marry someone who you feel a connection with and love. there are millions of sikh girls, i'm sure you can find someone who aligns with your sensibilities and who you can truthfully say that you love. sikhi does not say anything against love marriages. you can also be in a loveless arranged marriage which is a safe option b/c both families are more inclined to keep the union intact. i was one of those people who was like meh, i guess i'll just get arranged to some sikh. well i finally started dating for the first time this year and i'm getting married to someone that i love and cannot even imagine leaving. i think it's better to have lost & lost than never loved at all. unfortunately, a lot of people confuse love w/ looks & lust. a lot of men go for the fittest girl they can find and think they won the jackpot or something. in reality, your partner should be like an extremely loved best friend. there's a reason why it's a fact that the most stable and long-lasting relationships started as friendships.  i also think a lot of women are petty and divorce over small reasons, but there's other terrible things like high cheating rates as well. that's why the divorce rate in the west is high. be careful out there.
    • andrew tate praises sikhi too & likes sikhs. his brother also donated to sikh families iirc. they just like any "alpha" religion and tbh islam is the most "alpha" in their eyes. islam is very good at promoting that image. but imo a real alpha man doesn't command respect by beating up his wive(s) or forcing them to wear a burqa. a real man will have his woman listen to him w/o raising a hand or his voice, and command respect by being respectful. he leads by example and integrity. that's true masculinity. you get the idea. + yes, it's definitely true that islam is growing rapidly and making massive inroads. strength in numbers + belief will do that. but rlly it's just because of the birth rate. a lot of them are muslim b/c it's their "identity" just like how a lot of young sikhs will say they're "culturally sikh" or whatever. there just aren't billions of sikhs who lambast their identity everywhere and have strict and linear rules like in islam. besides, the reality is that islam and its followers are some of the most morally bankrupt. you can see all the weird trans rules in iran, bacche baazi in afghanistan, visiting brothels, watching p*rn, p*dophilia what goes on behind the scenes in countries like uae & qatar, etc, and come to your conclusions. you can google all the stats yourself and see which countries do the most of these ^.   
    • stop associating with hinduism, that's the absolutely worst thing you can do as a sikh. not sure if you noticed but the entire world looks down upon and spits at india & hindus, literally no one respects them and considers them weak and cowardly. literally 1+ billion of them but not perceived as a strong religion commandeering respect. 
    • you wrote a whole lot but told us nothing. what exactly did you do wrong to make you feel this way?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use